Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

"If its true that more than 100 women and children died", then "Israel violated International Law" during hostage rescue, says former executive director of Human Rights Watch

113 replies

HelenHen · 13/06/2024 17:39

This is a very good read and seems to address many issues that were raised in other threads. Written by Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch (1993-2022)

"International humanitarian law requires that a military refrain from launching an assault if the anticipated civilian toll “would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated”. It is reasonable to conclude that the Israeli operation fell short of this standard"

"International humanitarian law requires militaries to take “all feasible precautions” to spare civilians, which Hamas violated by holding the hostages in two apartment buildings in Nuseirat, but that does not relieve Israel of the separate duty to avoid an attack that causes disproportionate harm to civilians. Palestinian civilians do not stop being civilians just because they are endangered by Hamas."

"The duty to take all feasible precautions also applies to the Israeli military. One obvious precaution is to launch military operations at a time of day when fewer civilians are present, but the Israeli military launched the rescue operation shortly before noon, hoping to surprise Hamas, which would have expected a night-time operation. That may have made the operation safer for the Israeli soldiers involved, but it transferred the risk to the many Palestinian civilians who were out and about in the middle of the day, particularly in the nearby market, greatly increasing the death toll"

"What were the “dozens of nearby targets” that the Israel air force attacked? Was it able to strike Hamas fighters with any precision in the chaos of that moment? Or did it simply drop bombs in the vicinity, hoping to clear a path for the rescuers to flee despite the area being filled with civilians? We don’t know, but an independent investigation is clearly needed. Indiscriminate attacks are a war crime."

"While soldiers are allowed to engage in ruses – for example, feinting left while going right – they are not allowed to pretend to be a protected person, such as a civilian, because it endangers civilians when hostile forces cannot distinguish them from opposing military forces. That is why soldiers in combat wear uniforms."

www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jun/13/international-criminal-court-investigation-israel-hostage-rescue-raid

Inside Israel’s deadly operation to rescue four hostages | CNN

New details are emerging about one of the most dramatic and deadly events of Israel’s war on Hamas in Gaza.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/10/middleeast/inside-israels-hostage-rescue-intl-dst/index.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
HelenHen · 14/06/2024 18:59

noblegiraffe · 14/06/2024 18:29

For the record, because you keep snipping at me with what you think are gotchas

I do not support Israel's actions in Gaza. The death toll is horrendous. Their leadership are batshit, terrible people. I hope they are investigated for war crimes and dealt with appropriately and the country gets new, more moderate leadership as soon as possible. Hamas are also horrendous, terrible people and I hope they fuck off out of Gaza into oblivion as soon as possible.

But despite not supporting Israel, I am not going to let my brain fall out of my head and swallow every single bit of anti-Israel messaging that is pumped onto my social media. Hence me challenging stuff like people posting Hamas propaganda uncritically.

There is a propaganda war going on and people should be sceptical of everything. Even if it comes from the former Director of Human Rights Watch. Follow the links, check what is being said.

And this propaganda was is not just about Israel, it's about the west.

So is suggesting that international and independent journalists and observers be allowed to work safely spreading propaganda?

You still didn't answer my question.

OP posts:
Dulra · 14/06/2024 18:59

DownNative · 14/06/2024 18:52

Yes, and it's entirely valid to question anything that comes from Hamas as well as Israel on this point.

Associated Press did an article that should give everyone food for thought irrespective of who you stand with in the war.

https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-casualties-toll-65e18f3362674245356c539e4bc0b67a

It underscores the difficulty in getting numbers, verifying them and putting them into specific contexts. This particular war is not the same as the Russia-Ukraine war. Actually, I don't think there's a suitable war that actually compares to this - not even past wars in the same region. As far as warfare goes, this one is revolutionising it which will be felt in many ways for decades to come similar to how WW2 changed many things.

As per AP, the numbers of women and children being killed is going down from 64% in October 2023 to 38% in March 2024. More men are being killed, BTW. One of the things this shows is the change in tactics from the Israel Defence Force.

But overall numbers in this war is really for afterwards. Even then, it'll take years to properly collate, verify and analyse. It's why I don't usually comment on these other than to point out the Gaza Health Ministry is controlled by Hamas.

As welcome as it is that, in percentage terms, less children are being killed we all know they will be more negatively impacted by the lack of humanitarian aid, malnourishment, disease and also the negative impact trauma has on a child's development and the long-term impact of trauma.

HelenHen · 14/06/2024 18:57

PeasfullPerson · 14/06/2024 17:33

Time will tell us, and while numbers may be disputed, that the level of suffering has been too much is in my eyes not up for debate.

Here is an article published by The Lancet Group.

‘No evidence of inflated mortality reporting from the Gaza Ministry of Health’

Benjamin Q Huynh
Elizabeth T Chin
Paul B Spiegel

Published:December 06, 2023

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)02713-7/fulltext

Thank you for this link. It's a very interesting read.

OP posts:
PeasfullPerson · 14/06/2024 18:54

The ‘confirmation’ of numbers is for after the war, but as @Dulra has said numbers do still matter, and it would be easier to get a better idea of what is going on if independent observers and journalists were able to be in Gaza.

The secrecy stinks.

DownNative · 14/06/2024 18:52

noblegiraffe · 14/06/2024 17:38

I think the suggestion that only Israel has any issue with accepting without question the figures coming from a terrorist organisation is a bit suspect.

Yes, and it's entirely valid to question anything that comes from Hamas as well as Israel on this point.

Associated Press did an article that should give everyone food for thought irrespective of who you stand with in the war.

https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-casualties-toll-65e18f3362674245356c539e4bc0b67a

It underscores the difficulty in getting numbers, verifying them and putting them into specific contexts. This particular war is not the same as the Russia-Ukraine war. Actually, I don't think there's a suitable war that actually compares to this - not even past wars in the same region. As far as warfare goes, this one is revolutionising it which will be felt in many ways for decades to come similar to how WW2 changed many things.

As per AP, the numbers of women and children being killed is going down from 64% in October 2023 to 38% in March 2024. More men are being killed, BTW. One of the things this shows is the change in tactics from the Israel Defence Force.

But overall numbers in this war is really for afterwards. Even then, it'll take years to properly collate, verify and analyse. It's why I don't usually comment on these other than to point out the Gaza Health Ministry is controlled by Hamas.

FILE - Palestinians search for bodies and survivors in the rubble of a residential building destroyed in an Israeli airstrike, in Rafah southern Gaza Strip, on Dec. 20, 2023. An AP analysis of Gaza Health Ministry data finds the proportion of Palestini...

Women and children of Gaza are killed less frequently as war’s toll rises, AP data analysis finds

The trend is significant because the death rate for women and children is the best available proxy for civilian casualties.

https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-casualties-toll-65e18f3362674245356c539e4bc0b67a

Dulra · 14/06/2024 18:48

Apologies for that appearing 3 times no idea how it happened I'll get 2 of them deleted

Dulra · 14/06/2024 18:41

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Dulra · 14/06/2024 18:40

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Dulra · 14/06/2024 18:40

DownNative · 14/06/2024 18:31

By the same token, neither can numbers from the Hamas run Gaza Health Ministry be accepted as evidence.

Indeed, Associated Press had quite the detailed article on numbers discrepancies from Hamas recently.

As I said before, numbers of dead and injured by status is for after a conflict free of the fog of war. Not during it.

As I said before, numbers of dead and injured by status is for after a conflict free of the fog of war. Not during it.

Don't agree. Maybe you are talking about military lives there? But no way should there not be verification of how many civilians are being killed or injured until after a war. There has to be checks to make sure one side is not completely obliterating the civilians on the other (I'm speaking hypothetically here to make my point)

PeasfullPerson · 14/06/2024 18:36

Israel should let independent observers in.

DownNative · 14/06/2024 18:31

HelenHen · 14/06/2024 18:24

My comment about the numbers was in response to Downnatives now deleted post.

I believe the numbers should not be disputed unless there is evidence to say they are incorrect. Lover numbers provided by the state who did the killings cannot be accepted as evidence because they have no legitimate way of verifying those numbers on foreign soil. They did not recover or account for the bodies.

By the same token, neither can numbers from the Hamas run Gaza Health Ministry be accepted as evidence.

Indeed, Associated Press had quite the detailed article on numbers discrepancies from Hamas recently.

As I said before, numbers of dead and injured by status is for after a conflict free of the fog of war. Not during it.

noblegiraffe · 14/06/2024 18:30

I believe the numbers should not be disputed unless there is evidence to say they are incorrect.

Humanity is doomed.

noblegiraffe · 14/06/2024 18:29

HelenHen · 14/06/2024 18:18

@noblegiraffe if you're going to press home a point with me, can you please answer this?

For the record, because you keep snipping at me with what you think are gotchas

I do not support Israel's actions in Gaza. The death toll is horrendous. Their leadership are batshit, terrible people. I hope they are investigated for war crimes and dealt with appropriately and the country gets new, more moderate leadership as soon as possible. Hamas are also horrendous, terrible people and I hope they fuck off out of Gaza into oblivion as soon as possible.

But despite not supporting Israel, I am not going to let my brain fall out of my head and swallow every single bit of anti-Israel messaging that is pumped onto my social media. Hence me challenging stuff like people posting Hamas propaganda uncritically.

There is a propaganda war going on and people should be sceptical of everything. Even if it comes from the former Director of Human Rights Watch. Follow the links, check what is being said.

And this propaganda was is not just about Israel, it's about the west.

DownNative · 14/06/2024 18:28

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

HelenHen · 14/06/2024 18:24

noblegiraffe · 14/06/2024 18:04

What unfortunately happens is that some posters would rather focus on disputing numbers

There is plenty of discussion of the awfulness of it all.

Helenhen was the one who started the discussion about whether the numbers were disputed.

And the fact that she then said the numbers should not be disputed is definitely worth discussing.

Do you think that Hamas propaganda should be taken as fact?

My comment about the numbers was in response to Downnatives now deleted post.

I believe the numbers should not be disputed unless there is evidence to say they are incorrect. Lover numbers provided by the state who did the killings cannot be accepted as evidence because they have no legitimate way of verifying those numbers on foreign soil. They did not recover or account for the bodies.

OP posts:
PeasfullPerson · 14/06/2024 18:21

We definitely shouldn’t take any information presented by either Israel or Hamas as fact.

Let the independent observers in.

HelenHen · 14/06/2024 18:18

HelenHen · 14/06/2024 17:33

Do you agree that if international journalists and observers were allowed to work safely and report the facts, that it would be in everyone's best interest?

@noblegiraffe if you're going to press home a point with me, can you please answer this?

OP posts:
noblegiraffe · 14/06/2024 18:13

Nothing that comes out of Gaza from the IDF or Hamas should be taken as fact.

Glad to hear it. I hope @HelenHen takes note.

Dulra · 14/06/2024 18:12

noblegiraffe · 14/06/2024 18:04

What unfortunately happens is that some posters would rather focus on disputing numbers

There is plenty of discussion of the awfulness of it all.

Helenhen was the one who started the discussion about whether the numbers were disputed.

And the fact that she then said the numbers should not be disputed is definitely worth discussing.

Do you think that Hamas propaganda should be taken as fact?

Do you think that Hamas propaganda should be taken as fact?

Nothing that comes out of Gaza from the IDF or Hamas should be taken as fact. There is though many independent eye witness reports from international doctors and humanitarian aid workers that can be better trusted.

noblegiraffe · 14/06/2024 18:04

What unfortunately happens is that some posters would rather focus on disputing numbers

There is plenty of discussion of the awfulness of it all.

Helenhen was the one who started the discussion about whether the numbers were disputed.

And the fact that she then said the numbers should not be disputed is definitely worth discussing.

Do you think that Hamas propaganda should be taken as fact?

drowninginsick · 14/06/2024 17:59

Anyone who can't see the devastating human affect of all this must be off their rocker. I understand that some may blame Hamas or Israel more but anyone who can see what's happening to those children and not recognise the devastation is beyond help

PeasfullPerson · 14/06/2024 17:58

I agree with both the things you have said there @drowninginsick

What unfortunately happens is that some posters would rather focus on disputing numbers, which then shifts attention away from recognising that the human level of suffering is too much. Comments about the human cost of acts are often ignored, and showing empathy has you categorised as being a ‘useful idiot’ for Hamas.

drowninginsick · 14/06/2024 17:48

Surely most people question numbers from both side as they've clearly got reasons to lie! That can't be controversial. Questioning figures isn't saying"is it enough suffering" the level of suffering is horrendous Sad

PeasfullPerson · 14/06/2024 17:47

noblegiraffe · 14/06/2024 17:38

I think the suggestion that only Israel has any issue with accepting without question the figures coming from a terrorist organisation is a bit suspect.

No you misunderstand. Israel are the ones that are implicated in the deaths, they are the ones that are most impacted, from a propaganda and legal perspective, if there is a misreporting of the numbers.

If the numbers are inflated they have the most to gain from allowing independent observers in.

If Israel has something to hide then they benefit from the secrecy.

HelenHen · 14/06/2024 17:47

I have asked mumsnet to edit the title to include quotes so that there can be no accusations of me posting in bad faith.

I'm sorry if the title was misleading. That was not my intention.

Thankfully they have also deleted downnatives personal attack on me. It was quite a leap.

OP posts: