Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

Hamas preventing mass evacuation of Gaza City for propaganda reasons

42 replies

Twiglets1 · 03/09/2025 15:37

Times of Israel reporting today that as the IDF prepares to expand its ground operations into Gaza City, Hamas is preventing civilians from evacuating south.

Defense officials estimate that 70,000 to 80,000 residents have fled Gaza City, most of them in the past 72 hours, even before an official evacuation order. Over the weekend, the number stood at about 10,000 out of the city’s estimated one million residents. Officials expect departures to continue as the IDF presses its campaign.

“The Hamas terror organization is doing everything it can to block the population’s movement southward in order to use civilians as human shields and for propaganda purposes,” one security official says. “In practice, the public’s barrier of fear has been broken, and tens of thousands of residents have managed to bypass Hamas checkpoints and evacuate the city.”

Meanwhile, the IDF releases a recording said to depict a Gaza City resident telling a Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) officer that Hamas is preventing civilians from moving south.

“We want to go south but Hamas is blocking the way,” the resident is heard saying. “They tell people: go back home, there is no evacuation, go back, go back — and people scatter.”

He adds that many residents are fearful, with some attempting to take side streets and alternative routes. According to his testimony, Hamas operatives are stationed along the seashore near al-Nabulsi junction in western Gaza City and other areas, blocking main roads.

The IDF says the testimony highlights Hamas’s use of civilians as human shields to deter military operations.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/israeli-officials-hamas-preventing-mass-evacuation-of-gaza-city-for-propaganda-reasons-but-tens-of-thousands-have-left/

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Wedonttalkaboutboris · 07/09/2025 07:47

Netanyahu is actually quoted in 2019 saying that anyone who wants to stop a Palestinian state should support keeping Hamas strong in Gaza.

There’s no evidence (yet) that he personally ‘funded’ Hamas, but his governments repeatedly approved Qatari cash transfers into Gaza knowing Hamas controlled the strip. He reportedly embraced this as a strategic move to divide Palestinian factions and hinder peace negotiations.

https://www.thenation.com/article/world/why-netanyahu-bolstered-hamas

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_support_for_Hamas

Why Netanyahu Bolstered Hamas

The Israeli prime minister followed a decades-old divide-and-rule strategy that fuels endless war.

https://www.thenation.com/article/world/why-netanyahu-bolstered-hamas/

TulipLavender · 07/09/2025 02:11

CaramelPecan · 04/09/2025 15:39

Where are Hamas going to go though? Who’s going to take them?

To another country to plan and execute further terrorist attacks either at Israel, allies of Israel or Jewish communities in other countries?

I can’t see how they can be allowed to leave tbh.

I never understood why Hamas leaders are being protected in other countries. Why is there not pressure from other governments to bring them to justice?

Are they considered as separate to the military arm of Hamas? How does that make sense?

Why haven’t the ICC issued arrest warrants against them?

They have made public statements that they want their civilians to die and they will carry out attacks on Israel again and again?

I also really don't understand why given the USA and Qatar are such close allies - why doesn't the USA get Qatar to stop hosting Senior Hamas Leaders. It doesn't make sense to me.

Everexpanding · 07/09/2025 00:40

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/usaid-analysis-found-no-evidence-massive-hamas-theft-gaza-aid-2025-07-25/

Exclusive: USAID analysis found no evidence of massive Hamas theft of Gaza aid

Everexpanding · 07/09/2025 00:38

Also included in the report

“Israeli officials blame the UN for failing to distribute aid and have repeatedly claimed Hamas is stealing much of the assistance, though an internal US government report said this was not true.”

rebutting the misinformation spread by many posting on this thread @Twiglets1

Everexpanding · 07/09/2025 00:35

mids2019 · 06/09/2025 23:21

The UN which seems to have some sort of agenda against Israel. The amount of hyperbole that this institution continually emits against Israel is incredible. The boy who cried wolf is a good comparison here as people are tuning out of the continuous use of cataclysmic terms in this war that never quite reach reality.

Hyperbole???
when this is happening

More than 7,000 under-fives in Gaza put in malnutrition recovery in two-week period

www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/06/unicef-under-5s-recovery-programmes-acute-malnutrition-gaza

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 07/09/2025 00:18

mids2019 · 06/09/2025 23:21

The UN which seems to have some sort of agenda against Israel. The amount of hyperbole that this institution continually emits against Israel is incredible. The boy who cried wolf is a good comparison here as people are tuning out of the continuous use of cataclysmic terms in this war that never quite reach reality.

The UN isn’t issuing statements lightly. Their reports are based on verified evidence from the ground, including mass civilian casualties, destruction of homes, hospitals, and denial of essential supplies. Dismissing it as ‘hyperbole’ ignores actual human suffering. Tens of Thousands of children are starving and being killed- this isn’t a case of crying wolf, it’s a humanitarian catastrophe.

mids2019 · 06/09/2025 23:21

The UN which seems to have some sort of agenda against Israel. The amount of hyperbole that this institution continually emits against Israel is incredible. The boy who cried wolf is a good comparison here as people are tuning out of the continuous use of cataclysmic terms in this war that never quite reach reality.

Twiglets1 · 06/09/2025 15:35

Lunalara · 06/09/2025 14:58

All of this tells me that there are lots of people that are willing to believe sources like the daily mail over organisations like the UN and basic facts of the events.

Why? No one has quoted from the Daily Mail.

OP posts:
Lunalara · 06/09/2025 14:58

All of this tells me that there are lots of people that are willing to believe sources like the daily mail over organisations like the UN and basic facts of the events.

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 06/09/2025 11:31

Twiglets1 · 06/09/2025 05:15

No one has ever believed the shit that babies are Hamas.

Why are they killing so many then?

quantumbutterfly · 06/09/2025 11:29

mids2019 · 06/09/2025 06:51

Aren't there tunnels the Palestinains could use?

I see that a lot of them are accessed by ladders in vertical shafts so not very inclusive, but at least they're often in homes and public buildings.
Though tbf I saw footage of sinwar's wife and children using one to leave Gaza just before 7/10 and she didn't look particularly nimble.

There were a couple that you could drive through so they could be considered 'accessible.'

mids2019 · 06/09/2025 06:51

Aren't there tunnels the Palestinains could use?

Twiglets1 · 06/09/2025 05:15

beachcitygirl · 06/09/2025 04:48

Apparently everyone is hamas. Even babies. No one, literally no one believes this shit anymore.

No one has ever believed the shit that babies are Hamas.

OP posts:
beachcitygirl · 06/09/2025 04:48

Apparently everyone is hamas. Even babies. No one, literally no one believes this shit anymore.

Twiglets1 · 06/09/2025 04:29

ElaineParrish · 06/09/2025 00:15

Not disputing their reliability. I'm just surprised it's not been broadcast by UK or US news sources, given that they are meant to be in support.

As the article seems like useful information, that should be widely known.

I think the UK media not mentioning this shows their bias against Israel.

This one particular child was used for propaganda purposes and it was considered a very relevant story at the time. Now it turns out to be a lie, suddenly it’s not important as only one child.

OP posts:
RandomWordsThrownTogether · 06/09/2025 00:44

It’s almost like Israel are trying to get their story together for why they just HAD to, were FORCED to bomb more innocent children. Hamas are evil but the IDF take it to a whole other level!

The reality is starving people, injured people, child amputees etc… do not have the energy or the ability to evacuate. For those that do there are serious trust issues at play when someone who has in the past told people to evacuate and then bombed the evacuation routes, bombed their refugee tents etc... Would you trust these lying murderers and keep moving from place to place? The IDF and their supporters are a shower.

ElaineParrish · 06/09/2025 00:15

Twiglets1 · 05/09/2025 04:52

No one is justifying genocide.

@ElaineParrish Times of Israel is a mainstream source. Its scores according to the mediabiascheck website:

Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-2.5)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.8)
Country: Israel
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MODERATE FREEDOM
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Maybe you mean it's not a UK source?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/times-of-israel/

Not disputing their reliability. I'm just surprised it's not been broadcast by UK or US news sources, given that they are meant to be in support.

As the article seems like useful information, that should be widely known.

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 05/09/2025 17:24

CaramelPecan · 04/09/2025 22:26

FREE tents brought into Gaza to provide shelter for the evacuation being sold in Gaza’s markets for $1200 CASH.

Cue the accusations of Israel is not letting in tents for vital shelter in the evacuation.

https://x.com/imshin/status/1963136899788292115

https://x.com/cogatonline/status/1963668403371298856

That blasted X again.

So we’re meant to applaud Israel for levelling nearly 2 million people’s homes- even children in displacement camps- and then tossing a few tents at them?

  • The UN confirms over 1.3 million Gazans still lack proper shelter due to blocked deliveries of tents and other key supplies .
  • Even where tents did arrive, around 74% are now unusable, destroyed by prolonged exposure to harsh conditions.
  • After winter storms, 110,000 out of 135,000 tents were rendered unfit for habitation- telling evidence of the failed ‘help’ provided.
  • Israel claimed it would allow shelter deliveries but aid groups- including the UN, CARE, ShelterBox, and the Norwegian Refugee Council- report continued obstruction and red tape.

In short: dropping “some tents” doesn’t offset the destruction and neglect of an entire people made homeless.

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 05/09/2025 17:20

Twiglets1 · 05/09/2025 04:52

No one is justifying genocide.

@ElaineParrish Times of Israel is a mainstream source. Its scores according to the mediabiascheck website:

Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-2.5)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.8)
Country: Israel
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MODERATE FREEDOM
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Maybe you mean it's not a UK source?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/times-of-israel/

It’s a genocide-
and there’s plenty of people on this board trying to explain why the actions of Israel and the IDF are ‘justified’.

mids2019 · 05/09/2025 07:16

Why is it only the Israeli media that give updates on Israeli soldiers killed in action? If we have a balanced press in the country surely that information would be channelled through the BBC.? Do Israeli troop deaths reveal the shocking truth this is a war and upset the pro Palestine looks that won't give up their genocide change despite it not being legally proved (or actually happening)?

why is the UN not as critical of Russia in its invasion of Ukraine as the justified self defence of a nation state?

people are able to see biased in the media and institutions and indeed critical thinking is a useful skill in life. There does seem to be an unthinking non mentality about the pro Palestine position that is scary and certainly results in increased anti semitism; which was maybe the end goal after all.

Twiglets1 · 05/09/2025 04:52

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 04/09/2025 20:49

It’s actually pathetic the lengths some are going to to justify this genocide now. Actually disgusting. What is happening is very visibly indefensible.

No one is justifying genocide.

@ElaineParrish Times of Israel is a mainstream source. Its scores according to the mediabiascheck website:

Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER (-2.5)
Factual Reporting: HIGH (1.8)
Country: Israel
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MODERATE FREEDOM
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

Failed Fact Checks

  • None in the Last 5 years

Maybe you mean it's not a UK source?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/times-of-israel/

OP posts:
CaramelPecan · 04/09/2025 22:26

FREE tents brought into Gaza to provide shelter for the evacuation being sold in Gaza’s markets for $1200 CASH.

Cue the accusations of Israel is not letting in tents for vital shelter in the evacuation.

https://x.com/imshin/status/1963136899788292115

https://x.com/cogatonline/status/1963668403371298856

That blasted X again.

https://x.com/imshin/status/1963136899788292115

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 04/09/2025 21:01

CaramelPecan · 04/09/2025 20:58

Neutral agencies like the UN and the Red Cross.

🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

Sorry, should have said just ANY other sources that aren’t the literal party actively engaged in the conflict. But apparently that’s the only source some of you will take as gospel.

CaramelPecan · 04/09/2025 20:58

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 04/09/2025 20:47

This “reporting” raises more questions than it answers. A few points to consider:

  1. Source bias: The piece quotes Israeli defense officials and a recording released by the IDF/COGAT. These are parties actively engaged in the conflict—they are not independent observers. Framing Hamas as blocking civilians is coming directly from the side conducting the bombardment. There is no corroboration from neutral humanitarian agencies like the UN or Red Cross.
  2. Numbers: The claim that 70–80,000 have “fled” out of 1 million residents is presented without independent verification. In a city under bombardment and siege, movement is chaotic, and figures provided by the military often serve strategic messaging.
  3. Human shields claim: This is a standard line used to justify civilian deaths in conflict. Even if Hamas forces were in populated areas, international law still obliges the IDF to distinguish civilians from combatants and avoid collective punishment. Civilians killed or trapped in the bombing can’t automatically be blamed on Hamas.
  4. Evacuation portrayal: The recording is taken at face value, but there’s no context—who recorded it, under what circumstances, and is it representative of the wider population’s experience? It’s one person’s testimony released by a party with a vested interest in the narrative.
  5. Overall framing: The article implicitly justifies the scale of destruction in Gaza, implying it’s necessary because civilians “could have” left but Hamas allegedly stopped them. This completely ignores the siege, the lack of safe passage, the destruction of roads and infrastructure, and the fact that starving, bombed civilians often cannot evacuate safely even if they want to.

Bottom line: using one-sided military sources to frame Gaza’s civilians as complicit is deeply misleading. Reports from independent agencies consistently show civilians are suffering massively regardless of Hamas’s actions.

Neutral agencies like the UN and the Red Cross.

🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

ElaineParrish · 04/09/2025 20:54

Is it only documented on 'times of Israel'? Is it anywhere else?
I don't think anyone Israel wants to convince is going to trust an Israeli source of info, without it being backed up by mainstream media

Swipe left for the next trending thread