Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

This is a religious war not a land war.

85 replies

NotABottie · 30/05/2025 11:51

Why were Palestinians chanting ‘Allahu Akbar’ when committing the atrocities of Oct 7th and celebrating it afterwards, when the dead bodies of victims were paraded in the streets, if this is not a religious war?

Why is this being ignored and pro-Palestinians insist it’s only about land?

OP posts:
Namechangedformyanswer · 31/05/2025 10:13

PollyPaintsFlowers · 31/05/2025 05:52

That was from the Christian Post

Apparently it's nothing to do with religion. Get rid of Christians as well as eradication of Jewish people. Stop pretending, it's the inconvenient truth.

Namechangedformyanswer · 31/05/2025 10:03

PollyPaintsFlowers · 31/05/2025 05:51

Ah yes, Palestinian Christians who are treated so well by Palestinian Muslims

'The Christian population in areas governed by the Palestinian Authority and Hamas has plummeted drastically by up to 90% in some communities, a new study suggests, attributing the decline to violence, discrimination and economic hardships that threaten the survival of Christianity in its historical heartland.
The Christian demographic in Palestinian territories has experienced a dramatic reduction over the past century. In 1922, Christians made up 11% of the population in geographical Palestine. By 2024, this number had dwindled to 1%, marking a nearly 90% decrease, according to a study conducted by the Israeli think tank Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs.

...The report attributes the decline in Bethlehem to systemic socio-economic hardships, instability and harassment by both Muslim Palestinians and the Islam-dominated Palestinian Authority.
"The mass exodus of the Christians risks undermining the survival of Christianity in its birthplace," the researchers conclude.
One Protestant clergy member living under the control of the PA said, "Christians feel unprotected due to the failure of the PA police to intervene on their behalf in confrontations with Muslims."'

Wow, a 90% decrease in Christians in Palestinian areas. Is that not religious cleansing

Sofiewoo · 31/05/2025 09:15

Twiglets1 · 31/05/2025 08:56

From Wikipedia: On 1 March, the day the first phase of the ceasefire was scheduled to end, Hamas rejected an Israeli proposal to extend it to release more hostages. Hamas said the second phase should proceed as originally planned.

Netanyahu's office said that Israel endorsed a US plan to extend the Gaza truce for the Ramadan and Passover periods. Under this plan, half of the living and dead hostages would be released on the first day of the extended truce and the remaining hostages would be released at the end of the period if a permanent truce was reached.

His office said that the initial deal allowed Israel to resume war at any moment after 1 March if negotiations were deemed ineffective.

Following Hamas's refusal to accept the US ceasefire extension proposal, Israel ceased the entry of aid to Gaza the next day, 2 March.

So it's a bit more nuanced than just "Israel broke the ceasefire."
Israel resumed the air strikes at a time when the first phase of the ceasefire had expired and the second not yet begun. Had Hamas accepted the Israeli proposal to extend the first phase to release more hostages, Israel would not have ceased the entry of humanitarian aid or launched the airstrikes on March 18th. So both sides argue that it was the other side's fault.

Hamas now have another opportunity to pause the war under similar conditions to the one proposed back in March. Will Hamas agree this time I wonder or do they prefer to carry on with the war?

Edited

That doesn’t back up your statement. The initial ceasefire was a 3 phased approach, this was agreed by both sides. At the end of the first phase Israel refused to move on to the latter stages of the agreement.

The proposal post 1 March was different to what was in the original agreement.

Sofiewoo · 31/05/2025 09:14

inamarina · 31/05/2025 09:05

What Hamas could have done is not start the current war in the first place.
What they could do now is release the remaining hostages and surrender.
Surely worth a try, at least if they actually want the war to stop?

Edited

But Isreal have rejected that. They’ve said the won’t agree to the release of hostages with the terms of stopping the war.

Sofiewoo · 31/05/2025 09:13

inamarina · 31/05/2025 09:05

What Hamas could have done is not start the current war in the first place.
What they could do now is release the remaining hostages and surrender.
Surely worth a try, at least if they actually want the war to stop?

Edited

But Isreal have rejected that. They’ve said the won’t agree to the release of hostages with the terms of stopping the war.

inamarina · 31/05/2025 09:05

Sofiewoo · 31/05/2025 07:23

I really don’t agree that Hamas can “stop” anything.
If Hamas completely disbanded a lot of this wouldn’t stop, Israel would make more moves into Palestine and Palestinian citizens would not just be allowed to live a quiet peaceful life.

What Hamas could have done is not start the current war in the first place.
What they could do now is release the remaining hostages and surrender.
Surely worth a try, at least if they actually want the war to stop?

Twiglets1 · 31/05/2025 08:56

Sofiewoo · 31/05/2025 08:10

Clearly a ceasefire is meaningless to Israel, it’s been broken before only in March and would be broken again.

From Wikipedia: On 1 March, the day the first phase of the ceasefire was scheduled to end, Hamas rejected an Israeli proposal to extend it to release more hostages. Hamas said the second phase should proceed as originally planned.

Netanyahu's office said that Israel endorsed a US plan to extend the Gaza truce for the Ramadan and Passover periods. Under this plan, half of the living and dead hostages would be released on the first day of the extended truce and the remaining hostages would be released at the end of the period if a permanent truce was reached.

His office said that the initial deal allowed Israel to resume war at any moment after 1 March if negotiations were deemed ineffective.

Following Hamas's refusal to accept the US ceasefire extension proposal, Israel ceased the entry of aid to Gaza the next day, 2 March.

So it's a bit more nuanced than just "Israel broke the ceasefire."
Israel resumed the air strikes at a time when the first phase of the ceasefire had expired and the second not yet begun. Had Hamas accepted the Israeli proposal to extend the first phase to release more hostages, Israel would not have ceased the entry of humanitarian aid or launched the airstrikes on March 18th. So both sides argue that it was the other side's fault.

Hamas now have another opportunity to pause the war under similar conditions to the one proposed back in March. Will Hamas agree this time I wonder or do they prefer to carry on with the war?

Sofiewoo · 31/05/2025 08:10

Twiglets1 · 31/05/2025 08:02

Well they could stop hiding and meeting in their tunnels under where lots of Palestinian civilians are, like under hospitals, that would help?

Like the latest top Hamas chief Mohammed Sinwar (and the second in command and their aides) - meeting in a tunnel under the European hospital which meant the IDF had to bomb the hospital to kill them.

They could agree to the current ceasefire proposal which would pause the war for 60 days to allow humanitarian aid to flow freely into the region and for diplomatic negotiations to replace the daily bloodshed.

Clearly a ceasefire is meaningless to Israel, it’s been broken before only in March and would be broken again.

Twiglets1 · 31/05/2025 08:02

Sofiewoo · 31/05/2025 07:23

I really don’t agree that Hamas can “stop” anything.
If Hamas completely disbanded a lot of this wouldn’t stop, Israel would make more moves into Palestine and Palestinian citizens would not just be allowed to live a quiet peaceful life.

Well they could stop hiding and meeting in their tunnels under where lots of Palestinian civilians are, like under hospitals, that would help?

Like the latest top Hamas chief Mohammed Sinwar (and the second in command and their aides) - meeting in a tunnel under the European hospital which meant the IDF had to bomb the hospital to kill them.

They could agree to the current ceasefire proposal which would pause the war for 60 days to allow humanitarian aid to flow freely into the region and for diplomatic negotiations to replace the daily bloodshed.

Sofiewoo · 31/05/2025 07:23

inamarina · 30/05/2025 17:02

What about the third party, Hamas? Is there anything they can do?

I really don’t agree that Hamas can “stop” anything.
If Hamas completely disbanded a lot of this wouldn’t stop, Israel would make more moves into Palestine and Palestinian citizens would not just be allowed to live a quiet peaceful life.

EasyTouch · 31/05/2025 07:12

DonutRings · 31/05/2025 05:56

20% of Muslims living in Israel absolutely do not serve in the IDF. In 2021 that number was around 600 and included Muslim Arabs (Palestinian citizens of Israel) and Bedouin who made up the majority of the number.

It's actually disgusting how many people are denying that ethnic cleaning of Palestinians is happening at the very least - and probably actually genocide (according to warnings from the international courts and the UN, as well as organisations that focus on genocide research and education). Honestly, what would you call the forced displacement, destruction of homes, wiping out of entire bloodlines of families, mass killings and buying in mass graves? What do you think of the Israeli politicians who openly make genodical statements on TV? I'm genuinely curious why you're so confident that it isn't ethnic cleansing, when literally every international aid organisation, NGOs, the UN, international courts say that it is. (And anyone with access to a free media and a modicum of critical thinking).

You need to comprehend a post before lambasting it.
The poster said that the IDF is 20% Muslim.
This does not mean that 20% of the Muslim Israeli population is in the IDF.

DonutRings · 31/05/2025 05:56

fizzybootlace · 30/05/2025 19:04

I don’t think some posters here know that about 20% of the Israeli population are Muslims, and serve in the IDF. About 5% are Christian. If they wanted to carry out “ethnic cleansing”, probably easier to start with those people. But that’s not what’s happening.

20% of Muslims living in Israel absolutely do not serve in the IDF. In 2021 that number was around 600 and included Muslim Arabs (Palestinian citizens of Israel) and Bedouin who made up the majority of the number.

It's actually disgusting how many people are denying that ethnic cleaning of Palestinians is happening at the very least - and probably actually genocide (according to warnings from the international courts and the UN, as well as organisations that focus on genocide research and education). Honestly, what would you call the forced displacement, destruction of homes, wiping out of entire bloodlines of families, mass killings and buying in mass graves? What do you think of the Israeli politicians who openly make genodical statements on TV? I'm genuinely curious why you're so confident that it isn't ethnic cleansing, when literally every international aid organisation, NGOs, the UN, international courts say that it is. (And anyone with access to a free media and a modicum of critical thinking).

PollyPaintsFlowers · 31/05/2025 05:51

Ah yes, Palestinian Christians who are treated so well by Palestinian Muslims

'The Christian population in areas governed by the Palestinian Authority and Hamas has plummeted drastically by up to 90% in some communities, a new study suggests, attributing the decline to violence, discrimination and economic hardships that threaten the survival of Christianity in its historical heartland.
The Christian demographic in Palestinian territories has experienced a dramatic reduction over the past century. In 1922, Christians made up 11% of the population in geographical Palestine. By 2024, this number had dwindled to 1%, marking a nearly 90% decrease, according to a study conducted by the Israeli think tank Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs.

...The report attributes the decline in Bethlehem to systemic socio-economic hardships, instability and harassment by both Muslim Palestinians and the Islam-dominated Palestinian Authority.
"The mass exodus of the Christians risks undermining the survival of Christianity in its birthplace," the researchers conclude.
One Protestant clergy member living under the control of the PA said, "Christians feel unprotected due to the failure of the PA police to intervene on their behalf in confrontations with Muslims."'

Demographics Don’t Lie: The Decline of the Christian Population in PA- and Hamas-Controlled Areas

The story of religious discrimination and coercion against Christians - Demographics Don’t Lie: The Decline of the Christian Population in PA- and Hamas-Controlled Areas

https://jcpa.org/article/demographics-dont-lie-the-christian-population-in-pa-and-hamas-controlled-areas-is-declining/

DonutRings · 31/05/2025 05:43

TakeMe2Insanity · 30/05/2025 17:51

What about the Palestinian Christians? Whole blood lines have been removed by the Israelis, churches bombed. This isn’t just about the Israeli’s protecting themselves from muslims. This is about Israel wanting as much land as they can grab regardless of who it belongs to.

People love to forget the Palestinian Christians because it ruins their convenient narrative of "Palestinians = bloody thirsty Muslims" - and therefore deserving of being wiped out.

DonutRings · 31/05/2025 05:37

NotABottie · 30/05/2025 12:16

From my understanding the issue with the land is that the Palestinians believe it is Islamic land so must be ruled by Muslims full stop.

As opposed to Jewish people who believe Israel is their ancestral land, yes, but also wanted their own sovereignty to prevent the persecution they had experienced in other countries which they had no control over.

Rather creative use of the word "understanding" there.

mids2019 · 31/05/2025 04:57

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/smotrich-calls-expansion-israels-borders-during-jerusalem-day-celebrations

With respect to the Israelis some of the more hard line cabinet ministers are the most devoutly religous.

I think the inflammatory problem here is that Judaism in general in all its multiple facets will be conflated with views of sun sections of Judaism in Israeli society and this will have the sir c.f. Result of increasing anti semitism world wide as people are Jews not in Israel as a soft legitimate target in those who view the Gazan conflict as partly inspired by religion.

This religion based hatred is not taken seriously enough by some in this country where I fear Jew hate may be ignored at some levels. I think this is the reason what I fear anti Semitic views will sadly increase in the UK.

Smotrich vows to 'rebuild temple' during Jerusalem Day celebrations

Call by far-right finance minister would entail the destruction of Al-Aqsa Mosque

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/smotrich-calls-expansion-israels-borders-during-jerusalem-day-celebrations

TheBlueUniform · 31/05/2025 04:50

businessflop25 · 30/05/2025 12:23

Frankly it no longer matters. BOTH sides have committed horrendous acts. And it is always the innocent who pay the price.
Israel are not the innocent party nor are Hamas. Whether it’s religion or land or power or whatever the fuck they want to fight about doesn’t matter anymore. They need to put this to bed once and for all and come up with a lasting peaceful solution. Isreal need to give back ALL of the land they have stolen and let aid in. Hamas need to surrender.
It all just needs to fucking stop!

I agree that they’re all as bad as each other at this point. Always men, same as every war on going in the world now. The innocent women and children and other men that just want to live in peace but they are collateral damage. It’s abhorrent all of it and needs to stop.

TheBlueUniform · 31/05/2025 04:46

greencartbluecart · 30/05/2025 12:17

Are you trying to excuse the Israelis hostility, murder and land grab because the Palestinians are Muslim? Can’t decide if this thread should be reported for straight racism or not

Reported for pointing out what is correct? The whole war is based on religion and the fact that both religions see the land as their own and both sides want it for their people.

TheBlueUniform · 31/05/2025 04:43

Of course it’s about Religion, then land by default, because both religions believe it’s their land and that’s what they are fighting over.

GiraffesAtThePark · 31/05/2025 04:37

Both religion and land are important factors. I’m trying to see how this argument helps. If we agree with you that it’s religious then what follows? The Palestinians don’t need their land and can just go live in any Muslim country? Is that the argument?

mids2019 · 31/05/2025 04:22

https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=baf9129c546c704f&q=Everything+happens+by+the+will+of+Allah+in+Arabic&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjBqOiw38yNAxWnW0EAHbrFJsEQ1QJ6BAgMEAE&biw=800&bih=1280&dpr=1.5

Every thing happens by the will of Allah so the only way Palestinians can reconcile the death toll and their cities' destruction is to fervently believe the destructible Gaza is a precursor to some sort of glorious future victory over Israel as if they don't then their faith has to be surely tested (or abandoned).

It is this ferevent religous belief I believe underpins Palestinians views that Israel has to be defeated as surely that has to be God's will and possibly have the Hamas fighters on October 7th a fantastical notion that they could win a battle against the IDF.

Google Search

https://www.google.com/search?bih=1280&biw=800&dpr=1.5&q=Everything+happens+by+the+will+of+Allah+in+Arabic&sa=X&sca_esv=baf9129c546c704f&ved=2ahUKEwjBqOiw38yNAxWnW0EAHbrFJsEQ1QJ6BAgMEAE

mids2019 · 31/05/2025 04:14

It's an interesting point and I think religion has to be some sort existential platform to inform Palestinian meaning in life after losing comprehensively in this war.

it must be incredibly difficult to reconcile everything happening because of God's will when being at the receiving end of aerial bombardment that has destroyed virtually all property in your land and has led to widescale discomfort. The only reconciliation of these two opposing points is to believe in some fantastical God inspired victory for the Palestnian people at some unknown future point which made all the sacrifice worthwhile.

the Palestinians are therefore maybe in a position where as a society they are willing to take a great deal of damage as the alternative is that they believe God has abandoned them.

UsernamesAreTaken · 30/05/2025 23:07

fizzybootlace · 30/05/2025 20:03

I think you should stick to facts.

The book contains facts and most importantly the lived experience of a British Jewish lady, long before this particular genocide started.

Worryabouteverything · 30/05/2025 21:08

This aggression was being done before I was born and will still be happening when I'm gone.
Not one of the governments that are at war care enough about the innocent people that are caught up in the fighting. They don't care about the children and babies from both sides dying or being maimed.
Such a sad event that I can never see ending.