Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

To wish those in Israel safety in these coming times

684 replies

mids2019 · 15/06/2025 04:09

Israel is a country at war and I know many will have links or family in that country so I think it appropriate to wish them safety in the coming days.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
dairydebris · 18/06/2025 10:03

GretaGreen · 18/06/2025 09:57

Honestly the past few days have laid out the hypocracy of all of the pro Israel posters. Suddenly International law means something(if it's Israel being attacked) , attacking first means nothing(if you are Israeli), civillian infrastructure should be off limits(if it's Israeli), it's just fine to openly worship genocidal terrorist supporting maniacs(if they are Israeli), it's fine to be genocidal if you've been treated badly(if you are Israeli), it's OK to have a horrific regime running a country(if it's Israeli), is fine to have undeclared and uninspected nuclear weapons(if you are Israeli), it's OK to talk about and care about civillians in one place without mentioning every other conflict in the world(if those civilians are Israeli) and on and on it goes.

We just don't get that it really isn't double standards though because apparently we are all too busy being useful idiots learning everything from tiktok, supporting terrorists and being antisemitic to truly understand.

I dont really understand your first paragraph but am really impressed by the self awareness shown in the second. Bravo!

purpletablet · 18/06/2025 09:57

DigitalInteractor · 18/06/2025 09:26

WTAF! They had the whole of the Arab world - the Arab League. Palestinians are Arabs. It was the Arab League who caused much of the displacement by telling them to leave while they wiped out the Jews which they subsequently catastrophically failed to do.

What do you think the Nakba (Great Catastrophe) was called that?

How many times and how many Arab armies started wars with Israel?

You are sounding more and more desperate and ridiculous.

The idea that the Arab League told Palestinians to leave so they could “wipe out the Jews” has been debunked by historians, including Israeli ones. There’s no credible evidence of a coordinated evacuation order. In fact, many Palestinians fled in terror as news spread of massacres like Deir Yassin, or were forcibly expelled by Zionist militias during the war.

Yes, Palestinians are Arabs, but they are also a distinct people with their own identity, history and connection to the land. The Arab states absolutely played a role, but that doesn’t erase what was done to Palestinians on the ground. The Nakba is called the “Great Catastrophe” because hundreds of thousands of people lost their homes, their land and their right to return. That catastrophe has never ended.

Wars didn’t happen in a vacuum. Each war followed a pattern of displacement, military occupation, and settlement expansion. The imbalance of power today is so extreme that pretending this is a fair fight between equals is what’s truly ridiculous.

GretaGreen · 18/06/2025 09:57

ComeAsYouAreAsAFriend · 18/06/2025 09:01

And Of course 7 Oct was a declaration of war by Hamas.
So when it is Israel bombing Iran everything that happened before that is taken into account. When Hamas carried out a terrorist attack on Israel none of what happened before is taken into account?

In case there is any confusion I am not supporting Hamas or Iran just pointing out the usual double standards when it comes to Israel.

Edited

Honestly the past few days have laid out the hypocracy of all of the pro Israel posters. Suddenly International law means something(if it's Israel being attacked) , attacking first means nothing(if you are Israeli), civillian infrastructure should be off limits(if it's Israeli), it's just fine to openly worship genocidal terrorist supporting maniacs(if they are Israeli), it's fine to be genocidal if you've been treated badly(if you are Israeli), it's OK to have a horrific regime running a country(if it's Israeli), is fine to have undeclared and uninspected nuclear weapons(if you are Israeli), it's OK to talk about and care about civillians in one place without mentioning every other conflict in the world(if those civilians are Israeli) and on and on it goes.

We just don't get that it really isn't double standards though because apparently we are all too busy being useful idiots learning everything from tiktok, supporting terrorists and being antisemitic to truly understand.

purpletablet · 18/06/2025 09:39

DigitalInteractor · 18/06/2025 09:02

Oct 7th was an REAL genocide, you muppet!

I absolutely would feel murderous if Oct 7th happened to my family, community, people. I absolutely would want the perpetrators wiped off the face of the earth. That is a totally normal human response. What is not is you trying to insinuate that Israelis have no right to feel like that. Why don’t they? As I said their leadership luckily doesn’t let emotions make their decisions for them.

In your view, Palestinians are allowed to ‘express rage’ by embarking on a frenzy of slaughter, gang rape, dismemberment, decapitation, baby burning, mutilation, torture and kidnapping because Israel tries to prevent them from carrying out terrorist attacks and murdering Israelis but Israelis aren’t even allowed to express rage over Oct 7th in words?

The civilian casualties of war are just that. Every war has them, again why are Palestinians so special that you think there shouldn’t be any? Of course no one WANTS civilian casualties least of all Israel and the oniy reason the number is so high is due to Hamas using them as human sacrifices/martyrs. Their MO is well documented. The martyr ideology of Gazans is well documented. We in the West cannot fathom this so prefer not to believe it.

As Golda Meir said - ‘When peace comes we will perhaps in time be able to forgive the Arabs for killing our sons, but it will be harder for us to forgive them for having forced us to kill their sons. Peace will come when the Arabs will love their children more than they hate us’.

Calling October 7th a “real genocide” is a distortion of both facts and the meaning of the word. What happened that day was horrifying, but genocide is the deliberate, systematic attempt to eliminate a people. That is what has been unfolding in Gaza for months: entire families wiped out, neighborhoods flattened, journalists, medics, and aid workers targeted, over 15,000 children killed, and deliberate starvation of an entire population.

You say Israelis have the right to feel rage. Fine, but that rage has translated into state-led mass killings, not just words. Palestinians, on the other hand, have been expected to watch their children die under rubble and somehow respond with perfect restraint. If you truly believed no one wants civilian casualties, you would condemn all of them, not justify one side’s based on who you believe loves their children more. That quote from Golda Meir reveals everything about the mindset behind this violence. It shifts blame for killing children onto their grieving parents.

OurStepsWillAlwaysRhyme · 18/06/2025 09:35

DigitalInteractor · 18/06/2025 09:02

Oct 7th was an REAL genocide, you muppet!

I absolutely would feel murderous if Oct 7th happened to my family, community, people. I absolutely would want the perpetrators wiped off the face of the earth. That is a totally normal human response. What is not is you trying to insinuate that Israelis have no right to feel like that. Why don’t they? As I said their leadership luckily doesn’t let emotions make their decisions for them.

In your view, Palestinians are allowed to ‘express rage’ by embarking on a frenzy of slaughter, gang rape, dismemberment, decapitation, baby burning, mutilation, torture and kidnapping because Israel tries to prevent them from carrying out terrorist attacks and murdering Israelis but Israelis aren’t even allowed to express rage over Oct 7th in words?

The civilian casualties of war are just that. Every war has them, again why are Palestinians so special that you think there shouldn’t be any? Of course no one WANTS civilian casualties least of all Israel and the oniy reason the number is so high is due to Hamas using them as human sacrifices/martyrs. Their MO is well documented. The martyr ideology of Gazans is well documented. We in the West cannot fathom this so prefer not to believe it.

As Golda Meir said - ‘When peace comes we will perhaps in time be able to forgive the Arabs for killing our sons, but it will be harder for us to forgive them for having forced us to kill their sons. Peace will come when the Arabs will love their children more than they hate us’.

"because Israel tries to prevent them carrying out terrorist attacks" is rather disingenuous. I'm thinking the stealing of their land, denial of their identity, erasure of their history, occupation of the tiny slice of their land they still have, economic subjugation, murder, violence, destruction of property, expulsion and detention without trial just might have been the problem?

Dangermoo · 18/06/2025 09:32

purpletablet · 18/06/2025 09:26

If you’re really worried about nuclear weapons and global safety, you should be concerned about any country acting with impunity and dragging others into conflict. Israel’s actions don’t make the UK safer. They increase the risk of wider war and retaliation. And five people being arrested in London doesn’t justify bombing another nation without international oversight. That’s not security, it’s escalation. What you’re calling “hard facts” are really just selective outrage.

Talking of selective outrage...

purpletablet · 18/06/2025 09:26

1dayatatime · 18/06/2025 09:01

@purpletablet

"It’s funny because to me it seems like the Israel defenders on this forum are the ones twisting words, projecting their own assumptions, and accusing others of distortion when they’re the ones refusing to engage honestly."

Personally I'm grateful for Israel bombing the crap out of Iran's nuclear weapons programme and saving the UK getting involved.

Two months ago five Iranians were arrested for planning a terrorist bomb attack in London. Imagine what would have happened if these people had access to nuclear bombs.

This is not "twisting words" or "projecting own assumptions " or "distortion " or any other bollocks buzz word bingo - it's hard facts.

If you’re really worried about nuclear weapons and global safety, you should be concerned about any country acting with impunity and dragging others into conflict. Israel’s actions don’t make the UK safer. They increase the risk of wider war and retaliation. And five people being arrested in London doesn’t justify bombing another nation without international oversight. That’s not security, it’s escalation. What you’re calling “hard facts” are really just selective outrage.

DigitalInteractor · 18/06/2025 09:26

WTAF! They had the whole of the Arab world - the Arab League. Palestinians are Arabs. It was the Arab League who caused much of the displacement by telling them to leave while they wiped out the Jews which they subsequently catastrophically failed to do.

What do you think the Nakba (Great Catastrophe) was called that?

How many times and how many Arab armies started wars with Israel?

You are sounding more and more desperate and ridiculous.

dairydebris · 18/06/2025 09:23

purpletablet · 18/06/2025 09:12

This take completely erases the power imbalance at play. Israel had international backing and recognition when it declared itself a state. The Palestinians were never given that kind of support. Intead, they were dispossessed, displaced, and then blamed for resisting it. You say they “chose not to declare a state,” but gloss over the fact that their land was partitioned without their consent, and their attempts to resist that weren’t exactly met with open arms. This idea that they’re not victims because they fought back ignores decades of military occupation, blockades, and systemic oppression. Calling it “infantilisation” to acknowledge that is just another way of denying the reality they live under.

The Palestinians ( not known as that at that time, should we say Arabs living in the area? ) did have backing. They and their supporters, the Arab League, chose war instead of state building.

You said they were dispossessed. Thats incorrect. It wasn't the plan for there to be no Jews in Palestine and no Arabs in Israel. The Arabs who left their homes did so because of the war that their side started. If war hadn't been declared by the Arab League, perhaps most of those people who lost their homes would still be there. You know, like the ones who are; living in Israel as Israeli Arab Citizens.

If in 1948 Palestinian leadership had declared Palestine a state instead of a war of annihilation on Israel, surely you can see Palestinians would be better off now?

Yes, there's a huge power imbalance now, because of the nation building Israel has achieved since 1948. Personally I have huge admiration for what they've achieved in such a short space of time.

I don't understand why you're so keen to write Palestinian agency out of the whole story.

And it goes on today. Its up to Israel to end the war on here, despite the fact that Hamas started it. Almost as if they couldn't help it, isn't it?

Dangermoo · 18/06/2025 09:20

SharonEllis · 18/06/2025 09:05

Its not a double standard if you understand the background. Tbe root of the problem is both Iran's and Hamas's refusal to accept Israel's existence. And nobody thinks Iran having nukes is a good idea, apart from a few people on here who think everyone should have them in the interests of fairness and sticking it to the West and Israel.

I can't believe they actually think like that; that Iran are being treated unfairly! Some MNers are more worried about Trump having nuclear missiles, rather than a terrorist regime, who won't stop at Israel. It's just the results of brainwashing.

Dangermoo · 18/06/2025 09:17

Francine84 · 18/06/2025 00:30

Israel bombed Iran first. Iran has every right to defend itself. Hard to believe that anyone could possibly still support Israel given how many innocent women and children they’ve killed in Gaza.

Hard to believe how anybody can support Iran, when those terrorists were arrested in the UK. Do you think they wish us well? Israel is doing us a favour. I'm getting a bit tired, also, of reading the same emotional guilt tripping. There have been many casualties on both sides. - it's awful, but it's war.

purpletablet · 18/06/2025 09:12

dairydebris · 18/06/2025 08:41

Palestinians never got the chance to declare a state? Thats just incorrect. They chose not to, because they didn't want to share any of the land with Jews. They could have declared a state, albeit smaller than they might have wished. They chose not to, which in hindsight we can see was a huge error.

There wasn't a Palestinian state at that time as you know, so they weren't made stateless. They chose not to declare a state because they weren't happy with the division of land.

What do you mean Israel declared itself unilaterally? How else does a single state declare itself? Why didn't Palestine 'declare itself unilaterally' too then?

The Palestinian people wouldn't have been under 'military occupation' if they hadn't constantly funneled their resources into trying to violently slaughter Jews and end Israel.

This constantly infantilisation of Palestinians is so odd. They are where they are because of choices made by their leadership.

You've built your narrative to make them constant helpless victims. They are not.

This take completely erases the power imbalance at play. Israel had international backing and recognition when it declared itself a state. The Palestinians were never given that kind of support. Intead, they were dispossessed, displaced, and then blamed for resisting it. You say they “chose not to declare a state,” but gloss over the fact that their land was partitioned without their consent, and their attempts to resist that weren’t exactly met with open arms. This idea that they’re not victims because they fought back ignores decades of military occupation, blockades, and systemic oppression. Calling it “infantilisation” to acknowledge that is just another way of denying the reality they live under.

SharonEllis · 18/06/2025 09:05

ComeAsYouAreAsAFriend · 18/06/2025 09:01

And Of course 7 Oct was a declaration of war by Hamas.
So when it is Israel bombing Iran everything that happened before that is taken into account. When Hamas carried out a terrorist attack on Israel none of what happened before is taken into account?

In case there is any confusion I am not supporting Hamas or Iran just pointing out the usual double standards when it comes to Israel.

Edited

Its not a double standard if you understand the background. Tbe root of the problem is both Iran's and Hamas's refusal to accept Israel's existence. And nobody thinks Iran having nukes is a good idea, apart from a few people on here who think everyone should have them in the interests of fairness and sticking it to the West and Israel.

DigitalInteractor · 18/06/2025 09:02

purpletablet · 18/06/2025 08:37

I wasn’t “incorrectly attacking” anyone. I responded to someone who explicitly said they would feel murderous and wanted people “wiped off the face of the earth.” If that’s not genocidal language, what is?

And yes, October 7 was horrific. But calling it “genocidal” while brushing aside the mass killing of civilians in Gaza for months as justified or unfortunate collateral damage shows selective empathy.

If you’re not interested in hearing the rest, that’s your choice. But don’t pretend it’s because my point wasn’t valid. It’s because it made you uncomfortable.

Oct 7th was an REAL genocide, you muppet!

I absolutely would feel murderous if Oct 7th happened to my family, community, people. I absolutely would want the perpetrators wiped off the face of the earth. That is a totally normal human response. What is not is you trying to insinuate that Israelis have no right to feel like that. Why don’t they? As I said their leadership luckily doesn’t let emotions make their decisions for them.

In your view, Palestinians are allowed to ‘express rage’ by embarking on a frenzy of slaughter, gang rape, dismemberment, decapitation, baby burning, mutilation, torture and kidnapping because Israel tries to prevent them from carrying out terrorist attacks and murdering Israelis but Israelis aren’t even allowed to express rage over Oct 7th in words?

The civilian casualties of war are just that. Every war has them, again why are Palestinians so special that you think there shouldn’t be any? Of course no one WANTS civilian casualties least of all Israel and the oniy reason the number is so high is due to Hamas using them as human sacrifices/martyrs. Their MO is well documented. The martyr ideology of Gazans is well documented. We in the West cannot fathom this so prefer not to believe it.

As Golda Meir said - ‘When peace comes we will perhaps in time be able to forgive the Arabs for killing our sons, but it will be harder for us to forgive them for having forced us to kill their sons. Peace will come when the Arabs will love their children more than they hate us’.

ComeAsYouAreAsAFriend · 18/06/2025 09:01

SharonEllis · 18/06/2025 08:46

@ComeAsYouAreAsAFriend Israel's official declaration is that they launched Operation Rising Lion in response to intelligence that claimed to show Iran was approaching a point of no return in the development of nuclear weapons.

That's correct, intelligence and the reported breach by the IAEA, and Iran can't have nukes because of their stated intention to destroy Israel, decades of attacks and ongoing regional destabilisation.

And Of course 7 Oct was a declaration of war by Hamas.

And Of course 7 Oct was a declaration of war by Hamas.
So when it is Israel bombing Iran everything that happened before that is taken into account. When Hamas carried out a terrorist attack on Israel none of what happened before is taken into account?

In case there is any confusion I am not supporting Hamas or Iran just pointing out the usual double standards when it comes to Israel.

1dayatatime · 18/06/2025 09:01

@purpletablet

"It’s funny because to me it seems like the Israel defenders on this forum are the ones twisting words, projecting their own assumptions, and accusing others of distortion when they’re the ones refusing to engage honestly."

Personally I'm grateful for Israel bombing the crap out of Iran's nuclear weapons programme and saving the UK getting involved.

Two months ago five Iranians were arrested for planning a terrorist bomb attack in London. Imagine what would have happened if these people had access to nuclear bombs.

This is not "twisting words" or "projecting own assumptions " or "distortion " or any other bollocks buzz word bingo - it's hard facts.

SharonEllis · 18/06/2025 08:53

purpletablet · 18/06/2025 08:47

It’s funny because to me it seems like the Israel defenders on this forum are the ones twisting words, projecting their own assumptions, and accusing others of distortion when they’re the ones refusing to engage honestly.

There you go again, generalising.

purpletablet · 18/06/2025 08:47

SharonEllis · 18/06/2025 08:41

No its because you take what people say and misinterpret load your own agenda onto it, which is what you have just done with me.

It’s funny because to me it seems like the Israel defenders on this forum are the ones twisting words, projecting their own assumptions, and accusing others of distortion when they’re the ones refusing to engage honestly.

SharonEllis · 18/06/2025 08:46

@ComeAsYouAreAsAFriend Israel's official declaration is that they launched Operation Rising Lion in response to intelligence that claimed to show Iran was approaching a point of no return in the development of nuclear weapons.

That's correct, intelligence and the reported breach by the IAEA, and Iran can't have nukes because of their stated intention to destroy Israel, decades of attacks and ongoing regional destabilisation.

And Of course 7 Oct was a declaration of war by Hamas.

dairydebris · 18/06/2025 08:41

purpletablet · 18/06/2025 07:48

Palestinians never got the chance to declare a state in 1948 because the land they lived on was carved up without their consent, and when they rejected being made stateless overnight, they were punished for it. Israel declared itself unilaterally and was immediately recognised and armed, while hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were expelled and have lived under occupation or in exile ever since.

You say they could have spent decades building a future, but how does that happen under military occupation, repeated bombings, land theft, and blockades? No amount of “better leadership” changes the fact that Palestinians have never had full control of their borders, airspace, economy, or safety.

Why are you blaming an oppressed people for not thriving under occupation?

Palestinians never got the chance to declare a state? Thats just incorrect. They chose not to, because they didn't want to share any of the land with Jews. They could have declared a state, albeit smaller than they might have wished. They chose not to, which in hindsight we can see was a huge error.

There wasn't a Palestinian state at that time as you know, so they weren't made stateless. They chose not to declare a state because they weren't happy with the division of land.

What do you mean Israel declared itself unilaterally? How else does a single state declare itself? Why didn't Palestine 'declare itself unilaterally' too then?

The Palestinian people wouldn't have been under 'military occupation' if they hadn't constantly funneled their resources into trying to violently slaughter Jews and end Israel.

This constantly infantilisation of Palestinians is so odd. They are where they are because of choices made by their leadership.

You've built your narrative to make them constant helpless victims. They are not.

SharonEllis · 18/06/2025 08:41

purpletablet · 18/06/2025 08:37

I wasn’t “incorrectly attacking” anyone. I responded to someone who explicitly said they would feel murderous and wanted people “wiped off the face of the earth.” If that’s not genocidal language, what is?

And yes, October 7 was horrific. But calling it “genocidal” while brushing aside the mass killing of civilians in Gaza for months as justified or unfortunate collateral damage shows selective empathy.

If you’re not interested in hearing the rest, that’s your choice. But don’t pretend it’s because my point wasn’t valid. It’s because it made you uncomfortable.

No its because you take what people say and misinterpret load your own agenda onto it, which is what you have just done with me.

purpletablet · 18/06/2025 08:37

SharonEllis · 18/06/2025 08:10

You were incorrectly attacking one person on this site for having genocidal thoughts - don't cover yourself by extrapolating. And describing 7 October as just 'one day' is to minimise what was a genocidal attack. On that basis Im not terribly interested in whatever else you have to say.

I wasn’t “incorrectly attacking” anyone. I responded to someone who explicitly said they would feel murderous and wanted people “wiped off the face of the earth.” If that’s not genocidal language, what is?

And yes, October 7 was horrific. But calling it “genocidal” while brushing aside the mass killing of civilians in Gaza for months as justified or unfortunate collateral damage shows selective empathy.

If you’re not interested in hearing the rest, that’s your choice. But don’t pretend it’s because my point wasn’t valid. It’s because it made you uncomfortable.

ComeAsYouAreAsAFriend · 18/06/2025 08:14

SharonEllis · 18/06/2025 05:40

No they didnt. People keep saying this but it doesnt make it true. Iran has been attacking Israel for years.

So by that logic Hamas didn't start a war on oct 7th? because there has been back and forth attacks for years. People keep conveniently changing the rules to suit their narrative.

Israel's official declaration is that they launched Operation Rising Lion in response to intelligence that claimed to show Iran was approaching a point of no return in the development of nuclear weapons.

SharonEllis · 18/06/2025 08:10

purpletablet · 18/06/2025 06:23

You say it’s not genocidal to wish death on the Palestinians who took part in October 7th. But the problem is that, in reality, the rage and punishment have not been limited to those individuals. Entire neighborhoods have been flattened, families wiped out, and tens of thousands of civilians, including children, have been killed. That is not targeted justice. That is collective punishment on a massive scale.

If you truly believe only the perpetrators should be held responsible, then why defend or excuse a response that has overwhelmingly harmed people who had nothing to do with that day?

What I find troubling is how quickly people demand absolute condemnation from Palestinians while offering endless justification for Israel’s far greater use of force. Yes, what happened on October 7th was horrific. But to suggest that all Palestinian suffering since then is the result of that one day is both dishonest and dehumanising.

You say it is normal to wish death on those responsible. Fine. But when Palestinians react with rage after decades of occupation, siege, and mass killing, they are labelled as terrorists or savages. That is the double standard being pointed out.

No, not all Palestinians were involved in October 7th. But Israel has responded by collectively punishing the entire population of Gaza. If you believe that is not genocide simply because no one used that exact word, that is a dangerously low standard to apply.

And yes, Palestinians are often blamed just for existing. Their homes are demolished, their land is taken, and even their right to a national identity is denied. Again, not all Palestinians committed atrocities on October 7th, but they’ve certainly all been blamed for it.

You were incorrectly attacking one person on this site for having genocidal thoughts - don't cover yourself by extrapolating. And describing 7 October as just 'one day' is to minimise what was a genocidal attack. On that basis Im not terribly interested in whatever else you have to say.

purpletablet · 18/06/2025 07:48

dairydebris · 18/06/2025 06:57

You do realize they could have had a state, an army, an economy, trade, everything that a successful state needs, if they'd actually declared a state like Israel did back in 1948- then spent the following decades building a future for their kids rather than focus on killing Jewish kids instead?
I hold the various Palestinian leaders accountable for this utter failure to put its people first. At every fork in the road they've chosen violence.
Palestinian lives are awful now yes. But its wilful misreading of history to suggest its all Israels fault. Back in 1948 other choices could have been made and Palestinians wouldn't be in this position.

Palestinians never got the chance to declare a state in 1948 because the land they lived on was carved up without their consent, and when they rejected being made stateless overnight, they were punished for it. Israel declared itself unilaterally and was immediately recognised and armed, while hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were expelled and have lived under occupation or in exile ever since.

You say they could have spent decades building a future, but how does that happen under military occupation, repeated bombings, land theft, and blockades? No amount of “better leadership” changes the fact that Palestinians have never had full control of their borders, airspace, economy, or safety.

Why are you blaming an oppressed people for not thriving under occupation?

Swipe left for the next trending thread