Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

Anti-semitism in the UK

797 replies

Lolapusht · 13/07/2025 11:02

Published yesterday I believe.

Evidence of anti-Semitism in the UK

Not sure if that link will work so…

https://x.com/nicolelampert/status/1944147294917439912?s=61&t=_cKTNp_TyAyzDViEOCJDFQ

OP posts:
Thread gallery
22
Lolapusht · 15/07/2025 15:47

Lolapusht · 15/07/2025 15:38

.

Nice little bit of blindness to everyday anti-Semitism.

OP posts:
Lolapusht · 15/07/2025 15:38

.

Anti-semitism in the UK
OP posts:
Hotchocolatebuns · 15/07/2025 15:35

TinklySnail · 15/07/2025 15:30

Awful, truly heartbreaking. They deserve to have a government who cares. That’s why Hamas needs to go and a more moderate government in power.
Maybe then our Jewish community can stop living in fear of death threats.

The mental gymnastics it takes to look at the charred bodies of children and somehow pin their deaths on anyone but the government that dropped the bombs is staggering.

TinklySnail · 15/07/2025 15:30

Hearing · 15/07/2025 15:12

Yeah having just looked everywhere online there is no evidence of what you just said re the cutting off breasts and the poles. That’s as credible as the 40 beheaded babies.

More children died just now in Gaza by Israel than all the children in October 7th and the child hostages.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/13/dozens-of-palestinians-killed-in-latest-israeli-attacks-near-food-aid-distribution-sites-medics-and-witnesses-say

Awful, truly heartbreaking. They deserve to have a government who cares. That’s why Hamas needs to go and a more moderate government in power.
Maybe then our Jewish community can stop living in fear of death threats.

JoyDivision79 · 15/07/2025 15:23

@Hearing I will go look for the source I watched. I agree it's not ok to say anything if there's no validity to that. I'll retract if there's nothing to suggest it's factual. It came from October 7 hostage testimonies. I'll find the source.

The Guardian article. That is horrible. I have no words to convey what I feel about kids blasted to pieces. I accept it's not right. I accept if that is no accident, if it's deliberate, it's a very uncomfortable reality.

I can accept lots of horrible things here.

I still feel the same about every single point I have.

I'm quite sure there will be enough evidence out there that will confirm the point regarding Hamas, the place they come from and their intent. Look at that girl bent in two on the back of a truck. Come on. This is no stretch for goodness sake.

I do hear you though. It's important to verify....

OpheliaWasntMad · 15/07/2025 15:19

Unbelievable that we have posters referring to “40 beheaded babies” in order to mock the atrocities of October 7th
Shame on you

OpheliaWasntMad · 15/07/2025 15:17

Hearing · 15/07/2025 15:12

Yeah having just looked everywhere online there is no evidence of what you just said re the cutting off breasts and the poles. That’s as credible as the 40 beheaded babies.

More children died just now in Gaza by Israel than all the children in October 7th and the child hostages.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/13/dozens-of-palestinians-killed-in-latest-israeli-attacks-near-food-aid-distribution-sites-medics-and-witnesses-say

This is a nasty horrible comment - dismissing the suffering of Jewish people- on a thread that is about anti semitism in the UK.

Beachtastic · 15/07/2025 15:08

Beachtastic · 15/07/2025 08:25

@Hotchocolatebuns You never did answer either of these questions. They weren't rhetorical.

...and still silence on these simple questions. Might the answers reveal too much about what's actually behind the original subject of this thread - that is, the safety of Jewish people in our own country - before it got diverted into finny-fannying around the intricacies of Middle Eastern politics?

JoyDivision79 · 15/07/2025 14:47

Hotchocolatebuns · 15/07/2025 14:33

Blaming “Islam as an ideology” is just recycled bigotry. You wouldn’t say “Judaism is the problem” and expect a pass. Singling out 1.9 billion people while claiming concern for girls or invoking the Holocaust isn’t deep, it’s absurd.

Not true at all. You are peddling more inappropriate lines such as bigotry. I as a female have some very big problems with an ideology that seems to despise women.

Why did young beautiful ladies from Oct 7th have their breasts sliced off? Why metal poles found inside vaginas? You don't know me enough to know this is a very big trigger for me personally. Why these acts in particular and what does this tell us? Why were men found with metal poles inserted into their anus? Why that? What do you think? And this is all a reflection of that ideology.

I never before reflected on why Andrew Tate converted to Islam. Someone suggested why on a podcast i listened to. Can you imagine why someone like this would be drawn to that. Have a guess.

I absolutely will rip Judaism as an ideology a new arsehole if I happen to observe, receive messages consistently in my space about fundamentals that are anti to my values. If this then grows into a situation where people are being subjugated, threatened and ignored when they talk about it. Well yes you'll hear me on here talking very openly about that.

I am absolutely disgusted by the ideology of Catholicism in many ways. I would have to reflect on the holy books and if domination of others is a key message in them. Maybe it is. I am really horrified by history wherein this ideological bullshit was forced upon people who were ripped from homes and forced into boarding schools. If this was here in my face now, I would be talking loudly.

You don't like my honesty. I'm saying things people believe and it's unsettling.

There's not one thing bigoted about me. I know my values are pretty grounded. I'm simply not with the masses. I'm always happy to be re educated too and this is not the definition of the things I'm accused of being.

I'm sorry to derail.

Lolapusht · 15/07/2025 14:38

@Hotchocolatebuns I literally copy and pasted what you said. Fell free to add additional text from your posts if you feel the context of your comments hasn’t been represented correctly.

OP posts:
Hotchocolatebuns · 15/07/2025 14:36

Lolapusht · 15/07/2025 14:32

@Hotchocolatebuns on being able to call out Zionism:

”Calling out Zionism as a political ideology or opposing the actions of the Israeli state (especially when they involve the killing and displacement of thousands) is a moral stance, not a hateful one.
Meanwhile, Islamophobia and other forms of racism are often ignored or normalised, and that double standard is deeply concerning. We should be able to speak clearly and firmly against injustice wherever it happens without being shouted down with bad-faith accusations.
Silencing people by calling them antisemitic for caring about Palestinian lives not only misuses the term, it dilutes the fight against real antisemitism.”

..and

@Hotchocolatebuns on on Islamophobia:

“But painting an entire religion as the root of the problem crosses a line. It’s not brave or honest, it’s just lazy and dangerous. People aren’t being “silenced” for asking hard questions, they’re being called out for blaming whole communities based on fear and bias.”

Your response completely misrepresents what I’ve said. Criticising the policies of the Israeli government or opposing Zionism as a political ideology is not the same as blaming Jews. That’s a deliberate conflation, and it shuts down legitimate discussion. If someone criticised the Iranian regime, you wouldn’t accuse them of Islamophobia. So why pretend criticism of a state equals hatred of a people here?

What is dangerous is using bad-faith accusations of antisemitism to silence people speaking out against state violence.

Hotchocolatebuns · 15/07/2025 14:33

JoyDivision79 · 15/07/2025 14:09

No way. I really do refute that claim.

It would not be treated or received the same way at all. Because of not being afforded the same protection, preference and metaphorical ramming into spaces where people not interested in it, have to eat it up. ( This does not impact me personally. I do believe the experience of others who do live this).

We also have the fear encapsulating and suppressing debate. We have no Christianphobia after all?

I would happily debate regarding my problems with all religions. I have issues with elements within every single religion. I don't like or agree with aspects of the fundamentals of Judaism. Will I get a Fatwa on my ass for saying so? No. Arrested? No. My life at risk even? No. A high five? Well actually, yes maybe. From a fair amount I would actually suggest.

And this is a huge problem. Because it will breed the risk posed and vulnerability of this group. And I'm going to say Holocaust again.

I am continually, without moving, referring to the ideology of Islam. This is my language consistently. You are trying to adapt the language. I don't ever talk about ' them Muslims'. I don't do it. I wonder how awful it must be for many living in that system to be quite honest with you. The girls especially.

Blaming “Islam as an ideology” is just recycled bigotry. You wouldn’t say “Judaism is the problem” and expect a pass. Singling out 1.9 billion people while claiming concern for girls or invoking the Holocaust isn’t deep, it’s absurd.

Lolapusht · 15/07/2025 14:32

@Hotchocolatebuns on being able to call out Zionism:

”Calling out Zionism as a political ideology or opposing the actions of the Israeli state (especially when they involve the killing and displacement of thousands) is a moral stance, not a hateful one.
Meanwhile, Islamophobia and other forms of racism are often ignored or normalised, and that double standard is deeply concerning. We should be able to speak clearly and firmly against injustice wherever it happens without being shouted down with bad-faith accusations.
Silencing people by calling them antisemitic for caring about Palestinian lives not only misuses the term, it dilutes the fight against real antisemitism.”

..and

@Hotchocolatebuns on on Islamophobia:

“But painting an entire religion as the root of the problem crosses a line. It’s not brave or honest, it’s just lazy and dangerous. People aren’t being “silenced” for asking hard questions, they’re being called out for blaming whole communities based on fear and bias.”

OP posts:
DryDay · 15/07/2025 14:18

I am so sorry for your terrible experiences, OP.

Please know that my family and I stand with British Jews and will always fight antisemitism.

’Never again’.

TinklySnail · 15/07/2025 14:18

@Voxon
Exactly my point but your way of putting it was better than mine.
It is double standards. I will wave my Israel flag with my Union flag and keep laughing at the vile comments I get from mainly Muslim men.

Lolapusht · 15/07/2025 14:18

Hotchocolatebuns · 15/07/2025 13:27

Very well said.

Criticising the policies of a government is not the same as attacking a people or a faith. We do it with our own government regularly, and it would be absurd to call that anti-British. The same principle applies here.

Calling out Zionism as a political ideology or opposing the actions of the Israeli state (especially when they involve the killing and displacement of thousands) is a moral stance, not a hateful one.

Meanwhile, Islamophobia and other forms of racism are often ignored or normalised, and that double standard is deeply concerning. We should be able to speak clearly and firmly against injustice wherever it happens without being shouted down with bad-faith accusations.

Silencing people by calling them antisemitic for caring about Palestinian lives not only misuses the term, it dilutes the fight against real antisemitism.

“Calling out Zionism as a political ideology” so you don’t think Israel should exist as a country. Cool. Now we’re getting somewhere.

I really wouldn’t describe pro-Palestine supporters as being silenced.

This is a thread about the unacceptable rise of anti-Semitism in the UK and yet here you are complaining you’re being silenced because of your support for Palestine.

OP posts:
Lolapusht · 15/07/2025 14:14

quantumbutterfly · 15/07/2025 13:29

If you're addressing all those points to me, it's not my reading comprehension that's flawed.

.

Ryan Gosling Reaction GIF
OP posts:
TinklySnail · 15/07/2025 14:14

Hotchocolatebuns · 15/07/2025 14:00

Let’s be real - if someone said the same kind of sweeping things about Jews or Christians, we’d all immediately recognise it as prejudice. So why is it acceptable (to you) when it’s about Muslims? Criticising Hamas or political violence is one thing. But painting an entire religion as the root of the problem crosses a line. It’s not brave or honest, it’s just lazy and dangerous. People aren’t being “silenced” for asking hard questions, they’re being called out for blaming whole communities based on fear and bias.

I can take the piss and be as derogatory as I like about a religion.
That’s what free speech means.
I can criticise any religion I choose to. I can poke fun at any god or prophet I choose to.
People do make sweeping comments about Jews, Christians etc. What we don’t do is threaten death on an individual because of a religious belief.
Jews: ‘tight’
JW: ‘tell everyone on FB to not answer the door and then discuss blood transfusions’
Christians: ‘bible bashers’ and ‘Praise Jebus’
I don’t hate anyone religious person and would not offer up death threats against them.

Lolapusht · 15/07/2025 14:11

PuttingOnTheKitsch · 15/07/2025 13:26

I'm struggling with your reading comprehension.

I never said that nobody had died.

There clearly have been deaths.

I said that your statement that the Syrian government was massacring Druze was incorrect.

I even provided a news article from a respected source to verify this.

You seem to think you are being very clever, by not admitting that you were wrong, but instead responding by stating things like:

Sky News is partisan

Denying the article has on the ground sources

Both of which I have disproved at which point you claimed to prefer OSINT sources (aka unverified sources on Twitter)

It is odd that you label the SNHR, which again is an independent organisation, as a "Syrian network diatribe" when it reports on the actions of the Israeli government in Syria, yet when it has news you find pleasing to your world view, you are happy to respect it as a news source, which should be more wider reported.

However, for those who follow the media as opposed to solely relying random OSINT accounts on Twitter because they have the most gruesome footage, the ongoing issues in Syria, clearly do receive media coverage. The outbreak of violence on the coast earlier this year was widely reported upon in the international media and as demonstrated by the Sky News reporting, ongoing events in Suwayda are also receiving coverage.

Ooh…I think your ire should be directed at me, not @quantumbutterfly. Well, partly anyway.

I was the one who mentioned OSINT sources on X.

You may not know how to filter out the grifters from genuine posters with reliable information, but I do. The accounts I follow are fine. I can hand on heart say that I do not follow them because they show the most gruesome footage and take your accusation as an insult.

The Sky News article you cited quote official Syrian sources which I’m sure are as reliable as Hamas sources. You can’t possibly write off every OSINT account on X as an unverified source then provide one source quoting the official response from a regime who has no desire to publish their brutality.

Who carried out the violence on the coast earlier this year that received an adequate amount of media coverage? Don’t think you answered that question, just went off on a diatribe about grifters and Twitter.

OP posts:
Voxon · 15/07/2025 14:10

Herein lies just one of the examples of the double standard.

Zionism is both a political and religious ideology. As is Islam.

Both are therefore subject to the same rights for people to criticise as much as they wish, provided that the criticism isn't hateful.

Nobody thinks it's okay if our streets had mobs of people wanting to dismantle Islam. But they think it's perfectly acceptable to do that for Zionism.

Their argument is that Zionism is fundamentally discriminatory and causes suffering to people. I think you could make a similar argument for Islam.

The difference is, people inherently understand it's pretty gross...unless the targets are Jews. Then it's fine.

Please don't give me "but what about the children?" Because I could ask you "but what about the gays or the women or the tens of thousands of 10 year old sold in marriage?"

It's not a legitimate lime of criticism if you seek to demonise and destroy.

JoyDivision79 · 15/07/2025 14:09

Hotchocolatebuns · 15/07/2025 14:00

Let’s be real - if someone said the same kind of sweeping things about Jews or Christians, we’d all immediately recognise it as prejudice. So why is it acceptable (to you) when it’s about Muslims? Criticising Hamas or political violence is one thing. But painting an entire religion as the root of the problem crosses a line. It’s not brave or honest, it’s just lazy and dangerous. People aren’t being “silenced” for asking hard questions, they’re being called out for blaming whole communities based on fear and bias.

No way. I really do refute that claim.

It would not be treated or received the same way at all. Because of not being afforded the same protection, preference and metaphorical ramming into spaces where people not interested in it, have to eat it up. ( This does not impact me personally. I do believe the experience of others who do live this).

We also have the fear encapsulating and suppressing debate. We have no Christianphobia after all?

I would happily debate regarding my problems with all religions. I have issues with elements within every single religion. I don't like or agree with aspects of the fundamentals of Judaism. Will I get a Fatwa on my ass for saying so? No. Arrested? No. My life at risk even? No. A high five? Well actually, yes maybe. From a fair amount I would actually suggest.

And this is a huge problem. Because it will breed the risk posed and vulnerability of this group. And I'm going to say Holocaust again.

I am continually, without moving, referring to the ideology of Islam. This is my language consistently. You are trying to adapt the language. I don't ever talk about ' them Muslims'. I don't do it. I wonder how awful it must be for many living in that system to be quite honest with you. The girls especially.

quantumbutterfly · 15/07/2025 14:01

Hotchocolatebuns · 15/07/2025 14:00

Let’s be real - if someone said the same kind of sweeping things about Jews or Christians, we’d all immediately recognise it as prejudice. So why is it acceptable (to you) when it’s about Muslims? Criticising Hamas or political violence is one thing. But painting an entire religion as the root of the problem crosses a line. It’s not brave or honest, it’s just lazy and dangerous. People aren’t being “silenced” for asking hard questions, they’re being called out for blaming whole communities based on fear and bias.

Which brings us back to the topic of the thread

Hotchocolatebuns · 15/07/2025 14:00

JoyDivision79 · 15/07/2025 13:56

@Hotchocolatebuns it isn't fair to keep saying far right.

I go hard left on one area and then move right away on others. I don't believe anyone saying what you're uncomfortable hearing is far right or racist.

If we lived in the 1980s, this conversation would be different for me. I would see a particular group as incredibly vulnerable. That's not happening though.

The religion and ideology element is unfortunately very relevant. I cannot believe how many interviews and how much footage I have watched and read where an undercurrent seeps in. That's often a view about Jewish Israelis. That then sadly will extend to Jewish people here.

What is very unsettling is that this is playing out, yet no one is allowed to say, Islam is quite problematic in all this is it not? The fundamentals of an ideology even written in it's texts that do send a message about sharing, about Jews, about action to take.

This feeds into Hamas. And supports the problem wherein they are operating through principles of this ideology that I certainly don't like. That their actions and position are relevant in the context of the Middle East when a two state solution is suggested or let's share, play nice, peace comes out. Well how when it's the antithesis of an ideology they breathe?

People get very pissed off when silenced over this reality. Or called Far Right. You cut any conversation off immediately then.

Let’s be real - if someone said the same kind of sweeping things about Jews or Christians, we’d all immediately recognise it as prejudice. So why is it acceptable (to you) when it’s about Muslims? Criticising Hamas or political violence is one thing. But painting an entire religion as the root of the problem crosses a line. It’s not brave or honest, it’s just lazy and dangerous. People aren’t being “silenced” for asking hard questions, they’re being called out for blaming whole communities based on fear and bias.

quantumbutterfly · 15/07/2025 13:59

IAmNotASheep · 15/07/2025 13:57

That last para is very racist!

Indeed, not all white people are privileged.

Swipe left for the next trending thread