Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Homebase let cat out of the bag about using workfare to reduce wage bills

139 replies

ttosca · 05/04/2013 10:11

Only someone very naive could believe private firms are participating in the government?s workfare scheme because they want to provide work experience for unemployed people out of the goodness of their own hearts and not as a way of reducing their wage bills by using forced labour at taxpayers? expense.

But ask any of them and they?ll swear the workfare people they?ve taken on are extra to their requirements and are not ? repeat not ? replacing jobs they would normally have had to pay someone a proper wage to do.

Well. It looks like Homebase have accidentally let the cat out of the bag.

Here?s a poster currently displayed on the wall in the manager?s office of Homebase Haringey ? which clearly shows the company is using workfare as a means to reduce their payroll costs:

tompride.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/homebase-workfare.jpg?w=529&h=715

This is particularly interesting, as Homebase have recently been lying to telling the public they?re not participating in workfare at all. See my previous post about that here:

Homebase are so embarrassed about using workfare ? they?re reduced to lying about it

Looks like Homebase just can?t stop themselves telling porky pies about workfare, doesn?t it?

tompride.wordpress.com/2013/04/05/oops-homebase-let-cat-out-of-the-bag-about-using-workfare-to-reduce-wage-bills/

OP posts:
ttosca · 05/04/2013 21:14

I am with the people, with the workers, with the Daily Mail readers against the elites who do not represent the people

No, you're just confused.

OP posts:
claig · 05/04/2013 21:04

The American founding fathers didn't do any of that. America was born from noble ideas and principles.

I defy you to keep a dry eye when listening to the great words of their National Anthem - land of the brave and home of the free. Magnificent stuff. It is even better than a Daily Mail editorial and that is saying something!

claig · 05/04/2013 20:59

Rockefeller was a capitalist and Stalin was a communists. They were both elites in their respective socities. Neither was a worker.

I am with the people, with the workers, with the Daily Mail readers against the elites who do not represent the people and who want to inflict zero-growth and low-growth and population control on the people of the earth under their climate change scam in order to maintain power and control in their oligarchical system of elte control.

That is why I read teh Daily Mail, widely known as the people's paper and the paper of the "squeezed middle" who are "sqiueezed" by the elite.

MiniTheMinx · 05/04/2013 20:53

that should be 50*, sorry must get back to work.

MiniTheMinx · 05/04/2013 20:52

American history is fascinating, they kill their presidents, invade other countries, drop air bases all over the globe, undermine other governments, control the top 20 corporations, extract tribute from the poorest regions. America looks at the the rest of the world, points to the ground and says "your standing on my oil"

MiniTheMinx · 05/04/2013 20:45

Rockefeller, and who was he? capitalist or worker?

claig · 05/04/2013 20:43

Mini, I am not an expert on American history, but I have heard some of the American Cosntitution being read out and it is one of teh world's finest documents that freed teh people from tyranny and unrepresentative government. The American Revolution was the unfolding of teh historical process that led to the freeing of teh human spirit from oligarchical rule and was supported by teh French who had had their own revolution to free the people.

America is a great country founded on noble principles and ideals and freedom of thought and expression is enshrined in their great constitution. It is one of teh shining documents of world history and teh human spirit.

But I will listen to teh Marxist view and see what they say about it.

MiniTheMinx · 05/04/2013 20:38

History of the founding fathers and the constitution.

an elite bunch of wealthy people who tried to limit democracy.
claig · 05/04/2013 20:29

'Just because is already happening doesn't mean it can't be changed.'

I agree with you there, the poll tax was changed. But we all make different judgements and different beliefs. You probably believe in climate catastrophe, I don't. I don't think workfare will be changed because I think it was decided on high by New Labour and the Tories (whereas the poll tax did not have Labour support and even many Tories disagreed with Thatcher on it). I could be wrong, but that is the way I see it. But I am not stopping you opposing it if you think you can change it.

'So your resignation is not borne out of reality'

It is borne out of my understanding of reality, just as I don't think that the rich eleiet will end their climate change and zero-growth policies easily unless they are exposeed by more Climategates in teh future, but I doubt that will happen, so what will be will be.

'Your ideas are very close to fascist, I'm afraid: the disdain for 'intellectuals', 'progressives', and rhetoric directed at the 'elite' - even though you have no idea who they really are.'

No I am not a fascist because unlike you I believe in democracy and I like to hear all views - be that Guardian or Daily Mail. I believe in the will of teh people (just like teh American founding fathers) and not in "sofa government" by Oxbridge elites who do not represent the people.

Justr because you have not yet understood that environmentalists are puppets of teh rich elite and that the Club of Rome who commissioned teh 'Limits to Growth' report that kickstarted the worldwide green low-growth zero-grwoth movement net on what I think was a Rockefeller estate in Italy, but I can't remember exactly and would need to look it up, doesn't mean that you will not one day understand teh truth.

The Daily Mail is not a fascist paper. it is teh world's leading online paper and named teh Stephen Lawrence killers and is against teh BNP. So you can try and smear good Daily Mail journalists and millions of good readers worldwide, but it only shows the desperation of your arguments.

'[The Tories] They all overwhelming also rich, white, males -- many of whom inherited millions and have never worked a day in their lives.

Where do you get this stuff from? The Socialist Worker's Party magazine?
Thatcher was a middle class white woman and worked for a living. She was also our one and only female Prime Minister, David Davis grew up in a single parent home on a council estate and stood for leader of the Tory party. John Major left school at 16 and was the son of a circus entertainer. What are you on about? They were not all Oxbridge PPEs.

' You have no idea who 'the people' are'

I beg to differ. The people in their masses but the Daily Mail and teh Sun. You and your Socialist Worker buddies do not represent teh majority of teh people. I respect all people and all views, but as a democrat, I respect teh wishes of the majority and don't look down on them or the paper that they choose to read which is known as teh people's paper and proudly bears that name.

ttosca · 05/04/2013 20:08

claig-

Because it is already happening and was voted in as far as I know. It is happening and I think it is futile to wish that it wasn't. I don't believe in charging at windmills like Don Quixote.

This is meaningless. Just because is already happening doesn't mean it can't be changed. If this were not true, all progress would be impossible.

I think some things cannot be changed, so I think it is best to try and modify them for teh best possible outcome.

Why is this one of those things? We already have evidence protests, boycotts and shaming are having a large effect on workfare, as many charities and companies which have been targeted have pulled out.

So your resignation is not borne out of reality (not surprising). Perhaps you should ask yourself whether you really do object to workfare at all.

I don't know what proto-fascism is, but do you have anything to contribute apart from insults?

Proto = early, latent, developing.

Your ideas are very close to fascist, I'm afraid: the disdain for 'intellectuals', 'progressives', and rhetoric directed at the 'elite' - even though you have no idea who they really are. Meanwhile you unwittingly support the real 'elite' - the rich and ruling class in power - whilst you criticise environmentalists and other left-wing or liberal organisations. Your political ideas are a total inversion of reality.

You support the Daily Mail which is a fascist newpaper which has repeatedly supported fascists (The Blackshirts and Le Pen) in the past and which uses hateful, nasty rhetoric to criticise 'the other', which basically includes anyone who isn't middle-class, white, conservative, and heterosexual.

You support the Tories, who could not be more detached and unrepresentative of the UK as a whole. They all overwhelming also rich, white, males -- many of whom inherited millions and have never worked a day in their lives. And whilst they make poor people poorer and put people on workfare to make them work for free, they spend hundreds of thousands in Parliamentary expenses on champage, and have recently come out as wanting £30K payrise.

Meanwhile you keep talking about 'The People'. You have no idea who 'the people' are. They are not represented by The Tories or the Daily Hatred.

You are seriously misguided. Seriously.

OP posts:
MiniTheMinx · 05/04/2013 20:07

They don't ask us because they don't represent us. They represent the interests of capitalists. What we need to do is remind them that they are only going to get behind the wheel if we give them the keys.

Labour unfortunately are in a very precarious position because they have been co-opted to the right. They fear losing the benevolence of a global cabal of tax dodging corporations and the investment they believe we need. Thatcher released the equivalent to a deadly virus over the globe, something that has turned on us, will ultimately bankrupt nation states incl us and labour have little power to stop it. Its like sleeping with the enemy. They appease the global capitalists and beg for their favour.

wannabedomesticgoddess · 05/04/2013 20:04

Yes, and the tories are all ears.

claig · 05/04/2013 20:02

It's called a representative democracy. You vote them in and they do what they please. I don't really understand it, but from what I can make out, that's what New Labour was all about.

That's why people say "plus ca change..."

claig · 05/04/2013 19:59

I would have said "Climate Act! Oi! No!" and the Harry Enfield character might possibly have agreed. But alas they never asked us, that would mess up their plans and only create fuss.

MiniTheMinx · 05/04/2013 19:58

Some nuts support UKIP, some even vote UKIP, this gets Scameron on the run. He comes out and says "lets tackle immigration" what we have to do is put an equal amount of pressure on labour for them to come out and condemn workfare. We need to nudge labour to the left. We need to be unequivocal, you want our votes, you represent us.

claig · 05/04/2013 19:56

New Labour didn't ask me and you when they decided to start on the path to workfare, they didn't ask me and you when they brought in the Climate Act, they didn't ask me and you when they decided to "save the planet" for us, they didn't ask me and you, they never do.

claig · 05/04/2013 19:52

I'm not a progressive, I don't know how New Labour started the process, all I know is that they did.

claig · 05/04/2013 19:50

'What does 'decided on high'? By whom? By what process?'

I don't know, because I don't move in New Labour circles.

New Labour took on the marican ideas and began legislation which began teh move towards it. I don't know what process it was. Maybe it was the New Labour "sofa government" that we have heard about.

' Why can't we do anything about it? '

Because it is already happening and was voted in as far as I know. It is happening and I think it is futile to wish that it wasn't. I don't believe in charging at windmills like Don Quixote. I think some things cannot be changed, so I think it is best to try and modify them for teh best possible outcome.

I don't know what proto-fascism is, but do you have anything to contribute apart from insults?

ttosca · 05/04/2013 19:44

claig-

wannabe, I don't think we can do anything about workfare. I think it has been decided on high that that will happen and New Labour even began the path towards it.

What does this even mean? What does 'decided on high'? By whom? By what process? Why can't we do anything about it? It sounds to me like you actually support it - or want to support it.

People have boycotted and shamed various workfare companies, and it is already on the verge of collapse because so many 'providers' are pulling out.

Do you have anything to contribute but proto-fascism, claig?

OP posts:
claig · 05/04/2013 19:42

'Workfare is reducing jobs and undermining the NMW.'

I agree about that, because it is not being used as part of a growth programme, but is using current capacity in a non-growing economy.

That is why I believe we should create an entirely new area of growth funded by quantitaive easing (which should be given to large capital projects rather than banks) and this will create additional jobs and put people on workfare in these new growth areas rather than with existing employers stacking shelves for free.

We have to enlarge teh job market, we have to expand and we have to grow. We can't create employment in a zero-growth low-growth climate.

ttosca · 05/04/2013 19:41

Osborne is no fascist, he stood up to the rich elite and told them and their green jesters that he was not prepared to bankrupt Britain to "save the planet".

Jesus Christ... that is one confused individual right there...

OP posts:
claig · 05/04/2013 19:39

wannabe, I don't think we can do anything about workfare. I think it has been decided on high that that will happen and New Labour even began the path towards it.

But if we are going to have it, let's make it useful to the people on workfare and to the community.

I think it is possible to both create jobs and train people on workfare with useful skils at the same time and I think that will start the economy moving.

It has got to be better than doing nothing.

claig · 05/04/2013 19:36

I don't believe everything that the Daily Mail says.

But there are Tories who have been calling for growth and kickstart to the economy. I think Boris has been calling for the extension of a major airport.

We can't afford to just sit back and wait and keep our fingers crossed that things will turn out alright. The government has been voted in by the people and it has been entrusted with the power to act. We need action not delay.

wannabedomesticgoddess · 05/04/2013 19:34

So are we creating jobs or training people on workfare?

How about we create jobs and also create VOLUNTARY PAID apprenticeships and training opportunities so people can further themselves.

Workfare is reducing jobs and undermining the NMW.

SanityClause · 05/04/2013 19:26

Wow Claig, Keynsian economics? That's unusual for a fan of the DM!

Swipe left for the next trending thread