Media coverage deliberately biased against Corbyn, British public believes

'If I was an MP I certianly wouldn't be supporting him'

Yes, but the members voted for him. How can the 250 odd or however many of them defy over 500,000 members, some of whom tirelessly work for the party and promote its interests? What sort of democracy is that? It looks like an Oxbridge North Korea we know best attitude, a bit like Owen Brent and his Brexit stance.

'You have proved yourself to be an extremely committed UKIP supporter'

Well I am thinking of switching back to Conservative under Theresa May becaause I am impressed with her common sense, so I am not that committed to UKIP. I vote for common sense and whoever has got most of it and right now that looks like Theresa May, now that Cameron and the Oxbridge hoody huggers are gone.

Here is Steve Topple from The Canary again

"We made the Labour Party so furious they wrote us a letter, and it’s hilarious
...
But many people were genuinely upset that they wouldn’t be able to vote. And, more often than not, it was for the most ridiculous of reasons. Tweeting once in support of the Green Party. Apparently “abusing” a Labour MP by telling them they were angry. Being “in breach of the party’s recruitment rules“, without any explanation. Tweeting in support of Palestine. Voicing their displeasure at Syrian airstrikes. And being a former member of another party.

www.thecanary.co/2016/09/08/made-labour-party-mad-wrote-us-letter-hilarious-opinion/

What sort of party is that? Is it something out of North Korea? Are you not allowed to change your mind, to praise another party, to criticize your own party or one of its Oxbridge MPs?

They are supposed to serve the people, not act like petty bureaucrats who go through their tweets line by line.

'I wonder where Seamus Milne fits in to this Oxbridge conspiracy fantasy'

He broke free.

'A ukip supporter cheerleading for Corbyn is not doing it for the good of the Labour Party, that is for certain,'

I am doing it for the good of the country and the people. I don't care about the Labour Party who sees it fit to expel members because they once tweeted support for the Green Party or called Blair a name. I don't have any party loyalty to parties that act like that or to a Tory party that supports hoody hugging or to UKIP who lets some plonker say something stupid. I care about the country and a better politics for the people, free from an elitist Oxbridge team of idiots who are a groupthink team who are out of touch with the people.

'They trashed John Smith too and Corbyn has social media to use to his advantage '

Yes, the right wing media will always trash Labour unless they carry out warmongering policies like Blair did in which case, a lot of them, but not the Daily Mail, will back him.

But what is different is that Labour MPs did not trash John Smith. Never before have so many Labour MPs trashed their own leader, elected with the largest mandate in UK political history by their own members. Now we are seeing the true panic of the Establishment as even the 172 Labour MPs turn against Labour's most popular leader ever with its own members.

'Corbyn has social media to use to his advantage '

It is fortunate for Corbyn that the stranglehold on the public mind that the Oxbridge metroplitan media had has been broken by the internet, because without that, the Establishment would have finished Corbyn months ago, but now they are losing.

'anyone who thinks he has a chance is deluded'

But that is not what the Corbynistas think or the hundreds of thousands of newly joined members or the Establishment who are giving it everything they have got, along with the 172, to try and stop Corbyn implementing real left wing policies that benefit the people.

'And lost a safe labour seat '

It was a council seat. Most voters don't bother turning out for that. What was the percentage turnout?

'local elections the worse results for an opposition party in 30 years'

Corbyn has had to suffer a relentless metropolitan media and BBC barrage of negative publicity as the Establishment stepped up its campaign against him in a desperate attempt to remove the politician with the highest mandate in UK political history. It is not surprising that most people now have a negative impression of Labour and even of Corbyn after hearing Corbyn being slagged off repeatedly as being useless etc by one Labour MP after another for months.

Most people don't pay that much attention to politics, unlike Momentum members, and therefore they are left with a negative impression of Labour. But as Corbyn says, after the Conference, after the 172 are put back in their box, Labour can begin to communicate positively about what it will do for the people and then it will do better in local elections, particularly after the anti-Brexit Owen Smith is no longer showing contempt for the British people's referendum vote.

'Most people do not care about theories of establishment or golden circles they vote for a party they feel will be good for them with a leader they have confidence in'

I agree, because most people don't understand how the system really works, but they all have a sense that something is wrong, that the country is not going in the right direction and that there has to be a better way. They just don't know why it is wrong.

This quote sums it up in Steve Topple's article in The Canary

"The attitudes of Labour MP’s towards the public have changed very little in over 100 years. The common theme is a basic contempt for working class people. Tristram Hunt told students at Cambridge University’s Labour Club that:

You are the top one per cent. The Labour Party is in the sh*t. It is your job and your responsibility to take leadership going forward. The way you serve the Corbyn leadership is to be as dissenting and creative as possible."

www.thecanary.co/2016/09/08/fight-soul-labour-party-much-jeremy-corbyn-opinion/

Politics has been an Establishment parlour game run by an Oxbridge metropolitan elite who think they are the one per cent, when in reality a non-Oxbridge outsider like Farage is ten times as capable as Oxbridge Tristrm Hunt of Labour.

In their Establishment parlour game, they were able to control and ignore the people for a long time because they felt they were the one per cent ad their metropolitan mates from Oxbridge were in the media to help them.

But finally the people had enough of hoody hugging and Oxbridge misthinking and the crazy hoody hugging cross-party politically correct consensus, and the People's Army was born as the people flocked to UKIP. That was the first assault on the Oxbridge insiders' stitch-up of the system. And it was an amazingly successful popular insurgency that didn't just shake the Establishment, it rocked Brussels and Europe too and finally lead to the world-changing Brexit vote which has been noticed and admired across the Atlantic by the self-styled "Mr Brexit", the populist insurgent, Donald J Trump, next people's Preident of the United States and leader of the Western world.

Meanwhile, Labour members had held their noses for years and voted for the warmongering Tory-lite Oxbridge team who ran Labour in the hope that they coud deliver victory. But after Miliband's loss, they finally had enough and said it is time for some left wing policies and the Corbyn revolution began, and this is the second phase of the assault on the Oxbridge teams which is why Oxbridge Tristram tells the next generation of the Oxbridge "one per cent"

"You are the top one per cent. The Labour Party is in the sh*t. It is your job and your responsibility to take leadership going forward. The way you serve the Corbyn leadership is to be as dissenting and creative as possible."

It is the people vs the one per cent, and for once the people have the upper hand and it looks like Corbyn will beat the 172. The outcome does not just affect Labour members, or Labour voters, it also affects the Oxbridge teams and the entire public.

'The Blairite, middle-left voters have been strong enough to elect a government in the past. Assuming that they haven't all had a change in values, there is an opening to secure those votes.'

You have to look back in history t understand why Blair won at all.

I voted for Blair in 1997 and yet I had been a Thatcher conservative before that. Lots and lots f cnservatives voted for Blair and he won a landslide. But it was not because they were Blairites, it was because the whole country had had enough of the arrogant sleazy Tories after 18 years and needed a change. Then Blair was Tory-lite, called Tory Blair instead of Tony Blair by some Labour members, so Blir didn't scare the Tory horses and then Murdoch backed Blair so with the inertia of politics, Blair lasted for a while. I and many Tories who voted for him quickly abandoned him as the level of his duplicity, spin and political correctness became evident, but with Murdoch's backing and mainstream media spin, he and the Oxbridge teams managed to stay in power for a number of years. Finally, the public had enough of politically correct Labour and voted in another politically correct Oxbridge politician, Cameron.

Then we saw the rise of UKIP because conservatives had enough of Oxbridge and the politically correct hoody huggers, and UKIP won the European elections and the Establishment and Oxbridge teams panicked. Then Cameron and the hoody huggers made the mistake of misreading the British public and thinking that the media wuld be able to save them in a referendum, and we beat them in Brexit.

Now it is all over for the Establishment teams, politics is fractured and their media spin can't fool and unite enough people for them to win. No we have a revolution in Labour with Corbyn and now we have common sense conservatism with Theresa May.

There is no way back for the Blairites, they only succeeded because people were sick f the Tories in 1997.

Corbyn believes in uncontrolled immigration and McDonnell believes that by the end of the century countries will no longer have borders. This is nonsense and claptrap and anti common sense and they are unable to change their positions because it is part of the politically correct dogma that underlies Labour thinking.

They have espoused it for decades, the echo chamber of Labour has amplified that thinking, Oxbridge teams applauded, only John Mann has the courage to call out its stupidity, but that is why John Mann can never be Labour leader, because his thinking is not "Labour correct", not "politically correct", not "Establishment correct", not "Oxbridge correct".

But even with all the claptrap, Corbyn can still win if he is able to articulate a populist vision. Whether he can do it is another matter because he seems to be too weak to defeat the Oxbridge teams who work for the Establishment and who want to end any chance of a democratic populism that will end the rigged system.

I have always said that Corbyn spouts a lot of claptrap because he is wedded to politically correct Labour dogma which is anti common sense. I prefer Trump and Farage to Corbyn because of common sense. But that doesn't mean I don't like Corbyn, he just has less common ense than Farage and Trump.

UKIP grew because Conservatives had had enough of Cameron and the Oxbridge hoody huggers. They couldn't vote for Corbyn because he is politically correct, and ordinary working class Labour voters are also not politically correct, so as Conservative voters raised UKIP in the polls, Labour voters joined them.

But the Oxbridge teams will end UKIP because it is a populist movement. Labour is more powerful. Farage, who is UKIP, has stood down, so UKIP's appeal will now plummet, because although Diane James is excellent, she hasn't got Farage's appeal and his ability to take it to the metropoliatn elite.

So UKIP will string along and many of us will keep voting for them to annoy the metropolitan elite, but they can't win.

The really exciting change in politics in the country is Corbyn. If he is able to articulate a populist policy and overturn the metropolitan elite consensus then he will win and even some conservatives and many UKIP voters will vote for him despite of his political correctness.

"Tories fail to block police probe into election fraud allegations in Thanet South

A judge has granted police more time to investigate Conservative expenses in the Kent constituency during the general election.
...
Ukip leader Nigel Farage was fighting to win the marginal seat of Thanet South ahead of the general election, which made it a high-profile target for Conservative campaigning."

www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2016/06/tories-fail-block-police-probe-election-fraud-allegations-thanet-south

Farage was a minnow compared to the elites. The people can dream but dreams seldom come true. But we won Brexit and one day the people will win.

'I must say you're taking ukip's demise very well'

Because i am and always was a floating voter. I took Farage's loss in the election well because I understand how the Oxbridge teams work and knew that they usually get their way.

The battle for the people over the elites is a long, slow one. UKIP can't win it, but we won Brexit and now there is Corbyn and one day the people will win.

I will back the side of the people against the elites everytime, and different parties at different times will be the best hope to win, which is why is why I can take UKIP's demise lightly.

Rome wasn't built in one day and the Oxbridge teams won't be beaten overnight.