50 Jewish children kicked off plane, female supervisor allegedly beaten to the ground and handcuffed!

Where are you reading or seeing this is what the singing was?

concurrently, people seem to WANT it to be true that the teenagers were kicked off due to their religion and not just for being louts.

No - you are being disingenuous.
People are rightly concerned that the full facts are properly investigated.

The words of the Spanish minister calling the French Jewish children “Israeli brats” are very concerning- it suggests he has automatically equated all Jews with Israel

I don’t disagree but that’s a separate incident isn’t it ? It has nothing to do with why the group of teenagers were removed from the flight.

I don’t see the value in conflating the two incidences in this discussion in particular. It’s perfectly possible the teenagers were being rowdy and disruptive and the minister is antisemitic. Only one event influenced the other.

A 21 year old in charge of 50 kids on her own?

That was always going to be a disaster and it was totally irresponsible to start with.

It just sounds to me like th crew had safety concerns that the kids were rowdy and bothering other passengers and that their carer could not handle them.

They made the sensible decision to ask them to leave before taking off.

Then it seems some people with agenda got involved and are trying to claim they were targeted just because they were Jewish which frankly just sounds like nonsense and trying to curry some sympathy while the world is now seeing the true horror of children starving to death in Gaza...

The crew's priority is the safety of the aircraft and of all passengers. Not political games.

Woah, you’re putting a lot of words in my mouth.

It has been reported multiple times that that was chanted, and that the children were being disruptive and interfering with safety equipment. Why are you so determined to not believe that?

This is the sort of post that is very problematic.
You are repeating something as if it is a proven fact. Why?

You don’t want to consider the possibility that the children are innocent? Why is that? Is it because you agree with the Spanish minister that they are “Israeli brats” and you don’t need the facts of the case?

Evidence hasn't been the strongest focus to date; I don't see why some posters would start asking for it now. Interesting that the footage hasn't made it to social media. You see so many plane experiences being circulated.

I don’t think posters on here should be repeating the accusations “death to Arabs” etc as if it is an established fact.

It is a fact that the statement “Israeli brats” was made by the Spanish minister. Regardless of what happened- that statement appears antisemitic to me.

If they had been singing anti-Semitic songs in Arabic, you can bet they wouldn’t have been turned off the plane.
And would have been described as French.

The airline is to blame for 50 children singing “death to arabs”???

This!
50 kids are going to be rowdy -the airline is to blame for allowing the booking without proper ratio -numerous safeguarding issues.

Would be odd if that was OP’s intention, seeing as she is the one focussed on it and keeps bringing it up…?

People are repeating it because they WANT it to be true.
They WANT the Jewish children to be viewed as the guilty party here

concurrently, people seem to WANT it to be true that the teenagers were kicked off due to their religion and not just for being louts.

We don’t have the full information yet

quite. Bit early for accusations of antisemitism and airline staff to be accused of guilt by association then wouldn’t you agree?

Because OP keeps going on about it, whilst ignoring the claims around the children being unruly.

Whatever the truth of the incident ( hopefully it will emerge)
Spains Minister of Transportation should be condemned. His remarks, about French Jewish children seem antisemitic to me. Why call them Israeli? Why draw attention to their Jewishness if it was not relevant to their eviction from the plane? Why did he not call them “French children”

People are repeating it because they WANT it to be true.
They WANT the Jewish children to be viewed as the guilty party here.
@MyDearEagle is right.
We don’t have the full information yet so people jumping to assume the children were “brats” might need to ask themselves some questions about why they were so quick to decide who was telling the truth.

The point of what chants were being sung is irrelevant since the airline haven’t included it as part of their reasoning for kicking the teenagers off and it’s being denied that they were sung.

you’re getting you knickers in a twist over songs that have been denied as sung when there are no formal accusations in the first place.

Agree with this. I just read the official statement from the airline again and it doesn’t mention “death to Arabs” or any type of racist chanting at all.
Why are people repeating it as if it were a proven fact?

Yes, it's OK to state that antisemitism is accused at every turn. However, it's perfectly fine to raise the issue of starving gazan children, every time Jews are discussed. Moreover, the alleged death to Arab chants seem to be getting much more focus than the weekly death to Jews chants. I suppose the prejudice is hard to disguise when one is so intent on calling Israel a terrorist state. As soon as I see that, I know what other rhetoric is to follow.

The airline says they were compromising safety so why isn’t that enough for you regardless of what they may or may not have been chanting?

Your are focussed entirely on the wrong things here OP.

Why should the airline have to explain to you why the woman was arrested? They are an airline, not the police, and it is the police who make the decisions about who to arrest. Maybe this women was resisting the instruction to leave the plane, or was shouting and being rude because she was upset that her charges were out of control. We don’t know, but I’m more than happy for the police and airlines to take every necessary precaution when it comes to safety, and for obvious reasons the standard needs to be much higher in the air than it does on land.

You might find this helpful, so that you know the full story. Please do read to the end of the paragraph.

TLDR? The pilot trained the 9/11 terrorists. He didn't of course know they had evil intentions but he did say they were "poor, aggressive students and expelled them after an incident".

Let's get the story straight before this poor man is hounded to death.

But the claims in the post you're quoting are unverified and, honestly, currently appear dubious.

And if they do turn out to be false claims, that'd be a problem...

That’s the feeling, isn’t it - if you criticise anything we do it’s antisemitism. And the irony is, that’s what starts the seed growing…resentment around seeming imperviousness to anything.

I swear that White Europeans are given something to conveniently " forget" any collective " uncomfortable" parts of their history every twenty years...leading to large cognitive dissonance as to their foundation and real place in the world.

Especially the Brits and among them, especially the English.

Continental Europeans are just far more direct with their likes and dislikes and do not partake of angry politesse that is the British/English way.

Hence many on this thread not being able to relate to the possibility of this story happening from the French tourists' point of view.

Even as a few of them can barely disguise their glee at discovering a prism through which to release their apparently long festering " problematic" trains of thought, glad to be able to throw off the self imposed shackles of " public tolerance of ALL".......