Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

How very Tory

138 replies

newwave · 15/02/2011 23:20

CUT & PASTE

Francis Maude, multi-millionaire ex-banker, took thousands of pounds from the public purse when he rented out the Westminster house he owns and bought another one a hundred yards away so that he could claim the mortgage payments on his MPs expenses and get everyone else to buy him another home to add to the four he already had.

That's how much this greedy despicable hypocrite cared about the deficit when he was sucking up public money for himself.
Then is wasn't so much Big Society as Pig Society, with piggy-eyed Francis Maude with his snout in the trough.

How was he punished for his greed? Cameron promoted him.
David Cameron and Francis Maude: 'All In It Together'.
Right up to their effing necks.

He should be in the nick with every other cheating bastard of whatever party

OP posts:
claig · 17/02/2011 11:17

'Of course, what I should really be doing is voting for the good of the country..not myself.'

Deciduousblonde, that's why I vote Conservative. I vote for the good of the country, because that is also for the good of myself. What happens to the country, matters to me too, which is not the case for Islingtonistas. Ordinary people are the country, what's good for the country is good for us, "we are all in it together" apart from the Islingtonistas.

georgeorwell · 17/02/2011 11:15

i am working class claig you obv are not and you don't seem to accept the fact that some of us know when the piss is being taken.

how wonderful though of you to mention Gramsci. he is one of the reasons i made italy my home. whereas you're more of an admirer of Machiavelli evidentemente.

peace and love.

georgeorwell · 17/02/2011 11:11

claig "hope lies with the proles". yeah and look what happened to Winston Smith. (reread 1984 if his name doesn't ring any bells).

i hear you re. condescending attitudes to "chavs" which i reckon to be one of the most offensive terms bandied around at present but was certainly not invented by a groniad journo. the rags most down on the poor are those rags mentioned previously (mail, sun etc). the sun is the most insidious and particularly awful as it pretends to be mates with the working clases while it systematically supports parties that shaft them. (whoever uncle Rupe tells them to support).

my mum's family is working class and my nan always read the mirror. thank fuk she was dead when piers bloody morgan took over.

and intellectual non working class left wingers have always existed and are vital (pace george orwell, marx, ENGELS blah blah) and are an essenial component in any imminent revolution!

Deciduousblonde · 17/02/2011 11:10

Thing is georgeorwell, I was screwed the most under New Labour. Never been so 'poor' as I was in the last 13 years.

As Labour & Tory have a very fine line between them there really isn't anywhere for me to go IF I were to vote according to my own circumstances.

Of course, what I should really be doing is voting for the good of the country..not myself.

claig · 17/02/2011 11:01

But, georgeorwell, you probably like the communist revolutionaries, the rabble rousers. But they also are middle class charlatans, theorists who read Gramsci, Trotsky, Marx and Lenin. They are spongers who feed off the working class and then mistreat them terribly if they ever get into power.

There is a reason that the working class buy the Sun and the Daily Mail, and not the Morning Star. It's not because they are stupid, it's becasue they have a nose for Bolshevik bullshit.

not1not2 · 17/02/2011 10:56

PMSL at pig society Grin

claig · 17/02/2011 10:55

rabbitstew, you are right, saying that the Daily Mail is the truth is a bit too much. I think it is more accurate to say it is nearer the truth.

rabbitstew · 17/02/2011 10:50

claig - do you really think the Daily Mail tells "the truth"?

georgeorwell · 17/02/2011 10:49

jeez claig i'm not a new labour supporter or groniad reader. quit with the bipolarisms!

new labour is not a leftwing party and stopped serving the working classes' interests decades ago. and the groniad is not affiliated to labour anyway i think you'll find.

georgeorwell · 17/02/2011 10:46

no, as a middle earner you're screwed by the tories first and foremost as they are now the electorate of new labour.

claig · 17/02/2011 10:45

But georgeorwell, that is that attitude of so many of the public school educated Oxbridge Guardian journalists. They look down on the working classes, as complimentary showed. They think they know what is best for the working classes, and they are the ones who think that aspiration is "bollox", as they sit in their cushy jobs pontificating on the working classes, after having been educated at Oxbridge.

It is those parvenus and arrivistes who think the working class is thick and "duped". Have they ever been in a working class pub and listened to ordinary people? If they had, then they wouldn't look down their noses at the working class. It was teh working class that voted Thatcher in, because they longed for and aspired for the hope that she offered. It is good working class lifelong Labour supporters like Mrs. Duffy who are called bigots by the professional intelligentsia of the Labour Party. It is Prescott who says "we are all middle class now". They don't care about teh working class, they just use them and dupe them. It is the working class who buy the Sun and many also buy the Daily Mail. That's what angers the Oxbridge educated arrivistes on the Guardian, they fear that they won't be able to fool the working class any longer.

As complimentary pointed out, this Oxbridge educated elite despises the working class, thinks they are all bigots, and thinks they should forget about aspiration and know their place. They think they are stupid, but the great George Orwell knew different. As he said, "hope lies with the proles".

Deciduousblonde · 17/02/2011 10:35

Heck, what do I know? as a middle earner I get screwed by both of them.

Too 'rich' to get the perks help from the governments and too poor to be really comfortable.

It really isn't worth me voting if I just think of myself, is it?

rabbitstew · 17/02/2011 10:35

Since when can you say opinion is "the truth"? All newspapers spout their own opinions, picking and choosing the facts that support their opinions and ignoring the inconvenient details that get in the way of a good, provocative story.

georgeorwell · 17/02/2011 10:31

deciduousblonde to elaborate i meant if you're not rich it's illogical if not downright masochistic to be a tory as they exist solely to advance the interests of the moneyed classes at the expense of the non rich. period. and anyone duped by their aspirational bollox is just plain deluded.

claig · 17/02/2011 10:25

and QueenBathsheba, it is certainly not bipolar to read both the Guardian and the Daily Mail. Your are reading one to see the lies, and the other to read the truth. Complimentary has given a concise explanation of which is which.

georgeorwell · 17/02/2011 10:24

the torygraph is hardly respectful of the working classes though is it comp?

claig · 17/02/2011 10:21

complimentary, thank you for your input on the Guardian. it's about time someone told the truth. Wine

complimentary · 17/02/2011 10:06

Guardian.

complimentary · 17/02/2011 10:05

Inability to understand the words in the Gaurdian?. I don't need to understand the terminology in this old rag.
All I need to know is that it calls itself the most 'Liberal paper in the world'. Most if not all Guardian readers live in affluent areas Primrose Hill, Muswell Hill etc; they look down their snouts at those "awful working class people in council estates, who are racist, thick and ignorant". Whilst supping cappucinos at the local cafe/starbucks. They sneer at the working classes for being worried about mass immigration whilst ensconcing themsleves in white middle class areas. Cameron a 'Liberal Conservative' (according to him) bypassed 15 schools near downing street, so that he could get his daughter into a oversubscribed state schooL. His nearest school the first language of the children was Arabic. Georgeorwell I have nothing against individual people who read the Guardian, but the paper stinks of hypocrisy and so do a lot of the readers! GrinIncluding Cameron!

Deciduousblonde · 17/02/2011 09:39

if you could do with a few bob you shouldn't be a tory supporter btw

Confused
complimentary · 17/02/2011 09:37

Newwave. For your comments about my lovely newspaper, I would say I would hit you around the head with copies of the Guardian!!Grin
But unfortunately I can't find enough of them at the local post office!

You could metaphorically beat me to death with the circulation of the Mail!Grin

p.s. Bet your local newsagents sells loads of my favourite paper, just rushing out to get a copy!!Before they are snapped up.

Have a nice day! Smile

georgeorwell · 17/02/2011 09:36

who's looking for a fight comp? and here was me thinking i could enter into some reasoned debate on here as opposed to factions sniping at each other.

what's all this guardian hate about? i don't read it except online occasionally but i often suspect the antipathy towards it is motivated by envy at its erudite, pithy pitch (charlie brooker par example) and an inability to understand all the words.

Queen yes it does!

QueenBathsheba · 17/02/2011 09:09

I read both that must make be bi-polar Grin

newwave · 16/02/2011 23:41

The Daily Mail, the only toilet paper that comes with the shit already in it :)

The Guardian is for people who want their opinions to be informed not manipulated.

OP posts:
complimentary · 16/02/2011 22:48

georgeorwell. I read all the good papers the Daily Mail, Telegraph, Times, and the Sun (my husband likes the boobs on page 3). The only paper I don't buy is a filthy North London rag called the Guardian, I don't like papers that sneer at the working classes, that are pretentious, cowardly, some of those people who buy it are Libtards who think they are better then the general population.

No, my local newsagent sells at least 5 copies of the Guardian daily! I suppose that's about right with it's daily circulation of 285.000.
The Mail has a circulation of 2.4 million and half the readers are women, so yes, it's my preferred paper, with others.
My favourite magazine is 'Nuts'. Even if it's aimed at men! It's so sexist it's a right laugh isn't it! Grin

Let's put it like this Mr or Mrs Georgeorwell if you are looking for a fight, you will certainly find it on here! PS I don't support the Tories, never have.