Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

When will the BBC be held accountable for their lack of patriotism

559 replies

longfingernails · 01/12/2010 22:59

Why does this far-left propoganda group continually try to do Britain down?

Why can't they have more presenters who think like the majority of Brits - people who believe that Britain is truly great - indeed, the best country in the world.

People who believe in our institutions, who love the monarchy, who revere the military, who speak in hushed awe about the majesty of our traditions. Presenters who are over-awed by the silent beauty of our countryside, and the glory of our heritage and history. Why do they always use their sneering, supercilious, Guardianista attitude - this constant insinuation that Britain should always be taking the blame and apologising. Coincidentally, it seems to stem from the same sort of sneering middle-classery that is prevalent on MN...

The most recent, shameful episode is the Beeb trying their best to spoil the England 2018 bid. Now I have no time at all for football - I can't stand it - but I fully recognise how important it is for our economy, and also for our national psyche.

The sooner the BBC withers and dies the better. Sadly, it has gotten away with a miniscule 16% cut in the TV tax over 6 years. They will continue their ramblings for the foreseeable future.

OP posts:
Appletrees · 06/12/2010 09:07

They are less normal. Being so outside of the norm allows us to isolate them and join to exclude them as pert of a society.. most criminals justify their crime, I was poor, she asked for it, he provoked me. They thereforel appeal to a sense of "good", reasoning, and acceptability within society. They acknowledge that social sense and the moral imperative, even if they break it.

Hullygully · 06/12/2010 09:03

And claig, sadly, just because you repeat a thing over and over, it doesn't get to be true.

claig · 06/12/2010 09:03

AppleTrees, you are right. I don't need to, it detracts from the argument.

Hullygully · 06/12/2010 09:03

Could you explain what God wanted? I have always found there to be quite contradictory interpretations. Which do you hold to be true and why?

claig · 06/12/2010 09:02

Hully, yes, a mother's live is biological, ot is hard-wired, in the genes i.e. it is natural, it is as nature intended, and lions and tigers and birds have the same instinct. It is universal, because it comes from God.

Yes, there are pickpockets and thieves and vultures, but they are in the minority, just like Mao. The natural majority tendency is good, the minority is evil.

TheCoalitionNeedsYou · 06/12/2010 09:02

Appletrees - But those bad things I mention above are as natural as the positive things we can do. Culture and civilisation are ways of reducing those negative behaviours.

We can see what happens in places where civilisation and civil society have broken down.

Society that benefit the WHOLE of society are not a particularly natural human behaviour - many societies benefit only small parts of that society.

Appletrees · 06/12/2010 09:02

Craig: you rely too much on your Christianity as a cogent force of argument when you don't need to, and when non Christians will always dismiss your premise and therefore your reasoning.

Appletrees · 06/12/2010 09:00

Nature is amoral though.. you have defined love as "good" which assumes there is an outside absolute "good". That's a human or divine creation. Love for offspring is practical and of survival.

claig · 06/12/2010 08:59

exactly, AppleTrees, we naturally create our societies. Our human spirit creates societies that allow humanity and the human spirit to flourish. We are naturally repelled by evil and we create laws to lock up evil criminals and to punish their evil acts. We naturally crave justice, because the human spirit is good and just, and because God is good and just.

Hullygully · 06/12/2010 08:59

Or had they perhaps all read the Thoughts of Chairman Mao?

Hullygully · 06/12/2010 08:59

A mother's love for her child is natural and instinctive

It's biological.

Claig, I hate to rain on your humans are love parade, but pickpocketing, looting and thieving is one of the biggest headaches for emergency staff at disaster incidents like the tube bombings, Madrid train bomb etc etc ad infinitum

claig · 06/12/2010 08:56

Nature is not amoral. A mother's love for her child is natural and instinctive and is not amoral. People naturally help those in need, they don't go around stabbing everyone in the back, unless they are Stalin.

Appletrees · 06/12/2010 08:55

Society does not enable us to transcend nature. Or society would be an unnatural thing. To create a society maximizing benefit to society is natural, or it wouldn't happen. Society didn't happen by magic, or by an outside force. We create them. It is in our nature.

claig · 06/12/2010 08:54

Do you believe in evidence-based research, like the evidence-based research on "climate science", carried out at the University of East Anglia. Sometimes evidence-based research is just politically-based research.

I am sure that Mao had a lot of evidence-based researchers supporting his evil system.

There is good and evil in nature, and it is a battle, but eventually good defeats evil and Mao's system crumbles.

An example of the natural tendency to goodness is :

if a man is run over by a bus in the street, people rush to help him and save him. It is a natural instinct, there is no time for thought. People don't rush to rob his pockets, except, possibly, Maoists.

Hullygully · 06/12/2010 08:51

claig - are you quite mad?

against nature and against God

Nature is amoral.

And

Could you explain what God wanted? I have always found there to be quite contradictory interpretations. Which do you hold to be true and why?

TheCoalitionNeedsYou · 06/12/2010 08:49

Because otherwise you seem to be saying, "It's nice to be nice. Aren't people nice? Yes they are. Lovely."

You're basically using the contents of your head as evidence again.

TheCoalitionNeedsYou · 06/12/2010 08:47

Claig - plesase can you reference some research showing the humans races natural tendancy to goodness in the absence of cultural or societal restraint.

claig · 06/12/2010 08:37

'So stealing, infidelity, rape and murder are all good? All these things are natural.'

They are not natural. They are like Mao, they are evil and they happen less than love, respect, help and friendship, except in a society like Mao's.

claig · 06/12/2010 08:34

Mao was horrid to people because he believed in a horrid philosophy which was against nature and against God. He thought he was superior to the people he ruled over. He killed millions to create his vision of what was worthwhile.

TheCoalitionNeedsYou · 06/12/2010 08:32

So stealing, infidelity, rape and murder are all good? All these things are natural.

Hullygully · 06/12/2010 08:30

why oh why?

Mao's failure might also have had something to do with the fact that he was a bit horrid to an awful lot of people.

claig · 06/12/2010 08:28

and Chairman Mao's society of course was Godless, since communists like him outlaw religion. Mao was a representation of the transcendence of man over God and nature. His system was unnatural and bad, and that is why it had to fail and eventually China will be free, because that is what the human spirit works towards. That is natural, that is good.

claig · 06/12/2010 08:22

Because nature was created by God, and God is good. Chairman Mao's society transcended human nature and it was bad.

TheCoalitionNeedsYou · 06/12/2010 08:13

Claig - why does something being natural make it good? The whole point of the culture and society thing is to allow us to transcend our natures.

claig · 06/12/2010 06:56

Do you think that the patriotic words in the Scottish National Anthem, 'Flower of Scotland', are propaganda lines. Don't you understand the feeling behind those words? Do those words leave you cold? Don't you understand the sentiment of the person who wrote those words? The sentiment is patriotism and it is human and it is feeling.
The feeling is love and it is what separates living beings from stones.