Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

UAE plans to bankroll first ‘planned community’ in south Gaza

213 replies

Twiglets1 · 24/01/2026 06:00

Guardian Exclusive: Blueprints describe a ‘case study’ community where residents submit biometric data to gain entry:

The United Arab Emirates plans to fund “Gaza’s first planned community” on the ruined outskirts of Rafah. Palestinian residents there will have access to basic services like education, healthcare and running water, as long as they submit to biometric data collection and security vetting, according to planning documents and people familiar with the latest round of talks at the US-led Civil Military Coordination Center in Israel.

The planned city would mark the UAE’s first investment in a postwar reconstruction project located in the part of Gaza currently held by Israel. The wealthy Gulf state has contributed more than $1.8bn of humanitarian assistance to Gaza since 7 October 2023, according to UAE state media, making it Gaza’s largest humanitarian donor.

Blueprints for the Emirati-backed endeavor are laid out in an unclassified slide deck obtained by the Guardian and first reported by Dropsite, but the UAE’s role as its planned financier has not previously been reported. The presentation was prepared for a cohort of European donors who visited the CMCC on 14 January, according to an aid official who shared details about the briefing on the condition of anonymity. Israeli military planners have given the plans their stamp of approval.

The United Arab Emirates did not comment on its decision to endorse the Board of Peace, or its plans to fund one of the first US- and Israeli-backed reconstruction projects in Gaza.

One US official said that the first Emirati-backed compound could “become a model” for a string of residential camps that US and Israeli officials have described as “alternative safe communities”.

Within the first Rafah community, billed as a “case study”, planners envision several efforts to prevent the influence of Hamas, including the introduction of electronic shekel wallets “to mitigate the diversion of goods and funds to the Hamas financial channels”, and a school curriculum that will “not be Hamas-based”, but supplied by the UAE. Planners also specify that residents will be permitted to “enter and exit the neighborhood freely, subject to security checks to prevent the introduction of weapons and hostile elements”.

A White House spokesperson said that the Emirati-backed compound would be built during the board’s initial reconstruction push.

Land-clearing efforts for the Rafah site are already under way, an Israel Defense Forces spokesperson told the Guardian.

“Israel’s mission on the east side of the yellow line is to clear the infrastructure in that territory, including tunnels, booby-trapped houses – all of the infrastructure left on our side,” the IDF spokesperson said.

They also said that Israel would not participate in building or running the Emirati compound. “When construction begins, that’s when the ISF participates with boots on the ground.”

A project timeline obtained by the Guardian indicates that site planning began with a “land deed” review in late October and will entail at least four to six months of preparations before construction begins.

www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/23/uae-funds-gaza-community

OP posts:
CommonlyKnownAs · 25/01/2026 10:33

RedSongBird · 25/01/2026 10:26

The world was up in arms about it and Israel used the delay in recovering the bodies as an excuse to break the ceasefire. The fact that it seems no one knows where the remaining body is is sad to say the least but at least there is/was an attempt to recover it. I believe there isn’t even going to be an attempt to recover and identify the Palestinian bodies.

You say 'bodies' plural here, and 'was'. But previously you used the present tense and said body in the singular, ie what's happening now. That's what we're talking about.

The world is clearly not up in arms about that one body still being in Gaza and it's not preventing any of the plans, which the person's family are actually pretty fucked off about.

CommonlyKnownAs · 25/01/2026 10:31

RedSongBird · 25/01/2026 10:19

Japanese imperialism ended because of the economic boom which they enjoyed which partly began as a result of the US pumping billions of dollars into the country in order to supply its troops in the Korean war. Jamming the entire population of Gaza into a secure labour camp and forcing them into indentured labour is not improving their lives.

There are multiple factors that led to the end of Japanese imperialism, and yes the economic support is one of them. This is one of the reasons I'm in favour of giving the Gazan people better options.

I don't see anything to suggest this proposal would include the whole population of Gaza, and indeed the security requirements would suggest otherwise. But even if it did, we are still left with the unfortunate reality that nobody has yet identified a better reconstruction option that stands any chance of happening. If you think you'd prefer the tent festering, Rohingya treatment, that's up to you but presumably you understand that Gazans are not a hive mind and might disagree?

RedSongBird · 25/01/2026 10:30

CommonlyKnownAs · 25/01/2026 09:58

The unpalatable reality is it doesn't actually matter how willing the Gazan people are to accept that their lives are shittier now than they were pre 7th October, it's the truth either way. They do not have agency or any prospect of it in the near future.

As for whether getting rid of Hamas/similar groups is a solution, we can only guess. There are examples of movements who've been so badly militarily beaten that they stop being a threat, hence there's been no problem with Japanese imperialism for 80 years now. Equally there are some where you can't kill the idea.

I think most take the view that the best chance of change comes if you give people better options. That would definitely be my preference, my concerns are over how to do this in practice. But leaving the population to their tents is also one of the possibilities here.

It is the fact that no one cares about the Palestinians that gets me. I thought that the days of Israel gaslighting the world into believing they were the good guys and the Palestinians were the bad guys was over but unfortunately it appears I’m wrong.

RedSongBird · 25/01/2026 10:26

CommonlyKnownAs · 25/01/2026 10:15

There still is an Israeli's body left in Gaza, and I wouldn't say the world is particularly up in arms about that tbh. Don't hear anything much about it, and it evidently isn't functioning as a barrier to this planned community idea. His family think the world has forgotten them.

The world was up in arms about it and Israel used the delay in recovering the bodies as an excuse to break the ceasefire. The fact that it seems no one knows where the remaining body is is sad to say the least but at least there is/was an attempt to recover it. I believe there isn’t even going to be an attempt to recover and identify the Palestinian bodies.

RedSongBird · 25/01/2026 10:19

CommonlyKnownAs · 25/01/2026 09:58

The unpalatable reality is it doesn't actually matter how willing the Gazan people are to accept that their lives are shittier now than they were pre 7th October, it's the truth either way. They do not have agency or any prospect of it in the near future.

As for whether getting rid of Hamas/similar groups is a solution, we can only guess. There are examples of movements who've been so badly militarily beaten that they stop being a threat, hence there's been no problem with Japanese imperialism for 80 years now. Equally there are some where you can't kill the idea.

I think most take the view that the best chance of change comes if you give people better options. That would definitely be my preference, my concerns are over how to do this in practice. But leaving the population to their tents is also one of the possibilities here.

Japanese imperialism ended because of the economic boom which they enjoyed which partly began as a result of the US pumping billions of dollars into the country in order to supply its troops in the Korean war. Jamming the entire population of Gaza into a secure labour camp and forcing them into indentured labour is not improving their lives.

CommonlyKnownAs · 25/01/2026 10:15

There still is an Israeli's body left in Gaza, and I wouldn't say the world is particularly up in arms about that tbh. Don't hear anything much about it, and it evidently isn't functioning as a barrier to this planned community idea. His family think the world has forgotten them.

RedSongBird · 25/01/2026 09:58

Twiglets1 · 25/01/2026 09:55

Why is it hypocritical though? If you are alluding to the fact that Israel got most of their dead bodies returned, they only achieved this through hard negotiations. They paid a high price for the return of their hostages dead & alive.

Hamas negotiated different things in the peace settlement such as the release of thousands of Palestinian prisoners.

That is exactly why I’m saying it is hypocritically disgusting. If it were an Israeli body, or any other western nation, the world would be up in arms.

CommonlyKnownAs · 25/01/2026 09:58

The unpalatable reality is it doesn't actually matter how willing the Gazan people are to accept that their lives are shittier now than they were pre 7th October, it's the truth either way. They do not have agency or any prospect of it in the near future.

As for whether getting rid of Hamas/similar groups is a solution, we can only guess. There are examples of movements who've been so badly militarily beaten that they stop being a threat, hence there's been no problem with Japanese imperialism for 80 years now. Equally there are some where you can't kill the idea.

I think most take the view that the best chance of change comes if you give people better options. That would definitely be my preference, my concerns are over how to do this in practice. But leaving the population to their tents is also one of the possibilities here.

RedSongBird · 25/01/2026 09:56

Twiglets1 · 25/01/2026 09:48

We disagree here because I believe their life should be better without Hamas rather than “even worse”. Could it even get much worse than what years of living under Hamas rule has led them to?

I don’t know how this planned community in south Gaza will work out for Gazans or indeed from the bigger peace plan. But I fail to see how it could get much worse for them than living in tents in refugee camps in poverty which is the current reality for so many.

If I were unfortunate enough to be born a Gazan, I would rather live in a tent for the time being and slowly try to rebuild myself than be put in a secure ghetto, having their kids brainwashed with Israeli propaganda trying to erase their history and be forced to work for the very people who put me there in order to survive. As well as food and shelter, people need dignity and self determination or it is no life at all.

Twiglets1 · 25/01/2026 09:55

RedSongBird · 25/01/2026 09:42

For once we agree but how hypocritically disgusting is that.

Why is it hypocritical though? If you are alluding to the fact that Israel got most of their dead bodies returned, they only achieved this through hard negotiations. They paid a high price for the return of their hostages dead & alive.

Hamas negotiated different things in the peace settlement such as the release of thousands of Palestinian prisoners.

OP posts:
Twiglets1 · 25/01/2026 09:48

RedSongBird · 25/01/2026 09:38

So their life was shitty before but now they just have to accept it is going to be even shittier. They may be able to get rid of Hamas but that is not a solution. If you don’t get rid of the reason for Hamas, it will simply manifest itself again but in another form.

We disagree here because I believe their life should be better without Hamas rather than “even worse”. Could it even get much worse than what years of living under Hamas rule has led them to?

I don’t know how this planned community in south Gaza will work out for Gazans or indeed from the bigger peace plan. But I fail to see how it could get much worse for them than living in tents in refugee camps in poverty which is the current reality for so many.

OP posts:
RedSongBird · 25/01/2026 09:42

Twiglets1 · 25/01/2026 09:39

I guess this is a rhetorical question because the answer is obvious. Sad but true that unless someone specifically pays for the bodies to be recovered, they won’t be.

For once we agree but how hypocritically disgusting is that.

Twiglets1 · 25/01/2026 09:39

RedSongBird · 25/01/2026 09:31

What’s going to happen to all the bodies buried under the rubble where these luxury resorts are going to be built. Are they going to be recovered and accounted for or simply swept up by the bulldozers clearing the rubble and simply dumped.

I guess this is a rhetorical question because the answer is obvious. Sad but true that unless someone specifically pays for the bodies to be recovered, they won’t be.

OP posts:
RedSongBird · 25/01/2026 09:38

Twiglets1 · 25/01/2026 09:31

No one is trying to paint it as a magnanimous solution though.

Countries like the UAE who this thread is about will only pour millions/billions into Gaza if they see a likelihood of some return on their money in future.

The same goes for all other countries like the US for example.

The sad fact is wars make people rich and the reconstruction of Gaza will not be done for free. But it could be better than the alternative. As @CommonlyKnownAs the international community could just leave the refugees to fester in tents as they move into the next crisis. I don’t see that as preferable.

So their life was shitty before but now they just have to accept it is going to be even shittier. They may be able to get rid of Hamas but that is not a solution. If you don’t get rid of the reason for Hamas, it will simply manifest itself again but in another form.

RedSongBird · 25/01/2026 09:31

What’s going to happen to all the bodies buried under the rubble where these luxury resorts are going to be built. Are they going to be recovered and accounted for or simply swept up by the bulldozers clearing the rubble and simply dumped.

Twiglets1 · 25/01/2026 09:31

RedSongBird · 25/01/2026 09:18

It’s unbelievable how some people are trying to paint this as some magnanimous solution. Gaza was already one of the most densely populated areas on earth. They’re now planning on jamming the entire population into less than half the land, away from the coast because that is where the luxury resorts are going to go. Gaza was always seen as an open air prison but this is something else now. The Palestinians formally recognised the State of Israel in 1993 giving up their claim to 78% of historical Palestine in order to reach a two state solution. Israel totally reneged on the deal and did not recognise Palestine. Israel has made it perfectly clear they will never recognise Palestine and will do everything in their power to block a two state solution. They brag about it ffs. Israel wants more land, not less. They don’t even try to hide the intention.

No one is trying to paint it as a magnanimous solution though.

Countries like the UAE who this thread is about will only pour millions/billions into Gaza if they see a likelihood of some return on their money in future.

The same goes for all other countries like the US for example.

The sad fact is wars make people rich and the reconstruction of Gaza will not be done for free. But it could be better than the alternative. As @CommonlyKnownAs the international community could just leave the refugees to fester in tents as they move into the next crisis. I don’t see that as preferable.

OP posts:
CommonlyKnownAs · 25/01/2026 09:24

The last thing any of this will be is magnanimous. Any country or entity willing to invest in Gaza will be doing so because they think they can get enough out of it to make the risk worthwhile.

RedSongBird · 25/01/2026 09:23

CommonlyKnownAs · 25/01/2026 09:13

I do wonder what you think this would look like. How we'd go from attributing whatever level of Israeli responsibility you want, to a viable rebuilding plan.

Unfortunately, it's much easier to identify the obvious risks and downsides of this UAE plan than it is to come up with viable alternatives that anyone will volunteer to do. Important to stress that being left to fester in tents is very much one of the possibilities here. The world does that to refugees who've done nothing to deserve it all the time, it's just that more people have heard about the Gazans than, say, Dadaab or Kutupalong. There is no guarantee of reconstruction and nobody else is actually obliged to help.

It’s not the UAE’s plan. It is all highlighted in the ‘new’ Gaza plan unveiled by Kushner the other day. It’s not about rebuilding Gaza. It’s about real estate development. Once again, Palestinian land has been stolen.

RedSongBird · 25/01/2026 09:18

billiongulls · 25/01/2026 08:55

It sounds like a dystopian land stealing nightmare

It’s unbelievable how some people are trying to paint this as some magnanimous solution. Gaza was already one of the most densely populated areas on earth. They’re now planning on jamming the entire population into less than half the land, away from the coast because that is where the luxury resorts are going to go. Gaza was always seen as an open air prison but this is something else now. The Palestinians formally recognised the State of Israel in 1993 giving up their claim to 78% of historical Palestine in order to reach a two state solution. Israel totally reneged on the deal and did not recognise Palestine. Israel has made it perfectly clear they will never recognise Palestine and will do everything in their power to block a two state solution. They brag about it ffs. Israel wants more land, not less. They don’t even try to hide the intention.

CommonlyKnownAs · 25/01/2026 09:13

billiongulls · 25/01/2026 09:03

Those praising it can only be those who are blind to or deliberately obscuring the Israeli hand in and responsibility for the tragedy of Gaza. Because that's where we have to start.

I do wonder what you think this would look like. How we'd go from attributing whatever level of Israeli responsibility you want, to a viable rebuilding plan.

Unfortunately, it's much easier to identify the obvious risks and downsides of this UAE plan than it is to come up with viable alternatives that anyone will volunteer to do. Important to stress that being left to fester in tents is very much one of the possibilities here. The world does that to refugees who've done nothing to deserve it all the time, it's just that more people have heard about the Gazans than, say, Dadaab or Kutupalong. There is no guarantee of reconstruction and nobody else is actually obliged to help.

billiongulls · 25/01/2026 09:03

Those praising it can only be those who are blind to or deliberately obscuring the Israeli hand in and responsibility for the tragedy of Gaza. Because that's where we have to start.

billiongulls · 25/01/2026 08:55

GeneralPeter · 24/01/2026 06:10

Let’s see if this works, but if so it sounds like a great idea. An option to live in a secure compound without Hamas infiltration.

It sounds like a dystopian land stealing nightmare

CommonlyKnownAs · 25/01/2026 08:12

Oh definitely, wanting a viable Palestinian and a viable Israeli state on the land is the opposite of genocidal.

GeneralPeter · 25/01/2026 08:08

Carla786 · 25/01/2026 07:06

Wanting a nation for Palestinians is NOT inherently genocidal.

The version of 'kill and/or dominate all the Jews' unquestionably IS, though- and that's what Hamas and the shameful 'Palestinian Authority' have been promoting onto generations.

I believe in a 2SS but there are many, many hills to climb first.

I totally agree.

I think the genocidal strand is deeply rooted, not new, and pretty dominant. But it’s absolutely not inherent.

CommonlyKnownAs · 25/01/2026 07:49

Islandsofsand · 25/01/2026 04:05

It would be helpful to reflect on how the U.S. backed attempts to develop a 2SS may not have favoured the Arabs. Of course there are some Arabs who didn’t want this, as there have been Israeli leaders - the current one included.

What’s happening in the West Bank shows that it takes Israelis to also want to have a fair 2SS.

It does indeed. And I think that takes us back to the sort of framing a Hamas controlled education system is going to provide.

I trust Hamas to ensure full coverage of the likes of Smotrich in any schooling system they're in charge of. What they're not going to do is explain that there are multiple factions in Israeli society, that 7th October handed the lunatic fringe settlers in the West Bank a golden opportunity to steal more land, and that the attacks deliberately targeted the sort of Israeli who does want to work towards a fair two state solution. That the whole point of killing people like Vivian Silver and Shani Louk was to try and kybosh any peace process. But to move forward, Gazan children will need to understand both sides of this.

Swipe left for the next trending thread