Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Police endanger the lives of students, schoolchildren and others on 24th Nov. Tuition Fees Demonstration

195 replies

dotnet · 25/11/2010 14:46

At the London demo, police 'kettled' the demonstrators mid-afternoon, just as many people were wanting to leave.
The police showed contempt to the schoolchildren, students, parents and lecturers. They lied to them repeatedly; when someone asked how they could get out of the confinement area, they'd indicate a police cordon opposite, or at the other end of the area,even though none existed - the plods at every exit were barring the way, riot shields in hand, making a 'wall.' No exits were opened from mid-afternoon until about 6.30, and all this time, many- probably most - of those present simply wanted to leave the area, having made their point.
There were thousands of people in a confined space, and nearly all of the kids' behaviour was exemplary despite the utter frustration of being penned up against their will. I even saw some sixth formers (or younger) doing the Hokey Cokey. Bless! - they deserved better treatment than they got.
TWO Portaloos were brought in, and no food or water. A relative of mine came down Whitehall to ask why on earth I had been trapped, and again - was met with lies. 'All the demonstrators can leave whenever they want' she was told. 'Well, if that is so, why is no-one leaving?' she asked. 'It's because they're happy where they are' lied the plod.
Should the police not be charged with False Imprisonment? If I locked someone in my house against their will, that would be the charge I would have to face. Yet the police think it is perfectly fine to coop up thousands of young people and to lie that that is where they want to be, closing their ears to the repeated chant of 'let us leave, let us leave.'
Or perhaps reckless endangerment to life would fit the bill. It was an idiotic, dangerous and thoroughly irresponsible decision by the Head of the Metropolitan Police (I suppose)to concur with the way his force operated yesterday. People have been crushed to death in similar oonfined spaces (remember that terrible football stadium tragedy?)
Those young demonstrators are people's loved children. Shocking that the Metropolitan Police force is filled with such contempt for young life and limb.

OP posts:
moondog · 27/11/2010 17:33

My parents contributed to 1st, then there was actually a 2nd for which I didn't get much at all as cocked up the 1st, so I happily worked 3 days a week for duration of course (and still easily managed a 2:1).

For the third, I won a very generous scholarship as it was vocational training. For this last one, I paid.

The idea that a hefty slice of the population is entitled to a university education is madness. It is elitist, that's the whole bloody point.

grannieonabike · 27/11/2010 17:28

Moondog - I think you've already answered my question, actually. I would object to 'spolit whingers with an unwarranted sense of entitlement' too. I just don't know any.

grannieonabike · 27/11/2010 17:25

What has struck me from reading some posts on here is how hostile some people feel towards students. I don't understand why. To me that's like feeling hostile towards shop-keepers or nursery nurses. Why single out a section of society like this? Were they bitten by a rabid chemistry student once or something?

NormaStanleyFletcher · 27/11/2010 17:25

Moondog - Genuine question - what about the other two university courses? Did you have to pay for them too?

moondog · 27/11/2010 17:16

I didn't realise we were arguing.
You express an opinion and I express another.
Just because I don't agree with what you say doesn't mean that I don't read it and consider it.

I'm not the one calling people 'dim' aand 'bitter' either. It amuses me no end but it is one which does not endear me to the arguments voiced here.

Kaloki · 27/11/2010 17:15

And before anyone says I'm against the students, if I'd been aware of the last protest I'd have gone myself. Walking stick and all.

Kaloki · 27/11/2010 17:14

The problem is dotnet, the protest before did involve violence, they had no way of knowing that it wouldn't go that way again.

In an ideal world the hooligans wouldn't hijack peaceful protests for their own means, or if they did, they would be easily identifiable so they could be removed. In that ideal world the police could stay away. No one would get hurt, scared or have their property damaged (on both sides)

But while those idiots are still there, the police have to be prepared for the worst, because the alternative is being blamed for sitting back and doing nothing.

Blaming the police, although I can see the reasons, is missing the point. In the same way that blaming the students is missing the point. It is neither of those parties faults. It's the rioters that turn up to these events that are at fault.

Kettling isn't ideal, no, but in all honesty, how many other methods are there available bearing in mind they were aware that there was a high chance there were rioters in amongst the students?

Have to say as well, leaving the van there as bait? Even if this was the case it didn't mean anyone had to vandalise it.

grannieonabike · 27/11/2010 17:05

OK Moondog, can I suggest a truce? How about we discuss the issues, express our views reasonably and give eachother's opiniona the consideration they deserve? I'd be up for that.

Btw, I'm being genuine. I really want to know how we can resolve this difficult situation. It's important to take different opinions into account, imo.

moondog · 27/11/2010 17:02

I've just paid £££££ for my recently completed MSc. Was very happy to do so too.

NormaStanleyFletcher · 27/11/2010 17:02

Did you have to pay fees Moondog?

moondog · 27/11/2010 16:54

I don't find men or teenagers or old people offensive. I am a very happily married privileged person with an impeccable education (having attended a trio of excellent universities.)
I object to spolit whingers with an unwarranted sense of entitlement.

Oh, and holier than thou earnest types like you lot.

grannieonabike · 27/11/2010 16:51

Moondog, still don't understand what you (and others) find so offensive about teenagers. Do you also hate old people? Men?

If there's anything wrong with teenagers today, then who's responsible? Your generation and mine.

grannieonabike · 27/11/2010 16:45

Dotnet, you reminded me of something I was thinking earlier. Yes, the police would have been filming you, and you probably are on their database. One or other of the police spokesmen I was talking about earlier has also mentioned 'intelligence' as a way of fighting demonstrators.

I wish it was the other sort ...

edam · 27/11/2010 16:27

If it's foolish to feel sorry that a man died then I'm happy to be a fool, Moondog.

What does laughing at his death make you, exactly?

moondog · 27/11/2010 16:24

Your earnest posturing just makes you look even more foolish, Edam.

edam · 27/11/2010 16:22

Moondog - what, precisely, is so amusing about the death of Mr Tomlinson?

dotnet · 27/11/2010 16:16

The 'violent rioters' in the kettle were kids horsing about and no, I certainly wouldn't assume they wouldn't break more glass or spray more graffiti, given the chance. But my guess is the police van which got damaged was put there deliberately. Even if it wasn't, there would have been no problem in getting it out of the kettle, so why was it left there?
The protesters were filmed by the cops, probably every last one of us - I know I was, I saw it happening.

Given that the kettle had been made (and you could make a case for that, if you think it was worth spending a million pounds plus on massive policing - horses, dogs, helicopters, vans, many hundreds of riot police -in order to catch - ooh, maybe ten? fifteen? people causing damage to property)- then it would have been the easiest thing in the world to let all those people who wanted to leave, come out, two or three abreast as and when they wanted to. The van dancers graffiti-ers and sprayers would have been easy to pick up. Oh yes, and somebody smashed the glass of a bus stop and someone also smashed a small pane of glass in a multi-paned door.
That was about the extent of it. It wasn't big and it wasn't clever, but it wasn't violent, it was stupid horseplay and venting of feelings at being caged up.

OP posts:
grannieonabike · 27/11/2010 16:02

Kaloki, what worries me more than what actually happened at the last demo is the tone of the remarks of the high-ranking police officers who have been interviewed in the news and in papers (one from the Met and one from South Yorkshire, I think). They are talking about demonstrators as if they are all criminals.

The police know they are being filmed at these demos so there is great pressure on them to behave appropriately. I worry that these remarks demonise young people and mean that 'appropriately' in their eyes is OTT in the eyes of the demonstrators and will escalate the violence.

Kaloki · 27/11/2010 15:22

I have mixed feelings on this. I totally agree with the protests.. but I also have a lot of sympathy with the riot police. It may have been a peaceful protest, but they aren't psychic, they have to be prepared for the worst case scenario. If they hadn't used the kettling technique then could you guarantee that the violent rioters (as opposed to the protesters) wouldn't have caused further damage and/or injury?

moondog · 27/11/2010 14:16

'I'm genuinely frightened that one of their number (and it only takes one) - will kill again.'

dotnet · 27/11/2010 12:46

And Moondog, don't be nasty to Grannie. Heaven forfend that anyone might die in the course of this protest, but as far as I'm concerned, the more the police keep their batons, their dogs, their horses and their hands to themselves, the safer people are. Now that we know the line is that there'll be massive police presences at future demos, - in my view, we're LESS safe. I'm genuinely frightened that one of their number (and it only takes one) - will kill again.

OP posts:
dotnet · 27/11/2010 12:39

I'll drop the Princess Anne thing now, Desiderata, though there are certain similarities. The 'going to university is an overrated pastime' quote - I thought you took that tack too. And wasn't it you who said I should go and clean some bogs? Similar use of language methinks; P. Anne told reporters to 'bog off'....

However I don't want to turn this discussion flippant, it's interesting and the subject is important.

Just to add a bit to the subject of the Student fees protest, - I was pleased to hear on radio 4(this morning) that someone important at the Charities Commission (didn't catch her name - she has a title) has pointed out that universities will LOSE lots of money - something to do with charitable status (I'll have to listen again to get the interview in full)- if they seriously intend to put up their fees in a big way. She said, to avoid losing their funding they would have to be able to prove in a copper-bottomed way that NO prospective student would be disadvantaged/put off by

much higher fees.
Good, good, good. That looks as if it'll make the Cam/Clegg machiavellian plot more difficult to enact than they thought.

OP posts:
granted · 27/11/2010 11:29

huddspur - of course you can usefully compare on thing to another.

It's not the same as stating they are identical.

granted · 27/11/2010 11:27

Because moondog is another one too dim to have gone to university, I expect. And bitter about it.

There's no way anyone who themselves went to university and benefitted from a free education themselves would be such a hypocrite, is there? (Tory/Lib Dem MPs excepted, obviously - they are the definition of 'hypocrite'.)