Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

To wish those in Israel safety in these coming times

684 replies

mids2019 · 15/06/2025 04:09

Israel is a country at war and I know many will have links or family in that country so I think it appropriate to wish them safety in the coming days.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
ClosetBasketCase · 19/06/2025 13:19

Oh look, OP gets upset that the Isreali hospital gets hit when civillians are inside - question - were you as upset when isreal were bombing the palastinian hospitals in gaza? killing hundreds if not thousands of civillians, women and children in the process? no? then why the hell not?

Twiglets1 · 19/06/2025 12:59

Babyboomtastic · 19/06/2025 11:17

No they aren't.
That's just a lie you tell yourself so that killing Palestinians is ok in your mind.

  1. Do you think Israel would bomb one of their own hosptials if Hamas were hiding underneath btw?
  2. do you have evidence of hamas command centres underneath every single hospital bombed by Israel over the last two years? Dozens if not hundreds of attacks?

No I don't think Israel would bomb one of their own hospitals (even in the strange situation where Hamas were hiding underneath) because they are not at war with themselves.

No I don't have evidence of Hamas command centres underneath every single hospital Israel has bombed over the last 2 years, but I tend to believe them when they say that they had the suspicion of Hamas militants or tunnels in the hospital grounds.

Where they were mistaken, this should be investigated to see if they had enough reasonable grounds to bomb or not. It may be the case that certain individuals who are investigated after the war are found guilty of war crimes as they lacked sufficient evidence but bombed the hospital anyway. In this situation, I would agree that the individuals have committed war crimes and should be punished.

inamarina · 19/06/2025 12:50

10UsernamesNotAvailableTryAnotherOne · 19/06/2025 12:02

So, not only is there are strong possibility of a military presence under the hospital (the Fortress of Zion), there's a definite military presence right next to the hospital.

Why on earth are you mentioning the Fortress of Zion (located underground beneath the IDF headquarters in central Tel Aviv) in connection with the bombing of a hospital in a city over 100 km away?

JustGoClickLikeALightSwitch · 19/06/2025 12:33

Oh dear, my reply wasn’t polite enough . Once more @10UsernamesNotAvailableTryAnotherOne - your lack of knowledge means that you are very confidently mixing up two cities 100km apart.

JustGoClickLikeALightSwitch · 19/06/2025 12:07

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

10UsernamesNotAvailableTryAnotherOne · 19/06/2025 12:02

GentleSheep · 19/06/2025 11:45

According to the Iranian government there were members of the military in the hospital that they hit.

According to the Iranian government! Not really a ringing endorsement is it? I think what is valid though is that pretty much next door to the hospital is a military intelligence facility and it could be that the missile was slightly adrift and caught the hospital instead. Perhaps. Difficult to know for sure.

So, not only is there are strong possibility of a military presence under the hospital (the Fortress of Zion), there's a definite military presence right next to the hospital.

JustGoClickLikeALightSwitch · 19/06/2025 12:01

10UsernamesNotAvailableTryAnotherOne · 19/06/2025 11:51

Chances are that there is a military presence under the hospital. The IDF have large, sprawling underground bunker called the Fortress of Zion under Tel Aviv.

https://archive.is/wojie

Right - so, there is an underground military complex in TLV (not under a hospital), therefore "chances are" there's one under a hospital in a city 100km away?

Kakeandkake · 19/06/2025 11:54

GentleSheep · 19/06/2025 11:45

According to the Iranian government there were members of the military in the hospital that they hit.

According to the Iranian government! Not really a ringing endorsement is it? I think what is valid though is that pretty much next door to the hospital is a military intelligence facility and it could be that the missile was slightly adrift and caught the hospital instead. Perhaps. Difficult to know for sure.

yeah It was this.

10UsernamesNotAvailableTryAnotherOne · 19/06/2025 11:51

Babyboomtastic · 19/06/2025 10:56

How do you know there weren't IDF in there? How do you know the IDF didn't do it themselves and blame Iran? All the same pathetic arguments here as have been made to justify bombing hospitals over the last two years. Pathetic.

Chances are that there is a military presence under the hospital. The IDF have large, sprawling underground bunker called the Fortress of Zion under Tel Aviv.

https://archive.is/wojie

dairydebris · 19/06/2025 11:47

Babyboomtastic · 19/06/2025 10:56

How do you know there weren't IDF in there? How do you know the IDF didn't do it themselves and blame Iran? All the same pathetic arguments here as have been made to justify bombing hospitals over the last two years. Pathetic.

Sorry, are you actually suggesting the IDF have a base in a hospital? Or that Israel bombed its own hospital and blamed it on Iran? Is that what you believe? For what reason do you believe this? Because otherwise its just yet more word salad...

Start a war, you get war crimes. Iran, Israel, Palestine, the UK, the US. All commited war crimes.

You bomb a hospital that you know has no military value at all, its a war crime, no matter who pulled the trigger.

GentleSheep · 19/06/2025 11:45

According to the Iranian government there were members of the military in the hospital that they hit.

According to the Iranian government! Not really a ringing endorsement is it? I think what is valid though is that pretty much next door to the hospital is a military intelligence facility and it could be that the missile was slightly adrift and caught the hospital instead. Perhaps. Difficult to know for sure.

Dangermoo · 19/06/2025 11:43

purpletablet · 19/06/2025 11:34

The presence of a military target near or beneath a hospital does not automatically make the hospital a valid target under international law. Even if there is some military activity, the laws of armed conflict require strict proportionality and precautions to avoid harm to civilians. Hospitals still retain special protection, and attacks on them must meet an extremely high threshold of justification.

In many of the cases where Israel has bombed hospitals, little to no verifiable evidence was provided to support the claims that they were being used as military command centres. And even if there were legitimate targets nearby, intentionally destroying a hospital treating civilians, or making it inoperable, would still likely violate international law if the civilian harm is excessive in relation to the military advantage.

If we are now agreeing that hospitals are not valid targets unless the military presence is clear, confirmed, and proportionate, then the standard needs to apply to everyone, not only to Iran or others. The rules of war are not optional. They are meant to protect civilians, no matter which side they are on.

Agree but all parties have to be abiding by international law and one might question whether that is always the case in the ME.

purpletablet · 19/06/2025 11:34

Twiglets1 · 19/06/2025 11:04

Oh you’re back… well they are valid targets if they have military command centres built underneath them with top military commanders hiding there.

If they are just hospitals treating sick people then no they are not valid military targets.

The presence of a military target near or beneath a hospital does not automatically make the hospital a valid target under international law. Even if there is some military activity, the laws of armed conflict require strict proportionality and precautions to avoid harm to civilians. Hospitals still retain special protection, and attacks on them must meet an extremely high threshold of justification.

In many of the cases where Israel has bombed hospitals, little to no verifiable evidence was provided to support the claims that they were being used as military command centres. And even if there were legitimate targets nearby, intentionally destroying a hospital treating civilians, or making it inoperable, would still likely violate international law if the civilian harm is excessive in relation to the military advantage.

If we are now agreeing that hospitals are not valid targets unless the military presence is clear, confirmed, and proportionate, then the standard needs to apply to everyone, not only to Iran or others. The rules of war are not optional. They are meant to protect civilians, no matter which side they are on.

PaxAeterna · 19/06/2025 11:33

According to the Iranian government there were members of the military in the hospital that they hit.

Really? It’s like the Iranian regime is playing a sick joke on Israel.

It’s awful because ultimately ordinary people pay the price.

Dangermoo · 19/06/2025 11:20

I'm wondering why this thread is being derailed, when it's rinse and repeat posts being brought from the numerous other threads.

Babyboomtastic · 19/06/2025 11:17

No they aren't.
That's just a lie you tell yourself so that killing Palestinians is ok in your mind.

  1. Do you think Israel would bomb one of their own hosptials if Hamas were hiding underneath btw?
  2. do you have evidence of hamas command centres underneath every single hospital bombed by Israel over the last two years? Dozens if not hundreds of attacks?
Kakeandkake · 19/06/2025 11:15

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Twiglets1 · 19/06/2025 11:04

Babyboomtastic · 19/06/2025 10:16

Over the last almost 2 years, Israel has repeatedly tried to persuade the world that hospitals containing civilians are valid military targets.

I guess Iran were listening.

That doesn't mean I don't feel incredibly sorry for the civilians caught up in this, no hospital deserves to be bombed. But it would be incredibly hypocritical if Israel to claim it's unacceptable.

Oh you’re back… well they are valid targets if they have military command centres built underneath them with top military commanders hiding there.

If they are just hospitals treating sick people then no they are not valid military targets.

Twiglets1 · 19/06/2025 11:01

We see what we see on these threads which is very little sympathy ever being expressed for Israeli citizens caught up in the violence of war.

Hence we don’t expect to see an outcry against Iran for targeting Israel citizens in a hospital but time will tell if it even gets mentioned on many threads.

Kakeandkake · 19/06/2025 10:59

Kakeandkake · 19/06/2025 10:57

They cry foul at the same actions they carry out themselves over and over and over again.

According to the Lebanese Ministry of Health, between October 2023 and November 2024 the Israeli military attacked 67 hospitals, 56 primary health care centres, and 238 emergency medical teams, killing at least 222 medical and emergency relief workers.

SharonEllis · 19/06/2025 10:57

ComeAsYouAreAsAFriend · 19/06/2025 10:09

Ok be pedantic it is how they are described on wiki as well, I obviously haven't gone through all government websites but in my experience with stuff like this, most use the same descriptions. My post was in response to posters suggesting that their only reason for being in existence was because they want to kill all Jews I was merely pointing out that that is not the only reason given. As I said thread has moved on

Has anyone said that the only reason for their existence was to kill all Jews?

Kakeandkake · 19/06/2025 10:57

They cry foul at the same actions they carry out themselves over and over and over again.

Babyboomtastic · 19/06/2025 10:56

dairydebris · 19/06/2025 10:39

Only there's one major difference. Theres absolutely no chance whatsoever that that hospital was an IDF base, had tunnels with IDF hiding out, or had any IDF commanders anywhere near. It was a purely civilian target. So a war crime.

How do you know there weren't IDF in there? How do you know the IDF didn't do it themselves and blame Iran? All the same pathetic arguments here as have been made to justify bombing hospitals over the last two years. Pathetic.

Kakeandkake · 19/06/2025 10:55

You think the world can't see the hypocrisy of the Israeli government?

Kakeandkake · 19/06/2025 10:54

dairydebris · 19/06/2025 10:39

Only there's one major difference. Theres absolutely no chance whatsoever that that hospital was an IDF base, had tunnels with IDF hiding out, or had any IDF commanders anywhere near. It was a purely civilian target. So a war crime.

How many hospitals did Israel attack on Lebanon?