Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

Iranian clerics call for assassination of Trump and Netanyahu

237 replies

Twiglets1 · 30/06/2026 20:42

Article in The Telegraph reports that Iran’s most senior clerics have called for the assassination of Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu.

In a 10-point statement, the Assembly of Experts said the killing of “the criminal American president” and “the wicked prime minister of the Zionist regime” was a religious duty.

Assassinating the two leaders – whom they described as mahdour al-dam, or deserving of death – “must not be neglected under any circumstances”.

In their call for Mr Trump and Mr Netanyahu to be assassinated, the clerics wrote that avenging the blood of Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader who was killed on the first day of the war, remained “paramount”.

“It is obligatory upon any duty-bound person who gains access to these criminals to send them to hell,” they added.

The language read like a religious edict but stopped short of a formal fatwa, which in Shia Islam is issued by an individual cleric in his own name rather than by a group.

The Assembly of Experts is an 88-member body of clerics constitutionally tasked with choosing and supervising the supreme leader.

The statement shows how fractured the establishment has become.

Only about 63 of the body’s members signed it, and the Assembly’s secretariat distanced itself hours later.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/06/30/iranian-clerics-call-for-trump-assassination/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
JadeHare · 03/07/2026 07:55

Well let’s hope the good old US of A has yanked Israel’s chain hard enough to prevent any more assassinations at this funeral. Because negotiations will be well and truly off the table if Israel murder anyone else.

RedTagAlan · 03/07/2026 07:50

LuckyHazelFox · 02/07/2026 21:14

Liberals shed more tears over tyrants being killed. I can't even begin to imagine mourning the assassination of a man who orders women to be stoned to death.

Posts like this do confuse me. Because what do you mean by liberal here ?

Because in political terms, so far as I can make out, liberals cover everyone as per liberal democracy. Surely the opposite of liberal is in the authoritarian/theocracy/dictatorship group.

That is my understanding of it anyway. Happy to be corrected. Political terms do tend to get muddled up.

Twiglets1 · 03/07/2026 07:42

JadeHare · 03/07/2026 07:07

There’s nothing very holy about anyone in this stupid war, no.

But this is ok is it? Because it’s just Israel planning the assassinations? Not Clerics.

“Senior U.S. officials feared that Israel intended to assassinate Iran’s top negotiators as the Trump administration pursued a high-stakes deal to end the war there and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, current and former officials familiar with the matter said.
Washington’s objection to killing Abbas Araghchi, Iran’s foreign minister, and Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the country’s parliamentary speaker, was so acute that this spring it took the extraordinary step of asking intermediaries to warn Iran about Israel’s assassination aims, the officials said.
“You kill those folks and you’re killing the pragmatists,” said a U.S. official, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the U.S. outlook on Israel’s targeted killing campaign.”

Excerpt From
“U.S. warned Iran about Israel’s aims to assassinate leaders”
John Hudson, Ellen Nakashima
The Washington Post
https://apple.news/APOhEIdo5TVCpJrDm3OFGBA
This material may be protected by copyright.

No it’s not “ok” for anyone to order assassinations of world leaders, I already said that. And for the Israeli military to consider assassinating Iranian negotiators seems unwise which is probably why they didn’t do it.

This thread is about religious leaders ordering assassinations though. They shouldn’t be doing that if they are supposed to be some spiritual authority. I think this demonstrates they are religious in name only.

Yes a bit like Trump if he claims to believe in God. But no one goes to him for spiritual guidance I imagine (hope).

OP posts:
RedTagAlan · 03/07/2026 07:27

BunfightBetty · 03/07/2026 07:16

But this is ok is it? Because it’s just Israel planning the assassinations? Not Clerics.

Am I missing something? Where has anybody said that this is ok?

Well, this is why what the clerics said is important I think. Does anyone have the document they issued, translated.

Because if they said " We approve the killing of A and B because of XYZ and said they will kill us", then what A and B say are totally valid to the discussion.

If I threatened to kill someone and the cops turned up at my door, any backstory would matter. If they had already killed my family and were threatening to kill everyone else and burn my house down, the cops (and the beak) might take that into account.

Would you not agree ?

BunfightBetty · 03/07/2026 07:16

JadeHare · 03/07/2026 07:07

There’s nothing very holy about anyone in this stupid war, no.

But this is ok is it? Because it’s just Israel planning the assassinations? Not Clerics.

“Senior U.S. officials feared that Israel intended to assassinate Iran’s top negotiators as the Trump administration pursued a high-stakes deal to end the war there and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, current and former officials familiar with the matter said.
Washington’s objection to killing Abbas Araghchi, Iran’s foreign minister, and Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the country’s parliamentary speaker, was so acute that this spring it took the extraordinary step of asking intermediaries to warn Iran about Israel’s assassination aims, the officials said.
“You kill those folks and you’re killing the pragmatists,” said a U.S. official, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the U.S. outlook on Israel’s targeted killing campaign.”

Excerpt From
“U.S. warned Iran about Israel’s aims to assassinate leaders”
John Hudson, Ellen Nakashima
The Washington Post
https://apple.news/APOhEIdo5TVCpJrDm3OFGBA
This material may be protected by copyright.

But this is ok is it? Because it’s just Israel planning the assassinations? Not Clerics.

Am I missing something? Where has anybody said that this is ok?

JadeHare · 03/07/2026 07:07

There’s nothing very holy about anyone in this stupid war, no.

But this is ok is it? Because it’s just Israel planning the assassinations? Not Clerics.

“Senior U.S. officials feared that Israel intended to assassinate Iran’s top negotiators as the Trump administration pursued a high-stakes deal to end the war there and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, current and former officials familiar with the matter said.
Washington’s objection to killing Abbas Araghchi, Iran’s foreign minister, and Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the country’s parliamentary speaker, was so acute that this spring it took the extraordinary step of asking intermediaries to warn Iran about Israel’s assassination aims, the officials said.
“You kill those folks and you’re killing the pragmatists,” said a U.S. official, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the U.S. outlook on Israel’s targeted killing campaign.”

Excerpt From
“U.S. warned Iran about Israel’s aims to assassinate leaders”
John Hudson, Ellen Nakashima
The Washington Post
https://apple.news/APOhEIdo5TVCpJrDm3OFGBA
This material may be protected by copyright.

U.S. warned Iran about Israel’s aims to assassinate leaders — The Washington Post

In the spring, U.S. officials suspected that Israel intended to kill Iran’s top negotiators and sent a warning to Tehran to take precautions.

https://apple.news/APOhEIdo5TVCpJrDm3OFGBA

Twiglets1 · 03/07/2026 00:05

JadeHare · 02/07/2026 23:14

How so? Which country has killed who? Do you think it’s ok for another country to go in and kill another countries leader? Clearly you do. And yet here you are saying that Clerics shouldn’t do this. Double standards much?

Just more whataboutery. Clerics shouldn’t do it! And see how ridiculous it is even having to defend that statement if we swap clerics for the Archbishop of Canterbury or Pope Leo. What makes the Iranian religious clerics so different they get a free pass to openly ordering assassinations?? They seem to have more in common with the mafia than genuine people of religion.

I don’t agree with a President or Prime Minister authorising the killing of another country’s leader. The Ayatollah I wasn’t bothered about on account of the thousands of Iranian protesters that were being murdered under his watch and the human rights abuses being inflicted upon his own people. But anyway, that’s a different topic to assassinations being called by a group who aren’t the elected leaders of the country. Or are you saying the Iranian clerics are effectively running Iran?

Even just from a timing perspective the actions of this group should be condemned as it’s an inappropriate time to call for assassinations while Iran and the US have both signed the Memorandum of Understanding and negotiators have 60 days to agree a framework for peace. Seems like the Iranian clerics don’t want peace but WW3. Not very holy of them is it?

OP posts:
JadeHare · 02/07/2026 23:14

Twiglets1 · 02/07/2026 19:47

whataboutery

How so? Which country has killed who? Do you think it’s ok for another country to go in and kill another countries leader? Clearly you do. And yet here you are saying that Clerics shouldn’t do this. Double standards much?

Rothburypixie · 02/07/2026 22:26

LuckyHazelFox · 02/07/2026 21:14

Liberals shed more tears over tyrants being killed. I can't even begin to imagine mourning the assassination of a man who orders women to be stoned to death.

Who’s been mourning him on this thread? I don’t think any sane person would mourn the Iranian regime leaders

Islandsofsand · 02/07/2026 21:50

Of course leaders shouldn’t be calling for assassinations nor extra judicial killings. That it’s a religious leader is remarkable, but so is targeted killing by a democratic state allied to the West. It’s something we expect from Russia or other authoritarian states. It’s illegal.

For a religious state, a cleric also has a clear leadership role. It’s not whataboutery to make a comparison as to how leaders of different types of states act and what they say.

Imagine how uniquely horrifying the Iranian clerics call to assassinate others would be if it didn’t occur in a world were Iranian leadership has itself been assassinated, alongside Iranian scientists etc. by Israel.

Iran seems to exist in a region where assassination of prominent people by other countries seem to be part of doing business. It not unreasonable to draw attention to this, particularly given recent events.

For the Iranian clerics - this may have a religious basis. Reminds me of the religious tone of some of the violent rhetoric against Gazans by some Israeli leaders, including Rabbis.

This will also be sidelined as whataboutery by those not wanting to hear uncomfortable truths.

LuckyHazelFox · 02/07/2026 21:14

Liberals shed more tears over tyrants being killed. I can't even begin to imagine mourning the assassination of a man who orders women to be stoned to death.

Twiglets1 · 02/07/2026 21:10

BunfightBetty · 02/07/2026 21:07

I couldn’t agree more.

I’ve just had an image of the Archbishop of Canterbury calling for the CofE faithful to hunt down Putin and murder him. it was so far away from what she would ever do or say, that it was actually amusing.

Think there would be a few threads about that on MN and the response wouldn’t be Meh…

OP posts:
BunfightBetty · 02/07/2026 21:07

Twiglets1 · 02/07/2026 17:36

Very much agree. Posters will use deflection and whataboutery rather than talking about anything that casts Iran in a bad light.

One of the problems with men of religion acting like the mafia is it makes their religious beliefs look fake. Like if Pope Leo suddenly called on Catholics around the world to assassinate Trump, people would be shocked and question his faith.

If he was part of a group of top religious clerics all doing the same thing, it would suggest none of them were really men of religion but rather men of power cynically using their influence to achieve a desired outcome - murder.

If religion in this day and age is used to do things like order assassinations, how do we know as a society if we should still respect others' religious beliefs or not?

I couldn’t agree more.

I’ve just had an image of the Archbishop of Canterbury calling for the CofE faithful to hunt down Putin and murder him. it was so far away from what she would ever do or say, that it was actually amusing.

BunfightBetty · 02/07/2026 21:04

RedTagAlan · 02/07/2026 17:34

It is pretty difficult to defend Trump and Netanyahu. And if someone can't defend Trump and Netanyahu, is it not natural to instantly think of why they can't defend them ?

See my bit above where I mention the idea of "prison justice" and the "meh" factor. This is not on the same scale as the Fatwa against Rushdie. I don't think so anyway. If I started a thread saying the prison death threats against some recently jailed con were outrageous, do you really think nobody would mention why the con is in jail ?

I wouldn’t defend either of them, myself.

My point is that they didn’t need defending. It wasn’t them (this time) committing the egregious act. The Iranian clerics shouldn’t be calling for their murder no matter what they’ve done. Apart from anything else, why on earth are they egging their faithful on to carrying out such a heinous crime?

do you really think nobody would mention why the con is in jail ?

I agree 100% with you that people would mention that, for sure. You can’t expect to come across nobody who disagrees with you in life. Equally, though, I wouldn’t agree that the con should be murdered summarily by a fellow prisoner, regardless of what they had done.

BunfightBetty · 02/07/2026 20:37

Martymcfly24 · 02/07/2026 17:34

Not touchy at all. What a strange thing to say on a discussion forum.

You didn't make it clear at all.But if you want to make the point it's both then maybe an extra sentence in your post would clarify that. Its not much in a lengthy post.

It came across as touchy to me 🤷‍♀️

👍 I’ll consider adjusting my expectations of readers.

Twiglets1 · 02/07/2026 19:47

JadeHare · 02/07/2026 19:33

The POTUS and the Prime Minister of Israel shouldn’t commit murder either. But here we are.

whataboutery

OP posts:
JadeHare · 02/07/2026 19:33

The POTUS and the Prime Minister of Israel shouldn’t commit murder either. But here we are.

Twiglets1 · 02/07/2026 19:28

JadeHare · 02/07/2026 19:17

I don’t think anyone reading this thread will think I have lost my mind. I hope they will see the double standards that you are trying to apply. Clerics, men of the cloth, shouldn’t promote murder. The POTUS, and Benjamin Netanyahu, who have committed murder, totally absolved. It makes no sense.

Who said they are totally absolved? They haven't been, they have been strongly criticised for starting the Iran war for example.

Clerics and men of the cloth shouldn't promote murder - that shouldn't be a controversial thing to say.

OP posts:
Twiglets1 · 02/07/2026 19:25

RedTagAlan · 02/07/2026 17:55

Religion is used in this day and age to call for people to be killed. It is far from unique to Iranian clerics. See my posts above re US evangelicals calling for gays to be killed by the Government. They made that come true in Uganda too.

The above post is justification for whataboutism being valid on this subject. Because if the above poster is suggesting that what a cleric of one religion says means ALL of that religion is tarnished, then surely that logic holds for all religions?

I don't see anyone saying The King should not do his Church thing because a Christian leader says gays should be executed.

I never suggested using religion for violent purposes is unique to the Iranian clerics. Nevertheless, it's pretty unique what they have done I think? Can't think of any other religious leaders who have called for people around the world to try to assassinate 2 world leaders.

I was talking about all religions when I said If religion in this day and age is used to do things like order assassinations, how do we know as a society if we should still respect others' religious beliefs or not? I don't respect anyone that uses religion to order assassinations and I don't respect the US evangelicals who call for death to gay people.

I don't think any UK church leaders have said that gay people should be executed. If people said that sort of thing in the UK now it wouldn't be tolerated (rightly so). Very different values from Iranian extremists and US extremists.

OP posts:
JadeHare · 02/07/2026 19:20

Or did these men of power not use their power cynically? Honestly, it doesn’t make sense.

JadeHare · 02/07/2026 19:17

I don’t think anyone reading this thread will think I have lost my mind. I hope they will see the double standards that you are trying to apply. Clerics, men of the cloth, shouldn’t promote murder. The POTUS, and Benjamin Netanyahu, who have committed murder, totally absolved. It makes no sense.

Twiglets1 · 02/07/2026 19:07

JadeHare · 02/07/2026 17:54

“but men of power cynically using their influence to achieve a desired outcome - murder.”

But yet you fail to see that Trump and Netanyahu are men of power. Not necessarily men of religion, but men of power nevertheless, and they have done exactly the same thing. Commit murder.

Of course I see that Trump and Netanyahu are men of power too. But this particular thread is not about world leaders abusing their power it is about the Iranian clerics.

This is just more whataboutery. I'll be sure to mention the Iranian clerics on threads about Trump and Netanyahu. People will think I've lost my mind but there you go.

OP posts:
JadeHare · 02/07/2026 18:00

RedTagAlan · 02/07/2026 17:57

They use religion non stop.

Edit. In my above post where I referenced the above post, did not mean yours of course.

Edited

I get your point. Doubt Donald could recite the Lord’s Prayer to be honest.

RedTagAlan · 02/07/2026 17:57

JadeHare · 02/07/2026 17:54

“but men of power cynically using their influence to achieve a desired outcome - murder.”

But yet you fail to see that Trump and Netanyahu are men of power. Not necessarily men of religion, but men of power nevertheless, and they have done exactly the same thing. Commit murder.

They use religion non stop.

Edit. In my above post where I referenced the above post, did not mean yours of course.

RedTagAlan · 02/07/2026 17:55

Religion is used in this day and age to call for people to be killed. It is far from unique to Iranian clerics. See my posts above re US evangelicals calling for gays to be killed by the Government. They made that come true in Uganda too.

The above post is justification for whataboutism being valid on this subject. Because if the above poster is suggesting that what a cleric of one religion says means ALL of that religion is tarnished, then surely that logic holds for all religions?

I don't see anyone saying The King should not do his Church thing because a Christian leader says gays should be executed.

Swipe left for the next trending thread