Please or to access all these features

Mumsnet classics

Relive the funniest, most unforgettable threads. For a daily dose of Mumsnet’s best bits, sign up for Mumsnet's daily newsletter.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Has DH got another think coming or have I got another thing coming???

812 replies

NotMyRealName2015 · 01/11/2015 14:56

I’ll clarify Blush

DH and I were having a light hearted debate about who was going to sort the garden out this afternoon (there are weeds growing out of weeds, and we have guests coming this week)
DH said that if I thought he was doing it today ‘I had another thing coming’.

I pointed out the phrase was ‘another think coming’ and that he should now go and do the garden as punishment for his failure. Grin
However, he is insisting I am wrong and that ‘thing’ is the right word. I say that doesn’t even make sense! What ‘thing’ is coming?? He just says ‘English doesn’t always make sense.’ (Not technically his first language but he has a British parent so has always been bilingual and is completely fluent)

MN jury needed. Who is correct??
Loser will obviously be doing the garden. Winner will sit down with coffee and biscuits, looking smug and saying 'you've missed a bit.'

OP posts:
MaidOfStars · 02/11/2015 10:57

Cognitive dissonance the mental stress or discomfort experienced by an individual who holds two or more contradictory beliefs.

I believe I am right. I know I am wrong.

Cue: reams of retrospective justification.

Grin
squoosh · 02/11/2015 10:45

I don't think it's a crap phrase at all. I think it's a marvellous phrase and clearly makes far more sense than 'thing'.

GreenPotato · 02/11/2015 10:41

I'm with you Bugrit!

I'll accept that "think" is "right" in the sense that it was the original phrase, according to various sources (though I'm still a bit Hmm at our ancestors for thinking up such a crap phrase!) However in linguistics "right" is a moveable feast and often things do change according to mishearings and what makes the most sense, and I think "thing" makes the most sense which is why loads of people clearly use it.

Also what loads of people don't seem to get is that both can be "right", if both are widely used and accepted. It's like some people say "I couldn't care less" and others, especially in the US, say "I could care less" to mean the same thing. "I could care less" makes no sense to me at all, however it's in common use and means what it means.

squoosh · 02/11/2015 10:39

The rest of us are on tenterhooks, hoping to see a pacific example of correct useage

You know 'tenter' is correct though?

OTheHugeManatee · 02/11/2015 10:36

'Where I live in the North East people routinely say 'register' as 'red chester'. Also 'mortified' for angry, as in 'When DD stayed out late the other night I was mortified'. Also 'paletic' for drunk and 'brufen' for ibuprofen. I know some of these are dialectic'

Not sure what all these malapropisms have to do with philosophical debate between two opposing views trying to establish the truth through reasoned argument Grin

(Sorry, couldn't resist.)

All the lovely pedants on this thread need to see the Eggcorn Database. It collects words or phrases that are repeated wrong but still sound plausible, like 'to all intensive purposes'.

BugritAndTidyup · 02/11/2015 10:36

You know, the more I think about the phrase in the context of how we usually use 'think' as a noun, the less it makes sense to say 'another think coming'. Since a 'think' is usually just a session of mulling things over, I could have another think and come to the exact same conclusion, whereas the whole point of the phrase is that something else is going to happen.

People saying that the sentence contains no 'thing'; well of course it does. The thing that you're expecting to happen is a thing. Just because you're not using the word 'thing' doesn't mean it's not a thng.

It makes no sense, people! I mean I know you're right and everything, but you're not right for the reasons that you say you are; 'thing' may be wrong, but it makes much more sense, and for some reason I am really fucking invested in having someone acknowledge this. Grin

Come on, it's not too much to ask is it? I am saying that you're right, after all?

DadDadDad · 02/11/2015 09:59

Here's a legitimate use of "baited breath", for comic effect. (Geoffrey Taylor: Cruel, Clever Cat. Written in 1933 according to website I just googled).

Sally, having swallowed cheese
Directs down holes the scented breeze
Enticing thus with baited breath
Nice mice to an untimely death.

Grin
MaidOfStars · 02/11/2015 09:55

Sorry Bugrit, should have read through!

DadDadDad · 02/11/2015 09:55

(I had this post all ready to cut-and-paste to show that I know it's not "baited").

Yes, I was just being mischievous (not mischievious), as I know it's "bated" as in the sense of "abated", meaning "lowered" / "depressed", in the sense that you are barely breathing as you wait in anticipation. Apparently, "baited breath" made it past a proof-reader into one of the Harry Potter books.

MaidOfStars · 02/11/2015 09:55

YY. 'Baited breath' sounds like you have a mouthful of maggots Grin

Rack my brain.
Wrack and ruin.

BugritAndTidyup · 02/11/2015 09:54

I already did, Maid. Wink see my third post. Feeling a bit silly now.

Although in fairness I can't think of any other situations where it's used to refer to a single thought on its own, which is where I think my knee jerk 'it's not a noun!' Response came from.

BertieBotts · 02/11/2015 09:50

Bated breath Grin You did that on purpose!

BertieBotts · 02/11/2015 09:50

I suppose also re mortified, most things which make you embarrassed would also make you angry if directed at another person. "I peed my pants and I was so mortified" is obviously not anger. But "He's seven years old and had a giant tantrum, I was mortified!" could be anger caused by the embarrassment caused by the bad behaviour of another.

MaidOfStars · 02/11/2015 09:50

Bugrit Why don't you go away and have a think about when 'think' is used as a noun.... Grin

DadDadDad · 02/11/2015 09:49

OK - let's see what others say. I wait with baited breath.

DadDadDad · 02/11/2015 09:47

It seems "rack" should be the right answer and has etymology on its side, but "wrack" has been around a long time, and you can probably get away with it. Well, that's going by this link which chimes with what I've read elsewhere: www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2012/10/wracking-your-brain-vs-racking-your-brain/

BertieBotts · 02/11/2015 09:47

True, Norah!

Maybe the mortified thing started because people heard somebody using it about their partner/child's embarrassing but also bad behaviour and assumed that instead of embarrassed, they meant they were angry. And then started using it that way themselves. "He turned up with another woman, I was mortified!" could go either way.

Paletic sounds like a mispronunciation of paralytic, ie, unable to walk. Brufen is an old name for ibuprofen.

I think it's wrack your brains. Although, apparently, wrack is just an alternate spelling of the verb to rack, ie, stretch on a rack. So both are technically correct because they are the same word. I never knew that before! I had always assumed that it meant something along the lines of search thoroughly, not stretch!

WhiffyBiffer · 02/11/2015 09:45

It's think! Amazed so many saying its 'thing'. Another THINK coming people!

Grapejuicerocks · 02/11/2015 09:43

I would rack them too but am completely prepared to be wrong.

MaidOfStars · 02/11/2015 09:42

Us quietly = is quite.

MaidOfStars · 02/11/2015 09:41

clam My comment re: ignorance was in support of you and aimed at potbelly

People think it means rude and uncouth, but its proper meaning us quietly simply uninformed.

Grapejuicerocks · 02/11/2015 09:41

I think that spitting feathers was originally thirsty but is more recently used as anger based on nothing but my own experience

annandale · 02/11/2015 09:40

Ooh tough one Dad. I think I would rack them. Now off to google.

HunterHearstHelmsley · 02/11/2015 09:33

100% think!

DadDadDad · 02/11/2015 09:32

Here's another:

Do you "rack your brains" or "wrack your brains"?