Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

To wish those in Israel safety in these coming times

684 replies

mids2019 · 15/06/2025 04:09

Israel is a country at war and I know many will have links or family in that country so I think it appropriate to wish them safety in the coming days.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
Stripes56 · 17/06/2025 21:22

HellsBalls · 17/06/2025 20:55

@DigitalInteractor ”That means standing with Israel to most people.”

As simple as that message is, and despite the vast, vast majority of Europeans believing that, and their governments actively and openly expressing this, the pro-Palestinian minority cannot accept it

It can only be antisemitism or radicalization driving them on.
Otherwise this forum should be alive on the wars in Sudan and the repression of women in Afghanistan.
But they are not. Not a fecking whimper. Why? Because there are no Jews involved.

I am not sure what you mean by ‘standing with Israel’

However, there are polls and trackers that ask somewhat related questions- so we don’t need to guess what most people think.

Here are few headlines:

Net favourability towards Israel in Germany (-44), France (-48) and Denmark (-54) has reached its lowest level since we started tracking in 2016. Public sentiment in Italy (-52) and Spain(-55) are likewise at their lowest or joint lowest levels, albeit over a shorter timespan from 2021 onwards.

Overall, only 13-21% in any country have a favourable opinion of Israel, compared to 63-70% who have an unfavourable view.

Fewer people likewise now ‘side’ with the Israelis in our sympathy tracker. Between 7-18% say they sympathise most with the Israeli side, the lowest or joint-lowest figure in five of our six countries since the Hamas attacks.

By contrast, between 18% and 33% say they sympathise more with the Palestinian side; only in Germany are the figures for each side similar (17% for Israel, 18% for Palestine).

Very few people think that 7/10 was justified- shows you don’t have to be ‘pro-Hamas’ to ‘not stand by Israel’

https://yougov.co.uk/international/articles/52279-net-favourability-towards-israel-reaches-new-lows-in-key-western-european-countries

https://ygo-assets-websites-editorial-emea.yougov.net/documents/Eurotrack_IsraelPalestineConflict_May25_w.pdf

Net favourability towards Israel reaches new lows in key Western European countries | YouGov

Few Western Europeans see Israel’s attacks in Gaza as proportionate or justified

https://yougov.co.uk/international/articles/52279-net-favourability-towards-israel-reaches-new-lows-in-key-western-european-countries

purpletablet · 17/06/2025 21:18

devourfeculence · 17/06/2025 20:22

So if Palestinians wish violence on innocent Israelis they deserve sympathy but if Isralies wish harm on innocent Palestinians they deserve harm in return? And you were complaining about double standards?

You’re twisting what I said. I didn’t say anyone deserves harm. I was pointing out the double standard in how people react when the same sentiments come from different sides. When Palestinians express rage after decades of occupation, displacement, and bombardment, they’re labelled as savages. But when Israelis express open hatred or call for Gaza to be “flattened,” it’s often excused as justified anger or self-defence.

My comment was meant to hold up a mirror. It was asking why violence wished upon Palestinians is so widely accepted, while even imagining that reversed causes outrage. That is the double standard. And the fact that people are more upset by my words than by the actual suffering of Palestinians only proves my point.

GretaGreen · 17/06/2025 21:11

HellsBalls · 17/06/2025 20:55

@DigitalInteractor ”That means standing with Israel to most people.”

As simple as that message is, and despite the vast, vast majority of Europeans believing that, and their governments actively and openly expressing this, the pro-Palestinian minority cannot accept it

It can only be antisemitism or radicalization driving them on.
Otherwise this forum should be alive on the wars in Sudan and the repression of women in Afghanistan.
But they are not. Not a fecking whimper. Why? Because there are no Jews involved.

It's a bit rich to be saying that it's antisemitism to care about Palestinians because what about Sudan on a thread created to wish Israelis only well. Why do you think the OP only cares about Israel and not Sudan or where ever else? Why has not a single person who apparently cares so deeply about Sudan they throw a mention of it into every thread challenged the OP on that?

And again with the delulu that the vast, vast majority of people in Europe stand with Israel. Find me a single survey that says that. There is no silent majority. You and your hero worship Netanyahu are part of a minority. Put up a thread in aibu and ask if Netanyahu is a hero if you don't believe me or any of the polls that have been done across Europe on this topic.

HellsBalls · 17/06/2025 20:55

@DigitalInteractor ”That means standing with Israel to most people.”

As simple as that message is, and despite the vast, vast majority of Europeans believing that, and their governments actively and openly expressing this, the pro-Palestinian minority cannot accept it

It can only be antisemitism or radicalization driving them on.
Otherwise this forum should be alive on the wars in Sudan and the repression of women in Afghanistan.
But they are not. Not a fecking whimper. Why? Because there are no Jews involved.

Mercurial123 · 17/06/2025 20:49

DigitalInteractor · 17/06/2025 20:39

Do you mean the REGION of Palestine? Palestine is not and never has been a country.

I think ordinary people stand with innocent civilians who want to live in peace and live their lives as most of Western civilisation does, free from living in fear from a mad Mullah regime and demented terrorist proxies who indoctrinate evil and hatred, bring war on their people (and kill them themselves), and use them as human sacrifices for a fake cause created by an ideology which will not accept a Jewish State due to centuries old religious conflict.

That means standing with Israel to most people.

It's very convenient that you're "forgetting" Netanyahu has the right wing support and he's been illegally expanding the settlements over decades. Destroying Palestinian lives and communities. He won't be happy until the genocide is complete.

But you carry on believing what you will.

DigitalInteractor · 17/06/2025 20:39

purpletablet · 17/06/2025 19:35

Well yes, thankfully ordinary people do stand with Palestine. The real disconnect is with our politicians and much of the media, who keep pushing narratives that excuse or downplay what is happening. That is what I am referring to.

Do you mean the REGION of Palestine? Palestine is not and never has been a country.

I think ordinary people stand with innocent civilians who want to live in peace and live their lives as most of Western civilisation does, free from living in fear from a mad Mullah regime and demented terrorist proxies who indoctrinate evil and hatred, bring war on their people (and kill them themselves), and use them as human sacrifices for a fake cause created by an ideology which will not accept a Jewish State due to centuries old religious conflict.

That means standing with Israel to most people.

quantumbutterfly · 17/06/2025 20:27

purpletablet · 17/06/2025 20:18

There’s a huge difference between a colonised, occupied people reacting to decades of oppression, and a nuclear-armed state systematically brutalising a population it controls. Palestinians didn’t choose this situation. Israel holds all the power. The land, the borders, the military, the economy. Trying to draw a false equivalence here just ignores that imbalance entirely.

When I said I wished for Israelis what they wish for Palestinians, I was holding up a mirror, not calling for violence, but forcing people to confront the cruelty that’s been normalised when it’s aimed at Palestinians. The only reason it feels extreme is because we’ve been conditioned to see Palestinian suffering as routine.

This whole response just feels like you’re grasping for moral outrage in my words rather than reckoning with the reality I was pointing to.

...and your feelings about 7/10 ?

Insanityisnotastrategy · 17/06/2025 20:23

purpletablet · 17/06/2025 20:18

There’s a huge difference between a colonised, occupied people reacting to decades of oppression, and a nuclear-armed state systematically brutalising a population it controls. Palestinians didn’t choose this situation. Israel holds all the power. The land, the borders, the military, the economy. Trying to draw a false equivalence here just ignores that imbalance entirely.

When I said I wished for Israelis what they wish for Palestinians, I was holding up a mirror, not calling for violence, but forcing people to confront the cruelty that’s been normalised when it’s aimed at Palestinians. The only reason it feels extreme is because we’ve been conditioned to see Palestinian suffering as routine.

This whole response just feels like you’re grasping for moral outrage in my words rather than reckoning with the reality I was pointing to.

Not grasping for moral outrage, just working out what your moral boundaries are.

devourfeculence · 17/06/2025 20:22

purpletablet · 17/06/2025 20:18

There’s a huge difference between a colonised, occupied people reacting to decades of oppression, and a nuclear-armed state systematically brutalising a population it controls. Palestinians didn’t choose this situation. Israel holds all the power. The land, the borders, the military, the economy. Trying to draw a false equivalence here just ignores that imbalance entirely.

When I said I wished for Israelis what they wish for Palestinians, I was holding up a mirror, not calling for violence, but forcing people to confront the cruelty that’s been normalised when it’s aimed at Palestinians. The only reason it feels extreme is because we’ve been conditioned to see Palestinian suffering as routine.

This whole response just feels like you’re grasping for moral outrage in my words rather than reckoning with the reality I was pointing to.

So if Palestinians wish violence on innocent Israelis they deserve sympathy but if Isralies wish harm on innocent Palestinians they deserve harm in return? And you were complaining about double standards?

purpletablet · 17/06/2025 20:18

Insanityisnotastrategy · 17/06/2025 19:56

And do you also wish for Palestinians what they have wished for Israelis? Would that also be an acceptable thing to say?

There’s a huge difference between a colonised, occupied people reacting to decades of oppression, and a nuclear-armed state systematically brutalising a population it controls. Palestinians didn’t choose this situation. Israel holds all the power. The land, the borders, the military, the economy. Trying to draw a false equivalence here just ignores that imbalance entirely.

When I said I wished for Israelis what they wish for Palestinians, I was holding up a mirror, not calling for violence, but forcing people to confront the cruelty that’s been normalised when it’s aimed at Palestinians. The only reason it feels extreme is because we’ve been conditioned to see Palestinian suffering as routine.

This whole response just feels like you’re grasping for moral outrage in my words rather than reckoning with the reality I was pointing to.

devourfeculence · 17/06/2025 20:16

Insanityisnotastrategy · 17/06/2025 19:56

And do you also wish for Palestinians what they have wished for Israelis? Would that also be an acceptable thing to say?

The BBC have stories about Gaza pretty much every day.

Insanityisnotastrategy · 17/06/2025 19:56

purpletablet · 17/06/2025 10:41

It’s hard to watch the outrage over Israeli civilians being bombed when there has been so little sympathy shown for Palestinians, who have been bombed, starved, and ethnically cleansed for decades. The mainstream media rushes to show Israeli homes in ruins, interviews with traumatised citizens, and the human cost of attacks. Yet it rarely offers the same visibility to Palestinian suffering.

The suffering of Israelis is real. But so is the suffering of Palestinians, and it has been far more widespread and long lasting. The selective empathy by both the media and our politicians shows a stark hypocrisy.

I wish for Israelis only what they have wished for Palestinians. Nothing more, nothing less. And that is the heart of the issue. Because if Palestinians were treated with the same humanity and dignity that Israelis demand for themselves, we would not be in this situation.

And do you also wish for Palestinians what they have wished for Israelis? Would that also be an acceptable thing to say?

purpletablet · 17/06/2025 19:35

SharonEllis · 17/06/2025 19:24

It is bizarre because it is demonstrably untrue. Not to mention the huge number of threads on MN.

Well yes, thankfully ordinary people do stand with Palestine. The real disconnect is with our politicians and much of the media, who keep pushing narratives that excuse or downplay what is happening. That is what I am referring to.

SharonEllis · 17/06/2025 19:24

purpletablet · 17/06/2025 19:23

I’m well aware of the coverage and the protests. I’ve seen the marches, the TikToks, and the statements of support. But acknowledging that some coverage and activism is sympathetic to Palestinians doesn’t mean there isn’t also an overwhelming amount of dehumanisation and double standards, especially when it comes to how Palestinian lives are valued in mainstream political and media discourse. Pointing that out isn’t “bizarre” it’s calling attention to an imbalance that very much exists.

It is bizarre because it is demonstrably untrue. Not to mention the huge number of threads on MN.

purpletablet · 17/06/2025 19:23

SharonEllis · 17/06/2025 18:37

Im guessing you dont actually watch the news or follpw social media. Night after night there is sympathetic coversge of the Palestinians. How have yoi missed the marches and demonstrations? The social media posts tik toks eyc. I mean this is a completely bizarre post.

I’m well aware of the coverage and the protests. I’ve seen the marches, the TikToks, and the statements of support. But acknowledging that some coverage and activism is sympathetic to Palestinians doesn’t mean there isn’t also an overwhelming amount of dehumanisation and double standards, especially when it comes to how Palestinian lives are valued in mainstream political and media discourse. Pointing that out isn’t “bizarre” it’s calling attention to an imbalance that very much exists.

SharonEllis · 17/06/2025 18:37

purpletablet · 17/06/2025 10:41

It’s hard to watch the outrage over Israeli civilians being bombed when there has been so little sympathy shown for Palestinians, who have been bombed, starved, and ethnically cleansed for decades. The mainstream media rushes to show Israeli homes in ruins, interviews with traumatised citizens, and the human cost of attacks. Yet it rarely offers the same visibility to Palestinian suffering.

The suffering of Israelis is real. But so is the suffering of Palestinians, and it has been far more widespread and long lasting. The selective empathy by both the media and our politicians shows a stark hypocrisy.

I wish for Israelis only what they have wished for Palestinians. Nothing more, nothing less. And that is the heart of the issue. Because if Palestinians were treated with the same humanity and dignity that Israelis demand for themselves, we would not be in this situation.

Im guessing you dont actually watch the news or follpw social media. Night after night there is sympathetic coversge of the Palestinians. How have yoi missed the marches and demonstrations? The social media posts tik toks eyc. I mean this is a completely bizarre post.

Kakeandkake · 17/06/2025 17:20

The immoral, evil, despicable IDF soldiers used tank fire to shoot at a group of civilians trying to reach aid centres.

How is anyone defending the IDF?

I wouldn't be surprised if Israel nuked Iran and posters on here would still be saying 'poor Israel were just defending themselves!'

Kakeandkake · 17/06/2025 17:15

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I care, I think Greta's analysis is great.

What attention taken off? Israel murdered over 50 people just this morning who were just trying to feed their families.

If Israel doesn't want bad attention, they should stop carrying out war crimes and a genocide of the Palestinians.

DigitalInteractor · 17/06/2025 17:08

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

dairydebris · 17/06/2025 17:06

GretaGreen · 17/06/2025 16:38

It's a good job Iran aren't even trying make nuclear weapons then isn't it?

I'm not sure why our attention isn't on places that are actually 'totally fucked' like Gaza which has had the equivalent of 6 Hiroshimas dropped on it rather than something that isn't even being planned to happen? Why are we wasting time talking about pretend nukes when there is a country who has declared their wish to ethnically cleanse somewhere, is actually doing it and people are calling the man who is doing it a hero? 100 kids a day every day for over 600 days dead or injured and our attention is on the made up world of 'if Israel got nuked'.

Given your superior knowledge and certainty on the matter I hope you've made yourself available to governments facing difficult defence decisions all over the world. It would be amazing to have somebody who was always, always right to consult with.

GretaGreen · 17/06/2025 16:38

DigitalInteractor · 17/06/2025 16:21

Of course, martyrs are positively welcomed and encouraged by these fanatics. I don’t understand why people still don’t get this.

See Hamas!

Annihilating Israel, which has a much smaller landmass than Iran and would be totally fucked by a nuclear weapon, uninhabitable for years, would be a cause for celebration in much of the Middle East, and the West, sadly as evidenced by the reaction to Oct 7th.

It's a good job Iran aren't even trying make nuclear weapons then isn't it?

I'm not sure why our attention isn't on places that are actually 'totally fucked' like Gaza which has had the equivalent of 6 Hiroshimas dropped on it rather than something that isn't even being planned to happen? Why are we wasting time talking about pretend nukes when there is a country who has declared their wish to ethnically cleanse somewhere, is actually doing it and people are calling the man who is doing it a hero? 100 kids a day every day for over 600 days dead or injured and our attention is on the made up world of 'if Israel got nuked'.

DigitalInteractor · 17/06/2025 16:21

HellsBalls · 17/06/2025 15:58

@mouthpipette ”Of course Israel would not be at risk if Iran had nuclear weapons. Firing on Israel would guarantee retaliation and the total destruction of Iran. The Iranians know that, they just want to join the nuclear club.”

Pretty sure the Islamist extremists running Iran would be safe under the mountains when the attack is initiated, and consider the extermination of Israel a price worth paying.

Of course, martyrs are positively welcomed and encouraged by these fanatics. I don’t understand why people still don’t get this.

See Hamas!

Annihilating Israel, which has a much smaller landmass than Iran and would be totally fucked by a nuclear weapon, uninhabitable for years, would be a cause for celebration in much of the Middle East, and the West, sadly as evidenced by the reaction to Oct 7th.

DigitalInteractor · 17/06/2025 16:15

BelleHathor · 17/06/2025 15:27

Nicely written up by a think tank years ago, including plans to use Israel as a proxy to start the conflict and take most of the blame leaving America to lie that they're uninvolved.

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/which-path-to-persia-options-for-a-new-american-strategy-toward-iran/

"The US plan for war with Iran always included options to have Israel strike Iran on Washington's behalf with fake talks used to provide the US plausible deniability.

This is spelled out in detail in policy papers including Brookings' "Which Path to Persia?" report from 2009.

If you're not reading the policy papers you are just guessing at best, at worst helping the US get away with a war it itself engineered and enabled Israel to fight on its behalf and hoped to pin culpability solely on Israel for.

https://x.com/BrianJBerletic/status/1914690246807306642

p.s Chapter 5, "Leave it to Bibi: Allowing or Encouraging an Israeli Military Strike" starting on page 89 seems to be what the US is doing now.

Edited

Well they must have been psychic as there have been a few changes of US government since 2009 and Netanyahu was out of office for a while.

I think Netanyahu went in alone on this. Mossad has been in Iran for 20 years making preparations for when the need arose which was now. Similar to the Hezbollah pagers which was 10 years in the making. Bibi has amazing foresight and knows Israel’s enemies. These ideological fanantics don’t suddenly see the light.

The US is only getting involved due to the amazing wins Israel have had due to the above (which is all on Israel) and having a big chance of a successful operation.

If they hadn’t Trump would be still insisting on a ceasefire.

HellsBalls · 17/06/2025 15:58

@mouthpipette ”Of course Israel would not be at risk if Iran had nuclear weapons. Firing on Israel would guarantee retaliation and the total destruction of Iran. The Iranians know that, they just want to join the nuclear club.”

Pretty sure the Islamist extremists running Iran would be safe under the mountains when the attack is initiated, and consider the extermination of Israel a price worth paying.

BelleHathor · 17/06/2025 15:27

mouthpipette · 17/06/2025 13:44

Of course Israel would not be at risk if Iran had nuclear weapons. Firing on Israel would guarantee retaliation and the total destruction of Iran. The Iranians know that, they just want to join the nuclear club.
Whilst it's undesirable that there is yet another nuclear power in the world, Israel would be under no greater danger.
Iran trying to obtain nuclear warheads is simply being used as an excuse to bring down Iran, an Idea that has been in the mind of Israel and the US for the past 15 years. It's all part of the confected paranoia that there is an existential threat to Israel and that the nation is on the verge of being driven into the sea and therefore it is free to use whatever force it wants to counter this.

Part of Netanyahu's obscene aggression, in response to the Hamas barbarity, is his testing of the waters, to see just how far Israel can go before the rest of the world says "stop" .
To date, the deaths of tens of thousands and the devastation of a state has led to little more that a " We'd rather you didn't" from most of the western world. Oh yes, interspersed with.... "You have the right to defend yourself".

Yet another of the world's conflict where morality is subsumed by vested interests.

Nicely written up by a think tank years ago, including plans to use Israel as a proxy to start the conflict and take most of the blame leaving America to lie that they're uninvolved.

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/which-path-to-persia-options-for-a-new-american-strategy-toward-iran/

"The US plan for war with Iran always included options to have Israel strike Iran on Washington's behalf with fake talks used to provide the US plausible deniability.

This is spelled out in detail in policy papers including Brookings' "Which Path to Persia?" report from 2009.

If you're not reading the policy papers you are just guessing at best, at worst helping the US get away with a war it itself engineered and enabled Israel to fight on its behalf and hoped to pin culpability solely on Israel for.

https://x.com/BrianJBerletic/status/1914690246807306642

p.s Chapter 5, "Leave it to Bibi: Allowing or Encouraging an Israeli Military Strike" starting on page 89 seems to be what the US is doing now.

Which Path to Persia? Options for a New American Strategy Toward Iran

In a new Saban Analysis Paper, six Brookings experts analyze the main policy approaches toward Iran. In examining the benefits and drawbacks of the nine options—including engagement, persuasion, airstrikes, and containment—the authors refrain from reco...

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/which-path-to-persia-options-for-a-new-american-strategy-toward-iran