Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

UEFA have finally taken a stand

612 replies

LifeOfAShowGirl · 13/08/2025 20:15

https://x.com/uefa/status/1955706670824235327?s=46

A mild, late, spineless stand. But a stand. It makes me wonder how much longer this can go on before governments realise people are fed up of this.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
LifeOfAShowGirl · 16/08/2025 20:19

Kakeandkake · 16/08/2025 20:18

Shockingly, some people still can.

And not just that. They actually think they’re right

OP posts:
Kakeandkake · 16/08/2025 20:18

LifeOfAShowGirl · 16/08/2025 19:49

Jesus. You see this and wonder how anyone can oppose the messaging.

Shockingly, some people still can.

LifeOfAShowGirl · 16/08/2025 19:49

Kakeandkake · 16/08/2025 19:42

Jesus. You see this and wonder how anyone can oppose the messaging.

OP posts:
CyberStranger · 16/08/2025 19:45

dairydebris · 16/08/2025 18:57

So do you think people should just be permitted to post distortions, misinformation and flat out lies, and not expect to be pulled up on it?

Then list off a whole sorry chorus of strawman arguments to distract away from being caught in a lie?

There are lots of people on this board with varying levels of knowledge about the situation, and when untrue things are posted it can affect how others build their own narratives. You may think that doesn't matter. I completely disagree. If you post an untruth that I see, I'm going to mention it.

No one knows which country has broken the most international laws ever.

Israel has broken the most UN resolutions. UN resolutions are not law.

Get it right, or risk it being drawn attention to.

And if you post an lie to make Israel look worse, then having been caught in that lie,

refuse to take it back, accusations of your prejudice against Israel are plausible.

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

LifeOfAShowGirl · 16/08/2025 19:13

justanotherpassword · 16/08/2025 18:33

There’s little point in defending it. The stats speak for themselves and whatever media source or NGOs stats I quote I’ll be told it’s rubbish, they would say that. They are anti semetic, they don’t think Israel should exist or they are being paid by Qatar.

The list is endless and it gets exhausting.

Pointless to continue engaging with posters who are just flying the flag for Netenyah and think Israel can do no wrong. We will never see each other’s point and can’t even agree to disagree as the same posters start shouting down any meaningful discussion.

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

OP posts:
dairydebris · 16/08/2025 18:57

justanotherpassword · 16/08/2025 18:33

There’s little point in defending it. The stats speak for themselves and whatever media source or NGOs stats I quote I’ll be told it’s rubbish, they would say that. They are anti semetic, they don’t think Israel should exist or they are being paid by Qatar.

The list is endless and it gets exhausting.

Pointless to continue engaging with posters who are just flying the flag for Netenyah and think Israel can do no wrong. We will never see each other’s point and can’t even agree to disagree as the same posters start shouting down any meaningful discussion.

So do you think people should just be permitted to post distortions, misinformation and flat out lies, and not expect to be pulled up on it?

Then list off a whole sorry chorus of strawman arguments to distract away from being caught in a lie?

There are lots of people on this board with varying levels of knowledge about the situation, and when untrue things are posted it can affect how others build their own narratives. You may think that doesn't matter. I completely disagree. If you post an untruth that I see, I'm going to mention it.

No one knows which country has broken the most international laws ever.

Israel has broken the most UN resolutions. UN resolutions are not law.

Get it right, or risk it being drawn attention to.

And if you post an lie to make Israel look worse, then having been caught in that lie,

refuse to take it back, accusations of your prejudice against Israel are plausible.

justanotherpassword · 16/08/2025 18:33

Twiglets1 · 15/08/2025 09:45

@Thegreyhound We weren't just talking about international law being broken though were we?

The exact accusation was No country has broken so many international laws apart from Israel.

No mention of a specific year in the UN's opinion ... no it was a blanket statement which @justanotherpassword has not come back to defend.

There’s little point in defending it. The stats speak for themselves and whatever media source or NGOs stats I quote I’ll be told it’s rubbish, they would say that. They are anti semetic, they don’t think Israel should exist or they are being paid by Qatar.

The list is endless and it gets exhausting.

Pointless to continue engaging with posters who are just flying the flag for Netenyah and think Israel can do no wrong. We will never see each other’s point and can’t even agree to disagree as the same posters start shouting down any meaningful discussion.

EasyTouch · 16/08/2025 15:36

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

EasternStandard · 15/08/2025 11:32

It also stops those who would want to support them from doing so on social media.

EasternStandard · 15/08/2025 11:31

mouthpipette · 15/08/2025 11:25

The 'court' of public opinion would horrify you in the real world. I'm not talking about pre generated tables, I'm talking about every day men and women, who don't agree that Israel are terrorists. I tell you what they do think. They are glad that Israel has got the balls to take on the real terrorists because they are keeping the wolves from the door. Islamic extremism - note extremism, note moderate - is a global threat. @Dangermoo

Interestingly, the "court of public opinion" does not regard Hamas as being terrorists. About 85 % of the worlds population live in countries where Hamas are not designated as being a terrorist organisation.

This isn’t that surprising, there are a lot places where extreme violence such as Hamas use is used too. I’m glad we do proscribe them.

mouthpipette · 15/08/2025 11:25

The 'court' of public opinion would horrify you in the real world. I'm not talking about pre generated tables, I'm talking about every day men and women, who don't agree that Israel are terrorists. I tell you what they do think. They are glad that Israel has got the balls to take on the real terrorists because they are keeping the wolves from the door. Islamic extremism - note extremism, note moderate - is a global threat. @Dangermoo

Interestingly, the "court of public opinion" does not regard Hamas as being terrorists. About 85 % of the worlds population live in countries where Hamas are not designated as being a terrorist organisation.

Dangermoo · 15/08/2025 10:56

LifeOfAShowGirl · 15/08/2025 10:22

It does make me laugh that you say they’re pile ons, when it’s just people disagreeing with you. And you can’t label everything you disagree with as misinformation.

We've made it clear we can handle the pile ons. I believe that's what then escalates those pile ons. They aren't just posters disagreeing with you, in a healthy debate. They are either trying to shame you or manipulate you - it's called compliance and conformity - funnily enough there's another word for that.

Dangermoo · 15/08/2025 10:43

dairydebris · 15/08/2025 10:05

I don't mind the pile ons.

The moving the goalposts once caught in an untruth rather than admitting the untruth is what really gets me.

Mental health all good tho 👍🏼

That's good to hear x pile ons are only effective, when bombarded with objectivity -not much of that on display. Plenty of personal attacks though.

EasternStandard · 15/08/2025 10:33

dairydebris · 15/08/2025 10:25

What have I labeled as misinformation that wasn't actually misinformation, but just something I disagree with? Please point to 1 example?

I’m interested too

dairydebris · 15/08/2025 10:25

LifeOfAShowGirl · 15/08/2025 10:22

It does make me laugh that you say they’re pile ons, when it’s just people disagreeing with you. And you can’t label everything you disagree with as misinformation.

What have I labeled as misinformation that wasn't actually misinformation, but just something I disagree with? Please point to 1 example?

LifeOfAShowGirl · 15/08/2025 10:22

It does make me laugh that you say they’re pile ons, when it’s just people disagreeing with you. And you can’t label everything you disagree with as misinformation.

OP posts:
dairydebris · 15/08/2025 10:21

Twiglets1 · 15/08/2025 10:13

I don’t like the pile ons or the moving the goalposts or the personal attacks or the exaggerations when the truth is actually bad enough or the emotional manipulations.

They don’t actually upset me anymore though. More like it’s just boring to see the same techniques used by different users all thinking they’re being original.

Exaggerations when the truth is actually bad enough is a big one for me too.

Twiglets1 · 15/08/2025 10:13

I don’t like the pile ons or the moving the goalposts or the personal attacks or the exaggerations when the truth is actually bad enough or the emotional manipulations.

They don’t actually upset me anymore though. More like it’s just boring to see the same techniques used by different users all thinking they’re being original.

dairydebris · 15/08/2025 10:05

Dangermoo · 15/08/2025 09:50

Oh yes, the pile ons. You wouldn't mind if they said something original but those clichés just bore a hole in you.

Going back to the 'irrelevance' of the hostages - doesn't that statement confirm these posters aren't interested in how the arab-Israeli conflict got to where it is now? Well sadly, no. I was told the past wasn't relevant. I always look at how incessant those messages are and read between the lines of those posts.

@Gloriia a fantastic analogy on Netflix! How frighteningly accurate is that?

I don't mind the pile ons.

The moving the goalposts once caught in an untruth rather than admitting the untruth is what really gets me.

Mental health all good tho 👍🏼

GladioliGreen · 15/08/2025 10:05

CyberStranger · 15/08/2025 01:18

Yes I did read that one.

That was what I based my answers on.

As it says, 22 unexplained deaths because autopsies weren’t done in Israel. It doesn’t say why. The deaths attributed to SUNDS (which seems to affect that demographic) obviously did have autopsies done.

The report doesn’t differentiate between men and women being sexually assaulted. It says 100% of those surveyed had said they were. I could believe 75%, even 90% but 100% doesn’t sound plausible to me, especially as most of the workers are men. None of the workers spoke in the video, even anonymously and with translation.

Israel is a very small country, you’d expect word to travel among the Thai community fast about these unexplained deaths and sexual assaults. Especially in the Kibbutzims where a lot of the slaughtered Thai workers and those taken hostage (all men) were.

It raises questions that the Israelis in these Kibbutzims had a lot of Palestinian workers right up to.Oct 7th but they haven’t made any accusations about this themselves and the Israelis (who were slaughtered on Oct 7th) also ferried Palestinians to Israeli hospitals but the report says Thai workers were denied medical care?

How does that make sense? Thai workers were treated worse than Palestinians?

Here’s an article about a Gazan who worked in Israel right up until Oct 7th and was killed by Hamas gunmen on his way there. Note what his brother says about his work and how the Israeli farmer and the IDF treated him, although there is a particular spin from this publication, but you can read between the lines quite easily.

https://www.972mag.com/gaza-workers-israel-kibbutzim-massacres/

Edited

I don't have time to reply with links but do more research. There are many incidences of Palestinian workers receiving workplace injuries in Israel and being unable to access medical care. You'll be abe to find out why Palestinian workers didn't feel able to complain about mistreatment too.

Your word would spread stuff is just more victim blaming. Poor desperate people take risks, put up with mistreatment, poor conditions, poor pay, grueling long days because as I said they are desperate. That's true the world over. There is a reason agricultural workers tend to come from poor countries not prosperous ones and it isn't because they like working for 17 hours a day in the hot sun.

Israel isn't unique in their treatment of migrant workers but you pretending that Israel was hiring these poor people as some kind of outreach programme to help them just stood out to me as a bizarre reading of the situation, especially when as you say you have seen for yourself how they are generally treated across the ME.

EasternStandard · 15/08/2025 09:51

Gloriia · 15/08/2025 09:36

How on earth can the hostages not 'be relevant' Shock.

This is why we come on these threads to challenge stuff like this. On another thread a poster said they were sick of the hostages, sick of Oct 7th. Absolutely staggering as if they were talking about a new Netflix show that was a a bit boring.

'Perhaps it’s best to not engage with them?'

We have another poster who often says this yet they goes on to quote everything I say.

There are 2 sides to this conflict as uefa should know but perhaps too busy cashing cheques to read up on it.

Free the hostages! They will alway be 'relevant' ffs.

Edited

Of course hostages are relevant.

Dangermoo · 15/08/2025 09:50

Oh yes, the pile ons. You wouldn't mind if they said something original but those clichés just bore a hole in you.

Going back to the 'irrelevance' of the hostages - doesn't that statement confirm these posters aren't interested in how the arab-Israeli conflict got to where it is now? Well sadly, no. I was told the past wasn't relevant. I always look at how incessant those messages are and read between the lines of those posts.

@Gloriia a fantastic analogy on Netflix! How frighteningly accurate is that?

Twiglets1 · 15/08/2025 09:45

@Thegreyhound We weren't just talking about international law being broken though were we?

The exact accusation was No country has broken so many international laws apart from Israel.

No mention of a specific year in the UN's opinion ... no it was a blanket statement which @justanotherpassword has not come back to defend.

Twiglets1 · 15/08/2025 09:39

Gloriia · 15/08/2025 09:36

How on earth can the hostages not 'be relevant' Shock.

This is why we come on these threads to challenge stuff like this. On another thread a poster said they were sick of the hostages, sick of Oct 7th. Absolutely staggering as if they were talking about a new Netflix show that was a a bit boring.

'Perhaps it’s best to not engage with them?'

We have another poster who often says this yet they goes on to quote everything I say.

There are 2 sides to this conflict as uefa should know but perhaps too busy cashing cheques to read up on it.

Free the hostages! They will alway be 'relevant' ffs.

Edited

Lol I know exactly who you mean.

They target one of us incessantly then move on to another when it doesn't work... keep hoping we will get pressured to go away.

Swipe left for the next trending thread