One of the first things that leapt out at me in that report was this -
B’tselem says the testimony their researchers have gathered is remarkably consistent.
__
“All of them again and again, told us the same thing,” says Yuli Novak, B’tselem’s executive director
People capable of critical thinking might wonder if that leans towards it being a script.
B’tselem may be an Israeli human rights organisation but it’s main funding comes from leftist Western organisations and it operates a clear political bias to a one State solution which is rather like turkeys looking forward to Christmas.
ngo-monitor.org/ngos/b_tselem/
Also rather telling that they featured a self admitted member of the PIJ terrorist group, heavily involved in Oct 7th, to give his ‘testimony’.
Do you not think it was pretty logical that Israel were going to detain lots of suspected and known terrorists, from a known terrorist enclave after a massive terrorist attack carried out and supported by thousands of Palestinians, like Oct 7th, when there were also hundreds of Israeli and other countries citizens taken hostage who they needed intel on the location of, and to ensure they got all the suspects and intel on the perpetrators of the mass slaughter and gang rapes?
I imagine any country in that situation would have done the same.
The influx of suspects, which is actually damning on Palestinian society and the support for terrorism IMO, would have had an overwhelming and negative effect on conditions and the severity of how they were dealt with after an attack like Oct 7th?
How do you think Egypt or Jordan would have dealt with thousands of terrorist suspects in their prisons if the Palestinians had carried out an Oct 7th style attack there?
The ICRC showing their disgusting bias claiming they haven’t been able to check on terrorists welfare, when they refused to check on or give essential medication to innocent Israeli and international citizen hostages ‘consciously defying international law’ in that article.