Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Gove does it again!

214 replies

longfingernails · 21/06/2012 00:17

An end to dumbed down GCSEs, and a return to the O-Level!

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2162369/Return-O-Level-Gove-shake-biggest-revolution-education-30-years.html

He truly is a simply unbelievable reformer. It is so refreshing to have someone who really cares about education, putting pupils first, and not caring about whether idiot teaching unions bleat.

No doubt we will have Christine Blower ineffectually defending the ludicrous notion that standards in British secondary education have "improved" year on year on year despite international evidence. Watching the militant unions get their comeuppance - yet again! - is a delightful little bonus...

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
claig · 28/06/2012 19:02

Yes, you are right, it could have been a bad year for 'O' level candidates.

It's a difficult problem. If examiners make an exam too easy and lots of students get 100%, then I don't think pupils who got 99% should get a C grade, just because of norm referencing rules. So in that case, I do prefer the GCSE marking system, insofar as I understand it, rather than norm referencing.

MammaBrussels · 28/06/2012 18:53

Or the O-level year group could have been particularly weak and there's a 'normal' amount of A*-B grades.

As far as I know, and I'm a GCSE, AS and A2-level examiner, so I'm familiar with the examining system (too young for O-levels though). The Principal and Chief examiners do take into account the mark distribution when they have their awarding meetings (not that I attend them). It's one of a number of things they consider when setting grade boundaries. It should be considered, it should not be the only thing that determines grade boundaries.

claig · 28/06/2012 18:45

Yes, that is possible. But then presumably, there would be very few A*s at GCSE for that particular year. No system is perfect, they all have their positives and negatives.

MammaBrussels · 28/06/2012 18:11

Equally, Claig a C at GCSE could have been an 'A' at O-level, that's the problem with awarding marks in that way - it's a measure of your ability in relation to the rest of your year.

claig · 28/06/2012 18:02

True, with norm referencing or whatever it was called, then maybe an A at GCSE would have been a C at 'O' level and an A* could have been a B.

I lived through the 'good old days' and the bad old days of New Labour.

BoneyBackJefferson · 28/06/2012 17:55

claig

"Agee, but maybe the low A should be a B and the A* should be an A, like in the 'good old days'."

but you don't know what it would have been in the 'good old days'

claig · 25/06/2012 09:55

Agee, but maybe the low A should be a B and the A* should be an A, like in the 'good old days'.

Longtalljosie · 25/06/2012 09:39

Ah but it was a low A at GCSE - don't forget the top GCSE grade is A*.

I'm not hugely pro-GCSE - but I did think that was interesting.

claig · 25/06/2012 09:10

start of sentences

claig · 25/06/2012 09:09

Also, if you tie yourself in knots, don't put capitals at the starts of sentences and make spelling mistakes, and can still get an A, what do you have to do to get a B?

claig · 25/06/2012 09:03

Yes, the examiner said "he tied himself in knots", didn't capitalise some words at beginnings of sentences amd couldn't spell the noun practice. He would have given him an A grade at GCSE and about 75% at O level, which was a secure A. So there was not much in it. Bit of a poor show from an adult BBC presenter, as opposed to a 16 year old.

But, the examiner didn't mention that the GCSE exam had speech bubbles which acted as clues and prompts to help answer the question, whereas 'O' level candidates were faced with a blank page.

claig · 25/06/2012 08:53

Sorry, din't know about that bit. Will listen to it.

Longtalljosie · 25/06/2012 08:53

Oh damn I'd fail my O Level - misplaced bracket!

Longtalljosie · 25/06/2012 08:52

The bit where he's marked (the bit I heard is at 57.50)

claig · 25/06/2012 08:49

The quote from Ernest Hemingway was one of the speech bubbles which gave GCSE candidates a clue about how to answer the question "When is it important to listen to other people?"

The O level candidates received no clues, no speech bubbles. The GCSE candidates received more than one clue, they received several speech bubbles.

Longtalljosie · 25/06/2012 08:43

Not that one - the presenter had done an exam himself - talking about Ernest Hemingway

claig · 25/06/2012 08:24

www.bbc.co.uk/radio/player/b01k2b1l
It starts at 11:20

O level questions was "Describe somebody in your school or community who pretends to be much better that he or she really is"

GCSE question is "When is it important to listen to other people?"
followed by speech bubbles which helpfully and conveniently suggest possible things to consider.

Aside from the fact that the O level question encourages independent, sceptical thinking with questioning of authority, and the GCSE question encourages obedience and respect for elders and betters, we are told that
O level answers are almost mathematical (i.e. right or wrong), whereas GCSE questions are more of a "personal response". Is this a euphemism for anything goes, prizes for all points of view?

Robert Peston said that the GCSE maths question "seems" a bit a easier.

The GCSE question is
"Mark is organising a party for his group of 17 Scouts?
Each Scout will need ..."

Someone emailed the BBC and said why is the word scout spelt with a capital 'S'?

claig · 25/06/2012 07:59

Thanks, I will listen to it

Longtalljosie · 25/06/2012 07:57

Have a listen on iPlayer - the examiner gives reasons why he does better on the O Level - it's quite interesting and (if memory serves, I was having a conversation about rice krispies at the same time) is based on the GCSE needing a higher standard of analysis as opposed to memorising and repeating.

Longtalljosie · 25/06/2012 07:55

I think they probably read it before they put it up!

claig · 25/06/2012 07:10

By publishing this article, the BBC may have inadvertently increased respect for the 'good old days' and Queen Victoria. It wouldn't surprise me to find that this article is quickly wiped from the web, cleared from the cache and removed to Room 101.

claig · 25/06/2012 06:37

I think the reason that the public have left no comments so far, is because they rattled and breezed through the GCSE questions, but are still struggling through the O level question, with the help of an aspirin, an extra-strong latte and a bumper pad which is already full up with workings.

claig · 25/06/2012 06:26

The BBC page says 'Let us know how you got on', but there appears to be no comments section at the bottom of the page where the public can give their view.

claig · 25/06/2012 06:20

Fluke?

Have a look at the difference in standard

www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006qnj3

Longtalljosie · 24/06/2012 23:01

Interestingly Paddy O'Connell (I think it was) did an English GCSE and an English O Level for Broadcasting House this weekend. He did better on the O Level.