Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Amazon.co.uk pay ZERO tax in the UK. Why are people more annoyed about the bloke down the road maybe getting a benefit that he shouldn't than that. I don't understand.

134 replies

Pagwatch · 01/02/2012 10:50

Seriously. This weasel on radio 5 this morning just kept saying 'we pay all relevant taxes for the region' but wouldn't answer when Andrew Verity pressed 'yes, but that means tat you pay no tax in the ZuK because you have chosen to place Amazon.co.uk registered head office in Luxemborg.

If everyone phoned their mp about corporate tax evasion rather than mrs smiggins who is getting DLA when she looks fine we could pay off the deficit.

Hooray!

No. Seriously. Why don't we care about this?

OP posts:
Hathall · 01/02/2012 12:58

Well, we all enjoy the goods at such a low price.

whackamole · 01/02/2012 12:54

I didn't know that.

Amazon is my favourite online retailer. I might have to rethink that now as that pisses me off a lot.

helpyourself · 01/02/2012 12:52

Companies have to be based somewhere, but basing themselves where the tax is non existent puts them at an unfair advantage. At the very least as consumers we need transparency.

I bought a lot from Amazon over Christmas. I factored in the convenience, and the effect it would have on local shops and balanced it by shopping locally at other times. What I didn't consider, because I didn't know was that Amazon don't pay the taxes that the local independent bookshop down the road does.

Now I know I'll think twice before buying from Amazon.

IUseTooMuchKitchenRoll · 01/02/2012 12:42

So does that mean that a company that is based in the UK shouldn't be able to sell their product or service in France because if they did it would be screwing the French out of tax?

Don't be silly. Companies have to be based somewhere, and unless all companies are going to be prevented from ever trading with customers in other countries, this situation will always happen somewhere.

helpyourself · 01/02/2012 12:16

Emmmmm apple and amazon are not from a 'developing country'.
And 'foreign aid' is a complex, often misunderstood term - depending on the giver.
Please don't mix the two.

Was to me, I think. I think we should mix the 2. Companies avoid paying money to governments, the shortfall is made up via indirect taxation and in some cases, aid.

MoreBeta · 01/02/2012 12:10

The company pays the VAT it collects to Govt and it pays NI and income tax to Govt on wages it pays in the UK and pay Business Rates on the buildings it occupies.

The idea of imposing taxes on firms' profits is outdated in my view because business is so international now. Consumption taxes like VAT, wealth taxes on property and Business rates are much easier to impose and less easy to avoid.

This isn't a new phenomenon. I worked for a firm 25 years ago that never paid UK tax. It quite legally avoided it by routing all its contracts and invoices via Switzerland even though the business was operating a large part of its business out of the UK.

breatheslowly · 01/02/2012 12:00

They aren't doing anything illegal, but it is worth considering other retailers that do pay corporation tax in this country. That's if you care and I think it probably is worth caring as the uk relies on corporation tax.

wannaBe · 01/02/2012 11:52

You wouldn't be legally complicit if you paid a tradesman cash instead of by cheque or card. Cas is perfectly legal tender in the UK and the responsibility lies with the tradesperson not the client.

wannaBe · 01/02/2012 11:49

they're not doing anything illegal.

Their head office is not in the UK. Therefore their tax responsibilities are not in the UK. That's how business works.

grubbalo · 01/02/2012 11:48

Well yes sweet you're quite right - it's not the paying in cash that's the problem, but most people know the "cash" price is often cheaper (and I would guess a lot of people ask if paying in cash will be cheaper). By doing so, they are then contributing to the overall problem even if it's the tradesman actually committing the evasion.

SweetTheSting · 01/02/2012 11:44

Ah, thanks for the update re Jersey.

Paying cash to tradesmen is not of itself tax evasion - it just makes it easier for the tradesperson to commit tax evasion. I am not sure what, if any, responsibility the customer has to not pay in cash, or e.g. to only pay in cash if an invoice is given with a VAT registration number on it etc. Ultimately the tax evader is the tradesperson.

Though if they explicitly quote one price for cash and another price for cheques, I guess the customer might have some complicity that could lead to legal action - but I don't know.

grubbalo · 01/02/2012 11:43

Companies never pay 40% tax on their profits - corporation tax is at different rates and companies do lots of things to reduce tax bills!

Basically though Amazon's headquarters is on Luxembourg, so corporation tax is paid there. In the uk, Amazon are a service centre so don't pay corporation tax. They do however contribute via employee taxes, and a not insignificant employer National Insurance contribution.

This is the reason the govt lower corporation tax rates - to encourage businesses to leave headquarters in the uk. Is also why you hear about majorly successful companies like Barclays Bank paying effective tax rates of less than 5%.

Luxembourg dramatically cut corporation tax rates about 6-7 years ago I think to encourage companies to set up their headquarters there. Ireland did similarly actually.

GashInTheAttic · 01/02/2012 11:42

If you have/had a window cleaner bibbity,how do/would you pay him/her?

Just asking.

IUseTooMuchKitchenRoll · 01/02/2012 11:39

Amazon sell all over Europe though don't they?

Why should they choose the UK for their head office if it makes no difference to the service they give and they can make more profit from another country? They are a business, that's what businesses do.

Pinot · 01/02/2012 11:37

I don't really understand Blush They're avoiding paying 40% on their profits?

bibbitybobbityhat · 01/02/2012 11:32

I never pay tradesmen cash in hand.

My dh is self employed but in an industry where he couldn't ask for cash in hand, even if he was tempted to. Tonight we will be typing up invoices for all his employers.

I won't do it on principle.

MaMattoo · 01/02/2012 11:30

Emmmmm apple and amazon are not from a 'developing country'.
And 'foreign aid' is a complex, often misunderstood term - depending on the giver.
Please don't mix the two.

grubbalo · 01/02/2012 11:30

Link re the vat loophole being closed:

www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/budget-to-close-jerseys-hidden-mailorder-vat-loophole-2247764.html

grubbalo · 01/02/2012 11:29

The reasons are explained here

www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/richardfletcher/8745314/Is-the-tax-trap-closing-on-Amazon-eBay-and-Google.html

The vat loophole of sending from jersey etc has already or is in the process of being closed I believe.

While we're on the subject of tax avoidance though - how many people here pay tradesmen etc cash in hand? Because that is proper tax evasion - not even avoidance....

PosieParker · 01/02/2012 11:24

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/_chat/1396755-I-cant-believe-these-people-are-claiming-benefits

I had similar thoughts this am.

helpyourself · 01/02/2012 11:23

Sorry those countries, not companies.

helpyourself · 01/02/2012 11:22

Wow, just wow.

Tax avoided by business in the developing world is about the same as the Foreign Aid sent to those companies.

We're all being really screwed by them.

SweetTheSting · 01/02/2012 11:21

Amazon dispatch their CDs and DVDs from Jersey, I think, presumably this has a lower VAT regime for music and film? I think play.com did the same.

There is no VAT on books, only e-books.

No idea about everything else they sell like toys, think they all come within the UK for VAT.

Gigondas · 01/02/2012 11:19

Yep - but depends on goods and place of supply. Sometimes it's another retailer selling via amazon

Ponders · 01/02/2012 11:18

VAT appears on their invoices, doesn't it?