Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

BBC forced to correct two Gaza stories a week

119 replies

Twiglets1 · 09/11/2025 14:34

The BBC has been forced to correct two stories a week about the Gaza conflict since the Oct 7 attacks on Israel, The Telegraph has revealed.

BBC Arabic has had to make 215 corrections and clarifications over the past two years on stories that were found to be biased, inaccurate or misleading.

The figures follow a week of revelations by The Telegraph of one-sided reporting at the BBC, disclosed in an 8,000-word dossier compiled by a whistleblower, which also accused BBC Arabic of choosing to “minimise Israeli suffering” in the war in Gaza to “paint Israel as the aggressor”.

On Monday, the BBC is also expected to apologise for the misleading editing of a Donald Trump speech in a Panorama documentary, putting further pressure on Tim Davie, the BBC’s director general, to quit.

The media bias campaign group Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (Camera) obtained the corrections after over 100 of its complaints over BBC Arabic’s coverage were upheld.

One of its complaints involved a BBC Arabic report in January this year about the treatment of hostages by the Al-Qassam Brigade, in which the Hamas unit was described as “guarding” the hostages and being “responsible for securing the hostages”, rather than holding them captive.

BBC Arabic – which is part of the World Service and is funded mainly through the licence fee – has also been forced to make more than 40 corrections after Camera complained about stories that incorrectly referred to communities inside Israel’s internationally recognised territory as “settlements” and their residents as “settlers”.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11/09/bbc-forced-to-correct-two-gaza-stories-a-week/

OP posts:
Thedawnchorus · 10/11/2025 10:32

"The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (CAMERA), formerly the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, is an American nonprofit pro-Israel media-monitoring, research, and membership organization".

Ha ha. So no bias there then!!

GarlicHound · 10/11/2025 10:23

ThisOldThang · 09/11/2025 20:00

Winston Smith's job in 1984 was to edit an online newspaper to make the stories of the past fit the reality of the present.

Orwell based the Ministry of Truth upon his time at the BBC. It's incredible how accurate he was in his distopian depiction of the organisation.

No, he didn't. He based it on the wartime Ministry of Information, where he worked, and on Soviet misinformation.

Twiglets1 · 10/11/2025 10:21

GarlicHound · 10/11/2025 10:16

This is a good argument for not forcing the BBC to switch to commercial funding. Under its current funding model, it is answerable, though it takes a lot to get the answer.

The BBC is answerable and yet somehow it hasn't acted that way lately. It took a lot of evidence and a whistleblower to expose multiple examples of bias on a range of topics, and the BBC still tried to hide things under the carpet until the Telegraph made a big thing about it.

Maybe ultimately this will be good for the BBC if it reminds them they have obligations that commercial news organisations don't have, who knows.

OP posts:
GarlicHound · 10/11/2025 10:16

spoonbillstretford · 09/11/2025 19:03

I just wish there was this much scrutiny for all media channels and newspapers. Meanwhile the Daily Mail, Fox News and GBeebies talk absolute lies, fear and shite every day with zero scrutiny and people here swallow it whole.

This is a good argument for not forcing the BBC to switch to commercial funding. Under its current funding model, it is answerable, though it takes a lot to get the answer.

ThisOldThang · 10/11/2025 10:15

hellowhaaat3632 · 10/11/2025 10:13

This article made me laugh. They're the victims (of course). Sorry don't have an archive version.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/nov/09/bbc-attack-trump-telegraph-tories-tim-davie-resignation

The only story regarding this on their front page is a similar 'we're the victims' piece.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c07m2v1z4evo

They just don't get it.

An image shows the BBC logo pictured on the entrance to BBC Broadcasting House in central London, with the top of a camera in the foreground, taken in March 2023

Katie Razzall: A seismic moment that shows rift at top of BBC

There may be more to this than meets the eye, says the BBC's culture and media editor.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c07m2v1z4evo

Twiglets1 · 10/11/2025 10:14

Of course they are the victims @hellowhaaat3632 😂

OP posts:
ThisOldThang · 10/11/2025 10:14

Thedawnchorus · 10/11/2025 10:08

This is too funny. It's nothing about bias. Some people are very upset that every news corporation is not a mouthpiece for Israeli propaganda. God forbid they might report on war crimes or anything else that paints Israel in a negative light. Israeli leaders calling for the extermination of the Palestinians in Gaza is okay though.

I think you've been watching too much BBC News.

Thedawnchorus · 10/11/2025 10:08

This is too funny. It's nothing about bias. Some people are very upset that every news corporation is not a mouthpiece for Israeli propaganda. God forbid they might report on war crimes or anything else that paints Israel in a negative light. Israeli leaders calling for the extermination of the Palestinians in Gaza is okay though.

Ihatetomatoes · 10/11/2025 09:50

Lamelie · 10/11/2025 08:58

Exactly. And if this means we lose psb it’ll be a tragedy.

I agree. They must be neutral and seen to be neutral, it's vital

Ihatetomatoes · 10/11/2025 09:48

Lamelie · 10/11/2025 09:40

Oops sorry. Having an independent publicly funded broadcasting service (no adverts) and accountability is amazing.

It is, when they are unbiased, it isn't when they use public money to push agendas of people who run the organisation. They should just run factual stories and cut the bias and opinion.

Lamelie · 10/11/2025 09:40

Oops sorry. Having an independent publicly funded broadcasting service (no adverts) and accountability is amazing.

Twiglets1 · 10/11/2025 09:05

Psb is public service broadcaster for anyone who doesn't know (just had to Google it myself)

OP posts:
Lamelie · 10/11/2025 08:58

SharonEllis · 09/11/2025 14:55

Its infuriating. I'm a massive supporter of the BBC but this level of bias is completely unacceptable.

Exactly. And if this means we lose psb it’ll be a tragedy.

dairydebris · 10/11/2025 07:53

SharonEllis · 10/11/2025 07:43

I kind of agree with you, also as a lifelong leftie. I know lots of people now cancelling their tv licence. I wont yet be joining them but the BBC has been complicit in some shockingly poor journalism and contributed to a cultural climate of dictatorial groupthink around key issues, such as Israel/gaza, feminism and gender ideology and race (Kate Clanchy affair being a good example). Its still an ideal worth fighting for though! Spend 5 minutes in the US and you know why.

After 20 years in the US I'd happily pay double the license fee. In fact I'm actually pretty sure both my husband and I pay it so for once I've put my money where my mouth is 😉.

Twiglets1 · 10/11/2025 07:48

dairydebris · 10/11/2025 07:21

Not terribly encouraging reading @Twiglets1 - thanks as always for posting all this.

I haven't always lived in the UK and tbh ot sickens me to my stomach to hear anyone involved in US media criticizing UK media. The BBC and Fox News are so very world's apart that they can't be compared. The huge divisions in US society- actually the parallel world US voters live in- is in large part down to their unfit for purpose media.

I think its promising that this has been taken seriously and hope the BBC can address their issues. I think its unfair to expect that bias wont creep in from time to time- we are all biased. The important bit is having process to root it out and try to do better.

Long live the BBC 😈

Interesting perspective about the US unfit for purpose media that I was not particularly aware of - thank you.

Despite everything, I wouldn’t want to see the BBC destroyed either. It’s still one of the better news sources we have in the UK. But they do need to recognise their own bias and tendency towards group think. Get back to reporting the news as impartially as possible rather than allowing personal opinions to shape what they choose to report & how. And be mindful about not doing anything that could incite more violence at a time when society is very divided.

OP posts:
SharonEllis · 10/11/2025 07:43

dairydebris · 10/11/2025 07:34

Agree but good luck.

The BBC by the nature of the industry its a part of will always be left leaning. You've only got to be on mumsnet for 5m to see the whole of the left has a blind spot for antisemitism. They're so purposefully anti racist, and rightly so, that they literally cannot see the racism log in their own eyes. I say that as a lifelong leftie.

My point remains that overall the BBC is an amazing institution and the fact that these people have been forced to fall on their swords just backs that up for me.

It's not perfect, but its really, really good.

I kind of agree with you, also as a lifelong leftie. I know lots of people now cancelling their tv licence. I wont yet be joining them but the BBC has been complicit in some shockingly poor journalism and contributed to a cultural climate of dictatorial groupthink around key issues, such as Israel/gaza, feminism and gender ideology and race (Kate Clanchy affair being a good example). Its still an ideal worth fighting for though! Spend 5 minutes in the US and you know why.

Ihatetomatoes · 10/11/2025 07:34

Double resignation of 2 BBC bosses due to Trump documentary edit. Maybe they will be more factual in all stories if they appoint new people 🤔 can only hope, clear bias on Trump, Trans and Palestinian/Israel stories.

dairydebris · 10/11/2025 07:34

Ihatetomatoes · 10/11/2025 07:26

The Labour Party were anti semitic lead by Corbyn. It's taken a long time to slowly attempt to realise they were.

The BBC need to go through a similar process, weed out anti semitism and clean it up.

Agree but good luck.

The BBC by the nature of the industry its a part of will always be left leaning. You've only got to be on mumsnet for 5m to see the whole of the left has a blind spot for antisemitism. They're so purposefully anti racist, and rightly so, that they literally cannot see the racism log in their own eyes. I say that as a lifelong leftie.

My point remains that overall the BBC is an amazing institution and the fact that these people have been forced to fall on their swords just backs that up for me.

It's not perfect, but its really, really good.

Ihatetomatoes · 10/11/2025 07:26

dairydebris · 10/11/2025 07:21

Not terribly encouraging reading @Twiglets1 - thanks as always for posting all this.

I haven't always lived in the UK and tbh ot sickens me to my stomach to hear anyone involved in US media criticizing UK media. The BBC and Fox News are so very world's apart that they can't be compared. The huge divisions in US society- actually the parallel world US voters live in- is in large part down to their unfit for purpose media.

I think its promising that this has been taken seriously and hope the BBC can address their issues. I think its unfair to expect that bias wont creep in from time to time- we are all biased. The important bit is having process to root it out and try to do better.

Long live the BBC 😈

The Labour Party were anti semitic lead by Corbyn. It's taken a long time to slowly attempt to realise they were.

The BBC need to go through a similar process, weed out anti semitism and clean it up.

dairydebris · 10/11/2025 07:21

Not terribly encouraging reading @Twiglets1 - thanks as always for posting all this.

I haven't always lived in the UK and tbh ot sickens me to my stomach to hear anyone involved in US media criticizing UK media. The BBC and Fox News are so very world's apart that they can't be compared. The huge divisions in US society- actually the parallel world US voters live in- is in large part down to their unfit for purpose media.

I think its promising that this has been taken seriously and hope the BBC can address their issues. I think its unfair to expect that bias wont creep in from time to time- we are all biased. The important bit is having process to root it out and try to do better.

Long live the BBC 😈

Ihatetomatoes · 10/11/2025 07:08

Twiglets1 · 09/11/2025 19:59

Their editing of Trump's speech was probably the story that caused the BBC the most damage. But their bias over trans issues and Gaza are relevant too.

Their* *broadcast of Bob Vylan's set at Glastonbury also broke editorial guidelines in relation to harm and offence, so that was more reputational damage.

Yes broadcasting clear cheering on of terrorists, showing they are infiltrated with useful idiots, who don't know where the 'stop broadcasting ' switch is when it suits them.

Ihatetomatoes · 10/11/2025 07:05

Another one who is not surprised how inaccurate and biased the BBC has become. They can't even call a terrorist a terrorist.

I have no faith in the BBC who should just report facts, not spin stories to fit their narrative, whether pro hamas or trans. Reality and truth appear to have left their organisation when discussing Palestinian/Israel isses along with biological reality, it just stirs up hatred.

quantumbutterfly · 09/11/2025 23:16

The early days of the BBC had an awareness of it's role in the morale of the nation, this 'activism' has the opposite effect, it inflames divisions. It's the strategy of useful idiots because the BBC has funded some very good programming and I would be sorry to lose that.

quantumbutterfly · 09/11/2025 22:57

Twiglets1 · 09/11/2025 22:42

Just Googled it and Winston Smith's job is to rewrite historical records so ... the 1949 version of online news maybe seeing as reports change over time and are only "factual" in the loosest sense as being what someone wants the facts to be at a particular point in time.

True. My concern was the source ..book Vs film ( there are a few). Which is an interesting counterpoint to this discussion about where we get our facts/information from.
The subject of journalism losing impartiality and turning into activism was something associated press journalist Martin Friedman spoke about.
Controlling information has always been a political strategy right down to the algorithms that populated your online content.

Pp comments about loss of trust in institutions
, or more worryingly, the institutions of governance, should be ....a bit of a concern.

Swipe left for the next trending thread