Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Truly shocked by Tory bank trials for benefit claimants.

188 replies

caringcarer · 18/05/2024 07:31

When Tory's suggested looking at people's bank accounts to stop benefit fraud I thought they might catch out just a few people so it would be pointless doing it. I've just seen this article in local press and I couldn't believe my eyes about the number of bank accounts having an average of £50k yet claiming UC or low income benefits fraudulently. It was a real eye opener. Anyone else shocked?

www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/uk-news/dwp-tries-bank-account-checks-29191387

OP posts:
FaeryRing · 19/05/2024 11:43

IncompleteSenten · 19/05/2024 11:36

If you genuinely cannot see what is actually behind this and where this is heading, you are spectacularly naive.

Where is it heading given they won’t be the government in 6 months?

IncompleteSenten · 19/05/2024 11:36

FaeryRing · 19/05/2024 10:59

Oh come off it. If people are fiddling the system to the tune of billions of pounds, yes there should be clampdowns. Benefits are an economic support system, not an ideological sacred cow.

If you genuinely cannot see what is actually behind this and where this is heading, you are spectacularly naive.

caringcarer · 19/05/2024 11:36

Chewbecca · 19/05/2024 10:59

people having savings, many of them likely to be pensioners perhaps having a bit put away to help their kids. You've said on previous threads that you gave your son tens of thousands for a house deposit. Do you not think that just maybe other people might want to do that too?

but this is simply not what benefits can be intended for.
You just can't generate sufficient tax income from a country that enables everyone to "put a bit away for their kids". That, like it or not, is the privilege of those who have been able to earn more than they have spent.

Yes, and pay tax on those earnings too.

OP posts:
caringcarer · 19/05/2024 11:34

FaeryRing · 19/05/2024 11:00

Agree

I did give my son money for a house deposit but I've not claimed benefits to do so. It was from my personal savings and lump sum from Teachers Pension I got at 60.

OP posts:
Bumblebeeinatree · 19/05/2024 11:27

Opening new accounts often require proof of address, proof of identity and sometimes NI number.

Bumblebeeinatree · 19/05/2024 11:20

Lurkingandlearning · 18/05/2024 09:09

I might be misunderstanding how these checks will work. If someone wants to claim despite having funds that would make them ineligible, wouldn’t they have a “two sets of books” situation ie a separate account at a different bank to use for benefit payments?

Is there a central database for every account everyone has with any bank or other financial services?

Unless DWP can check everywhere people might have money squirrelled away I think the fraudsters will soon adapt.

HMRC can (usually) find all your bank accounts to check you are paying all the tax you should. I assume a cross check on names and addresses (banks and building socs have to declare all interest paid to HMRC). If you use several names and various addresses you might get away with it, which is what the benefit crime gangs do. Also why it's much more difficult to open bank accounts, etc these days know your customer and all that.

Miley1967 · 19/05/2024 11:01

Chewbecca · 19/05/2024 10:59

people having savings, many of them likely to be pensioners perhaps having a bit put away to help their kids. You've said on previous threads that you gave your son tens of thousands for a house deposit. Do you not think that just maybe other people might want to do that too?

but this is simply not what benefits can be intended for.
You just can't generate sufficient tax income from a country that enables everyone to "put a bit away for their kids". That, like it or not, is the privilege of those who have been able to earn more than they have spent.

Many pensioners on pension credit are still on fixed assessment periods where they don't even need to declare if savings go up so the article is likely misleading anyway.

FaeryRing · 19/05/2024 11:00

Chewbecca · 19/05/2024 10:59

people having savings, many of them likely to be pensioners perhaps having a bit put away to help their kids. You've said on previous threads that you gave your son tens of thousands for a house deposit. Do you not think that just maybe other people might want to do that too?

but this is simply not what benefits can be intended for.
You just can't generate sufficient tax income from a country that enables everyone to "put a bit away for their kids". That, like it or not, is the privilege of those who have been able to earn more than they have spent.

Agree

FaeryRing · 19/05/2024 10:59

IncompleteSenten · 19/05/2024 10:58

Well well now here's a surprise.

Stories appear that are shocking 'proof' of widespread fraud, leading to increased support for benefits clampdown including moving from all cash to part vouchers part cash and suggesting scrutinising benefit claimants bank accounts in order to give them "budgeting advice". At first. Leading inevitably to an approved list of things benefits can be spent on. All while reports of what people are spending Your Tax Money on is playing in the background, sympathy decreases, judgement increases, Tories justify further clampdown and restrictions, old buildings are repurposed as places people can be housed when they can't provide for themselves.

Oh come off it. If people are fiddling the system to the tune of billions of pounds, yes there should be clampdowns. Benefits are an economic support system, not an ideological sacred cow.

Chewbecca · 19/05/2024 10:59

people having savings, many of them likely to be pensioners perhaps having a bit put away to help their kids. You've said on previous threads that you gave your son tens of thousands for a house deposit. Do you not think that just maybe other people might want to do that too?

but this is simply not what benefits can be intended for.
You just can't generate sufficient tax income from a country that enables everyone to "put a bit away for their kids". That, like it or not, is the privilege of those who have been able to earn more than they have spent.

IncompleteSenten · 19/05/2024 10:58

Well well now here's a surprise.

Stories appear that are shocking 'proof' of widespread fraud, leading to increased support for benefits clampdown including moving from all cash to part vouchers part cash and suggesting scrutinising benefit claimants bank accounts in order to give them "budgeting advice". At first. Leading inevitably to an approved list of things benefits can be spent on. All while reports of what people are spending Your Tax Money on is playing in the background, sympathy decreases, judgement increases, Tories justify further clampdown and restrictions, old buildings are repurposed as places people can be housed when they can't provide for themselves.

LongSinceGotUpAndGone · 19/05/2024 10:50

I have some sympathy for people who have been working and then lost their income, but still have savings, who do this - if they had recklessly spent all they earned, they would be entitled to low/no income benefits.

Obviously not everyone earns enough to save money, but the system seems to penalise saving for those who can afford it, while at the same time constantly moving the goalposts for pensions, which means people have to try to save for retirement.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 19/05/2024 10:44

caringcarer · 19/05/2024 09:58

I don't claim any benefits. It just makes PP feel good to claim I do. I'll be claiming State Pension on a few years though.

It could be means tested by then - you might not get anything at all.

Miley1967 · 19/05/2024 10:43

You've started a thread about people having savings, many of them likely to be pensioners perhaps having a bit put away to help their kids. You've said on previous threads that you gave your son tens of thousands for a house deposit. Do you not think that just maybe other people might want to do that too?
You rent out 11 houses and I'm betting you are cashing in on many of those tenants being on UC and other low income benefits who will never have the chance to own their own home. I'm sure your future is very secure.
Check your privilege and don't start thread designed to get people frothing and then disappear for the day !

caringcarer · 19/05/2024 09:58

kitsuneghost · 19/05/2024 09:28

Did you pull and did the contraception 'fail'.
If so you could be in for a big multiple payouts

I don't claim any benefits. It just makes PP feel good to claim I do. I'll be claiming State Pension on a few years though.

OP posts:
kitsuneghost · 19/05/2024 09:28

caringcarer · 19/05/2024 00:27

I've been out all day. Which benefit do you think I claim?

Did you pull and did the contraception 'fail'.
If so you could be in for a big multiple payouts

caringcarer · 19/05/2024 00:27

Miley1967 · 18/05/2024 21:27

Was my comment the only one on this whole thread that you could be bothered replying to ?

I've been out all day. Which benefit do you think I claim?

OP posts:
0sm0nthus · 18/05/2024 22:12

IClaudine · 18/05/2024 19:06

No of course not.

But means testing PIP and DLA would make the system even more cumbersome than it is already. As a pp said, a lot goes unclaimed already because people can't face the rigmarole of claiming. We shouldn't add to that.

If that means a few mega rich people get to claim too, so be it.

In that case the systems need to be better designed.

marmaladeandpeanutbutter · 18/05/2024 21:38

qwertyqwertyqwertyqwerty · 18/05/2024 19:14

Just been reading about the fact that there are over 6 million households in such serious poverty they are regularly skipping meals. It's really offensive to me the government is wanting to cut back even more, instead of looking for ways to improve the lives of British citizens.

They release these kind of press releases to distract from the real scandal - the huge increase in poverty since the start of austerity in 2010.

This.

Miley1967 · 18/05/2024 21:27

caringcarer · 18/05/2024 20:20

@miley1967, Which benefit do you think I claim?

Was my comment the only one on this whole thread that you could be bothered replying to ?

Noras · 18/05/2024 20:59

I know many people who ‘employ’ spouses in their companies even though said spouses do not do a days work or do a little bit. They basically use the spouses personal allowance and lower tax rate, They can also pay into spouses pension and get tax relief.

I find that equally fraudulent and that should be investigated.

What about the dubious tax relief on Christmas parties - held at the company directors own home and they charge a debatable amount of costing as tax relief. People use that to even hold their own parties and call them ‘work’ parties.

I mean there is a whole load of fraud in self employed business expenses in small businesses. Let’s also explore that.

Noras · 18/05/2024 20:53

0sm0nthus · 18/05/2024 17:33

and the fact the wealthy people have means which are orders of magnitude over and above those of non-wealthy people counts for nothing??

Well if we follow that through then no one with significant means should qualify for things like free hospital care, free GP appointments and also no child benefit.

Re child benefit, technically speaking a couple could earn £240,000 between them and dump £120,000 into pensions and still get child benefit. I resent every penny that I pay in tax to those couples too!

People who suffer personal injury should not receive millions in damages paid into a trust and claim universal credit. As it is this is a savings exemption.

I claimed DLA for my son but he has a life time of needs and it’s petrifying. The money will get recycled ultimately into a vulnerable persons trust for him when we are dead.

Otherwise, my son will be forced into a life of potential poverty despite working and trying so hard to be better….because society does not distinguish much between him and those who have more options to escape that poverty just by not being disabled.

As parents we will do everything to thwart that but we don’t have millions and millions to look after him for life. He will need benefits.

Franky it’s the least of his costing as social care and education are far more costly.

A few weeks ago on Mums Net I said that I wanted to walk in front of a bus when told that my baby son most likely had global delays ( he has done remarkably well since those dark days).

Just for goodness sake walk in our shoes where there is no escape from your child’s destiny. You have hope as parents - I didn’t.

qwertyqwertyqwertyqwerty · 18/05/2024 20:26

FaeryRing · 18/05/2024 19:32

Are they people with £50,000 sat in the bank?

I assume that anyone who had enough money wouldn't be skipping meals, obviously. You rather miss the point, which is that 6 million households are regularly skipping meals and the government wants to cut support yet further.

You come across remarkably like a character from Dickens @FaeryRing

caringcarer · 18/05/2024 20:20

Miley1967 · 18/05/2024 10:49

Op the only thing that shocks me is people like you who rent out 11 homes and still claim benefits yourself !

@miley1967, Which benefit do you think I claim?

OP posts:
FaeryRing · 18/05/2024 19:32

qwertyqwertyqwertyqwerty · 18/05/2024 19:14

Just been reading about the fact that there are over 6 million households in such serious poverty they are regularly skipping meals. It's really offensive to me the government is wanting to cut back even more, instead of looking for ways to improve the lives of British citizens.

They release these kind of press releases to distract from the real scandal - the huge increase in poverty since the start of austerity in 2010.

Are they people with £50,000 sat in the bank?