Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

When will the BBC be held accountable for their lack of patriotism

559 replies

longfingernails · 01/12/2010 22:59

Why does this far-left propoganda group continually try to do Britain down?

Why can't they have more presenters who think like the majority of Brits - people who believe that Britain is truly great - indeed, the best country in the world.

People who believe in our institutions, who love the monarchy, who revere the military, who speak in hushed awe about the majesty of our traditions. Presenters who are over-awed by the silent beauty of our countryside, and the glory of our heritage and history. Why do they always use their sneering, supercilious, Guardianista attitude - this constant insinuation that Britain should always be taking the blame and apologising. Coincidentally, it seems to stem from the same sort of sneering middle-classery that is prevalent on MN...

The most recent, shameful episode is the Beeb trying their best to spoil the England 2018 bid. Now I have no time at all for football - I can't stand it - but I fully recognise how important it is for our economy, and also for our national psyche.

The sooner the BBC withers and dies the better. Sadly, it has gotten away with a miniscule 16% cut in the TV tax over 6 years. They will continue their ramblings for the foreseeable future.

OP posts:
slug · 03/12/2010 15:41

Roger McGough CBE. Quite well known actually. Hardly a "so called poet" and quite proud of his working class roots.

sfxmum · 03/12/2010 14:10

my word is the OP for real?
(probably should have read the entire thread but the OP makes me feel queasy, do you really believe the vast majority of people hold those views?

nothing wrong with having pride in the country and wishing it to do well

but love the monarchy? why?
revere the military? by all means train and pay them well respect them at the same time as you scrutinize, but revere? seriously?
far-left propaganda group? they could not be more establishment if they tried

spoil the bid? by exposing corruption? and why would it be a good thing to host it?

other than provide empty 'glory' while distracting from real problems?

TheCoalitionNeedsYou · 03/12/2010 14:01

Alan Moore is probably the UK's best known ceremonial magician and worshiper of Glycon.

TheCoalitionNeedsYou · 03/12/2010 13:58

I loved that poem when I was kid.

claig · 03/12/2010 13:36

'who is Alan Moore?'

is he Roger Moore's brother?

claig · 03/12/2010 13:23

who is Alan Moore?

Another objectionable poem from that poet. He is without feeling for people, he despises them and calls them "vandals" and "hooligans", just as he called the patriots "nuts".

Was this poem published in a Bolshevik journal, because it is again indicative of these butchers disdain for humanity?

In fact it is very similar to the lesson taught to the children in the 1010 global warming advert "No Pressure". There is a similar disdain for people, who get blown up if they don't agree wholeheartedly with reducing carbon emissions. I wonder if the global warming advert people are also left wing?

TheCoalitionNeedsYou · 03/12/2010 13:05

Your all a bunch of uneducated philistines who don't even know who Alan Moore is.

TheCoalitionNeedsYou · 03/12/2010 13:04

sigh

The Lesson by Roger McGough.

Chaos ruled OK in the classroom
as bravely the teacher walked in
the nooligans ignored him
hid voice was lost in the din

"The theme for today is violence
and homework will be set
I'm going to teach you a lesson
one that you'll never forget"

He picked on a boy who was shouting
and throttled him then and there
then garrotted the girl behind him
(the one with grotty hair)

Then sword in hand he hacked his way
between the chattering rows
"First come, first severed" he declared
"fingers, feet or toes"

He threw the sword at a latecomer
it struck with deadly aim
then pulling out a shotgun
he continued with his game

The first blast cleared the backrow
(where those who skive hang out)
they collapsed like rubber dinghies
when the plug's pulled out

"Please may I leave the room sir?"
a trembling vandal enquired
"Of course you may" said teacher
put the gun to his temple and fired

The Head popped a head round the doorway
to see why a din was being made
nodded understandingly
then tossed in a grenade

And when the ammo was well spent
with blood on every chair
Silence shuffled forward
with its hands up in the air

The teacher surveyed the carnage
the dying and the dead
He waggled a finger severely
"Now let that be a lesson" he said

LoremIpsum · 03/12/2010 12:49

Cross post, Claig. It reads differently with the extra lines and title.

DanZZZenAroundTheTreeAgain · 03/12/2010 12:48

supposed to read" sycophantic" ...

DanZZZenAroundTheTreeAgain · 03/12/2010 12:48

BBC is great
I see no reason for anyone to "love the monarchy", if they do, good for them and if they don't, why should they act like a bunch of syophantic clowns at a 17th century court? People love the monarchy and that's fine IMO. I don't - which I think in a modern democracy is also fine personally.

That the media should have to "love the monarchy" is frankly bizarre to my ears.

LoremIpsum · 03/12/2010 12:47

Don't know who the poet is, TCNY. Profoundly ignorant of any subtext or history behind it. On reading it without any knowledge it says, to me, life is good, dying in war is bad. That's not sneery to me.

claig · 03/12/2010 12:46

thanks GothAneeGeddes. But do read the other great responses too. Wink

LoremIpsum, the title of the poem is
'Why patriots are a bit nuts in the head", it is not mourning, it is not respectful of soldiers who died, it thinks they are nuts and stupid and wear rose-tinted spectacles, which the poet is too clever to wear. While these soldiers die on a foreign field for the sake of their country and people, the poet thinks of getting his end away. The poet doesn't even have respect for peasants (which doesn't surprise me of 'International Socialism'). The poet says

But you can't do this
if you have your belly shot away
and your seeds spread out over some corner
of a foreign field
to facilitate
in later years
the growing of oats
by some peasant yobbo

The use of the word 'yobbo' is significant. The poet is no peasant yobbo, he is probably am intellectual champagne socialist who has never got his hands dirty or sacrificed himself for a greater cause. He is just a selfish person who wants the pleasure of eating and drinking and getting his end away, while other young soldiers die for a cause greater than themselves and sacrifice themselves unselfishly whilst this sneering, selfish individual calls them nuts as he eats and drinks his heart out.

He doesn't honour their sacrifice or praise their courage. No, he thinks the sacrifice of these "nuts" only facilitates the growing of oats for a peasant yobbo. He doesn't mourn them, he won't say a prayer for them, because, to him, they are just "nuts".

TheFeministParent · 03/12/2010 12:45

I love the beeb, informative, unbiased and quality. Keep it state, ffs.

earwicga · 03/12/2010 12:42

Really funny OP. Needed the laugh it gave me after reading Frank cunting Field's new rubbish. Cheers :)

TheCoalitionNeedsYou · 03/12/2010 12:40

We should not forget that this same so called poet has advocated the mass murder of school children.

LoremIpsum · 03/12/2010 12:29

That poem is not sneering IMO, Claig. It's mourning a life cut short. It's not very good, again IMO, but I don't read sneering into it.

GothAnneGeddes · 03/12/2010 12:21

Can we send our football yobs to Siberia?

Yes, that's why the world cup in 2018 will be in Russia.

Claig, I've not agreed with much you've written here, but that was a great response.

claig · 03/12/2010 11:25

that nasty poem on a Marxist website, published in 'International Socialism' illustrates what I have said. The poem mocks patriotic soldiers who die fighting for their country and who sacrifice their lives for their people. The sneering, self-satisfied, supercilious tone is clear when the poet says

'Lives are good for you.
When you are alive
you can eat and drink a lot
and go out with girls
(sometimes
if you are lucky
you can even go to bed with them)
But you can't do this
if you have your belly shot away
and your seeds spread out over some corner
of a foreign field'

The poem doesn't understand patriotism, it mocks the sacrifice of soldiers who are patriotic, it thinks they are "nuts". Lucky for the poet that the majority are patriotic and will defend their country and sacrifice their lives for people who mock them. It is due to these patriots that the country remains free and that conscientious objectors don't have to sacrifice their lives.

I'm not surprised that 'International Socialism' thought it was a good poem to print. I bet some of the Marxists felt smug as they sneered at the patriots. They don't believe in patriotism or liberty because they are international socialists.

slug · 03/12/2010 10:53

OK doing links on the iPad is not easy.

Rodger McGough

slug · 03/12/2010 10:51

[http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/isj/1967/no029/mcgough.htm why patriots are all nuts in the head]

TheCoalitionNeedsYou · 03/12/2010 10:14

Not all Animal Rights protestors are loons, but some of our finest loons are Animal Rights protestors.

The World Cup is in Russia because the russian football hooligans greatly admire this countries history of football violence and want to fight are hooligans.

(This is partly true. I know someone who lives in Russia who got talking to someone in the playground who had translated the autobiography of the leader of one of the british Firms into Russian. )

sarah293 · 03/12/2010 09:25

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

claig · 03/12/2010 09:24

Can we send our football yobs to Siberia?

Yes, that's why the world cup in 2018 will be in Russia.

sarah293 · 03/12/2010 09:21

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Swipe left for the next trending thread