Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

Anyone watched the Louis Theroux documentary

405 replies

Ninerina · 30/04/2025 15:06

I knew that things were bad for the Palestinians but after watching the documentary I'm so disgusted by the 'settlers' the government of Israel and especially Daniella Weiss.
Palestinians are referred to as savages and camel riders by a rabbi!
Will we get a chorus of how Louis Theroux is anti- semitic now? The usual battle cry of the Israel supporters

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
purpleme12 · 01/05/2025 09:03

Oh well I guess it's not supposed to be a review then

Whatsinanamehey · 01/05/2025 09:02

purpleme12 · 01/05/2025 09:01

Have you read the whole article?

Just checking as PP said she's only quoted part of it

I couldn't read it cos you had to subscribe

He doesn't mention anywhere that the article is his review of the documentary.

purpleme12 · 01/05/2025 09:01

Have you read the whole article?

Just checking as PP said she's only quoted part of it

I couldn't read it cos you had to subscribe

Whatsinanamehey · 01/05/2025 08:59

purpleme12 · 01/05/2025 08:56

Just because it was only released on iPlayer a few days ago doesn't necessarily mean the author didn't watch it.

Sometimes they're given it in advance to watch so they can write a review

But there isn't a single reference to anything that happened in the documentary in the article. All the author does is attack the premise of the documentary - his objection is why LT made a documentary on settlers and not other forms of extremism that he thinks he should have made it on so I really don't think he has watched it.

purpleme12 · 01/05/2025 08:56

BelleHathor · 01/05/2025 08:52

The article was written on the 14th February 2025, so I would assume that the author did not watch the documentary. The BBC only released it a few days ago.

The article looks like a preemptive attempt to frame the narrative bu painting Louis Theroux as biased.

Just because it was only released on iPlayer a few days ago doesn't necessarily mean the author didn't watch it.

Sometimes they're given it in advance to watch so they can write a review

Whatsinanamehey · 01/05/2025 08:54

Twiglets1 · 01/05/2025 08:32

It’s laughable to me that you would imagine the journalist who wrote the article didn’t even watch the documentary. Sorry I just can’t take that suggestion seriously.

Why not? Why is it laughable? From the way the article Is written it certainly doesn't seem as if the author has watched the documentary as there isn't any references to anything that took place in the documentary.

BelleHathor · 01/05/2025 08:52

The article was written on the 14th February 2025, so I would assume that the author did not watch the documentary. The BBC only released it a few days ago.

The article looks like a preemptive attempt to frame the narrative bu painting Louis Theroux as biased.

Anyone watched the Louis Theroux documentary
hareclive · 01/05/2025 08:32

HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum · 01/05/2025 08:28

At the time of writing I couldn’t think of any other infamous leader from history with the same terrifying expression and sudden movements. She’s unnerving to watch particularly at the end when she shoves Louis very hard so he nearly falls backwards. At this point he calls her a sociopath and declines her invitation for him to shove her in return.

I still can’t think of another historical figure she reminded me of as I watched her. I fully appreciate that the mention of that man in this context may seem inappropriate, hence my use of “ironically”. On reflection I should have added “inappropriately”, too, and if there’s a stronger synonym of “ironically”, I would definitely have used that as well.

I see your point @quantumbutterfly but there was no aim to offend anyone. It was a comment designed to convey how frightening she is to observe with her unwavering, uncompromising conviction of the right of settlers to occupy land against international law.

I think it is really very relevant that DW ideology is the same as Hitlers! of course it is. we were all supposed to learn the lesson 'never again' but instead we are just sitting on our hands

Twiglets1 · 01/05/2025 08:32

LudvillasCave · 01/05/2025 08:30

So did the person who wrote this actually watch the programme?

They don’t mention the actual documentary once?

The message seems to be that they object in principle to its existence without engaging critically with any of the content.

It’s laughable to me that you would imagine the journalist who wrote the article didn’t even watch the documentary. Sorry I just can’t take that suggestion seriously.

LudvillasCave · 01/05/2025 08:30

Twiglets1 · 01/05/2025 06:45

Why does Louis Theroux keep picking on Israeli settlers?

When is Louis Theroux going to make a documentary where he embeds himself with Hamas in Gaza? Or Palestinian Islamic Jihad in Jenin, Nablus, Tulkarm, or Qalqilya? Probably never, because he’d most likely come to a sticky end.

I, for one, would be enthralled by Theroux’s signature brand of sneering, awkwardly bemused questioning if he were to go and live with members of Hamas’ Al-Qassam Brigades. Picture it: over breakfast in a darkened Gaza safe house, he nods along as his interviewee explains how their “martyrs” are sent to murder Jews in their homes, all while playing up his trademark discomfort for the cameras.

He could ask about their proud history of abducting civilians, their systemic use of rape and torture, or their policy of executing political rivals and suspected homosexuals. But, of course, that documentary will never be made.

Or how about one where Theroux embeds himself with the Iranian regime’s hardline Shia clerics? He likes to gently mock unusual religious beliefs, so the Twelver Shia rulers of Iran would be perfect: they believe they are governing under the direct mandate of God until the return of the Hidden Imam, who has been in occultation since 874 CE and will reappear when the world is filled with tyranny and oppression.

Just picture Louis’ eyebrow raising sarcastically as they explain how all of that will be preceded by major signs, including widespread corruption, the rise of a great deceiver (Dajjal), internal chaos in the Muslim world, and an apocalyptic war!

In the meantime, he could go out on trips with them as they arrest women for the crime of wearing a hijab improperly, imprison and torture dual nationals who visit their families, and abduct foreign citizens for ransom. Yet another group of religious fanatics Theroux could study up close and personal.

No? Then perhaps he could take a trip to Yemen to meet the Houthis, Iran’s favourite proxy army. Sipping black coffee and dressed in a Ma’awaz and Thobe, he could casually observe as they chant their catchy slogan of “Death to America, Death to Israel, Curse on the Jews.” Then he could drive them round in his famous Fiat 500 as they kidnap and torture people, from UN workers and women to human rights activists. Or join them as they recruit even more child soldiers, many of whom will die on the battlefield, and launch missiles at Israel to kill innocent people. Now that would be an interesting documentary. But maybe they’re just not kooky enough for the Louis Theroux/ BBC treatment.

Of course Theroux won’t make a film about any of those things. His attempt in 2016 to make a show even about British Muslims who were sympathetic to Isis “fizzled out”. I wonder why.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-does-louis-theroux-keep-picking-on-israeli-settlers/

So did the person who wrote this actually watch the programme?

They don’t mention the actual documentary once?

The message seems to be that they object in principle to its existence without engaging critically with any of the content.

HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum · 01/05/2025 08:28

quantumbutterfly · 01/05/2025 07:51

'ironically' that doesn't make any difference.

At the time of writing I couldn’t think of any other infamous leader from history with the same terrifying expression and sudden movements. She’s unnerving to watch particularly at the end when she shoves Louis very hard so he nearly falls backwards. At this point he calls her a sociopath and declines her invitation for him to shove her in return.

I still can’t think of another historical figure she reminded me of as I watched her. I fully appreciate that the mention of that man in this context may seem inappropriate, hence my use of “ironically”. On reflection I should have added “inappropriately”, too, and if there’s a stronger synonym of “ironically”, I would definitely have used that as well.

I see your point @quantumbutterfly but there was no aim to offend anyone. It was a comment designed to convey how frightening she is to observe with her unwavering, uncompromising conviction of the right of settlers to occupy land against international law.

Twiglets1 · 01/05/2025 08:19

quantumbutterfly · 01/05/2025 07:57

I'm not a huge fan of his usually. He comes from a very talented family though and this caught my eye.
Sandstorms by Peter Theroux
Days and Nights in Arabia

"Sandstorms" is a compelling narrative that explores the intricate cultural and political landscapes of the Middle East. Through a series of interconnected stories and personal journeys, the book delves into the lives of individuals caught in the region's tumultuous sandstorms of change and conflict. The author offers a vivid portrayal of the Middle East's diverse societies, examining the impact of historical legacies and modern challenges on the people who navigate the shifting sands of identity, loyalty, and survival. With a keen eye for detail and a deep understanding of the region's complexities, the narrative provides a thought-provoking glimpse into the heart of a world often

And Paul Theroux the travel writer ( his Dad I believe) - talented family indeed!

Whatsinanamehey · 01/05/2025 08:02

HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum · 01/05/2025 07:01

He attended a meeting as well as a jamboree at which the leaders of (illegal under international law) settler communities as well as a current member of the Israeli government (also a settler) spoke about removing Palestinians from Gaza and taking it for themselves (which would of course be ethnic cleansing). He showed the maps of Gaza they were looking at with red triangles indicating the parts they want to take.

He then showed a group with two rabbis standing close to the Gaza border; one of the rabbis made a pronouncement justifying plans to claim Gaza using dehumanising language to refer to the Palestinians. It was shocking to watch: a rabbi??

Louis didn’t interview these people - he observed and documented them speaking. He said nothing on these occasions although his deadly serious facial expressions gave us some indication of his thoughts.

This is a good point actually, some of the more extreme things that were recorded were not even part of any interview, just through observing the interactions between the settlers.

quantumbutterfly · 01/05/2025 07:57

Twiglets1 · 01/05/2025 07:22

@HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum and I didn’t even mention the article first. Someone else did which made me take a look at it. They were using it as evidence that Louis T is anti semitic which the article does not imply. He was just doing what he always does in his documentaries and I’m a fan of his who thought the documentary was overall very good.

Edited

I'm not a huge fan of his usually. He comes from a very talented family though and this caught my eye.
Sandstorms by Peter Theroux
Days and Nights in Arabia

"Sandstorms" is a compelling narrative that explores the intricate cultural and political landscapes of the Middle East. Through a series of interconnected stories and personal journeys, the book delves into the lives of individuals caught in the region's tumultuous sandstorms of change and conflict. The author offers a vivid portrayal of the Middle East's diverse societies, examining the impact of historical legacies and modern challenges on the people who navigate the shifting sands of identity, loyalty, and survival. With a keen eye for detail and a deep understanding of the region's complexities, the narrative provides a thought-provoking glimpse into the heart of a world often

Twiglets1 · 01/05/2025 07:56

Whatsinanamehey · 01/05/2025 07:55

@Twiglets1 have you watched the documentary?

Yes

Twiglets1 · 01/05/2025 07:55

HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum · 01/05/2025 07:48

I’m not at all agitated but agree this is a fair point. I apologise @Twiglets1

Thank you.

Whatsinanamehey · 01/05/2025 07:55

@Twiglets1 have you watched the documentary?

quantumbutterfly · 01/05/2025 07:51

HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum · 01/05/2025 07:45

That’s why I used the word “ironically”.

'ironically' that doesn't make any difference.

HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum · 01/05/2025 07:48

I’m not at all agitated but agree this is a fair point. I apologise @Twiglets1

Twiglets1 · 01/05/2025 07:46

@HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum Because I had already said I would post the Spectator article in the post before yours and I was assuming that people were reading the whole thread seeing as it was only 2 pages long at the time.

If you can’t be bothered to read 2 pages of comments then don’t start getting agitated about why people are posting links to things. If you had got to the end of the bit I posted you would have clearly seen the links to the Spectator.

HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum · 01/05/2025 07:45

That’s why I used the word “ironically”.

quantumbutterfly · 01/05/2025 07:43

HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum · 01/05/2025 06:42

It was very informative whilst being extremely upsetting to watch.

All the settlers featured came across as unhinged and entirely lacking any humanity or the ability to consider any other reading of history outside what they’d read in the Bible. Danielle Weiss seemed sociopathic, as Louis suggested. Her facial expressions and mannerisms were frightening at times and ironically reminded me of old film footage of Hitler addressing the crowds.

The scene towards the start with settlers visiting a purpose built viewing platform that looks across to Gaza clearly under bombardment with clouds of black smoke, the parents pointing it out to their children, was extremely disturbing. It was only one step removed from crowds gathered to watch a public execution.

Excellent documentary, Louis. Thank you.

...and ironically reminded me of old film footage of Hitler addressing the crowds.

not necessary, and if you can't see why .....

purpleme12 · 01/05/2025 07:43

I read the thread and knew her post was quoting from an article

HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum · 01/05/2025 07:40

Twiglets1 · 01/05/2025 06:45

Why does Louis Theroux keep picking on Israeli settlers?

When is Louis Theroux going to make a documentary where he embeds himself with Hamas in Gaza? Or Palestinian Islamic Jihad in Jenin, Nablus, Tulkarm, or Qalqilya? Probably never, because he’d most likely come to a sticky end.

I, for one, would be enthralled by Theroux’s signature brand of sneering, awkwardly bemused questioning if he were to go and live with members of Hamas’ Al-Qassam Brigades. Picture it: over breakfast in a darkened Gaza safe house, he nods along as his interviewee explains how their “martyrs” are sent to murder Jews in their homes, all while playing up his trademark discomfort for the cameras.

He could ask about their proud history of abducting civilians, their systemic use of rape and torture, or their policy of executing political rivals and suspected homosexuals. But, of course, that documentary will never be made.

Or how about one where Theroux embeds himself with the Iranian regime’s hardline Shia clerics? He likes to gently mock unusual religious beliefs, so the Twelver Shia rulers of Iran would be perfect: they believe they are governing under the direct mandate of God until the return of the Hidden Imam, who has been in occultation since 874 CE and will reappear when the world is filled with tyranny and oppression.

Just picture Louis’ eyebrow raising sarcastically as they explain how all of that will be preceded by major signs, including widespread corruption, the rise of a great deceiver (Dajjal), internal chaos in the Muslim world, and an apocalyptic war!

In the meantime, he could go out on trips with them as they arrest women for the crime of wearing a hijab improperly, imprison and torture dual nationals who visit their families, and abduct foreign citizens for ransom. Yet another group of religious fanatics Theroux could study up close and personal.

No? Then perhaps he could take a trip to Yemen to meet the Houthis, Iran’s favourite proxy army. Sipping black coffee and dressed in a Ma’awaz and Thobe, he could casually observe as they chant their catchy slogan of “Death to America, Death to Israel, Curse on the Jews.” Then he could drive them round in his famous Fiat 500 as they kidnap and torture people, from UN workers and women to human rights activists. Or join them as they recruit even more child soldiers, many of whom will die on the battlefield, and launch missiles at Israel to kill innocent people. Now that would be an interesting documentary. But maybe they’re just not kooky enough for the Louis Theroux/ BBC treatment.

Of course Theroux won’t make a film about any of those things. His attempt in 2016 to make a show even about British Muslims who were sympathetic to Isis “fizzled out”. I wonder why.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-does-louis-theroux-keep-picking-on-israeli-settlers/

Oh I see. Why didn’t you use quote marks in your post? Without quote marks readers will assume these are your words. Putting the link underneath doesn’t make up for the lack of quote marks.

Twiglets1 · 01/05/2025 07:22

@HaveYouActuallyDoneAnyWashingThisWeekMum and I didn’t even mention the article first. Someone else did which made me take a look at it. They were using it as evidence that Louis T is anti semitic which the article does not imply. He was just doing what he always does in his documentaries and I’m a fan of his who thought the documentary was overall very good.