Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Further education

You'll find discussions about A Levels and universities on our Further Education forum.

If you can pay uni fees.. Wwyd

34 replies

theredjellybean · 30/01/2018 16:02

My dd and dsd arw both hopefully off to uni in September this year. We can afford to pay their fees for them (and have done this for older siblings). But someone recently suggested we put the equivalent money into isa accounts, and got the girls to take out the loans, when they reached the point of having to start paying it back we could give them the lump sum to pay it off.
I would have thought any gains we make would be outweighed by the interest on the student loans.
Has anyone else taken this tack?

OP posts:
homebythesea · 31/01/2018 17:25

Student loans most definitely not interest free

www.slc.co.uk/students-and-customers/loan-repayment/interest-rates.aspx

Buglife · 31/01/2018 16:49

Take the loans and give them that money down the line when they want to buy a house, or when they can decide if it’s better for them to have all the cash and only pay a small amount per month for the loan. It’ll just be another deduction off their pay, whereas not many people are lucky enough to have a lump sum of money. It would take them a long time to save as much and I don’t think they’ll feel any better off than peers who took the loans of you do pay for uni.

Hillarious · 31/01/2018 16:43

I'd take out the loans and keep the money you have for a time when your children need financial help not readily available. The loans work effectively as a graduate tax.

Bellamuerte · 31/01/2018 14:48

Student loans are effectively supposed to be interest free (linked to inflation) and only paid back if you earn a decent salary. Many people never pay them off. By paying for education in cash, you're incurring the opportunity cost of not having the money available for other uses e.g. buying a house.

What's better: getting an interest free student loan and using your cash for a mortgage, or paying for your education in cash and having to pay interest on a bigger mortgage (or possibly even being unable to buy a house at all)? Obviously the former makes more financial sense!

homebythesea · 31/01/2018 13:57

In an ideal world I’d agree but pragmatically funding higher education is in my view a “nice to have” item that simply isn’t affordable

IWannaSeeHowItEnds · 31/01/2018 12:27

That's your prerogative home. I see it more as graduates tend to earn more so pay more tax and therefore contribute to the pot in that way.
I also believe that charging tuition fees is morally wrong. Those capable of studying for a degree should be supported by the state. The country benefits in the end.

homebythesea · 31/01/2018 11:41

@Iwannasee that’s all well and good but the money loaned is money out of the “pot” that I would (and do) feel bad about using when we can easily afford the tuition fees for our children. I know it’s going to be a relatively low number of parents who can do this but even so it’s an important principle for us

IWannaSeeHowItEnds · 31/01/2018 10:17

Have a look at the Martin Lewis information on student loans/fees. It is really informative about how they work, long term and then go from there.
Gist of it iirc, is that these loans are not really designed to be repaid in full and unless you are a really high earner, you won't be disadvantaged by taking out the loan.

homebythesea · 31/01/2018 10:10

It is unpopular here on MN but if you can pay I think you should (we do). Returns on cash ISA’s are negligible compared to the high (and increasing) interest rates on student loans. I also take the view that to apply for and then administer loans costs the taxpayer and why would you “waste” public funds if you don’t need to?

Swipe left for the next trending thread