Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

IDF bombs Nasser hospital and then bombs the rescue worker a second time.

382 replies

Kakeandkake · 25/08/2025 11:51

It is so sickening that they continue to act with such impunity. The bombed the hospital killing four journalists and THEN struck a second time killing the rescue workers who were trying to retrieve the bodies of the dead and injured.

The genocide continues in plain sight.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp89rp48246o

An injured emergency worker is led away by two other emergency workers. There is rubble and wreckage behind them. He is badly hurt.

Four journalists among 15 killed in Israeli strike on hospital, Gaza officials say

The strikes on Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis are said to have killed journalists working for international media.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp89rp48246o

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Kakeandkake · 27/08/2025 09:12

So, my questions are why two bombs for a camera?

@PinkBobby I read the same from analysts on MSM yesterday. That Israel is going to have a very difficult time trying to excuse using the intense munitions they did even if they did think there was a 'Hamas camera' there. And the 'double tap strike' designed for maximum harm for a camera on a hospital?? It is a war crime.

OP posts:
MissyB1 · 27/08/2025 09:11

Twiglets1 · 27/08/2025 09:04

How would medical staff working in a hospital know better than the IDF why they were targeting that surveillance camera?

And why would the staff be British and American if all the foreign doctors were ordered to leave before the strike as posted by @Martymcfly24

You clearly stated that hamas run the hospitals, again you know that Doctors and other healthcare staff have refuted those sorts allegations, again I will ask you why you think you know better than them? Can you answer that?

Kakeandkake · 27/08/2025 09:08

Twiglets1 · 27/08/2025 08:49

Hamas deliberately use hospitals for their activities though don't they? Blood shed as a result is all good propaganda to them (as evidenced by comments on this thread).

And hospitals have no ability to tell Hamas not to do it because Hamas run the hospitals.

Are you still trying to defend the IDF's actions that have been condemned by almost every single ally?

OP posts:
PinkBobby · 27/08/2025 09:08

Twiglets1 · 27/08/2025 08:36

It wasn't just "because of a camera" though was it?

From the source you linked, it was a camera that was positioned by Hamas in the hospital that was being used to observe the activity of IDF troops, in order to direct terrorist activity against them.

The statement from the IDF then provides names and photos of 6 Hamas terrorists who were eliminated during the strike on Nasser hospital, including one who took part in the October 7th massacre.

More details given in this thread:
www.mumsnet.com/talk/conflict-in-the-middle-east/5399464-idf-widens-nasser-hospital-probe-amid-questions-over-who-approved-tank-fire

But what I don’t understand is why there was so much collateral damage. They say it was to take out the camera. Two bombs were used to take out this tactical threat. Lots of people were caught up in the bomb - it killed 4 health workers, 5 journalists and who knows how many innocent people. The IDF have named 6 terrorists also killed in the attack (not targets, just ‘good’ collateral damage).

So, my questions are why two bombs for a camera? The attached photo is an Israeli strike of an Iranian official who was asleep in bed. Scarily precise. Even the windows nearby are intact. They chose to be targeted then. Why not use similar tactics for a camera in Gaza? Why see a threat on a hospital and not take every possible step to reduce civilian death/injury?

If the strike was against people attacking them, I understand that war can be messy. By this threat was ‘neutral’ in that it was fixed and able to be targeted. I appreciate you don’t have the answers to this but I cannot get the skill of the Israeli army out of my head and I don’t understand why that same precision wasn’t deployed on a camera.

My second question is re the 6 men killed. Alleged Hamas members - potentially a win for the IDF. But I wonder how they have those names and details of their deaths from an area they are not active in. Maybe drones? So, if they do have details of all the people the strike killed, why do they not have some idea of the civilian cost of this war. They tell us (fairly) that the Hamas figures are totally wrong. So why not share the actual count and reshape the narrative.

For me, the 6 Hamas members the IDF listed don’t explain away this strike because they weren’t the target. They don’t excuse the tactics or make the other deaths acceptable. I don’t understand why such a destructive force would be used against a camera when they have shown such skill in minimising collateral damage.

IDF bombs Nasser hospital and then bombs the rescue worker a second time.
Twiglets1 · 27/08/2025 09:04

MissyB1 · 27/08/2025 08:51

Medical staff including many British and Americans have totally refuted the claims you are making here, how would you know better than them? Have you worked in a Gaza hospital? And there is never justification for bombing hospitals anyway.

How would medical staff working in a hospital know better than the IDF why they were targeting that surveillance camera?

And why would the staff be British and American if all the foreign doctors were ordered to leave before the strike as posted by @Martymcfly24

Alittlefeedbackwouldbenice · 27/08/2025 08:58

It's irrelevant whether there was a camera.
The presence of a camera does not justify killing 20 people.

It's an overreaction on an extreme level and tells us everything we need to know about how little the IDF care about civilians. How expendable Palestinian lives are.

Then the double tap being blamed on a rifle scope. Again, it's dispropritate to bond somewhere because of this. Use a sniper to shoot someone behind the gun, sure. Send in troops yourself, fair enough. Bomb the entire building - callous disregard for human life.

That's if these excuses are even real. Pathetic.

MissyB1 · 27/08/2025 08:51

Twiglets1 · 27/08/2025 08:49

Hamas deliberately use hospitals for their activities though don't they? Blood shed as a result is all good propaganda to them (as evidenced by comments on this thread).

And hospitals have no ability to tell Hamas not to do it because Hamas run the hospitals.

Medical staff including many British and Americans have totally refuted the claims you are making here, how would you know better than them? Have you worked in a Gaza hospital? And there is never justification for bombing hospitals anyway.

Twiglets1 · 27/08/2025 08:49

Gloriia · 27/08/2025 08:44

'It wasn't just "because of a camera" though was it? From the source you linked, it was a camera that was positioned by Hamas in the hospital that was being used to observe the activity of IDF troops, in order to direct terrorist activity against them.'

Exactly. Nothing to see here just some 'journalists' <not hamas collaborators> taking scenic snaps or fun selfies maybe? 'Just a camera' indeed.

Hospitals need to tell these people to set up their surveillance units away from civilians.

Hamas deliberately use hospitals for their activities though don't they? Blood shed as a result is all good propaganda to them (as evidenced by comments on this thread).

And hospitals have no ability to tell Hamas not to do it because Hamas run the hospitals.

Twiglets1 · 27/08/2025 08:45

Martymcfly24 · 26/08/2025 19:44

Bullshit.

Why did they order foreign doctors to leave before the strike?
Why was there a double tap strike (illegal under the Geneva Convention) if it was just to hit a camera surely the first one would have taken it out?
Why was it a tragic mistake yesterday but today there's a reason and the case is closed.

I think it's very likely that the foreign doctors were asked to leave because the IDF were planning a drone strike on the Hamas surveillance camera.

According to the IDF statement, the "double tap" happened because shortly after the drone strike, troops spotted what they thought was a rifle scope, assessed it as an immediate threat, and urgently sought approval to fire.

This is currently the subject of a wider investigation because Hebrew media later reported that IDF Southern Command had only authorized a drone strike on the Hamas surveillance camera but did not approve the use of tank shells that ultimately caused the deaths, including those of several journalists.

www.mumsnet.com/talk/conflict-in-the-middle-east/5399464-idf-widens-nasser-hospital-probe-amid-questions-over-who-approved-tank-fire

Gloriia · 27/08/2025 08:44

'It wasn't just "because of a camera" though was it? From the source you linked, it was a camera that was positioned by Hamas in the hospital that was being used to observe the activity of IDF troops, in order to direct terrorist activity against them.'

Exactly. Nothing to see here just some 'journalists' <not hamas collaborators> taking scenic snaps or fun selfies maybe? 'Just a camera' indeed.

Hospitals need to tell these people to set up their surveillance units away from civilians.

Twiglets1 · 27/08/2025 08:36

SomeWomanSomewhere · 26/08/2025 18:36

Oh, well, seems they are now saying this was necessary because of a camera. Which ... the camera was Hamas, of course (it wasn't; it belonged to a Reuters correspondent from what I understand - but even if: they killed 20 people for ... a camera!):

https://x.com/IDF/status/1960364428786057545?t=in44EofBk9J-tUFBdQi2TA&s=19

Edited

It wasn't just "because of a camera" though was it?

From the source you linked, it was a camera that was positioned by Hamas in the hospital that was being used to observe the activity of IDF troops, in order to direct terrorist activity against them.

The statement from the IDF then provides names and photos of 6 Hamas terrorists who were eliminated during the strike on Nasser hospital, including one who took part in the October 7th massacre.

More details given in this thread:
www.mumsnet.com/talk/conflict-in-the-middle-east/5399464-idf-widens-nasser-hospital-probe-amid-questions-over-who-approved-tank-fire

GladioliGreen · 26/08/2025 22:00

SomeWomanSomewhere · 26/08/2025 18:36

Oh, well, seems they are now saying this was necessary because of a camera. Which ... the camera was Hamas, of course (it wasn't; it belonged to a Reuters correspondent from what I understand - but even if: they killed 20 people for ... a camera!):

https://x.com/IDF/status/1960364428786057545?t=in44EofBk9J-tUFBdQi2TA&s=19

Edited

You can't be too careful with those Hamas cameras. They might catch you bombing a hospital.

Martymcfly24 · 26/08/2025 21:50

BelleHathor · 26/08/2025 21:39

The IDF is spinning (yet another) tale and again! T@hey insult anyone with an ounce of intelligence.

Why? Likely because Trump said he is "not happy about it" during a press conference at the White House on Monday.
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-865283

The Israeli government has got to keep Trump on side. Trump is currently losing significant support from his base due to his unfulfilled promises (including unlimited support of Israel). So it's all about self preservation......

I saw that. Very obvious he didn't know.

Support for Israels military action in the US has fallen to 32% and Trump is all about the numbers.

BelleHathor · 26/08/2025 21:39

Martymcfly24 · 26/08/2025 19:44

Bullshit.

Why did they order foreign doctors to leave before the strike?
Why was there a double tap strike (illegal under the Geneva Convention) if it was just to hit a camera surely the first one would have taken it out?
Why was it a tragic mistake yesterday but today there's a reason and the case is closed.

The IDF is spinning (yet another) tale and again! T@hey insult anyone with an ounce of intelligence.

Why? Likely because Trump said he is "not happy about it" during a press conference at the White House on Monday.
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-865283

The Israeli government has got to keep Trump on side. Trump is currently losing significant support from his base due to his unfulfilled promises (including unlimited support of Israel). So it's all about self preservation......

Donald Trump 'not happy' about IDF hospital strike in Gaza | The Jerusalem Post

Trump repeated his claim that there are "probably just under 20" hostages left alive in the Gaza Strip during a press conference at the White House on Monday.

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-865283

Martymcfly24 · 26/08/2025 19:44

SomeWomanSomewhere · 26/08/2025 18:36

Oh, well, seems they are now saying this was necessary because of a camera. Which ... the camera was Hamas, of course (it wasn't; it belonged to a Reuters correspondent from what I understand - but even if: they killed 20 people for ... a camera!):

https://x.com/IDF/status/1960364428786057545?t=in44EofBk9J-tUFBdQi2TA&s=19

Edited

Bullshit.

Why did they order foreign doctors to leave before the strike?
Why was there a double tap strike (illegal under the Geneva Convention) if it was just to hit a camera surely the first one would have taken it out?
Why was it a tragic mistake yesterday but today there's a reason and the case is closed.

SaltAirAndTheRust · 26/08/2025 19:01

SomeWomanSomewhere · 26/08/2025 18:36

Oh, well, seems they are now saying this was necessary because of a camera. Which ... the camera was Hamas, of course (it wasn't; it belonged to a Reuters correspondent from what I understand - but even if: they killed 20 people for ... a camera!):

https://x.com/IDF/status/1960364428786057545?t=in44EofBk9J-tUFBdQi2TA&s=19

Edited

It’s actually just embarrassing for them at this point.

SomeWomanSomewhere · 26/08/2025 18:36

Oh, well, seems they are now saying this was necessary because of a camera. Which ... the camera was Hamas, of course (it wasn't; it belonged to a Reuters correspondent from what I understand - but even if: they killed 20 people for ... a camera!):

https://x.com/IDF/status/1960364428786057545?t=in44EofBk9J-tUFBdQi2TA&s=19

FalseFlag · 26/08/2025 10:31

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

FalseFlag · 26/08/2025 10:24

The problem is that Israel doesn’t see any journalists being killed, doesn’t see any innocent civilians being targeted, doesn’t see any women and children in hospitals being bombed and doesn’t see 60.000 people left dead because all Israel sees is themselves as victims. Nobody believes you anymore Israel. We see you.

Martymcfly24 · 25/08/2025 22:56

PinkBobby · 25/08/2025 21:41

Thank you - I think I’ll wait for better verification. Only because that account has videos of people spitting on Palestinian flags and throwing items at peaceful protesters - not my go to for actual news!

Edited

Oh I agree completely @PinkBobby . My point was this was the video that a pp used to discredit the journalist based on an account like the one shown. From viewing the video I could see words like invaded etc when it was two men strolling through a silent area were once again completely hyperbolic.

The account is completely and utterly biased.

Alittlefeedbackwouldbenice · 25/08/2025 22:46

PinkBobby · 25/08/2025 21:06

On your first point, I did have a moment earlier when I questioned how ‘good’ the IDF are because this seemed like such an absolute f up following the journalists being killed a few weeks ago. Then I remembered the pager attacks and the photo of the drone attack through a bedroom wall whilst the target slept and I realised how good they are at targeting specific people when they want to.

On point two, do you have sources for this? Only because Ive seen evidence the Israeli government armed groups in Gaza post 7/10 to challenge Hamas (maybe some of those guys are looting aid trucks and not just Hamas!) but I haven’t seen anything about armed groups pre 7/10.

Yes, Israel propped up Hamas before 7/10.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-hamas-now-its-blown-up-in-our-faces

https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahus-reportedly-warned-twice-that-qatari-cash-was-funding-hamas-military-wing

Now he's directly financing and resourcing rival armed gangs. If Gaza survives, in 25 years time, this will likely be the new Hamas, full of angry young men, with nothing to live for, who lost much of their family in this war.

SaltAirAndTheRust · 25/08/2025 22:34

It’s just unbelievable at this point.

Journalists. Doctors. Aid workers. Paramedics. They’re killing the people who have a front row seat to the genocide, so that the truth doesn’t come out

GladioliGreen · 25/08/2025 22:12

Martymcfly24 · 25/08/2025 20:21

Israel deeply regrets the tragic accident. Israel appreciates the work of journalists, medical teams and all civilians,” he said. “The army is conducting a thorough investigation.”
Netanyahu

Bullshit.

It reeks of we are really sorry we got caught on camera, again.

TooBigForMyBoots · 25/08/2025 21:47

PinkBobby · 25/08/2025 21:06

On your first point, I did have a moment earlier when I questioned how ‘good’ the IDF are because this seemed like such an absolute f up following the journalists being killed a few weeks ago. Then I remembered the pager attacks and the photo of the drone attack through a bedroom wall whilst the target slept and I realised how good they are at targeting specific people when they want to.

On point two, do you have sources for this? Only because Ive seen evidence the Israeli government armed groups in Gaza post 7/10 to challenge Hamas (maybe some of those guys are looting aid trucks and not just Hamas!) but I haven’t seen anything about armed groups pre 7/10.

www.palestinechronicle.com/israel-arming-criminal-gangs-in-gaza-former-defense-minister/

PinkBobby · 25/08/2025 21:41

Martymcfly24 · 25/08/2025 19:08

@PinkBobby
https://x.com/Osint613/status/1959920695351112035

This is the video.

Infiltrate/invade is a very unusual to use with this incident. Seems to be they are walking into empty space waving flags.
I'll leave people make of it what they will. I don't see any date stamps but obviously there must be.

The most frightening video to me was the group of civil defence targeted and killed .

Thank you - I think I’ll wait for better verification. Only because that account has videos of people spitting on Palestinian flags and throwing items at peaceful protesters - not my go to for actual news!

Swipe left for the next trending thread