Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Cameron can put his moment of madness behind him by breaking UNITE's petrol strike

61 replies

longfingernails · 26/03/2012 18:32

The UNITE union (biggest donors to the Labour party) are threatening to hold the country to ransom ostensibly because of 'elf and safety, but really because they feel £45k isn't a good enough salary for a tanker driver.

Let's get the army driving those tankers, and break UNITE/McCluskey's bully boy tactics - the public will be foursquare behind you, Mr Cameron, and it will leave Red Ed dithering unable to answer the simple question: whose side are you on?

OP posts:
crazynanna · 26/03/2012 19:55

I am a lower earner...and I back the strike and the drivers' all the way.

OracleInaCoracle · 26/03/2012 19:54

Hahaha care to make more generalisations? Dh works ft on a low income, I work pt min wage (that was labour) we live in a HA house, shop at asda and drink beer or tea. Off that high horse, its obviously clouding your judgment.

You are dull.

longfingernails · 26/03/2012 19:51

OracleInaCoracle Yes, but fortunately Cameron doesn't have to pander to you or to the Ocado-shopping champagne socialist demographic which exemplifies Mumsnet more generally. He needs to win over lower to middle earning floating voters - conveniently, those who will be hit hardest by the UNITE strike, and even more conveniently, the same voters who Red Ed desperately wants. I don't think this group will have a huge amount of sympathy for the tanker drivers.

OP posts:
Cruithne · 26/03/2012 19:45

do you have any idea what they do for a job?

i'm backing the unions 100%

OracleInaCoracle · 26/03/2012 19:45

Noamount of strike-breaking will put me on scameron's side, I'm afraid.

OracleInaCoracle · 26/03/2012 19:45

Noamount of strike-breaking will put me on scameron's side, I'm afraid.

EdithWeston · 26/03/2012 19:40

How many tankers do the military own?

Or are they going to have to requisition civvie ones?

claig · 26/03/2012 19:36

If environmental sustainability officers went on strike, no one would notice. Tanker drivers do a more important job for the nation.

claig · 26/03/2012 19:33

I think it can be a dangerous job. You can't keep the army driving the tankers forever. At some point a deal must be reached. I don't care if tehy earn £45K. They often work through the night and it can be dangerous.

If environmental sustainability officers in councils can earn £35K, then I think tanker drivers deserve what they earn.

longfingernails · 26/03/2012 19:26

claig It is UNITE that has provoked, organised and funded the strike. It is McCluskey who appears as the media spokesman. It is Red Ed who refuses to condemn.

I am not particularly concerned about the feelings of the truck driver on £45k aggrieved with their lot in life. Bring in the army, keep the forecourts flowing, and break the union and the Labour party.

OP posts:
claig · 26/03/2012 19:22

It is not the union and McCluskey, it is the workers who have voted for this. I would like to know why they have decided on this course. I don't think they will have done so lightly.

Swipe left for the next trending thread