Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

EU Elections 2014; time to finally vote for the BEST MEP candidates?

81 replies

Isitmebut · 16/01/2014 11:41

To most people in the UK the European Elections in May 2014 will either be a big yawn, a chance to protest about Europe, or chance to protest about UK domestic policies – and if recent turnout figures of 38% in 2004 and 35% in 2009 are a guide, it will be apathy that determines your constituencies MEP’s.

But how many people are aware that they may get a say in our membership of the E.U. - and that whether we stay ‘in’ or ‘out’ of the EU - they are sending their regional representatives to Brussels on huge salaries and expenses, averaging around £182,000 a year.

Indeed, one senior UK MEP who shall remain nameless, but is still in office, told the Observer in May 2009 that he had already claimed close to £2 million just in expenses, way back then.

So what I have trouble getting my head around, is just how expensive the protest vote can be, not just in monetary terms, but also in the quality of muppet, of any political party, we send over to Europe to represent out interests.

So while I ‘get it’ that in the past, a EU membership protest vote usually meant that the town fruitcake could get the taxpayers jolly to heckle a foreign bureaucrat, or two, on your behalf, but to but to reiterate the point, and a similar shock could await the independence referendum in Scotland, what happens if there was a surprise ‘yes’ vote and we are being represented by a bigger bunch of half wits, on far bigger remuneration packages, than the usual suspects in Westminster?

So IF/WHEN an E.U. Referendum is guaranteed by law, on every practical level, isn’t it far better to have VOTED for the best MEP candidate within a constituency, to PROMOTE the interests/views of that constituency, REGARDLESS of which UK political ‘tribal’ colours they wear – rather than take pot luck that around 37% of the voters get it right?

Remember no one party can wave their expensive MEP magic wand and GUARANTEE that the UK leaves Europe, as only a parliamentary majority in the house of commons of 326 seats, against the ‘never will leave’ political party’s, could even BEGIN the process of changing the necessary laws.

Isitmebut the EU has morphed from a useful Common Market of several large industrial trading nations to an ever larger expensive and inefficient Federation of Europe, that needs to change to be internationally competitive.

But whether it changes or not, ‘the people’ have to be trusted to have their say, and the only practical way I can see that EVER happening, is via an all party politically binding Referendum in 2017.

What are your thoughts?

OP posts:
Isitmebut · 15/02/2014 13:14

No, you are missing the point of this post; we are currently in the EU and as the Lisbon Treaty signed by Brown ensures most EU laws are UK laws, by law – so whether the Lib Dems play with a rubber stamp, or rubber anything else, this is where we are and there is NOTHING UKIP CAN DO ABOUT IT, by law.

The correct role of a MEP in my opinion, is to CURRENTLY try and use their position within the EU parliament to make push for sensible reforms to reduce the uber fat, bureaucratic, inefficient, unsustainable, state mentality that virtually every member state should want, as it costs each country less and makes them more competitive in the world.

This is important, as the ONLY WAY the UK will come out of the EU, is via the Referendum the Conservatives want, and only political party that CAN force one through. Otherwise we BY LAW will remain a filly signed up EU member.

So the LAST thing we need is MORE Ukip MEP’s; because:

Ukip are so anti EU they are in no ideological position to achieve anything of benefit to the UK now, or if we have to stay in

Ukip can not bring us out of the EU, despite their implied claims

Ukip MEP’s are therefore not fit for purpose in representing the UK, so therefore less useful to this nation than a very expensive, taxpayer’s, chocolate tea pot

In conclusion, for the sake of the UK, it matters not who you vote for in April, as long as it is NOT Ukip – and as a similar 28% Wythenshawe electoral turnout will allow Ukip a seat by default – people need to vote.

OP posts:
Spinflight · 15/02/2014 06:00

You miss the point, liblabcons are all the same as they just rubber stamp EU directives ( their MEPs) and rubber stamp those directives into law in Parliament.

Isitmebut · 07/02/2014 14:55

P.S. What is clear to me, is that both politicians and posters on boards like this, are peddling mistruths and misinformation.

From Miliband hypocritically blaming the coalition for the problems left by New Labour, with only huge debts to fix them, to Ukip pretending that they are an alternative to anything, including the false claim that votes for them will bring the UK out of the EU.

What I am looking to do is STRENGTHEN political debates by providing facts and figures that float my boat. Frankly in most parts of the UK, where Labour could take each families first born and the parents would still vote for them, I’m not looking to influence who people vote for – but at least know the truth when voting for a party, and why voting is so important, as apathy can let a numpty in to represent your area, by default.

OP posts:
Isitmebut · 07/02/2014 11:51

Spin……let me try and answer your points, as you don’t seem to understand the record of those you say your non policies are the answer to AND what Cameron is currently doing within the EU.

On EU reform, let us remember that the EU is an unsustainable socialist monster that was allowed to grow during ‘the good times’, and where hugely expensive bureaucracy and red tape will tie one hand behind the back of our businesses in a competitive world. Where unlike low business/personal taxes Far East countries, European States offered huge pensions and social security unsustainable in ‘the good times’, will now have to be ‘reformed’.

Look my point is, the EU needs to reform or slowly die under its own regulatory and financial burden – so if they don’t want to reform fast enough, then so be it – but whatever progress Cameron makes with near bankrupt Staes that need to save money e.g. like already reducing the EU budget, gets put to the people WHO THEN DECIDE.

On Tory members, what is this preoccupation of Ukip with their Membership over political substance, like thick football fans bragging down the pub? The Conservative Party has over 300 parliamentary seats, UKip has a big fat ZERO, and was around 26,000 votes across around 20 key marginals in getting a parliamentary majority. I have been a Conservative voter from way before Farage became an oil trader, but I would NEVER become a Member, what is the point, I can do more damage to Ukip half-wits on the internet, than sitting in a Tory Office going ‘ya, ya, wine bar’. If I’d cared, I’d look up how many of the old farts that were members have died over the past few years, but parliamentary seats count, and we’ll see in 2015.

On Tory policies, silly micro issues just prove Ukip posters ignorance of BIG PICTURE stuff that defines a successful country. Personal income tax rates in 1979 started at 32p, then 68p I believe. Tax on unearned income (from investments) was 90 odd % and should any business manage to make a profit in the pre Thatcher economic death spiral of 20% inflation/wages, the Corporate Tax Rate was 50% - and all these come down over Conservative administrations to stimulate MORE tax growth, so they are the PROVEN party of lower taxes for all.

Re the taxes for the rich, they are paying MORE under the Coalition, than Labour in 2010 OR Ukip, who proposed a Flat rate income tax and national Insurance of 32p, to help the oil traders of the world. The raising of top rate tax to 50p after 13-years in office by Labour, they budgeted would bring in £4-5 billion, brought in £100 million – and as one of the highest rates in the world, discouraged inward investment who’s company decision makers would have to pay it.

As for the size of the tax sapping State, which should be around 40% of any country’s economy but became 54% under Labour, the Tories from Thatcher on have believed it should be as big as it NEEDS to be – so ‘the people’ keep more of their own earnings in order to save or afford their own choices e.g. private pensions.

Conservative administration records show, they are PRO lower taxes & increased savings and ANTI uncontrolled public sector hiring (1 million from 1997 to 2010) anti uncontrolled/unsustainable rising benefits through a boom in employment, anti uncontrolled immigration, anti dumbing down childrens education, anti 90% of police at any time sitting on bums in stations, anti C.Diff germs in hospitals, anti annually living beyond this countries means, anti National debt and anti socialist politicians who believed in ALL of the above.

Those basic economic building blocks, proven to grow an economy, is what Conservative politicians have proven whilst in office, and that clearly uniformed Ukip ‘members’ ridiculously call ‘letting the nation down’, while without even one seat in Westminster, amateurishly and opportunistically, flip flopping policies to pretend they are an ‘alternative’ to Conservative success stories.

Look, I don’t agree with everything the Tories do, BUT IN REALITY, come 2015 either the Labour Party or Conservative Party will form the next government, and if people chose to vote Ukip and let in Labour, then so be it – but they should remember than in 2010, unlike 1979, no one saw where tax rates were going to go to fund fat government and ever growing benefits etc, Labour despicably chose to hide the increase taxes (and some cuts) they promised in their 2010 manifesto.

But this has all has nothing to do with this thread and the MEP elections in April this year; the fact is Ukip cannot bring the UK out of the EU so is promoting a lie to get votes.

OP posts:
Spinflight · 06/02/2014 23:33

Isitmebut..

"all our core beliefs that turned around the UK economy in 1979 are current policies"

That only London matters and the rest of the UK can be turned over to tourism? That the rich getting richer equals economic growth? That mass, uncontrolled, immigration is good for the UK? That under 25 year olds should be stripped of their rights? That Grammar schools are only fit for the rich? That sahm are scroungers who should be forced to work as well? The taxing the super rich hinders 'economic growth' but cutting benefits is merely punishing the workshy....

We all know what the tories stand for. The nasty party according to your own Home ( London ) secretary.

UKIP is predominantly working class, guess who we'll be looking after...

flatpackhamster · 06/02/2014 17:00

Isitmebut

Flatpack…I give facts, you talk about windmills, let the readers decide.

You give opinions.

The Conservative (and Cameron’s) view on the EU is clear, the previous Common Market before this Federal Europe nonsense that mainly happened from the late 1990’s, was fine and they would like the UK to remain within a REFORMED EU, with less of the excesses we all know about. Keeping up so far?

That view is arrant nonsense. The EU is unreformable. It is not interested in reform. It has a clear purpose and that purpose is not compatible with any pink fairy-dust pipe dreams of reform.

To achieve a 'reformed' EU you must gain the unanimous votes of all the EU member states. They all have to agree to go through the process of reform. That isn't going to happen. Reform is not an option. You are in or you are out. There is no negotiation to be done here. Cameron either doesn't know this - which makes him a fool - or he does, which makes him a liar.

As for that last paragraph, you are talking complete rollocks, as the polls show a narrowing to the only other party that will form a government in 2015, and as for our 2010 manifesto, all our core beliefs that turned around the UK economy in 1979 are current policies – and if any due to the Lib Dem coalition had to be ‘traded’, that was the price of Ukips votes in 2010, on a general election manifesto Farage now calls “drivel”.

If only that was true. Cameron is no Thatcher. If Cameron were a Thatcher, the Tory Party wouldn't be down to its last 100,000 members.

TheHammaconda · 06/02/2014 16:57

A political party, that millions of people support is a pimple on the ass of democracy? Do you understand what democracy actually means? Or do you just seek to eradicate views you don't like?

Isitmebut · 06/02/2014 15:34

Flatpack…I give facts, you talk about windmills, let the readers decide.

The Conservative (and Cameron’s) view on the EU is clear, the previous Common Market before this Federal Europe nonsense that mainly happened from the late 1990’s, was fine and they would like the UK to remain within a REFORMED EU, with less of the excesses we all know about. Keeping up so far?

However, they are the only party who CAN or will ALLOW THE PEOPLE TO DECIDE, via a YES/NO referendum, so it matters not a jot what Cameron, or any other Tories personal opinion is, or how they would campaign before hand.

Frankly speaking, I think I’m fairly well read up on most political issues, but I don’t have a clue of the true benefits to the UK of being in the EU, so I want to see the debate, with ON BALANCE all the pros and cons. My current unreformed view is a ‘no’, so only a lot of bleedin EU benefits that I don’t currently see, could sway me.

So as Ukip is just a pimple on the ass of democracy, with nothing to offer on the EU but expensive and ineffectual protests, but could easily derail the possibility of a referendum by taking Conservative votes again - it’s damn straight I detest the Ukip rabbles lies and Farage’s pimply ass because this is not a game of silly boys, it’s our, our children’s and their children’s futures.
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ukip/7693877/General-Election-2010-Ukip-challenge-cost-Tories-a-Commons-majority.html

As for that last paragraph, you are talking complete rollocks, as the polls show a narrowing to the only other party that will form a government in 2015, and as for our 2010 manifesto, all our core beliefs that turned around the UK economy in 1979 are current policies – and if any due to the Lib Dem coalition had to be ‘traded’, that was the price of Ukips votes in 2010, on a general election manifesto Farage now calls “drivel”.

In conclusion even if the 2015 general election was not going to define this nation prosperity for decades to come, I can not respect Ukip or anyone who knows they are a sham who support them, as they prey on the political ignorance of people – and exposing the futility of sending Ukip MEPs to Europe in April this year, is my contribution to both my children and this nation – call it my personal crusade.

OP posts:
flatpackhamster · 06/02/2014 14:07

You don't cut through anything. You tilt at windmills and you write flannel.

You keep arguing that the Conservatives are best placed to take the UK out of the EU, but they won't because they don't want to. They keep dangling the impossible dream of negotiation.

It must really annoy you that UKIP does so well despite 'not having any policies'. That speaks volumes about the way people view the Conservative party, which has policies in spades. Despite all your serious policies, you're haemorraging support. Perhaps it's because people know that it doesn't matter what you've got written down, it's meaningless because once you're in office you ignore those policies.

Isitmebut · 06/02/2014 12:10

Firstly, why does someone who successfully cuts through the Ukip lies and claims have to be from Conservative central office; for what it is worth, I have never been involved in politics (other than one year put leaflets through front doors when incumbent Labour has a small majority) but I follow politics closely – and if Ukip’s aim is to AGAIN take votes/seats from the Conservatives, they have to be prepared for the scrutiny, and what’s wrong with that – other than to deflect from Ukip’s substance?

And on that note, clearly by your own admission, Ukip has no mechanism to take the UK out of the EU, but the Conservatives do, especially if they have a majority in parliament – via the Parliament Act.
blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100251428/this-changes-everything-david-cameron-will-ram-the-inout-referendum-through-using-the-parliament-act/

As for the “value” of Farage you mention, is Ukip really worth £2 million plus in expenses claims to fund a political party’s MEPs who do not respect the job, or clearly the European Parliament they are attending, to represent UK taxpayers and regional interests?
www.theguardian.com/politics/2012/apr/20/ukip-meps-misused-eu-allowances

As for the mind numbing mantra about the failure of the other parties; Farage tells us that Ukip doesn’t have any policies, they have “a blank piece of paper” coming into the 2015 General Election, and can’t take us out of the EU, if Ukip (full of god knows what) isn’t a political “non entity”, what is?
www.newstatesman.com/politics/2013/02/ukip-party-bigots-lets-look-evidence

OP posts:
Spinflight · 05/02/2014 23:07

No they could not...

Neither could labour, tory or lib dem MEPs...

MEPs merely vote on laws drafted by the commission, they have no mechanism by which they can introduce new powers or rescind existing ones themselves.

Utterly pointless place in my opinion. Gives a facade of democratic legitimacy to a fundamentally bent system.

Saying that I'd certainly argue that we get better value out of Farage and co than whoever the nonentities who go to Brussels from the old, failed, parties are...

flatpackhamster · 05/02/2014 18:50

Isitmebut

Typical Ukip deflection, answer the question - if every MEP in April was (in the polls lead) Ukip, or even if every damn UK MEP was a EU hating Ukip MEP, could they bring the UK out of Europe, as per their promise over the years - or was it a lie?

UKIP has never claimed that voting for UKIP MEPs will 'bring the UK out of Europe'.

You're tilting at windmills.

If this is the best that Tory Central Office can manage then you're making a pretty poor fist of it. And you're scared, too.

TheHammaconda · 05/02/2014 18:12

Do you question why voters in Northern Ireland return Sinn Fein MPs to Westminster?

I'd imagine that people vote for UKIP in the European Parliament elections because they want their views represented in the European Parliament. I would imagine that in their minds it's better to have a UKIP MEP who doesn't show up than a Labour, LibDem or Green MEP who would vote for things that they, the voter, disagree with.

If Cameron put an in/ out referendum in the 2015 manifesto and he won the Salisbury Convention would apply. The electorate would then have their referendum. Referenda are not binding but it would take a brave government to fail to act on the will of the people.

Isitmebut · 05/02/2014 17:44

OMG…clearly “performing well in the European Parliamentary Election is the (UKIP) objective”, but why do you think voters are sending EU hating Ukip MEP’s on a tax payer hugely expensive European Parliamentary jollie, if NOT due their ‘Ukip would get you out’ rhetoric – as it’s certainly not to represent their regional interests?

Which goes back to my opening post’s point, as if the Tories fail to get through both chambers in parliament a referendum to give people a yes/no vote, as there is no other mechanism to leave the EU, forget ‘protest voting’, people should get out there and vote for the best candidate to represent them.

Therefore common sense has to question electing/sending anyone from the United Kingdom Independence Party to the European Parliament, as their objective is in their party’s name and can not be trusted to represent any UK region.

OP posts:
TheHammaconda · 05/02/2014 16:24

I don't think they've made that promise. It's an aim, whereas performing well in the European Parliamentary elections is probably an objective.

Isitmebut · 05/02/2014 16:15

Typical Ukip deflection, answer the question - if every MEP in April was (in the polls lead) Ukip, or even if every damn UK MEP was a EU hating Ukip MEP, could they bring the UK out of Europe, as per their promise over the years - or was it a lie?

OP posts:
flatpackhamster · 05/02/2014 15:54

If you think UKIP is 'far right', then perhaps you belong in the Lib Dem or Labour parties rather than the Tories.

Isitmebut · 05/02/2014 14:26

Spinflight….firstly let us remember that this thread is about the MEP elections this April, and so when talking about Ukip, let us examine why Ukip are currently tipped to win most MEP seats – rather than puerile name calling aimed at the established political parties, as a deflection to Ukips lack of ‘substance’.

Your accusations against me about being “rude and shoutey” and a part of the Conservative political machinery when I am just giving you facts over Ukips ‘pub style over substance’, just shows typical far right wing bullying which we have seen throughout Europe for many decades

But frankly if I was a Members of UKip, such as yourself, I would be (falsely) claiming that they are both a credible alternative to the establish parties and could bring the UK out of the EU if I had nothing else – especially as Farage has called your last General Election manifesto “drivel” – Farage’s word, not any of the established parties HQ..
news.sky.com/story/1200525/nigel-farage-disowns-ukip-manifesto-as-drivel

But of course Ukip cannot bring the UK out of the EU, and the fact that millions believe that you can, says more about Ukip’s disingenuous internet battering of promises that they cannot keep and spreading dissatisfaction with the other parties, than the numbers that have voted for you.

So as Ukip current General Election policies have been disowned by Farage, which I’d guess included HS2 (as in 2010 you wanted to electrify 3 new train lines in and around the north), let us concentrate on the MEP elections in April this year – as per this thread.

So tell this board honestly, if Europe hating Ukip took every MEP seat in the April election, giving all those Ukip MEP’s a £182k plus annual remuneration package, regarding their promise to bring the UK out of the EU, will Ukip be able to do it, YES or NO?

OP posts:
Spinflight · 04/02/2014 11:36

There are oly two polling companies which include UKIP in their prompts.. Opinium and Survation I think, despite us being way ahead of the LD's.

All the rest have UKIP as part of 'other' which does tend to reduce our polling figures. On top of that however if 300 people in a poll say they will vote UKIP several of the companies then apply a weighting due to our performance in the last general election. This usually results in a figure roughly half of that.

There is only one poll that matters however UKIP's rise does appear to have been downplayed by Yougov in particular. Survation and Opinium have had UKIP at between 16 and 19% consistently.

TheHammaconda · 04/02/2014 10:18

That's for the 2015 GE BTW

TheHammaconda · 04/02/2014 09:13

Spinflight, how do polls weight against UKIP? Do they fail to give UKIP as an option in the polls?

I've seen predictions for UKIP polling around 14% (no seats). The LibDems polling at around 10% and 25 seats.

Spinflight · 04/02/2014 04:17

The entire internet shall surely hold it's collective breath in anticipation Isitmebut. Hmm

I know there are some really strange ideas about UKIP doing the rounds in the bottom half of the internet but the idea that we have little to offer is rather stunningly naive...

If the opinion pools which actually prompt for UKIP and don't weight against us are to be believed there are roughly 5 million people who will vote UKIP in 2015.

Very few of these give a toss about the EU. Taking minimum wage earners out of tax entirely and Grammar schools are the policies which go down well on the doorstep. Free speech and honesty are our biggest assets, even if some take it a little far ( almost exclusively ex-tories as it happens) ...

More importantly representing those who have had no voice in politics for their entire lives. Many of our members are those old enough to have voted in the referendum, many feel the guilt of their vote weighing heavily on them. Even those too young feel a weight of responsibility, not for their own actions but for their collective lack of action in holding the subreptile elected scumbags to account whilst constantly being fed a three card trick and getting the same result.

If you don't think UKIP has anything to offer then you clearly think that a large percentage of the UK are subhuman. Which whilst you probably work at Tory party HQ isn't something I like to ascribe to anyone, even if they have bandied about revolting insults previously...

Isitmebut · 04/02/2014 02:06

So many words, so little to actually offer - as for the 2017 referendum, as you say elsewhere, Cameron can force it through, although somewhat unconstitutional, but watch that space.

OP posts:
Spinflight · 04/02/2014 01:35

Hmm... Caps again I see. Somewhat rude and shouty if you don't mind me saying so...

Is UKIP a protest vote all about the EU? You tell me, I merely talk and socialise with UKIP members, whose only defining characteristic is that they are good company. If you think UKIP meetings a a few sad, ranty old men boring each other to death about the EU then you evidently haven't been to one.

Indeed I think you are confusing yourself, possibly due to the BBC's coverage of anything EU related. One sad, sweaty tory argues with another sad, boring, sweaty tory and then the Chairman of ICB ( who is also a bald, fat, sweaty, boring, tory) says that one of the sad sweaty types was right.

If I had any interest at all I would find it remarkably difficult to keep track of which bad, fat, boring tory was decided to be right.....

Couldn't give much of a damn about the EU I'm afraid so if UKIP is a protest vote party then I'm in the wrong place.

Hmmm... Sad news... Your rigged and unlikely referendum was shot down in flames in the Lords. Hence there will not be one and you need a new record to play.

One trick pony party though I quite like, might even adopt it if you don't mind. The one trick however has nowt to do with the EU, would be equality under the law by my books.

Restoring equality under the law would be all that is required - won't happen though as it would have to apply to our scumbag politicians as well as us plebs.

Isitmebut · 04/02/2014 01:21

Does being a 'protest vote' on the EU make Ukip a bona-fida party - without one parliamentary MP - and MEP's who ignorantly just 'stick it to the man' to justify that £2 million?

In an EU where only a Tory referendum can give the UK voters a say, and Ukip make a Tory majority highly unlikely in 2015, how are rude MEP's in Europe "promoting our interests"?

So explain to me on here how 'the one-trick-pony-party' is ACTUALLY going to get the Uk out of the EU - to point out how they will not fail in their one CURRENT policy?

OP posts: