Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

6000 Palestinians made their way across the wall.

60 replies

vivainsomnia · 26/08/2025 17:20

For a start, I will say that I genuinely have no interest in siding with Hamas, or the IDF, or Palestinians, or Jewish people. I am only interested in better understanding all positions. I have just watched the interview, which turned out to be more of an argument between Kisin and Ammous from a year ago. One main point of disagreement and conflict between them is their differing views on Hamas intentions in Oct 2023.

Kisin believes that it was always Hamas plan to inflict terror and suffering to civilians on that days, whereas Ammous appears to think the intention, at least initially, was just to release Palestinian prisoners.

I read this on Wikipedia The attacks began with a barrage of at least 4,300 rockets launched into Israel[28][29][30] and vehicle-transported and powered paraglider incursions into Israel.[31][32] Hamas militants breached the Gaza–Israel barrier, attacking military bases and massacring civilians in 21 communities, including Be'eri, Kfar Aza, Nir Oz, Netiv Haasara, and Alumim. According to an Israel Defense Forces (IDF) report that revised the estimate on the number of attackers, 6,000 Gazans breached the border in 119 locations into Israel, including 3,800 from the elite "Nukhba forces" and 2,200 civilians and other militants.[33][28][29] Additionally, the IDF report estimated 1,000 Gazans fired rockets from the Gaza Strip, bringing the total number of participants on Hamas's side to 7,000.

It made me think: Could it be that the plan, as it was formulated before the attack, was for Hamas to attack the military bases mainly and but it got totally out of control?

Was it part of the plan that 2,200 civilians would also make their way to Israel and do whatever they did? Do we know the exact role these civilians took? Were they tasked to kidnap people, to rape and kill in the most vicious ways, or did their crossing was unplanned and their actions unexpected?

This is leaving me confused because if it was the case, for instance, that some, or even maybe the worse of the savagery was undertaken by these civilians, I can understand the IDF thinking that the war is not just about Nukhba forces but also about people who would not have been previously identified as dangerous, ie. Palestinian civilians who they are now killing indiscriminately.

Or is it that although classified as civilians, they actually belong to some 'group' that encourages violence against Israel?

Or were these civilians just going with the flow and did take part in some of the demonstrations but did not participate in any of the barbary?

Does anyone actually have any answers to these questions rather than reaching their own biased conclusions as both Kisin and Ammous are doing on that podcast?

Nukhba forces - Wikipedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nukhba_forces

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Twiglets1 · 06/09/2025 15:33

I can’t be bothered to go round in circles with the same arguments over this journalist who to me quite obviously had links to Hamas. It’s just a difference of opinion we will never agree on.

Lifesd · 06/09/2025 14:38

CaramelPecan · 30/08/2025 14:24

Seeing the jubilation on Gaza’s streets on Oct 7th while the dead bodies of dead Israelis were paraded, and at the disgusting ‘funeral’ celebration for the Bibas family, shows all you need to know about civilians in Gaza IMO.

Quite. And don’t forget the celebrations on British streets as well when the news broke. Trying to define that day as anything other than a heinous terrorist attack is disgusting IMO.

SummerFeverVenice · 06/09/2025 14:32

Twiglets1 · 03/09/2025 10:21

Yes photographic evidence was provided of that journalist having close ties to Hamas but it wasn’t taken on board. Suggestions that photos were doctored or so what? Doesn’t prove he sympathised with Hamas.

A photo of a journalist post interviewing Hamas’ Sinwar (he is in his press jacket) isn’t evidence of close ties to Hamas.

It’s part of the job of a journalist.

Just like Robert Fisk interviewed Osama bin Laden for the Independent. The many photos of him smiling and sitting next to Osama bin Laden, eating meals with him and so on don’t mean Fisk had close ties to Al Qaeda or was a terrorist.

6000 Palestinians made their way across the wall.
SummerFeverVenice · 06/09/2025 14:26

Gloriia · 03/09/2025 08:28

'However, IDF’s own count shows that 17% of the Palestinian dead in Gaza were terrorists and 83% were civilians from Oct 23 to May 25. This ratio is incredibly poor and indicative of either negligent incompetence or indiscriminate attacks either of which puts us into war crime territory.'

17% were known to the IDF that does not mean the 83% were civilians. This was discussed at length on here or on another thread. It was poor reporting on the Guardian's part, unsurprisingly.

No, it says clearly were known to be combatants. Not simply known. Israel knows the identity of everyone in Gaza. Palestinians had to pass through check points in Gaza with their identity papers and face recognition scanners every time they were displaced en masse.

SummerFeverVenice · 06/09/2025 14:23

@Beachtastic
But you can see from the videos that the civilians were unarmed.
I haven’t seen any videos where unarmed civilians were committing the Oct 7 atrocities.

SummerFeverVenice · 06/09/2025 14:22

allusernamesaretakennow · 03/09/2025 11:29

Gangs of men, many on mopeds, cars etc can and did rape, torture, murder and take hostage. The video with the Bibas mother and her babies on a motorbike as they were taken away, distraught, taken away to their deaths by 'ordinary men from Palestine'. Not pleasant men who wish to build a better future for their own wives and children, just men who hate and want to kill and wipe out and yet also stick their hands out for aid from the West and fail to link cause and effect - kill, rape, torture and take hostage then expect conflict.

Those were not “ordinary men from Palestine” those were heavily armed terrorists.
(warning- this is footage of the Bibas family being taken hostage)
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-3089841/Video-Footage-shows-kidnapping-Bibas-family-Kibbutz-Nir-Oz.html

Again, one of the features of terrorists is they don’t wear military uniforms when attacking. They wear civilian clothing.

SummerFeverVenice · 06/09/2025 14:16

Twiglets1 · 03/09/2025 12:15

Plus this journalist was also on the Hamas payroll according to documents seized by the IDF so he was more than someone who "just" sympathised with the goals of the organisation (killing Jews etc).

Snopes says that these alleged documents were never produced or authenticated, they report that Israel has not provided proof he was linked to Hamas.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/08/11/al-jazeera-anas-al-sharif-hamas/

They conclude they can neither confirm nor repute the allegations by Israel regarding Anas al-Sharif.

Investigating claim slain Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif was affiliated with Hamas

The Israel Defense Forces made the allegation without proof. Al Jazeera and al-Sharif rebutted the accusations.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/08/11/al-jazeera-anas-al-sharif-hamas/

SummerFeverVenice · 06/09/2025 14:01

Beachtastic · 03/09/2025 07:57

But you can see from the videos that the civilians were unarmed. They still managed to carry out vile atrocities, with great enthusiasm.

I'm very wary of this perception of Israel as a load of angry men bombing helpless women and children. There are some pretty fucking angry men hiding behind them.

It is good to be wary of perceptions that have no basis in fact or no evidence to support them.

This is not the case with Gaza because it is a fact that Israel has sent in tens of thousands of armed men who are shooting anyone that moves (even escaped Israeli hostages waving white flags and calling out in Hebrew) the air forces are in fact also bombing helpless women and children.

The IDF’s own database shows that 83% of the people they have killed were civilians, with over 66% being women and children. So even Israel agrees this is not a perception, but the reality of the Gaza war,p.

As for the “fucking angry men hiding behind them (women and children)” Arent Hamas hiding underground in tunnels? Where they don’t allow women and children to shelter? Which keeps Hamas terrorists safe & well away from the bombs dropped on the women and children filled hospitals, schools, churches & mosques & tents in the ‘safe evacuation zone’?

There are ways to do tunnel warfare which would not involve turning above ground civilian shelters to piles of rubble soaked in the blood of women and children.

Twiglets1 · 03/09/2025 15:22

Thought you didn't want to talk specifically about Anas Al Sharif @PaxAeterna

It's boring to cover the same ground, we aren't going to change each other's opinions about him.

Here's a challenge: try to respond without mentioning children.

Beachtastic · 03/09/2025 13:55

PaxAeterna · 03/09/2025 13:41

Well at least you are honest. You don’t care who dies in Gaza because they can all legitimately considered foes, even the children presumably.

At least you aren’t trying to deny it or justify it to yourself.

I knew the baby-murdering accusations would come out!

You asked specifically about killing "journalists."

It seems to me that Israel has done more to protect Gazan children than their own elected government.

PaxAeterna · 03/09/2025 13:41

Beachtastic · 03/09/2025 13:35

To be brutally honest, I don't really care. Given that Hamas ensure that it's impossible to differentiate "friend" (meaning, you know, possibly Hamas but possibly not...) from "foe" (meaning someone actively seeking the erasure of Israel and the Jewish people more generally), I wouldn't blame Israel for considering them all "foes" and think they have exercised extraordinary restraint in not actually carrying out the carpet-bombing genocide they are accused of doing.

Well at least you are honest. You don’t care who dies in Gaza because they can all legitimately considered foes, even the children presumably.

At least you aren’t trying to deny it or justify it to yourself.

Beachtastic · 03/09/2025 13:35

PaxAeterna · 03/09/2025 12:14

You can’t target journalists in a war zone because you make the assumption they aren’t “lovely”

Is what you are saying? Do you think that Israel should target and kill journalists in the conflict? Because “they must be sympathetic to Hamas”

To be brutally honest, I don't really care. Given that Hamas ensure that it's impossible to differentiate "friend" (meaning, you know, possibly Hamas but possibly not...) from "foe" (meaning someone actively seeking the erasure of Israel and the Jewish people more generally), I wouldn't blame Israel for considering them all "foes" and think they have exercised extraordinary restraint in not actually carrying out the carpet-bombing genocide they are accused of doing.

AngeloMysterioso · 03/09/2025 13:06

CaramelPecan · 01/09/2025 23:17

I agree, it was to humiliate Israel as a country together with it’s citizens, otherwise why film it?

The war was started with the intent to make Israel a pariah state, hated globally, isolated and destroyed on the world stage.

Hence why the atrocities were deliberate in their savagery, leaving Israel no choice but go into Gaza.

Then lights, camera, action!

And hasn’t it worked like a charm.

PaxAeterna · 03/09/2025 12:49

Twiglets1 · 03/09/2025 12:26

Yes I don't want to get into a big discussion about that particular journalist.

It all depends (speaking generally) on what is meant by "sympathetic" to Hamas.

I don't believe the IDF just targets journalists indiscriminately (I know many disagree). I do believe it's justifiable for them to target "journalists" who are only concerned about propaganda for Hamas. Where they get intelligence that particular journalists are working for Hamas, that changes their role from civilian, in my opinion.

Propaganda isn’t a weapon so you can’t target them for their words. It’s too wooly to start deciding what is propaganda and what is the truth… I mean maybe you have hit the nail on the head and this is what Israel is actually doing.

Israel tried to prove that Anas Al sharif was an active combatant and active in the hostilities to justify his death. Israel aren’t trying to say themselves that they are targeting journalists for their words alone because they know this doesn’t wash.

CaramelPecan · 03/09/2025 12:30

Beachtastic · 03/09/2025 11:05

Indeed. To be honest I find it hard to believe any journalist's career would ever have got off the ground in Gaza without being at least a Hamas sympathiser.

This is an interesting thread I came across about Hamas’s spokesman Abu Obeida and the Hamas’ propaganda apparatus. I wonder how many of these ‘journalists’ were part of his ‘publicity department’?

https://x.com/JewishWarrior13/status/1962907693372334378

https://x.com/JewishWarrior13/status/1962907693372334378

Twiglets1 · 03/09/2025 12:26

PaxAeterna · 03/09/2025 12:21

I think there was enough discussion at the time about the heavily disputed evidence that Israel provided defending the targeted killing of a particular journalist.

I’m responding to a more general statement about all journalists being sympathetic to Hamas. But the fact is, even if they are sympathetic, and we have no evidence to say they all are, then it still isn’t justifiable to target journalists.

Yes I don't want to get into a big discussion about that particular journalist.

It all depends (speaking generally) on what is meant by "sympathetic" to Hamas.

I don't believe the IDF just targets journalists indiscriminately (I know many disagree). I do believe it's justifiable for them to target "journalists" who are only concerned about propaganda for Hamas. Where they get intelligence that particular journalists are working for Hamas, that changes their role from civilian, in my opinion.

PaxAeterna · 03/09/2025 12:21

Twiglets1 · 03/09/2025 12:17

Not "journalists" in general but specific ones I would say it is justifiable if they have known connections to Hamas. Because if they are working for Hamas on propaganda they are as culpable as people working for Hamas in military ways.

I think there was enough discussion at the time about the heavily disputed evidence that Israel provided defending the targeted killing of a particular journalist.

I’m responding to a more general statement about all journalists being sympathetic to Hamas. But the fact is, even if they are sympathetic, and we have no evidence to say they all are, then it still isn’t justifiable to target journalists.

Twiglets1 · 03/09/2025 12:17

PaxAeterna · 03/09/2025 12:14

You can’t target journalists in a war zone because you make the assumption they aren’t “lovely”

Is what you are saying? Do you think that Israel should target and kill journalists in the conflict? Because “they must be sympathetic to Hamas”

Not "journalists" in general but specific ones I would say it is justifiable if they have known connections to Hamas. Because if they are working for Hamas on propaganda they are as culpable as people working for Hamas in military ways.

Twiglets1 · 03/09/2025 12:15

Beachtastic · 03/09/2025 12:03

Yes, I'm sure Hamas sympathisers are lovely folk who wouldn't wish harm on anyone.

Plus this journalist was also on the Hamas payroll according to documents seized by the IDF so he was more than someone who "just" sympathised with the goals of the organisation (killing Jews etc).

PaxAeterna · 03/09/2025 12:14

Beachtastic · 03/09/2025 12:03

Yes, I'm sure Hamas sympathisers are lovely folk who wouldn't wish harm on anyone.

You can’t target journalists in a war zone because you make the assumption they aren’t “lovely”

Is what you are saying? Do you think that Israel should target and kill journalists in the conflict? Because “they must be sympathetic to Hamas”

Beachtastic · 03/09/2025 12:03

PaxAeterna · 03/09/2025 11:13

They must have been a Hamas sympathiser is not justification for targeting journalists. Not even the Israeli administration themselves are trying to say that. Sympathising is not active support of a terrorist group.

Yes, I'm sure Hamas sympathisers are lovely folk who wouldn't wish harm on anyone.

allusernamesaretakennow · 03/09/2025 11:29

Beachtastic · 03/09/2025 07:57

But you can see from the videos that the civilians were unarmed. They still managed to carry out vile atrocities, with great enthusiasm.

I'm very wary of this perception of Israel as a load of angry men bombing helpless women and children. There are some pretty fucking angry men hiding behind them.

Gangs of men, many on mopeds, cars etc can and did rape, torture, murder and take hostage. The video with the Bibas mother and her babies on a motorbike as they were taken away, distraught, taken away to their deaths by 'ordinary men from Palestine'. Not pleasant men who wish to build a better future for their own wives and children, just men who hate and want to kill and wipe out and yet also stick their hands out for aid from the West and fail to link cause and effect - kill, rape, torture and take hostage then expect conflict.

allusernamesaretakennow · 03/09/2025 11:24

CaramelPecan · 02/09/2025 02:36

This level of delusion in trying to believe Hamas is not THAT bad is really dangerous and offensive IMO.

What does it say about these ‘thugs’, who included Palestinian civilians let’s remember, that they were given free rein for the first time ever to do what they wanted to Israelis, including women and children, that they embarked on a frenzied orgy of mass slaughter, mutilation, burning, decapitation and gang rape?

You excuse it as it all went ‘horrifically wrong’ and Hamas admitted to ‘faults’ while intimating that it was Israel’s fault for it being all too easy to breach security.

One would assume from your defence of Hamas that they were expecting to trade, that you don’t see a problem with the taking of babies, children and the elderly as hostages?

You are blatantly defending Hamas, a proscribed terrorist organisation in the UK.

I note MN has not deleted your post.

Thankfully MN 'got there in the end' and it's deleted. The open support/minimising/excuses for terrorism and the lack of accountability of murderers, rapists and general vile scum that would happily rape and murder women who just happened to be at a festival or in a kibbutz is delusional - they wouldn't worry too much about westerners who got in the way; yet here we are with westerners cheering them along with their merry crusade.

PaxAeterna · 03/09/2025 11:13

Beachtastic · 03/09/2025 11:05

Indeed. To be honest I find it hard to believe any journalist's career would ever have got off the ground in Gaza without being at least a Hamas sympathiser.

They must have been a Hamas sympathiser is not justification for targeting journalists. Not even the Israeli administration themselves are trying to say that. Sympathising is not active support of a terrorist group.

Beachtastic · 03/09/2025 11:05

Twiglets1 · 03/09/2025 10:21

Yes photographic evidence was provided of that journalist having close ties to Hamas but it wasn’t taken on board. Suggestions that photos were doctored or so what? Doesn’t prove he sympathised with Hamas.

Indeed. To be honest I find it hard to believe any journalist's career would ever have got off the ground in Gaza without being at least a Hamas sympathiser.

Swipe left for the next trending thread