Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Govt knew about Post Office Horizon cover-up

37 replies

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 27/01/2024 20:17

Whilst everyone is panicking about some military staff saying "well, we might have to conscript", it becomes clear that that particular media-whipped panicfest is a dead cat deployed to stop us all from clocking that David Cameron's coalition govt knew about Project Sparrow, knew about the Post Office's decision to fire the forensic accountants who found the bugs, and were complicit in the cover-up of software defects that cost the jobs, livelihoods, and liberty of over 700 sub-postmasters. The actual govt knew.

Heads are already rolling but frankly this is not enough. The BCS want legal changes to the presumption of "computer is always right".

It's a shame that Jo Swinson has left politics because I'd love to see her in front of an inquiry.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
JenniferBooth · 30/01/2024 00:48

@VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia Last week when they came out with this conscription thing was also Grenfell Testimony Week

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 28/01/2024 21:49

who was authorising the "no one else has had a problem with it" script at the helpline for a start?

It's standard in the early stages of a major incident for a help desk to be told not to say "yeah, loads of people have that problem" as part of reputation management and treating the service's users consistently. This, however, should be swiftly followed by an official service status update acknowledging the problems that the help desk staff can refer users to whilst second- and third-line staff work their arses off to get the underlying issues fixed.

OP posts:
VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 28/01/2024 21:38

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_Office_Limited indicates that Alan Cook and David Smith should also be answering difficult questions right now.

Post Office Limited - Wikipedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_Office_Limited

OP posts:
Fizbosshoes · 28/01/2024 18:55

I dont think she shouldn't be held accountable as I stated in my post, however as it stands she is the only one that has been publicly held up as culpable. But I refuse to believe that the CEO before her (I think Adam Crozier) plus big wigs at Horizon or Fujitsu were not also partly responsible.

nb Adam Crozier is now at itv so that may expalin why he wasn't featured in the drama but its feasible he may have been implicated in records/documents etc

forcedfun · 28/01/2024 17:52

SoDoffYourHat · 28/01/2024 17:49

I agree that everyone who is culpable for the scandal should be held accountable.

However, Paula Vennells took home more than £4.5 million during her tenure. If CEOs being paid such obscene amounts can't take accountability for what happens on their watch, what are they being paid for? By contrast, the average current salary for an investigator is £40k.

Of course she is responsible for what happened on her watch. But a lot of it happened many before she was appointed

All the relevant chief execs and chairs (as a minimum) should all be accountable

forcedfun · 28/01/2024 17:50

Fizbosshoes · 28/01/2024 14:56

The problem started (and was known about - although perhaps not in mainstream media) before her tenure , why is her predecessor also not being brought to account?

It's so frustrating isn't it. Not that she doesn't have some accountability but utterly outrageous how many others are likely to get away Scot free because the public are happy once a single head has rolled

SoDoffYourHat · 28/01/2024 17:49

I agree that everyone who is culpable for the scandal should be held accountable.

However, Paula Vennells took home more than £4.5 million during her tenure. If CEOs being paid such obscene amounts can't take accountability for what happens on their watch, what are they being paid for? By contrast, the average current salary for an investigator is £40k.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 28/01/2024 14:59

Fizbosshoes · 28/01/2024 14:56

The problem started (and was known about - although perhaps not in mainstream media) before her tenure , why is her predecessor also not being brought to account?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoating

If she is given all the blame, everyone else gets away scot-free.

Scapegoating - Wikipedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoating

OP posts:
Fizbosshoes · 28/01/2024 14:56

The problem started (and was known about - although perhaps not in mainstream media) before her tenure , why is her predecessor also not being brought to account?

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 28/01/2024 14:45

Fizbosshoes · 28/01/2024 14:36

ive dipped in an out of a series on radio 4 about this but Im pretty sure the problems at Horizon/Fujitsu were known about almost from the start. (ie turn of the century)
Paula Vennells has been (rightly) implicated but there must be a lot of others at the post office, at Horizon (who was authorising the "no one else has had a problem with it script at the helpline for a start?) Fujitsu and the government.
Why has she been singled out? the corruption is widespread, she was not a lone wolf masterminding the whole thing!!

  1. She's female (see rule one).
  2. She was in charge of PO at the time.

The two make her a very convenient scapegoat.

OP posts:
Fizbosshoes · 28/01/2024 14:36

ive dipped in an out of a series on radio 4 about this but Im pretty sure the problems at Horizon/Fujitsu were known about almost from the start. (ie turn of the century)
Paula Vennells has been (rightly) implicated but there must be a lot of others at the post office, at Horizon (who was authorising the "no one else has had a problem with it script at the helpline for a start?) Fujitsu and the government.
Why has she been singled out? the corruption is widespread, she was not a lone wolf masterminding the whole thing!!

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 28/01/2024 14:27

@PerkingFaintly @forcedfun This is all very useful, thanks.

I had no idea that criminal cases could he brought by anyone other than the Crown via CPS.

OP posts:
forcedfun · 28/01/2024 14:08

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 28/01/2024 13:20

A civil case ending with a jail sentence? I didn't know that was allowed.

They aren't civil cases.

I can bring criminal cases in my job. We have nothing to do with the CPS.

PerkingFaintly · 28/01/2024 13:43

Better than that, I've found the CPS's own page on private prosecutions.

The Post Office used this legislation to prosecute the postmasters. The RSPCA is another body which makes frequent use of it.

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/private-prosecutions

There was a total of three Horizon cases prosecuted by the CPS during Starmer's period in office – out of four criminal million cases the CPS handled in that time. He wasn't involved in any of the Horizon cases.

The attempt to make this about Starmer is just more smoke and mirrors from the Tory press. General Election imminent, so anything bad that's happened in the last 14 years is the fault of Anyone But The Tories. <shrug>

I didn't know about Horizon prosecutions, says Keir Starmer
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67950501

Private Prosecutions | The Crown Prosecution Service

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/private-prosecutions

PerkingFaintly · 28/01/2024 13:29

It's not a civil case. In England Wales anyone, even individuals, can bring a private prosecution through the criminal courts.

I did actually know this before, but someone on one of the other threads explained it quite well. Let me see if I can find it.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 28/01/2024 13:20

forcedfun · 28/01/2024 00:26

Royal mail run their own prosecutions though. It had nothing to do with the CPS/DPP. That's true too for every local authority in the country too (for instance).

A civil case ending with a jail sentence? I didn't know that was allowed.

OP posts:
forcedfun · 28/01/2024 00:26

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 28/01/2024 00:02

This is the same Keir Starmer who rightly intervened to protect women who withdraw rape accusations from being prosecuted unfairly themselves.

It's not like he didn't spot things and sort them out as DPP, so how come he missed this?

Royal mail run their own prosecutions though. It had nothing to do with the CPS/DPP. That's true too for every local authority in the country too (for instance).

Zipidydodah · 28/01/2024 00:07

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 28/01/2024 00:02

This is the same Keir Starmer who rightly intervened to protect women who withdraw rape accusations from being prosecuted unfairly themselves.

It's not like he didn't spot things and sort them out as DPP, so how come he missed this?

He apparently didn’t know that the CPS were dropping child abuse charges against the BBC’s most famous entertainer. a knight who was friends with the future king and multiple politicians. Apparently no one told him

They are ALL totally corrupt.

This country is fucked

Zipidydodah · 28/01/2024 00:02

Neither party give a shiny shit about the general public. Alister Cambell actually admitted on the rest is politics podcast that the investment levels the Blair/Brown govt made in public services were completely unaffordable so they used PFI to “get it off the govt books” and basically signed the country up to decades of paying off “rent” / maintenance/ contracts for decades that are substandard. IT systems that didn’t work, schools and hospitals made from RAAC with maintenance contracts where it costs £300 to change a light bulb.

The Tory’s just give the contracts to their mates and don’t care if it isn’t delivered - PPE, Teesport port.

This country’s politicians are totally corrupt and anyone who thinks one side is ‘better’ or ‘different’ from the other is fucking kidding themselves

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 28/01/2024 00:02

This is the same Keir Starmer who rightly intervened to protect women who withdraw rape accusations from being prosecuted unfairly themselves.

It's not like he didn't spot things and sort them out as DPP, so how come he missed this?

OP posts:
forcedfun · 27/01/2024 23:56

Utterly grim .I've witnessed first hand how my friend's dad's whole life has been shattered by this. And he is one of thousands

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 27/01/2024 23:53

Zipidydodah · 27/01/2024 23:48

I know ….. thank goodness we have an independent judiciary to keep Westminster in check. A competent Director of Prosecutions who would at least notice 700+ prosecutions from a single institution in his courts and investigate this ….

Hmmm... looks like the current Leader of His Majesty's Loyal Opposition was one of the DPPs who failed to spot this.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Director_of_Public_Prosecutions_(England_and_Wales)

Govt knew about Post Office Horizon cover-up
OP posts:
Zipidydodah · 27/01/2024 23:48

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 27/01/2024 23:41

That's "day ending in Y" stuff for any Westminster government, and TBH the other British govts too. The 700+ people convicted of fraud based on computer output that was known by 2014 to be unreliable is is a whole new level of corruption.

I know ….. thank goodness we have an independent judiciary to keep Westminster in check. A competent Director of Prosecutions who would at least notice 700+ prosecutions from a single institution in his courts and investigate this ….

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 27/01/2024 23:41

Zipidydodah · 27/01/2024 23:35

What about the Labour fucking govt that was responsible for this shit shoe in the first place?? Another PFI disaster thanks to their sheer fucking incompetence. They were told Horizon didn’t work, were told not to sign off on it but did so any way.

One day, someone will actually expose the PFI corruption from the last Labour govt and show the decades long disaster it has been for this country

Edited

That's "day ending in Y" stuff for any Westminster government, and TBH the other British govts too. The 700+ people convicted of fraud based on computer output that was known by 2014 to be unreliable is is a whole new level of corruption.

OP posts: