Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Labour getting things right, Tories getting things wrong: discuss!

40 replies

GibberingFlapdoodle · 18/04/2015 17:57

I liked these news stories about Labour pledging to end unpaid internships and stopping firms exploiting foreign workers and undermining the minimum wage (both from BBC).

Seems to be further evidence of Labour starting to support working class people over the rich again at long last. Meanwhile the Tories have put out that ridiculous desperate idea about increasing the hated right-to-buy of what little social housing remains (I won't link it as there've been threads already.

I never understood why so many people think Cameron is wonderful while Milliband is terrible. His (Cameron's) past remarks revealing his complete ignorance of how an economy runs on debt, his pathetic attempts to please the media at the time of the floods last winter, more recently his talk of putting open back doors in all IT encryption (including your online shopping and banking) reveal an incompetent fool who has not got a clue how to run anything or handle ordinary people. Presumably, from what people have told me, he smiles nicely.

Any comments?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
amicissimma · 27/04/2015 21:02

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

mak123 · 27/04/2015 18:42

I think the glory years of the 1970s are a misnomer (as you presumably intended). However our economy is now dangerously reliant on the unstable financial sector and for all the problems of the manufacturing industry they were not glorified casinos betting on everyone else's future. Since all this was shut down in the Thatcherite economic miracle (not) we have had record balance of payments deficits

ShellyBoobs · 27/04/2015 17:51

But i still perhaps naively believe they can return to their roots in the socialist/Union movement.

Yes, wouldn't that be marvellous!

Back to the glory years of 1970s British 'industry'.

Grin

And a Star for good measure.

Linguini · 27/04/2015 10:58

Boris Johnson trying to argue that introducing protection for tenants in fixed rent contracts will "drive people out of the rental market" HA what planet is he on.

Linguini · 27/04/2015 10:53

White = shite !

Linguini · 27/04/2015 10:51

I am also interested in labours apparent move leftwards.
It is long overdue. The left was totally abandoned under New Labour, leaving a gaping space and Ed Miliband has had years to re-claim that space. He has left it too long paying more attention to the wealth-and-business lobbiests during these years.

All trust in politics has gone imo. I basically wait with baited breath to see what happens.

Interesting to see the usual Tory white about businesses and the wealthy leaving Britain in their droves. Good i say! If the wealthy all leave, their influence leaves with them. Bring the NHS (etc) back into true public ownership, scrap the PFI's (brought in by New Labour not True Labour) that are destroying the system.

New Labour screwed up big time. But i still perhaps naively believe they can return to their roots in the socialist/Union movement.

GibberingFlapdoodle · 27/04/2015 09:59

Sorry for late reply, busy weekend. I promise to try harder to tidy up the toys I throw out of my pram a bit quicker in future.

Grimble, point taken, wrist duly slapped. There were problems in the 70s due to external oil shocks as I recall. I also read something recently about it being linked to deregulation as the US dollar stopped being pegged to gold (or anything else real) swhich destabilised matters, but I'm way out of my depth on fiscal policy. The deficit is much larger now than it was -briefly, it is now pretty consistently bad - in the 60s. As far as whether it's New Labour's doing or the Tories, I can't see a great dealof difference between the two tbh and therefore that doesn't greatly interest me, except to wonder if there will be a difference in the future. I will have to wait and see,or find out more about, exactly what consequences will arise from it.

The greens, well yes the wealth tax is a bit strange. Embarassingly so. I don't know whether that is the amount they think could be generated if tax avoidance wasn't routinely practised - tax avoidance needs to be addressed urgently at at least a European level, unfortunately the people we're asking to address it are usually well-off and avoiders themselves in one form or another. Perhaps theyjust missed a decimal point. It's a sign of basic error or inexperience either way. But I'm not seeing experience and professionalism as an unmixed blessing in politicians at the moment anyway (see tax avoidance comments Smile). Plus they are still the only people who are even actually looking seriously at the real social and environmental effects our globalised over-privatised economy is causing. Maybe they don't have all the answers in place yet, but they are asking the right questions and that is a good place to start. Not asking those questions, pretending we can hide our heads in the sand and continue with this status quo forever, is the real bonkers approach to me.

I don't expect them to win, I just want more of those questions being asked and the answers taken seriously in parliament.

OP posts:
grimbletart · 24/04/2015 17:29

Gibbering: I don't think I have fallen for "Tory propaganda" as you assert, any more than you have fallen for left-wing propaganda, which is something I wouldn't personally have chosen to say. Please can we assume that both of us have the ability to think for ourselves?

I stand by what I believe, particularly relating to my experience of working during the 1970s and the years we spent as the "sick man" of Europe (not my phrase). A thriving Labour led economy would not have needed a $3.9 billion bale out in 1976 from the IMF to stop it going bankrupt.

I see the Eurostat figures over time (which I have actually sourced) showed a negative currency balance under the last Labour government as well. The UK has notoriously - at least ever since I first voted in 1964 (you had to be 21 to vote then) - had balance of payments difficulties though that particular stat, along with inflation, loomed much larger as an election issue in the 60s and 70s than it does today.

I am pleased to hear that Spain and Italy appear to be dragging themselves out of the mire at last.Smile But would I swop the UK economy for theirs? Nah.

ShellyBoobs · 24/04/2015 12:22

Fyi my closest match politically are the greens and they are who I intend to vote for this time.

We should all be thankful that they haven't got a hope in hell of getting into power.

Have you seen their economic policies? Confused

They really are utterly bonkers. How on earth they expect their wealth tax to reap £20-40bn per year is anyone's guess.

The French have a much more savage wealth tax and that raises around £4bn and is set to decline as wealthy people continue to leave the country.

The greens would very quickly run out of other people's money to waste.

blacksunday · 23/04/2015 18:48

IDS should be in jail.

fortyfide · 23/04/2015 12:06

Tax thresholds raised....generally agreed to be a liberal policy.

Bedroom Tax? Sounds like Tory polics.

TOXIC benefit sanctions Soounds like Iain Duncan Smith (Was he the quiet man?)

Tis sad that cameron offered IDS another ministry at last reshuffle and IDS said "No way, Dave" Interesting if he shud have the clout to pull it off

But can he make the computer system work? A lot of big govt computer systems have failed. Anyone know why?

GibberingFlapdoodle · 23/04/2015 09:39

knacktoflying, fair enough, that's true about seeking support. But when 2/3rds of professional economists tell you that something is going wrong with the economy, plus most - virtually all in public health that I'm aware of - of the academic research tells you there are serious social issues being created, in short when the evidence stacks up that we're on a road to wrack and ruin, it's wise to take notice. The tories are not listening at all. Labour might be.

OP posts:
Theknacktoflying · 23/04/2015 09:33

This childish idea of 'good' and 'bad' makes me despair .... People always read newspapers and seek out 'info' which support the views they hold.

This idea of good and bad - the fact is the shadow parties can promise and offer the world and make big statements - it never comes to anything and is just hot air.

One person doesn't make the political party - there are all factions to consider in a party and I don't think there is too much separating the big two like before.

GibberingFlapdoodle · 23/04/2015 09:30

current account deficit increased under the tories, I mean.

OP posts:
GibberingFlapdoodle · 23/04/2015 09:28

Grimble, sorry, but you are just spouting the same old tory propaganda regarding their supposed ability with economics. Here's a guardian piece on where they've mucked up the economy www.theguardian.com/business/economics-blog/2015/apr/19/tory-long-term-economic-plan-not-even-the-propaganda-is-working

And you can also look at this nice eurostat graph on our current account ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/graph.do;jsessionid=N7LlVWatZtl9I8lYZtPa1fAyN9T35Yo1-4PLhOWuyA69U10DgFtC!-1700085361?tab=graph&plugin=0&language=en&pcode=tec00043&toolbox=type
If that works. I did find one which compared performance over time the other day but I can't lay my hands on it right now. Not only has the current account increased under the tories, so that we now have the biggest deficit in the eu, it is the worst performance ever over time. Only Italy and Spain were worse, and look, they're much better now.

OP posts:
GibberingFlapdoodle · 23/04/2015 09:24

Shelly, my beloved labour party??

Fyi my closest match politically are the greens and they are who I intend to vote for this time. They're the only people who have noticed that we cannot survive without a healthy environment and have some fairly joined-up thinking around social issues: the only problems I have with them is that they're very middle class, so a bit blind at times, and anti-feminist.

I am nevertheless following Labour's apparent return to the left with interest for its own sake and because they are still viewed as the mainstream left party, Blair and new Labour notwithstanding, and are just a bit likely to be a major player in what I hope will be a left-wing coalition. I started the thread largely to ask what other people are making of their shift back left and whether it's real or not, and got a bit carried away with the personal angles which exasperate me. Politics should be about the policies not the face on the cover.

OP posts:
ShellyBoobs · 22/04/2015 22:31

...while millionaires get tax cut

That's a Labour red herring you've fallen for.

The 50p rate was only brought in just before the 2010 election.

Why didn't Labour bring it in sooner if it's a fair and just way of raising money to give away?

Labour had also stated in their manifesto that they would not increase income tax rates but they still did it.

One thing is for sure, OH and I will start avoiding all the taxes we possibly can if the 50p rate is reinstated. That's something we have never done before. In fact, until last year we didn't even use ISAs but I'm determined that if Labour get in they will have as little of our money to waste as possible.

ShellyBoobs · 22/04/2015 21:57

Shelly, learn how to debate ideas without insults. No one knows everything.

Haha. Brilliant. You certainly seem to think you know everything regarding comparisons between your beloved Labour Party and the Conservatives.

You've started this thread with no intention of debating anything whatsoever. Pathetic.

grimbletart · 22/04/2015 19:05

Of course the Tories are the nasty party. Just as in 1979 in 2010 they were voted in after Labour crashed the economy and the Tories have to shovel up the detritus.

"Dear Chief Secretary, I'm afraid that there is no money. Kind regards and good luck." (Liam Byrne). Would he have left that note for Ed Balls?

I really wanted Labour to win in 2010 so they had to do their own dirty work for once. Yes, it was the bastard bankers who proved a mess too far - but some contingency left in the treasury coffers would have help a bit.

Now it looks as if we may repeat the whole cycle.

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." That Einstein bloke knew a thing or two.

robin4 · 22/04/2015 16:33

Labour didn't say they would not ban 0 hour contracts Labour have said they will bring in new rights -

an employee who has worked regular hours for 3 month will be intitled to a fixed hour contract, if wanted,
Ban employers expecting employees to be avaiablle on the off chance there will be work,
Won't be made to work for only one employer
Eployees who have their shifts changed at short notice they will recieve compensation from their employer.
Exploition is what some employers are doing.We all know when a 0 hour contract works and when it doesn't. The above will help

Gnightjimbob · 22/04/2015 15:30

Except perhaps, the 60% of people who actually like zero hours contracts??

robin4 · 22/04/2015 14:31

Does it really matter about whether politions smile in the right places?

Policies are what will affect lives.Labour policies on the NHS,0 hour contracts,paying interns etc etc will make a good impact on ordinary peoples' lives.

Tories have proved in the last 5 years what they are about,food banks while millionaires get tax cut. Tutuion fees trebled under them. Promising 12 billion cuts-these things will really matter when election is over. Cameron's (shifty) smile won't change that

MaliceInWonderland78 · 22/04/2015 13:15

Theyre damned if they do and damned if they don't.

I personally don't support the raising of the personal allowance - I think it risks disenfranchising people. People will much more likely hold their public servants/services to account when they can see that direct taxation is coming from their pay packet to pay for them.

I'd much rather see a personal allowance and then a flat tax (for income, capial, etc.) intorduced.

I've lived in some pretty 'colourful' places over the years. I know from personal experience and observation that Labour's (perhaps well intentioned) policies have an utterly devestating effect on those they profess to want to help.

GibberingFlapdoodle · 22/04/2015 13:01

Raising tax allowance... will that not raise the possibiity of future tory goverments saying 'you're not paying into the system, so you don't deserve anything back out'? I think it was a bad idea myself, I'd rather wages were upped and income inequality flattened and everybody contributed more.

I remember New Labour's stated commitment to lifelong learning with affection at least. Sure there were a few other good points...

OP posts:
Gnightjimbob · 22/04/2015 12:55

Tories have raised substantially the personal tax allowance which benefits massively the working poor.

Labour screwed over the working poor in every way imaginable.