Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

AIBU that the benefit cap is actually a cut on child benefit?

60 replies

ChickenLickn · 02/02/2012 19:39

This family would be affected by the cap. The family is made up of two parents who have combined their families and taken responsibility for their children - so there are 6 children in the family.

As the graph shows, most of their income is child benefit.
They spend the majority of the money on food for the family of 8. The next largest outgoing is for school uniform, shoes, other school expenses and clothing. So they are taking good care of the children.

They all live in an overcrowded 3 bed house, on a council estate in north wales.

The amount they will lose from the cap is more than the cost of their rent.

AIBU that this cap is actually a cut in child benefit, and will penalise people who are trying to bring up their children properly?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Takeresponsibility · 25/02/2012 16:57
  1. Neither of them have worked for over 10 years yet they have a 5 year old child - who did they think was going to support that child?
  2. As others have said - if their is no work in your field, get work outside your field/
  3. Five of those children also have another parent where is their contribution to raising their own kids?
  4. Learn to budget.
Orwellian · 04/02/2012 14:58

Wow, they have a higher disposable income than most working people. I certainly can't afford Sky, a 200per week cigarette habit or 24 cans of lager. Perhaps they will just need to tighten their belts a bit and consider whether the above mentioned is more important than paying for "eating and heating". After all, we are apparently "all in it together".

Pornyissue · 03/02/2012 09:07

Yes op you are probably the most unreasonable poster I have seen on here in a long time.

Agree with the majority on thread, it really is robbing Peter to pay Paul

Strawbezza · 03/02/2012 00:21

MrPants you & I are in the majority, maybe not on Mumsnet but in the country as a whole. Even the Labour party have recognised which way the wind is blowing. I think Ed Miliband said the proposed benefits cap should be lower than £26K outside London.

MrPants · 03/02/2012 00:11

Thank god I found this post - I started a similar one up about this couple a few days ago and to hear the bleatings of some of the wooly-minded fruit-loops on the left, one could be forgiven for thinking this family wasn't getting enough in benefits!

Strawbezza · 02/02/2012 23:29

Ooooh Politics.

Don't think there's much politics involved tbh, all the main parties agree that there should be a benefits cap.

Tories are in their element, it's like shooting fish in a barrel for them, they can blame Labour for the mess.

Labour are struggling to defend the fact that they allowed the numbers trapped by benefits (like this family, for whom it is simply not worth getting a job) to grow so fast.

OliviaMumsnet · 02/02/2012 23:20

Hallo
We're moving this to politics
Thanks
MNHQ

Strawbezza · 02/02/2012 23:17

Well said callmemrs

Going to work has lots of associated unavoidable costs - childcare usually being the biggest, but travel, clothes, etc. as well. I wonder what you'd have to earn to end up with the disposable income that this family has? Plenty more than £40K.

callmemrs · 02/02/2012 23:08

Strawbezza - and the irony is that if you post on MN saying you're earning 40k, you'll be told you're a lucky bitch and have no right to ever feel hard up (even though you might be paying £1000 a month or more on childcare). Yet if you get given the equivalent of a 40k salary for doing fuck all, you get sympathy from some sections of MN and outrage on your behalf that the govt could even dream of cutting back !!

Strawbezza · 02/02/2012 23:01

Child tax credits are a benefit paid for each child. How much you get depends on how much you earn. Parents out of work get the most. High earning parents get nothing. There are lots of websites explaining the full details.

CheesecakeMonster · 02/02/2012 22:54

sorry to hi jack slightly but what are child tax credits? iv heard of working tax credits obviously and child benefit...

Strawbezza · 02/02/2012 22:53

Really don't know how anyone can defend this.

This family is being given money which is the equivalent of a £40K+ salary per year. No wonder the dad's never bothered to get a job.

There are plenty of working families who are much worse off than this. How can that be right?

Strawbezza · 02/02/2012 22:40

The dad's a workshy scrounger.

It doesn't really matter what's cut. As long as something is. Currently this family are spending a good slice of their child benefit and child tax credits on fags, booze, pub, mobiles & sky. And despite the fact that these benefits are labelled as "child" benefits, the adults are spending most of them on themselves.

OffMeTrolley · 02/02/2012 22:15

Hopefully so

Kayano · 02/02/2012 21:32

I work for a big software company and they do whispers in house training for tech support staff. I think he is lazy and full of shit

maddening · 02/02/2012 21:31

and when did software writing dry up - surely software is pretty big these days and something that is not restricted by geography as he could do it from home?

Kayano · 02/02/2012 21:19

11 years on job seekers

Sorry but I would be asking 'what the actual fuck are you doing? Deliberately sabotaging your chances of getting employed?!'

He certainly doesn't give enough of a fuck to retrain because he has it bloody easy with unnecessary luxuries.

I don't believe for 1 second he can't get a job in 11 years Hmm

callmemrs · 02/02/2012 21:19

Thefeministswife - great post.

callmemrs · 02/02/2012 21:18

Oops posted too soon, your average working person in this country has finally had enough of this sort of piss take. I know dozens of working families who have to live on less than this. People who don't have the luxury of nights out, sky tv and half a dozen mobile phones.

TheFeministsWife · 02/02/2012 21:06

Hang on a minute, he spends £80 a month on going out! Shock DH works full time and can't afford to go out even once a month (it's actually more like once every 6 months) let alone four times a month! Shock £60 a month on Sky! Shock Our Sky package was £60 a month I've had to reduce because we can't afford it! We had the movies, HD and multi-room, got rid of the multi-room and HD it's now £35 a month. 24 cans of fucking lager and 200 cigarettes plus tobacco a week! Fucking hell! I can barely afford to buy a bottle of wine at the weekend and I buy the cheap stuff that tastes like shit!

I'm usually totally on the side of the person claiming benefits but this family is taking the total piss. We're literally robbing Peter to Paul every single fucking month, I have to borrow off my mum every week to make it through to the next Tuesday when I get my tax credits, then pay her back when DH gets paid and we're short again so it's a viscous circle. And this guy hasn't worked for 11 years because there's no jobs in his field? Work in a fucking supermarket then! Angry DH has gone from minimum wage job to minimum wage job over the years (as did I before having kids) and we've spent a fair share of our time on the dole. DH always took the 1st job that came up.

People like him are what gives ordinary struggling families on benefits a bad name. Angry

sodapops · 02/02/2012 21:01

I dare say there are people out there who the benefit cap is going to cause real hard ship, but this family is not one of them. They have Sky movies because "they don't go out", yet he spends £20 a week in the pub! They spend loads more on alcohol and tabbacco as well. Mobile phones can be done for a lot less than £32 a week, as can the £91 "other expenses".

IMVHO he should be getting a job and perhaps they should be looking at their outgoings now before they do implement the cap.

wannaBe · 02/02/2012 20:56

Poor lambs. Hmm

How about giving up smoking, the lager, the sky and getting off his arse and getting a job.

I don't believe for second he's applied for three jobs a week for the past nine years. And if he has and been turned down for all of them, then perhaps we need to start questioning why. Oh that's right, he hasn't been able to find a job in his "expertees" Hmm

Sorry, I have no sympathy for them at all.

usualsuspect · 02/02/2012 20:55

Haven't you lot raged enough about the feckless lazy benefit scroungers already?

Can't you give it a bloody rest for one night

StealthPenguin · 02/02/2012 20:55

And if you take away the "24 cans of lager, 200 cigarettes and pouch of tobacco" (which we'll say is costing £100 per week), the Sky TV, Mobile Phones and Entertainment, they would have an extra £167 per week.

That's £8684 per year.

That's double what the proposed "loss" in benefits is!

These people need to snap out of it. And fast.

foreverondiet · 02/02/2012 20:54

Yes I know the mobiles is for 8 people, but FFS I didn't have a mobile when I was a teenager. Making calls is a luxury. These people are living of the state.