Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Caroline Lucas’ bill fights taxdodging - another alternative to harmful public spending cuts

53 replies

ttosca · 09/06/2011 23:47

Caroline?s new Tax and Financial Transparency Bill, which could help the UK recover billions of pounds of lost tax by forcing companies to be more transparent in their accounting, is on the agenda for debate in Parliament on Friday (10 June).

The Bill, launched by the Brighton Pavilion MP in March this year, is due for its second reading in the House of Commons ? and will also feature on BBC Radio 4′s Decision Time programme tonight.

The Green MP launched her campaign after posing a number of Parliamentary Questions to the Chancellor, in which she exposed the fact that H M Revenue & Customs is failing to prevent serious tax evasion which could amount to as much as £16 billion in lost tax.

A report published by Tax Research UK in March revealed that around 500,000 companies ?disappeared? from the UK?s Register of Companies in the year to March 2010 ? with billions being lost to the Exchequer as a result.

Caroline believes that urgent measures are needed to stop companies that are formally dissolved from trading fraudulently, thereby undermining honest businesses who do pay their taxes.

She is also calling for a requirement on multinational companies to publish information on where they make their sales, record their profits and pay their taxes, in order to ensure that corporations make a fair and proper contribution to society.

Caroline said: ?The first aim of this Bill is to tackle the scandalous reality that around 500,000 companies every year appear not to be paying tax in the UK.

?Tax Research UK estimate that regulatory failures by H M Revenue & Customs and Companies House mean that around 500,000 companies a year fail to pay their tax or file their accounts.

?A great many are simply struck off the Register of Companies as a result, never to be heard of again. It is thought that up to £16 billion of tax a year might be lost to the country as a result.

?This Bill would ensure that banks have to provide details on all accounts they maintain for companies operating in the UK so that H M Revenue & Customs and Companies House can chase those companies who do not file the returns they?re obliged to make for the missing information ? and the tax they owe.?

She continued: ?Secondly, the bill would force companies to ?publish what tax they pay?, requiring all companies filing accounts in the UK to include a statement on the turnover, pre-tax profit, tax charge and actual tax paid for each country in which they operate, without exception.

?If they only trade in the UK, this has no impact on them. This information would, however, mean that the answers to the questions asked of Barclays Bank earlier this year about where it earned its profits, how much profit was recorded in tax havens, and where it paid its taxes could be answered for all companies trading internationally.?

The Brighton Pavilion MP added: ?This information is vital if we are to ensure that multinational corporations make a fair and proper contribution to our society.

?Companies cannot opt out of corporate social responsibility ? and paying tax to the country that provides them with their opportunities to trade is an essential part of it. You can?t be socially responsible and accountable unless you say where you are and what you do in each place that you trade.?

brightgreenscotland.org/index.php/2011/06/caroline-lucas-bill-fights-taxdodging/

OP posts:
claig · 11/06/2011 14:45

'So why aren't the usual suspects excited about a new method of reducing the deficit?'

Good question. I am also wondering where Newwave, HHLimbo and the rest of the usual suspects are.

Mellowfruitfulness · 11/06/2011 10:15

Just seen this, ttosca - very interested!

I don't think this has been widely publicised (but I've been very busy, so maybe I missed it).

Do you know what happened on Friday? If I get a chance today I shall try to find out.

It's about time, isn't it? The thing that strikes me, again and again, is that we all know what needs to be done, but there is a brick wall of vested interests that nothing seems to be able to shake. Governments remain pathetically attached to the idea that - in spite of decades of evidence to the contrary - wealth eventually trickles down. It doesn't - certainly not if companies are left to their own devices. It stays at the top unless governments force big banks and global companies to be more socially responsible and share it.

We need people who are good at making money in society - as long as they acknowledge the fact that they owe it to the rest of us to share their wealth. After all they have benefitted from being part of a society that has been created by the rest of us obeying the law and paying our taxes. They have also benefitted from us voting in governments that have allowed them to feather their own nests at our expense.

The logical conclusion of the monumental greed and selfishness shown by the banks and most of the people at the top of huge companies, is indeed survival of the fittest. They will survive and we will go under, unless we vote for a government that will force them to share.

ttosca · 11/06/2011 02:10

So? No one's interested in this?

We have a deficit problem, right? So why aren't the usual suspects excited about a new method of reducing the deficit which will reduce the need to cut public spending?

OP posts: