Please or to access all these features

Elderly parents

Am I right that most elderly people must self-fund care if they have assets?

193 replies

Coffeeisnotmycupoftea · 07/05/2026 09:25

People telling me time and again that my mum could get care home fees paid for by the government and I am certain they are wrong.

Mum is in the advancing stages of Alzheimer's having suffered now for 8 years. Between my father, my sister and I we have been caring for her ourselves. We now have a team of carers coming in 3 times a day as we are trying are best to keep her at home, for as long as possible.

We really don't want to put mum into a home if we can help it even though it is becoming a struggle (more for dad as he feels he has no life). This is not because of the fear of losing money as it's costing over £1k per week for the home carers as it is. It's more that we can keep an eye on her care at home and have yet to find a home we like the look of (have been viewing quite a few of late) but the truth is that mum will more than likely need to go into a care home within the next 6 months to a year as her care needs progress.

My parents have assets. I have looked into everything for them and have had SS round to do assessments etc and each and every time we are told care would need to be paid for in full by my parents (with AA and pensions included) because they have well over the £23,250 threshold. My parents FA has also given this information to us. We are fine with this and fully aware if you have any assets you need to pay for your care.

However, so many people we know tell us that mum should and would qualify for 'free' care. They seem to believe that continuing healthcare is really easy to get and I keep hearing their stories that their mum or dad are getting getting care home fees paid for free despite them owning property or having lots of savings etc. My sister is now pushing for us to find out more because someone she works for is telling her we absolutely must not pay for care home fees as we can get it paid for (??).

I am fed up telling them that isn't the case for a large percentage of people and most will have to fund their own care fees whether that is at home care or in a care facility.

I am right, aren't I? That most people with substantial savings and/or a home of their own will need to fund their own care? (I understand a house can not be sold whilst a spouse is living there but if they die the house will need to be sold to pay for the fees?)

OP posts:
user7463246787 · 07/05/2026 14:01

You would be entitled to carers allowance, which isnt a great deal but better than nothing. I don't think that is means tested at all.
We paid for care for 8 years, it was a big bill at £1500 a week but the care they had was good. They’d not have coped at home at all by then, and it would have tipped me over the edge in a few months!

Coffeeisnotmycupoftea · 07/05/2026 13:39

Kelta · 07/05/2026 12:58

So actually your mum only has just over a year/18 months worth of care home fees (plus obviously any income she has). After that then she will indeed be eligible for LA funding.

Anything in your dad's name cannot be touched and the house cannot be touched.

Edited

This is where we struggle to get the correct advice.

If mum is still in care after her savings run out I know the LA will more than likely cover the cost but once dad has passed the final bill will be taken from the sale of their home?

OP posts:
TheSmallAssassin · 07/05/2026 13:26

@MissCharlotteLutterell Yeah, I guess they would bet on a proportion of people dying before they needed care.

MissCharlotteLutterell · 07/05/2026 13:15

TheSmallAssassin · 07/05/2026 12:47

I'm not sure that any insurance company would offer it - how could they make a profit?

The same way insurers always make a profit: charge more in premiums than they pay out in fees.

Kelta · 07/05/2026 12:58

Coffeeisnotmycupoftea · 07/05/2026 12:02

We have a very similar situation.

Mum has just under £100k in her account and AA and pensions go in there too. Dad has his own account with his savings in. I know the house can not be taken into account if mum went into care and dad was still alive.

My dad stresses that if mum were to go into a home and her money was used within, say a year or so he would have to start paying out from his savings but I have told him he shouldn't have to do that as he may well need his money to pay for any future care needs that he may encounter.

So actually your mum only has just over a year/18 months worth of care home fees (plus obviously any income she has). After that then she will indeed be eligible for LA funding.

Anything in your dad's name cannot be touched and the house cannot be touched.

TheSmallAssassin · 07/05/2026 12:47

MissCharlotteLutterell · 07/05/2026 10:04

This is an area where insurance would be invaluable, whether that be state-provided or commercial. Spread the cost and risk, so everyone pays something and people receive according to their need.

I don't think there are any commercial products that offer this insurance, unfortunately, perhaps because governments keep saying they will sort out a social insurance scheme - but they aren't actually doing it. We really need a government with a vision and the will to push through positive changes on big issues like this.

I'm not sure that any insurance company would offer it - how could they make a profit?

Catgotyourbrain · 07/05/2026 12:46

Coffeeisnotmycupoftea · 07/05/2026 09:25

People telling me time and again that my mum could get care home fees paid for by the government and I am certain they are wrong.

Mum is in the advancing stages of Alzheimer's having suffered now for 8 years. Between my father, my sister and I we have been caring for her ourselves. We now have a team of carers coming in 3 times a day as we are trying are best to keep her at home, for as long as possible.

We really don't want to put mum into a home if we can help it even though it is becoming a struggle (more for dad as he feels he has no life). This is not because of the fear of losing money as it's costing over £1k per week for the home carers as it is. It's more that we can keep an eye on her care at home and have yet to find a home we like the look of (have been viewing quite a few of late) but the truth is that mum will more than likely need to go into a care home within the next 6 months to a year as her care needs progress.

My parents have assets. I have looked into everything for them and have had SS round to do assessments etc and each and every time we are told care would need to be paid for in full by my parents (with AA and pensions included) because they have well over the £23,250 threshold. My parents FA has also given this information to us. We are fine with this and fully aware if you have any assets you need to pay for your care.

However, so many people we know tell us that mum should and would qualify for 'free' care. They seem to believe that continuing healthcare is really easy to get and I keep hearing their stories that their mum or dad are getting getting care home fees paid for free despite them owning property or having lots of savings etc. My sister is now pushing for us to find out more because someone she works for is telling her we absolutely must not pay for care home fees as we can get it paid for (??).

I am fed up telling them that isn't the case for a large percentage of people and most will have to fund their own care fees whether that is at home care or in a care facility.

I am right, aren't I? That most people with substantial savings and/or a home of their own will need to fund their own care? (I understand a house can not be sold whilst a spouse is living there but if they die the house will need to be sold to pay for the fees?)

You are right

Siriusmuggle · 07/05/2026 12:43

My dad's care was to be funded by continuing health care. The hospital and social services sorted it all out on an expedited basis as he was considered terminally ill/end of life. As it was, he died the day after he came home from hospital so kind of didn't need it. But when he was previously to have been discharged it would have been self funded but his needs changed before they got as far as discharging him

rockrollerpud · 07/05/2026 12:36

You will not get CHC funding for dementia or Alzheimer’s unless her behavioural is so violent and aggressive that she gets sectioned. If she gets sectioned you’ll get her care home paid for.

Because you father lives at home they can’t take the house to pay for her care, but they will take half of the other joint assets/cash/savings she shares with your father. Until her share reduces to £23,250. Then they will pay SOME, not all. They’ll only paid all when her savings share gets to £14,000.

Picklesandfrickles · 07/05/2026 12:35

Often people are assessed after finding themselves in hospital due to a fall, UTI etc. However in your situation you can ring social services at the local authority and ask for an assessment, you explain you can no longer meet your Mums needs and even with a package of care x3 daily you cannot maintain her safety.

They will then come out and do an assessment on your Mum, financials and the current circumstances and inform you of what your entitled to. With my grandma she was living with my parents but it became unmanageable as she had dementia, she went into respite for x2 weeks and was re-assessed and the home said she needed 24 hour care. She did have over the threshold of savings/pension etc but not by much, once that ran out she was then funded. I believe this is how it works. They cannot sell the house whilst your Father is alive and they cannot regain the money once both have passed away.

I must admit im suprised at the amount of people on here whos family have been refused, it wasn’t a nice process for us but certainly wasn’t a nightmare to gain the funding.

ChubbyPuffling · 07/05/2026 12:21

We were basically told that MIL was too nice to qualify for CHC . If her behaviour was challenging, with more unpredictable support needs, she would have qualified.

thickhairproblems · 07/05/2026 12:18

I’m a nurse. There’s CHC funding but also fast track funding. We as nurses can do a CHC checklist and if they score positive then we will refer to the CHC team who will do further assessments. We don’t have anything to do with this after that.
A fast track is something us as nurses can complete and usually funding starts the same or next day. This is for people deemed end of life, specifically last 3 months of life. This will get reviewed every 3 months and can be taken away if no longer deemed end of life whereas continuing health care is long term. Fasttrack is particularly helpful if your trying to get your relative carers or a placement as having a fasttrack means we can get this in place quickly as funding is in place. If a person already has carers or in a care home then the only changes are who is funding it. To qualify for a fasttrack I would be looking at how responsive they was, if they was able to communicate, eat and drink, mobility, breathing patterns, if they needed any symptom management, rapid deterioration. They don’t need to have a palliative diagnosis they could just be elderly but entering end stages of life.

JKRgreatestfan · 07/05/2026 12:17

The companies that 'help' you apply for the Continuing health care funding, charge thousands and in most cases you will be wasting your money, as the 'not fit for purpose' NHS is stellar at finding ways to deny any claim.
So yes you are right, you have to use your own assets first in most cases with the exception of the house a spouse is living in. Quite right too I suppose. Why shouldn't you pay for your own care given that people live into their nineties now?

defnotadomesticgoddess · 07/05/2026 12:15

My mil was self funding until we were told by the hospital she was pallative- then she was discharged back to the care home. we applied for chc fast track (the process is different), she lived for another 5 months and her care was funded. Its so difficult was when you are dealing with that decline and wouldnt have thought about applying but my fil had it so we knew it was possible.

Coffeeisnotmycupoftea · 07/05/2026 12:08

Leavelingeringbreath · 07/05/2026 11:54

You need to request an assessment for Continuing Health Care.

From everything I have heard it appears to be a very stressful thing to put yourself through, not sure I want to tbh. If my sister insists others are telling her mum would get it I will leave it to her to do. I have done enough over the last 8 years!

OP posts:
Keroppi · 07/05/2026 12:07

I honestly think it depends regionally and perhaps whether you choose to go private to get the supporting evidence written more sympathetically and properly for your mum.

I don't mean to sound flippant but it's a little like PIP where if you know how to fill out the forms (and have a fluctuating condition - thats why you must fill the forms out as if its the worst day) and have supporting evidence from a sympathetic gp/nurse/physio you are more likely to get CHC.

My mum and sister are district nurses in the midlands.. when FIL had a catastrophic brain bleed stroke and was in hosp then a care home they were very knowledgeable about how to explain his conditions/effects.

The assessor we had who came out to the care home was not super gaslight-y like I've read can be the case so probably very lucky there too. The care home also didn't seem too bothered about him applying - I've heard they don't like chc as they get less money? Or the funded nursing care element most people get in a home goes straight to them? But I'm very uninformed on that

Coffeeisnotmycupoftea · 07/05/2026 12:05

RosieHosie · 07/05/2026 11:49

That's true, although councils often don't pay the weekly amount that the care actually costs. At the company I worked for, they had a guarantee that, once accepted they would 'top up' the difference once the person's money had run out. Many care homes wouldn't do this, so the person would need to be moved somewhere cheaper.

Most of the care homes we have visited say they need proof of at least 2 years of funds and only one said they would never move a resident if the money runs out, the rest were rather vague when I asked that question.

OP posts:
BringBackCatsEyes · 07/05/2026 12:03

saraclara · 07/05/2026 10:45

My mum had a massive stroke which left her paralysed and in need of 24 hour care. She did not qualify. The refusal of finding went to appeal, but no.

I have never heard a of anyone with dementia getting funding.

My MIL was held under a MH section. When they moved her from the MH unit to the dementia wing of the nursing home her care was paid for - still under Section.

Coffeeisnotmycupoftea · 07/05/2026 12:02

Kelta · 07/05/2026 11:39

You're not quite right.

It depends on what is held in your mums name.

Anything in your mum's name will need to be spent on her care (assuming that she doesn't get CHC).

If everything that is then left is in your DF's name apart from a joint share of the house then that cannot be touched. The house isn't taken into account whilst a spouse still lives there.

So in our situation my DP had £80k in DM's name. The house was in joint names. They then had about £270k in DF's name.

Once the 80k was spent (which at £1800 a week didn't take that long) then DM was eligible for funded care since she didn't have any other assets other than the house, but the house wasn't taken into account because DF still lived there.

If DF dies whilst DM is still alive and in a care home then at that point the other assets (if left to DM) would come into play again. This is why its important to assess and update wills etc.

It's also important to take into account income streams. DM had a good public sector pension and this all goes to fund her care. This affects DF's income stream.

We have a very similar situation.

Mum has just under £100k in her account and AA and pensions go in there too. Dad has his own account with his savings in. I know the house can not be taken into account if mum went into care and dad was still alive.

My dad stresses that if mum were to go into a home and her money was used within, say a year or so he would have to start paying out from his savings but I have told him he shouldn't have to do that as he may well need his money to pay for any future care needs that he may encounter.

OP posts:
SleepingisanArt · 07/05/2026 11:59

OP if you find a care home you like then put your Mum on the waiting list, hopefully a place will then be available when you need it.

My parent spent 4 months in hospital after a massive heart attack. Due to the extent of the damage there wasn't any surgery they could have (or indeed survive). Eventually discharged to a council funded care home with a 12 week life expectancy so those 12 weeks would be fully funded as it was considered an 'end of life' placement. Didn't die and in fact got stronger but far too frail and now with diagnosed vascular dementia could not go home. The family found a private nursing home which fortunately had a place available. Family paid the deposit to hold the place and then moved my parent into it. (Activated LPA and now fees are covered from their account.)

I sat through the MDT CHC assessment. It's brutal but the chair went to great trouble to explain everything, let me comment and feel fully involved. The conclusion was that the nursing element (about £250 per week) could be funded but there were no grounds to award full funding. The decision was explained fully and it was the correct decision. I'll have to sit through it again in a few months time as it's reviewed annually. I expect the outcome to be the same.

The care home can only take 50% of savings into account and not the house at all if there is a spouse or partner so your Dad won't be made homeless or left destitute paying for care for your Mum. It's a brutal process so it's helpful if the family are united. My FIL was in a care home and he thrived there whilst MIL was able to also get her life and interests back. She visited regularly and they had quality time together.

Good luck.

EffortlesslyDistracted · 07/05/2026 11:55

Kelta · 07/05/2026 11:48

Again though - only to the extent that there are assets left (excluding the house) in the DM's own name. Many older people will have a good chunk of their assets in the husband's name and this can't be touched and isn't taken into account at all in the calculations.

No, but often what triggers them going into a home is the death of the spouse when they were caring for one another so then the survivor inherits it and it can all be used for care fees, including the proceeds of the house. Not in the OP's case, but I have seen it several times amongst my extended family.

Leavelingeringbreath · 07/05/2026 11:54

Coffeeisnotmycupoftea · 07/05/2026 09:25

People telling me time and again that my mum could get care home fees paid for by the government and I am certain they are wrong.

Mum is in the advancing stages of Alzheimer's having suffered now for 8 years. Between my father, my sister and I we have been caring for her ourselves. We now have a team of carers coming in 3 times a day as we are trying are best to keep her at home, for as long as possible.

We really don't want to put mum into a home if we can help it even though it is becoming a struggle (more for dad as he feels he has no life). This is not because of the fear of losing money as it's costing over £1k per week for the home carers as it is. It's more that we can keep an eye on her care at home and have yet to find a home we like the look of (have been viewing quite a few of late) but the truth is that mum will more than likely need to go into a care home within the next 6 months to a year as her care needs progress.

My parents have assets. I have looked into everything for them and have had SS round to do assessments etc and each and every time we are told care would need to be paid for in full by my parents (with AA and pensions included) because they have well over the £23,250 threshold. My parents FA has also given this information to us. We are fine with this and fully aware if you have any assets you need to pay for your care.

However, so many people we know tell us that mum should and would qualify for 'free' care. They seem to believe that continuing healthcare is really easy to get and I keep hearing their stories that their mum or dad are getting getting care home fees paid for free despite them owning property or having lots of savings etc. My sister is now pushing for us to find out more because someone she works for is telling her we absolutely must not pay for care home fees as we can get it paid for (??).

I am fed up telling them that isn't the case for a large percentage of people and most will have to fund their own care fees whether that is at home care or in a care facility.

I am right, aren't I? That most people with substantial savings and/or a home of their own will need to fund their own care? (I understand a house can not be sold whilst a spouse is living there but if they die the house will need to be sold to pay for the fees?)

You need to request an assessment for Continuing Health Care.

Coffeeisnotmycupoftea · 07/05/2026 11:53

DPotter · 07/05/2026 11:05

I can only reinterate the comments made by other posters. The AgedUK website is very good for the financial side of things.

What I would say is this - my dad was very reluctant to place my Mum in a care home, very reluctant. They had carers going in 4 times a day with support from my Dsis and me but as these things often happen a crisis occured and there was no choice. Luckily for us Mum got a place at a wonderful care home at short notice. The care home manager said to my Dad 'We will make you a husband again rather than a carer' and they did. My Dad thrived and continues to do so. He visited my Mum pretty much daily until her death just under 2 years after admission. In retrospect Mum should have been admitted to a care home about a year before she actually was.

There comes a point with someone suffering with dementia when the health and welfare of the remaining spouse / family actually becomes more important. I know that sounds a harsh, even cruel thing to say but the worry, sacrifices and physical strain takes a very heavy toll. It did on my Dad far more than any of us realised. I would suggest you think of the situation from your father's perspective, his on-going health and well being.

We do but it's my father who is refusing for mum to go into care, not my sister and I.

He resents spending the money and believes family (ie my sister and I) should look after elderly parents. I have been helping for 8 years, I am exhausted and unwell from my own health issues and feel it's time for mum to go into care but it is a constant battle with my father (I have started previous threads with regards to this).

If and when we do find the right home for her I feel her care will be better than we can offer her right now, even though she is well looked after regardless of the cost (I don't care about inheritance, I care about my health which is currently failing).

OP posts:
Kelta · 07/05/2026 11:50

RosieHosie · 07/05/2026 11:49

That's true, although councils often don't pay the weekly amount that the care actually costs. At the company I worked for, they had a guarantee that, once accepted they would 'top up' the difference once the person's money had run out. Many care homes wouldn't do this, so the person would need to be moved somewhere cheaper.

Agreed, which is why when you are choosing a self funded care home for the first in a couple to need care, it is really important to check their policy on what happens if the resident no longer has assets to self fund.

RosieHosie · 07/05/2026 11:49

Kelta · 07/05/2026 11:39

You're not quite right.

It depends on what is held in your mums name.

Anything in your mum's name will need to be spent on her care (assuming that she doesn't get CHC).

If everything that is then left is in your DF's name apart from a joint share of the house then that cannot be touched. The house isn't taken into account whilst a spouse still lives there.

So in our situation my DP had £80k in DM's name. The house was in joint names. They then had about £270k in DF's name.

Once the 80k was spent (which at £1800 a week didn't take that long) then DM was eligible for funded care since she didn't have any other assets other than the house, but the house wasn't taken into account because DF still lived there.

If DF dies whilst DM is still alive and in a care home then at that point the other assets (if left to DM) would come into play again. This is why its important to assess and update wills etc.

It's also important to take into account income streams. DM had a good public sector pension and this all goes to fund her care. This affects DF's income stream.

That's true, although councils often don't pay the weekly amount that the care actually costs. At the company I worked for, they had a guarantee that, once accepted they would 'top up' the difference once the person's money had run out. Many care homes wouldn't do this, so the person would need to be moved somewhere cheaper.

Swipe left for the next trending thread