Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Central Bank of Ireland confirms it will no longer approve sale of Israeli ‘war bonds’

481 replies

Everexpanding · 01/09/2025 17:24

Good news. Political pressure, protests and letters beginning to work

www.irishtimes.com/business/2025/09/01/israel-to-market-war-bonds-through-luxembourg-as-irish-authority-expires/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
Everexpanding · 17/09/2025 20:33

(In our government and it’s policies )

OP posts:
Everexpanding · 17/09/2025 20:31

Still found no evidence of current antisemitism so ? Bye

OP posts:
SharonEllis · 17/09/2025 20:21

FFS I have never said 'that anti semitism is the reason our government has been critising Israel'. I have said some criticism in Ireland is shaped by antisemitism.

Could you listen to Irish people when they tell you that it is not.
That is NOT how it works. You listen to the victims of racism, not the people perpetrating the racism. Have you ever heard of a person saying to a black person, shush now, white people say they are not racist, lets put it all behind us, shall we?

I have to say, even I have been shocked by this thread. Absolutely no self-reflection whatsoever.

I didnt say historical incidents are 'behind government policy today' but do you have no idea how racism, cultutlral memory, prejudice actually work? Have you given it no thought at all?

You are dismissing the flag. You said it was a just a piece of cloth and said 'give me strength'. Would you say to a black person in america dont let the confederate flag bother you, its just a bit of cloth? Or perhaps a burning cross, just a bit of wood?

The PFLP is viscious extreme antisemitic organisation, responsible for numerous murders and particularly noted for its plane hijackings. It does not recognise Israel. It is proscribed by the EU and the US. Supporti g it is illegal but more important its obviously designed to intimidate Jews and cannot be anything other than antisemitic.

Im done here now.

PaxAeterna · 17/09/2025 19:49

SharonEllis · 17/09/2025 16:04

Obviously I am not saying antisemitism 100 years ago is proof of antisemitism today.

I was asked for examples of historic antisemitism.

what is proof of antisemitism today is people trying to downplay hostoric antisemitism, being defensive, pretending it didn't happen or wasn't important. Brushing it under the carpet. In the very same thread where people are arguing that affinity with Palrstinians is precisely because of a shared historical experience.

So the history of Irish colonialism counts.
But the history of Irish antisemitism doesn't.

Your post is a classic example of what Rachel Moiselle talks about and shows a complete lack of empathy. To have to daily walk past a flag which represents people who want to kill you and have actively particpated in the murder of Jewish people because they are Jewish, is horrific. And the reason it is horrific is not the flag itself really but because others like you, minimise its effect. Its another step in the dehumanisation of a population and another sign to a Jewish person that they don't count.

Listen to Jewish people when they tell you it matters.

You are trying to say that anti semitism is the reason our government has been critising Israel.

Could you listen to Irish people when they tell you that it is not.

What does the history of Irish colonialism “count” towards do you think? I don’t understand what you mean by that. It happened. These incidents of anti semitism happened too. But those historical incidents are not what’s behind government policy today. We didn’t even have our own country 100 year ago.

I’m not dismissing the flag at all. I don’t agree with supporting terrorist groups. But I also don’t think that the existence of the flag indicates what’s at the root of our government policy on this matter.

Twiglets1 · 17/09/2025 19:21

SharonEllis · 17/09/2025 19:16

That's you told @Twiglets1!

yes that's me told 😂

SharonEllis · 17/09/2025 19:16

Welcometoshowbusiness · 17/09/2025 18:25

You’re wrong @Twiglets1. What Israel is doing now is making things far worse.

That's you told @Twiglets1!

Welcometoshowbusiness · 17/09/2025 18:25

You’re wrong @Twiglets1. What Israel is doing now is making things far worse.

Twiglets1 · 17/09/2025 18:04

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 17/09/2025 18:00

“Israel could also end it tomorrow”
The killing of civilians is not a requirement for dismantling Hamas. Israel chooses collective punishment- cutting food, water, and medicine, bombing homes and hospitals- which is a war crime. Targeting civilians does nothing to weaken Hamas’ military capacity.

“If they allow Hamas to remain, there will be another 7/10”
Israel has bombed Gaza relentlessly for nearly a year, killing over 60,000 (?) Palestinians (20,000+ children), yet Hamas still remains. Military campaigns have historically strengthened Hamas by deepening despair and leaving no political horizon. Even Israeli security experts have acknowledged that there is no military solution without addressing occupation and Palestinian rights.

“Unlike Hamas, Israel values the lives of their citizens”
If Israel valued its citizens’ safety, it would have prevented 7/10 by heeding repeated warnings (including from Egypt) and by addressing the unsustainable blockade of Gaza. Instead, Netanyahu admitted he preferred Hamas in power to block a Palestinian state. That policy choice endangered Israeli citizens.

“Future Israelis at risk of Hamas raping/killing/kidnapping”
Civilian protection doesn’t come from extermination campaigns. It comes from political resolution. Decades of occupation, siege, and expansion of illegal settlements have fuelled militancy. Every credible international body- UN, ICJ, human rights orgs- has said Israel must end collective punishment if it wants security. Killing tens of thousands of children guarantees future cycles of violence, not safety.

Israel could end mass civilian killing tomorrow. Continuing genocide isn’t “protecting Israelis,” it’s prolonging insecurity for both peoples. True safety requires justice, not annihilation.

How else can Israel destroy Hamas without killing them? They don't negotiate in good faith, if they did they would have agreed to release all hostages, disarm and leave Gaza a very long time ago.

Hamas still remain, yes. Thousands of them seem to be hiding in Gaza city which is why the IDF are now targeting Gaza city.

Victim blaming nonsense re blaming Israel for 7/10 attack.

Israel can't end the war until Hamas are destroyed or agree to leave Gaza - it's that simple.

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 17/09/2025 18:00

Twiglets1 · 17/09/2025 17:35

Because they triggered this whole shit show by their actions on 7/10 and because they STILL haven't returned the hostages despite what this means for their people in terms of Gaza being destroyed and the loss of civilian life.

I don't personally accept that Israel are carrying out genocide but the IDF are killing thousands of Palestinian citizens. This would stop if Hamas would agree to release the hostages, disarm and leave Gaza.

You might say - Israel could also end it tomorrow. But I don't think they could really because if they allow Hamas to remain in Gaza, they will just be waiting for the next 7/10 at a later date. Unlike Hamas, Israel DO value the lives of their citizens and won't allow this situation to happen again & future Israelis to be at risk of Hamas raping/killing/kidnapping them.

“Israel could also end it tomorrow”
The killing of civilians is not a requirement for dismantling Hamas. Israel chooses collective punishment- cutting food, water, and medicine, bombing homes and hospitals- which is a war crime. Targeting civilians does nothing to weaken Hamas’ military capacity.

“If they allow Hamas to remain, there will be another 7/10”
Israel has bombed Gaza relentlessly for nearly a year, killing over 60,000 (?) Palestinians (20,000+ children), yet Hamas still remains. Military campaigns have historically strengthened Hamas by deepening despair and leaving no political horizon. Even Israeli security experts have acknowledged that there is no military solution without addressing occupation and Palestinian rights.

“Unlike Hamas, Israel values the lives of their citizens”
If Israel valued its citizens’ safety, it would have prevented 7/10 by heeding repeated warnings (including from Egypt) and by addressing the unsustainable blockade of Gaza. Instead, Netanyahu admitted he preferred Hamas in power to block a Palestinian state. That policy choice endangered Israeli citizens.

“Future Israelis at risk of Hamas raping/killing/kidnapping”
Civilian protection doesn’t come from extermination campaigns. It comes from political resolution. Decades of occupation, siege, and expansion of illegal settlements have fuelled militancy. Every credible international body- UN, ICJ, human rights orgs- has said Israel must end collective punishment if it wants security. Killing tens of thousands of children guarantees future cycles of violence, not safety.

Israel could end mass civilian killing tomorrow. Continuing genocide isn’t “protecting Israelis,” it’s prolonging insecurity for both peoples. True safety requires justice, not annihilation.

Everexpanding · 17/09/2025 17:59

SharonEllis · 17/09/2025 17:19

@Everexpanding what have your posts got to do with recognising antisemitism in Ireland which is what we were talking about.

Ok, listen to Irish people when they ask you to provide evidence of the baseless claim that their current government is anti semitic , you haven’t provided proof because there is none

OP posts:
Wedonttalkaboutboris · 17/09/2025 17:43

And I’m not minimising antisemitism- it’s real and serious. But criticism of Israel’s actions isn’t the same as hatred of Jewish people.

Wedonttalkaboutboris · 17/09/2025 17:40

SharonEllis · 17/09/2025 16:04

Obviously I am not saying antisemitism 100 years ago is proof of antisemitism today.

I was asked for examples of historic antisemitism.

what is proof of antisemitism today is people trying to downplay hostoric antisemitism, being defensive, pretending it didn't happen or wasn't important. Brushing it under the carpet. In the very same thread where people are arguing that affinity with Palrstinians is precisely because of a shared historical experience.

So the history of Irish colonialism counts.
But the history of Irish antisemitism doesn't.

Your post is a classic example of what Rachel Moiselle talks about and shows a complete lack of empathy. To have to daily walk past a flag which represents people who want to kill you and have actively particpated in the murder of Jewish people because they are Jewish, is horrific. And the reason it is horrific is not the flag itself really but because others like you, minimise its effect. Its another step in the dehumanisation of a population and another sign to a Jewish person that they don't count.

Listen to Jewish people when they tell you it matters.

No one is minimising historic antisemitism- it’s real and horrific. But it’s a false equivalence to suggest that solidarity with Palestinians today is motivated by antisemitism, rather than by the images we are all seeing of mass civilian deaths, starvation, and dead children.

The reason the Palestinian flag is so visible right now is not because people hate Jews, but because Israel’s actions in Gaza have horrified the world. To conflate criticism of a state with hatred of a people does a disservice both to Jewish people and to Palestinians living through genocide.

To equate seeing that flag with actual persecution is really trivialising and dehumanising what Palestinian civilians are living through right now: children starving, bombed, whole families erased. That’s why people are flying it- not to target Jews, but to stand against genocide.

I understand that seeing the flag may feel uncomfortable for some, but the reality is that Israel’s actions should be causing far more discomfort than the sight of a piece of cloth.

Twiglets1 · 17/09/2025 17:35

GladioliGreen · 17/09/2025 14:16

Why are you more angry at Hamas who committed a terrorist attack than you are at a government who are carrying out genocide?

Surely both should be derided and because we can't do anything about the terrorist attack that happened almost 2 years but can do something about the genocide that is unfolding in front of us it makes more sense to focus on Israel, the genociders?

Edited

Because they triggered this whole shit show by their actions on 7/10 and because they STILL haven't returned the hostages despite what this means for their people in terms of Gaza being destroyed and the loss of civilian life.

I don't personally accept that Israel are carrying out genocide but the IDF are killing thousands of Palestinian citizens. This would stop if Hamas would agree to release the hostages, disarm and leave Gaza.

You might say - Israel could also end it tomorrow. But I don't think they could really because if they allow Hamas to remain in Gaza, they will just be waiting for the next 7/10 at a later date. Unlike Hamas, Israel DO value the lives of their citizens and won't allow this situation to happen again & future Israelis to be at risk of Hamas raping/killing/kidnapping them.

SharonEllis · 17/09/2025 17:19

@Everexpanding what have your posts got to do with recognising antisemitism in Ireland which is what we were talking about.

Everexpanding · 17/09/2025 16:10

Listen to Palestinians or do they not count?

OP posts:
Everexpanding · 17/09/2025 16:09

Listen to the people telling you Israel is carrying out a genocide as confirmed by the UN and all major humanitarian groups and stop posting misinformation in support of Israel here unless you support their genocide??

OP posts:
SharonEllis · 17/09/2025 16:04

PaxAeterna · 17/09/2025 08:52

You are barking up the wrong tree Sharon. Antisemitism was deeply entrenched in Europe at this time - so I can only imagine that we too had anti semitism. There also are anti Semitic views today I’m sure.

However what I would argue what is more prevalent (although still very much a minority of people) is support for terrorism or “armed resistance” as they would say. That’s probably a genuine point you could make if you actually knew anything about Ireland or Irish society and weren’t just getting your info off twitter feeds from others who have well have truly drank the Kool aid. But again this attitude isn’t prevalent in the ruling parties or present in our policies and law.

In fact you cherry picking comments from people in the 1940’s or talking about incidents in 1905 as “proof” that anti semitism exists today is completely ridiculous, if you knew anything. Ireland is almost completely unrecognisable from 30 years ago, never mind 1905.

As for your modern day examples. Some mayor went to an event, someone flew a flag - honest to god give me strength.

Obviously I am not saying antisemitism 100 years ago is proof of antisemitism today.

I was asked for examples of historic antisemitism.

what is proof of antisemitism today is people trying to downplay hostoric antisemitism, being defensive, pretending it didn't happen or wasn't important. Brushing it under the carpet. In the very same thread where people are arguing that affinity with Palrstinians is precisely because of a shared historical experience.

So the history of Irish colonialism counts.
But the history of Irish antisemitism doesn't.

Your post is a classic example of what Rachel Moiselle talks about and shows a complete lack of empathy. To have to daily walk past a flag which represents people who want to kill you and have actively particpated in the murder of Jewish people because they are Jewish, is horrific. And the reason it is horrific is not the flag itself really but because others like you, minimise its effect. Its another step in the dehumanisation of a population and another sign to a Jewish person that they don't count.

Listen to Jewish people when they tell you it matters.

SharonEllis · 17/09/2025 15:51

GladioliGreen · 17/09/2025 14:16

Why are you more angry at Hamas who committed a terrorist attack than you are at a government who are carrying out genocide?

Surely both should be derided and because we can't do anything about the terrorist attack that happened almost 2 years but can do something about the genocide that is unfolding in front of us it makes more sense to focus on Israel, the genociders?

Edited

What on earth do you mean you cant do anything about a terrorist attack 2 years ago!? Hamas still hold hostages, still refuse to surrender, still terrorising their populatiin, sending the odd rocket. Why do they get to just carry on?

GladioliGreen · 17/09/2025 14:16

Twiglets1 · 17/09/2025 13:51

No justification for terrorist attacks either @Everexpanding but you don’t post about Hamas hardly ever on MN. That’s what I mean by unconscious bias, it’s the things that bother us more than all the other awful things going on in the world.

For me I’m angrier at Hamas than the Israel government - that could be my unconscious bias at play.

Why are you more angry at Hamas who committed a terrorist attack than you are at a government who are carrying out genocide?

Surely both should be derided and because we can't do anything about the terrorist attack that happened almost 2 years but can do something about the genocide that is unfolding in front of us it makes more sense to focus on Israel, the genociders?

quantumbutterfly · 17/09/2025 14:02

Everexpanding · 17/09/2025 13:52

But it’s not the only conflict I or others on this thread are interested in that is a presumption you are making

Or a comment on unconscious bias. Being human is a subjective experience, we all have reasons for thinking or feeling the way we do.

Twiglets1 · 17/09/2025 14:00

Everexpanding · 17/09/2025 13:55

I have regularly said I do not agree with Hamas’s actions, I do not post more regularly as there are not people on mumsnet promoting pro Hamas ideology

Your arguments are very one sided.

Compare the emotive language you use around the actions of the IDF & Israel government to the cool way you say “I do not agree with Hamas’s actions”.

You could be talking about a minor inconvenience for all the emotion in that sentence. And that is how you always talk about Hamas, when prompted to mention them at all.

Everexpanding · 17/09/2025 13:55

I have regularly said I do not agree with Hamas’s actions, I do not post more regularly as there are not people on mumsnet promoting pro Hamas ideology

OP posts:
Everexpanding · 17/09/2025 13:52

But it’s not the only conflict I or others on this thread are interested in that is a presumption you are making

OP posts:
Twiglets1 · 17/09/2025 13:51

No justification for terrorist attacks either @Everexpanding but you don’t post about Hamas hardly ever on MN. That’s what I mean by unconscious bias, it’s the things that bother us more than all the other awful things going on in the world.

For me I’m angrier at Hamas than the Israel government - that could be my unconscious bias at play.

quantumbutterfly · 17/09/2025 13:46

Everexpanding · 17/09/2025 12:50

But I don’t think unconscious bias is at play when we are witnessing or opposing genocide, there is no justification for genocide ever

I think it may be when it's the only conflict in the world we're interested in.

But if you are in the republic you will be concerned with different divisions to those in the UK.