Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

UK PENSIONERS. A BURDEN ON THE STATE.

111 replies

ivanhoe · 25/08/2011 12:06

It is clear that many of you on this site believe that the UK's elderly people are a burden on the State.

So, what you anti- elderly people are doing is descriminating against basically the old in our society, and our country.

You are saying that our elderly people are unaffordable.

That they must endure a low State pension and means tested handouts.

And while you are descrimating against our elderly people, you are full of yourselves to the point of banality.

I read somewhere recently on the internet, that the people living in the 30's and 40's were more mature and sophisticated than the people living today.

This I can believe.

OP posts:
amerryscot · 29/12/2011 11:09

When the Old Age Pension was set up, it was never intended to be the solo means of support for a pensioner. It was only ever meant to be a safety net. It was expected that a working person would make provisions for their own retirement.

ivanhoe · 29/12/2011 11:06

Since the 80's, Thatcher has made UK pensioners a burden on the State, as charity cases, even though our elderly people have spent a working life paying taxes and NI contrbutions.

I regard this idea of richer pensioners giving their winter fuel payment to poorer pensioners as an abomination, it is a disgrace.

Because what is needed is a Universial asnd substantial increase in the basic State pension, because rich or poor, all pensioners have paid their contributions when working, or if theu havent been working, they have been raising their children, this is contribution enough.

OP posts:
ivanhoe · 29/12/2011 11:01

Cold kills 180 British pensioners a day during winter

Please go to this link and sign this petition on the Government's web site.

epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/19311

All elderly people should receive residential care free, via the State, and a much higher basic State pension free of means testing

Responsible department: Department for Work and Pensions

The Government must fund elderly people's rights to free residential Care paid for by the State because our elderly people have paid into the system all their working lives, and Government must also pay all pensioners now and in the future, a much higher basic state pension by restoring the National Insurance Act born of a Labour Government in 1974 which linked increases in the State pension to male average earnings, or The Retail Price Index ( RPI), whichever the greater. In 1975, the then Labour Government passed the "Social Security Act", introducing a State Earnings Related Pensions Scheme, this was considered in the pensions industry, the most cost effective scheme ever.

Sign this petition, please.

OP posts:
2old2beamum · 20/12/2011 22:06

I did NOT vote this government in and I am furious at the attack on young poor families,single mums etc but all pensioners are not well off. A lot of our friends are in our situation DH and I are 65 & 68 and will have £13000 pa. We still have 2 DC's 6 & 13 (don't ask) at home and we will find it hard yes we still get CTC but no wonderful holidays for us. The winter fuel allowance is very much needed.

EdithWeston · 09/12/2011 21:58

Readers interested in this thread might like to see what pensioners are saying and doing themselves. Try the Saga website.

Rather than just making a noise, they are campaigning about the winter fuel allowance calling on those who don't need it to donate it, into their "recycling" fund, which will then help those in greater need. A small, but practical and laudable step, and one which is much more useful than criticism without an alternative programnme.

If you have elderly relatives who might feel themselves to be in a position to give up their allowance, do send the link on to them.

Ticketybootoo · 09/12/2011 21:48

Frankly unless you are loaded I can;t see why everyone isn't scared of being old and on a low income and potentially dependent on private sector carers that may or may not turn up to look after you.... In our society unless you have some economic worth you are not valued and sadly for me ( who is not going to be loaded in retirement ) that may be the case. In the mean time I will enjoy it as best I can . I come into contact with older people who on a regular basis who are dependent on others and all I can say is someone will need to help us all when we get there...l

eminencegrise · 11/11/2011 13:29

It is not anti-elderly to be of the opinion that 'retirement' should not be 20-30+ years long as standard. Hmm

Because it is becoming patently obvious that no economy can sustain such a model as people live longer and longer. They will have to work longer for less pension, use savings, have a lower standard of living. Just like all the rest of us!

Rosa · 11/11/2011 13:10

The anti elderly ...One day you will be old - I hope you don't starve or freeze in the winter as so many do.

Betelguese · 11/11/2011 13:05

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Betelguese · 11/11/2011 12:54

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

eminencegrise · 11/11/2011 01:25

I agree with Jinx! Absolish the universal bus pass and winter fuel allowance. I have a boomer mate, 60 in February and fit as a fiddle, who is ever gloating about these, on her husband's £26K/annum final salary pension (he will get more once he draws his state one), no mortgage and using the fuel allowance to go on a 5-star mini break whilst I sell things on Ebay to keep my young children warm and you expect sympathy?

She boasts, oh his pension is guaranteed. Does she really think my husband and I, and all our generation, and our children, will slave to pay such a fat pension to someone with no housing costs when the depression that will come arrives and we were are semi-starving and our children go without so she can go on holiday and gloat on Facebook about how she doesn't have to work?

People live longer, they should expect to work longer. 'Pension' was only supposed to be 5 years or so or less and then you died, not live for 20-30+ years playing golf whilst those but 20 years younger toil on knowing they will die standing at their work!

You think that's mean? You've probably never lived in a place where food is scarce.

Abolish all these wastes of money!

But they won't. Because they have boomers voting in governments who think we should pay for them to have a 20+ holiday whilst we know we will drop dead working. And we are not fools. And we are getting very very angry about it all.

Betelguese · 11/11/2011 01:10

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Jinx1906 · 12/10/2011 15:41

Which government attacks single mums and the disabled and who are the elderly people who voted them in?

WibblyBibble · 10/10/2011 20:28

Well, what all you elderly people keep doing is voting in governments who attack us single parents and our young disabled friends. Hardly surprising we don't like you much, is it?

Jinx1906 · 03/10/2011 10:15

I would cancel the bus pass, winter fuel etc.. and pay people a decent pension so they can decide how to spent their money.

Pensioners themselves should be able to decide if they want to spent their money on high fuel bills or a few months in the Canaries and if they wish to travel by bus not the state.

My granddad is lucky enough to have retired on a final salary scheme, he is 92 and still takes of to Spain in January and doesn't return until the end of April. Believe it or not but he actually saves money that way. Go Granddad!

ivanhoe · 26/09/2011 11:37

jkklpu, Since the 80's there has been a reduction in income tax revenue to all local communities UK wide.

While at the same time council tax has increased due to this income tax shortfall re- right wing low income tax trickle down economics.

Politically this "shift" in tax policy represents a devolution of the role of the state, putting onus on local taxes to fund local services more and more.

The Tory lead coalition are continung this devolution of the role of the state in favour of privcatisation and charities.

The is comically refered to as David Cameron's big society.

When in reality David Cameron's Tory's are taking us back to victorianised Britain, thanks to Nick Clegg.

OP posts:
jkklpu · 03/09/2011 19:08

Ivanhoe - Against my better judgement, will try to engage you on something you've said as fact: it's rubbish to say that most local services are paid for by local taxes. See Directgov:
"Local government spending is about a quarter of all public spending in the UK. Local authorities are funded by a combination of grants from central government, Council Tax and business rates."
And there's more here explaining that Council Tax provides about a quarter of Council funding.

But, judging from your attitude on this and other threads, this is probably just a great falsehood perpetrated by someone sinister and you will be right anyway.

scaryteacher · 03/09/2011 15:31

My Mum too Solo, so we help her out where she lets us do so. My fil is almost 80 so he has two final salary pensions plus state pension, and he was careful with his money and saved and invested. Good on him that he did; early retirement planning evidently works!

Solo · 01/09/2011 19:39

Scary, my Mum has a little over a quarter of that :(

EdwardorEricCantDecide · 30/08/2011 14:11

Our generation and younger will be fucked because we can't afford a house AND a pension even on average salary the retirement age will no doubt be raised several times if not scrapped entirely so it's likely the state pension will be even worse or won't exist, because people are living longer therefore it's just not affordable to pay a state pension when you're likely to live on another 30 or even 40 years!
On top of that my generation are unlikely to benefit from house price or share price booms!
Only the very rich from the generation below me will be able to go to university making social mobility much less likely.
Even private/company pensions now aren't worth very much!

I am 25yo btw

scaryteacher · 30/08/2011 10:25

I had occasion to go through my pils finances for IHT planning late last year, as pil has terminal cancer. I was astounded at the amount pil receives in pensions (both state and employers), it is about £40k plus per year net. Not all pensioners are hard up at all, and thanks to saving and investing in an employers pension, my pils have a good income.

ivanhoe · 25/08/2011 22:11

But seriously, my gps are in their mid 80s. My gd is fighting fit and walks the dog daily, has lots of little hobbies and the garden. My gm is in constant pain from osteo-arthritus, is getting increasingly immobile and is very frustrated and sad about it.

However, far from being poverty stricken, they have a good life all in all. Too young to be called up in WW2, they were given fantastic council housing when they started their family which they remained in until nearly retirement age. Then then exercised their right to buy under the Thatcher govt and benefitted from rising house prices. This gave them enough profit when they sold up on retirement to buy a smaller house OUTRIGHT.

They only had a modest income, but have managed fine the last 20 years on their state pension/savings. The council has offered to put in a stair lift/wetroom. They benefit from free transport, free prescriptions etc etc
I am sure that there are many WORSE off, but there will also be many better off - they are a purely average couple.

They don't NEED more cash - more community support maybe - but not money taken from others to suit this cause.

It is MY and younger generations I worry about. We will be fucked./////

Just how will your generation be fxcked ?

OP posts:
Portofino · 25/08/2011 17:34

But seriously, my gps are in their mid 80s. My gd is fighting fit and walks the dog daily, has lots of little hobbies and the garden. My gm is in constant pain from osteo-arthritus, is getting increasingly immobile and is very frustrated and sad about it.

However, far from being poverty stricken, they have a good life all in all. Too young to be called up in WW2, they were given fantastic council housing when they started their family which they remained in until nearly retirement age. Then then exercised their right to buy under the Thatcher govt and benefitted from rising house prices. This gave them enough profit when they sold up on retirement to buy a smaller house OUTRIGHT.

They only had a modest income, but have managed fine the last 20 years on their state pension/savings. The council has offered to put in a stair lift/wetroom. They benefit from free transport, free prescriptions etc etc
I am sure that there are many WORSE off, but there will also be many better off - they are a purely average couple.

They don't NEED more cash - more community support maybe - but not money taken from others to suit this cause.

It is MY and younger generations I worry about. We will be fucked.

2shoes · 25/08/2011 17:22

would it be bad form to start a thread saying the op is a drain on mumsnet?

Portofino · 25/08/2011 17:20

Personally I think I might prefer to be turned into sausages or something when I get past my sell by date, than clutter up the planet whilst the pills keep me going. I reserve my right to feel differently about this in 40 years. Grin