Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

To wish those in Israel safety in these coming times

684 replies

mids2019 · 15/06/2025 04:09

Israel is a country at war and I know many will have links or family in that country so I think it appropriate to wish them safety in the coming days.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
Dangermoo · 20/06/2025 14:00

dairydebris · 20/06/2025 13:57

If you're long past bickering about terminology just use the correct terms, then we won't have to bicker about it.
As it is, posters on here frequently use incorrect terminology to whip up more hatred. And that's unnecessary. That's why I quibble over it at least.
Being bombed is quite bad enough, there's no need to call it otherwise.

Exactly how I feel. Nothing is going to change what's happened and what's about to come because a few MNers quibble over terminology.

dairydebris · 20/06/2025 13:57

ComeAsYouAreAsAFriend · 20/06/2025 13:51

@PaxAeterna I applaud your determination but they're making you go round in circles so you give up. The world can see the level of destruction in Gaza we are long past bickering over terminology, to me it's demonstrating how little is left to defend

If you're long past bickering about terminology just use the correct terms, then we won't have to bicker about it.
As it is, posters on here frequently use incorrect terminology to whip up more hatred. And that's unnecessary. That's why I quibble over it at least.
Being bombed is quite bad enough, there's no need to call it otherwise.

Twiglets1 · 20/06/2025 13:53

Dangermoo · 20/06/2025 13:43

It's just relentless links and generated stuff that we could all go and find if we wanted. I can't speak for anyone else but I'm here to give my support to the Jewish people, who need it. They've been shafted by quite a few high profile people, including Susan Sarandon, who I once respected. I'm not defending my position again and don't expect anyone else to do the same. The thread about supporting terrorists confirmed why I intend to stick around - in solidarity x

You don't have to defend your position.

I've been sucked into doing that too many times by the relentless questioning but in the end, it is a bit pointless.

Can no longer be bothered with the circular arguments that go round and round.

Our opinions are valid. I know it gets a bit much sometimes but I'm glad you intend to stick around.

ComeAsYouAreAsAFriend · 20/06/2025 13:53

Twiglets1 · 20/06/2025 13:50

Links to mainstream reputable news sources are rather different ... don't worry if you don't understand why, I won't be explaining it.

Links are links that we could all go and find if we wanted.

don't worry if you don't understand why, I won't be explaining it.
I understand perfectly fine thanks don't need any explanation

Dangermoo · 20/06/2025 13:53

Twiglets1 · 20/06/2025 13:50

Links to mainstream reputable news sources are rather different ... don't worry if you don't understand why, I won't be explaining it.

Of course they are. Not bloody you tube videos and twitter shite. No amount of ill people posting about Trump being a clown from their hospital bed is going to get me to change my mind, either, on the Iran situation.

ComeAsYouAreAsAFriend · 20/06/2025 13:51

@PaxAeterna I applaud your determination but they're making you go round in circles so you give up. The world can see the level of destruction in Gaza we are long past bickering over terminology, to me it's demonstrating how little is left to defend

Twiglets1 · 20/06/2025 13:50

ComeAsYouAreAsAFriend · 20/06/2025 13:48

It's just relentless links
Have you checked who you've tagged on this? They're a big fan of the relentless links

Links to mainstream reputable news sources are rather different ... don't worry if you don't understand why, I won't be explaining it.

ComeAsYouAreAsAFriend · 20/06/2025 13:48

Dangermoo · 20/06/2025 13:43

It's just relentless links and generated stuff that we could all go and find if we wanted. I can't speak for anyone else but I'm here to give my support to the Jewish people, who need it. They've been shafted by quite a few high profile people, including Susan Sarandon, who I once respected. I'm not defending my position again and don't expect anyone else to do the same. The thread about supporting terrorists confirmed why I intend to stick around - in solidarity x

It's just relentless links
Have you checked who you've tagged on this? They're a big fan of the relentless links

Dangermoo · 20/06/2025 13:43

Twiglets1 · 20/06/2025 13:35

It's bizarre.

We don't harass them to agree with us.

It's tiring especially people using AI to spout nonsense.

It's just relentless links and generated stuff that we could all go and find if we wanted. I can't speak for anyone else but I'm here to give my support to the Jewish people, who need it. They've been shafted by quite a few high profile people, including Susan Sarandon, who I once respected. I'm not defending my position again and don't expect anyone else to do the same. The thread about supporting terrorists confirmed why I intend to stick around - in solidarity x

SharonEllis · 20/06/2025 13:43

PaxAeterna · 20/06/2025 13:41

I guess I’m surprised that people seem to think the term “carpet bombing” is ridiculous to use.

The scale of the destruction in Gaza is no secret, everyone from Trump to Netanyahu to The UN and human rights groups seem to agree - Gaza is unliveable, the bombs have destroyed it.

I’m puzzled that people think targeted bombing campaigns caused it.

Fair enough to argue over genocide or Apartheid which are highly specific legal terms. But to insist that this is targeted bombing seems extraordinary.

Because its not carpet bombing ffs. Look it up!

dairydebris · 20/06/2025 13:43

PaxAeterna · 20/06/2025 13:41

I guess I’m surprised that people seem to think the term “carpet bombing” is ridiculous to use.

The scale of the destruction in Gaza is no secret, everyone from Trump to Netanyahu to The UN and human rights groups seem to agree - Gaza is unliveable, the bombs have destroyed it.

I’m puzzled that people think targeted bombing campaigns caused it.

Fair enough to argue over genocide or Apartheid which are highly specific legal terms. But to insist that this is targeted bombing seems extraordinary.

But it is targeted bombing. They know what they're aiming at.
They've just aimed at lots of different buildings at different times.
See my post above too.

SharonEllis · 20/06/2025 13:43

PaxAeterna · 20/06/2025 13:26

Well it’s clearly not targeted bombing as such large swathes of buildings/land/people have been destroyed.

Would indiscriminate bombing be more palatable for you?

Its about accuracy and a lot of the bombing has certainly been targetted. that's completely unarguable. Im afraid I havent monitored every one. Why do you care what is 'palatable' to me? These discussions are so tedious.

PaxAeterna · 20/06/2025 13:41

Dangermoo · 20/06/2025 13:30

Why are some of you still clinging on to getting others to agree with you about genocide and now carpet bombing? You can keep asking the same questions in as many different ways, we do not share the same opinion.

I guess I’m surprised that people seem to think the term “carpet bombing” is ridiculous to use.

The scale of the destruction in Gaza is no secret, everyone from Trump to Netanyahu to The UN and human rights groups seem to agree - Gaza is unliveable, the bombs have destroyed it.

I’m puzzled that people think targeted bombing campaigns caused it.

Fair enough to argue over genocide or Apartheid which are highly specific legal terms. But to insist that this is targeted bombing seems extraordinary.

dairydebris · 20/06/2025 13:36

Dangermoo · 20/06/2025 13:30

Why are some of you still clinging on to getting others to agree with you about genocide and now carpet bombing? You can keep asking the same questions in as many different ways, we do not share the same opinion.

I dont think carpet bombing is an opinion tho. Its using unguided large heavy explosives to simultaneously or progressively in a short space of time completely cover ( carpet ) the enemy ground. Meant to cause large scale destruction and lots of civilian deaths.

Israel has been using targeted smaller munitions and warning civilians to move from target area. Sometimes using sound to warn of impending attack. Nowhere near the same thing.

Yes, much of Gaza has now been destroyed. But if it had been carpet bombed that would have all taken place in the space of a couple of hours / runs, and the civilian deaths toll would have been in the 100's of thousands.

Twiglets1 · 20/06/2025 13:35

Dangermoo · 20/06/2025 13:30

Why are some of you still clinging on to getting others to agree with you about genocide and now carpet bombing? You can keep asking the same questions in as many different ways, we do not share the same opinion.

It's bizarre.

We don't harass them to agree with us.

It's tiring especially people using AI to spout nonsense.

dairydebris · 20/06/2025 13:31

purpletablet · 20/06/2025 13:26

Yes, I put what I have written into AI to help correct the grammar and spelling etc. It just makes things quicker because I don’t have to spend as much time going back through what I’ve written. It’s a handy tool. I always make sure to read over it before posting to make sure it’s still all my own opinions.

Thanks for saying. I've been using a lot recently too for work and thought I recognised it. It's definitely better at spelling and grammar than me, but comes off weirdly flat and unengaged in posts like this. I admit I don't like it.

Apologies but I don't wish to engage further with you on the issues, I feel we'll never meet anywhere useful because of how you feel about the antisemitism of Hamas.

Dangermoo · 20/06/2025 13:30

Why are some of you still clinging on to getting others to agree with you about genocide and now carpet bombing? You can keep asking the same questions in as many different ways, we do not share the same opinion.

PaxAeterna · 20/06/2025 13:26

SharonEllis · 20/06/2025 13:22

Just bombing. Its not carpet bombing.

Well it’s clearly not targeted bombing as such large swathes of buildings/land/people have been destroyed.

Would indiscriminate bombing be more palatable for you?

purpletablet · 20/06/2025 13:26

dairydebris · 20/06/2025 13:09

So are you using AI? Direct question?

Yes, I put what I have written into AI to help correct the grammar and spelling etc. It just makes things quicker because I don’t have to spend as much time going back through what I’ve written. It’s a handy tool. I always make sure to read over it before posting to make sure it’s still all my own opinions.

SharonEllis · 20/06/2025 13:24

Im sure there is precise military terminology that Im not aware of. You dont need to be a military analyst to work out that its self evidently not carpet bombing. And Gaza is not "flattened'. Fgs.

SharonEllis · 20/06/2025 13:22

PaxAeterna · 20/06/2025 13:15

What would you call the method of bombing used to flatten Gaza then?

Just bombing. Its not carpet bombing.

PaxAeterna · 20/06/2025 13:15

SharonEllis · 20/06/2025 13:12

Carpet bombing is a method of bombing, not a measure of levels of destruction.

What would you call the method of bombing used to flatten Gaza then?

SharonEllis · 20/06/2025 13:12

PaxAeterna · 20/06/2025 12:59

Well I’d encourage you to look at the google maps recent update of Gaza which is still a year old and shows complete towns and areas absolutely flattened. 70% of buildings are destroyed or damaged, 90% of people are now homeless. Many roads and farmland has been damaged or wiped out?

What do you call destruction on this scale?

Carpet bombing is a method of bombing, not a measure of levels of destruction.

dairydebris · 20/06/2025 13:09

purpletablet · 20/06/2025 13:08

Feels like a bit of a deflection, to be honest. If I’ve missed something or misread your point, I’m more than happy to clear it up. But just calling it “word salad” without actually engaging with what I said isn’t really a response, it’s a way to avoid the conversation.

I’m here to talk about the actual issues. If anything I wrote came across as unclear or off the mark, say so and we can talk about it. I’d genuinely rather have a proper discussion than swap vague digs.

So are you using AI? Direct question?

purpletablet · 20/06/2025 13:08

dairydebris · 20/06/2025 12:24

Are you using AI to write these answers? Because they're always just slightly missing the point and oddly devoid of human phrasing.

A lot of word salad but no actual points being made.

Feels like a bit of a deflection, to be honest. If I’ve missed something or misread your point, I’m more than happy to clear it up. But just calling it “word salad” without actually engaging with what I said isn’t really a response, it’s a way to avoid the conversation.

I’m here to talk about the actual issues. If anything I wrote came across as unclear or off the mark, say so and we can talk about it. I’d genuinely rather have a proper discussion than swap vague digs.