Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

"If its true that more than 100 women and children died", then "Israel violated International Law" during hostage rescue, says former executive director of Human Rights Watch

113 replies

HelenHen · 13/06/2024 17:39

This is a very good read and seems to address many issues that were raised in other threads. Written by Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch (1993-2022)

"International humanitarian law requires that a military refrain from launching an assault if the anticipated civilian toll “would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated”. It is reasonable to conclude that the Israeli operation fell short of this standard"

"International humanitarian law requires militaries to take “all feasible precautions” to spare civilians, which Hamas violated by holding the hostages in two apartment buildings in Nuseirat, but that does not relieve Israel of the separate duty to avoid an attack that causes disproportionate harm to civilians. Palestinian civilians do not stop being civilians just because they are endangered by Hamas."

"The duty to take all feasible precautions also applies to the Israeli military. One obvious precaution is to launch military operations at a time of day when fewer civilians are present, but the Israeli military launched the rescue operation shortly before noon, hoping to surprise Hamas, which would have expected a night-time operation. That may have made the operation safer for the Israeli soldiers involved, but it transferred the risk to the many Palestinian civilians who were out and about in the middle of the day, particularly in the nearby market, greatly increasing the death toll"

"What were the “dozens of nearby targets” that the Israel air force attacked? Was it able to strike Hamas fighters with any precision in the chaos of that moment? Or did it simply drop bombs in the vicinity, hoping to clear a path for the rescuers to flee despite the area being filled with civilians? We don’t know, but an independent investigation is clearly needed. Indiscriminate attacks are a war crime."

"While soldiers are allowed to engage in ruses – for example, feinting left while going right – they are not allowed to pretend to be a protected person, such as a civilian, because it endangers civilians when hostile forces cannot distinguish them from opposing military forces. That is why soldiers in combat wear uniforms."

www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jun/13/international-criminal-court-investigation-israel-hostage-rescue-raid

Inside Israel’s deadly operation to rescue four hostages | CNN

New details are emerging about one of the most dramatic and deadly events of Israel’s war on Hamas in Gaza.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/10/middleeast/inside-israels-hostage-rescue-intl-dst/index.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
PeasfullPerson · 14/06/2024 23:59

Some people can’t resist arguing the numbers. How uncomfortable it would be for these people to imagine the pain of seeing your parents or your child killed, in broad daylight, because you happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and for Israel to write you off as collateral damage. God have mercy on those who cannot entertain the suffering of others while being so consumed by their own fear.

mollyfolk · 14/06/2024 23:48

Switcher · 14/06/2024 23:12

Seems like everyone in Gaza is either a woman or a child, and accurate figures are available at all times - apart from how many hostages are still alive. No idea apparently.

The humanity coming from your post! 50% of Gazan’s are children. It’s fairly logical that a lot have been killed, starved and maimed.

mollyfolk · 14/06/2024 23:46

The first casualty in war is the truth - that’s the old saying. I think both Hamas and the Israeli authorities are lying. I don’t believe for a minute that only “armed civilians” and Hamas were killed. In fact I have a real issue about the word civilian being used to describe people who are clearly Hamas - like the people keeping the hostages. Israel are saying this to justify civilian death.

I would be fairly sceptical of Hamas women and children figures. They have their own agenda.

Only independent investigation will discover the truth,

Dulra · 14/06/2024 23:13

Switcher · 14/06/2024 23:12

Seems like everyone in Gaza is either a woman or a child, and accurate figures are available at all times - apart from how many hostages are still alive. No idea apparently.

Well there is a really high percentage of children in Gaza apologies for the inconvenience

Dulra · 14/06/2024 23:12

Silence1 · 14/06/2024 23:10

Educate yourself and many many people couldn't make the march.
And I also think Israel are talking bollocks saying only Hamas and armed civilians were killed in the hostage rescue.
‘A beautiful outpouring of rage’: did Britain’s biggest ever protest change the world? | Politics past | The Guardian

I was there

Switcher · 14/06/2024 23:12

Seems like everyone in Gaza is either a woman or a child, and accurate figures are available at all times - apart from how many hostages are still alive. No idea apparently.

Dulra · 14/06/2024 23:11

User2460177 · 14/06/2024 23:02

It is incorrect information and human rights watch have well known anti Israel bias. Also israel are clear that only Hamas and armed civilians were killed so it’s not an issue anyway.

it’s funny that we never heard any of this in the war the uk and us (together with others) fought against Isis? We killed far more civilians and used special forces.

Also israel are clear that only Hamas and armed civilians were killed so it’s not an issue anyway.
Oh if Israel are clear that's fine then no issue at all thanks for clearing that up

it’s funny that we never heard any of this in the war the uk and us (together with others) fought against Isis?
There was loads in the media about that war, warts and all and that was pre social media and X, maybe you weren't old enough to remember?

We killed far more civilians
You didn't

Silence1 · 14/06/2024 23:10

User2460177 · 14/06/2024 23:02

It is incorrect information and human rights watch have well known anti Israel bias. Also israel are clear that only Hamas and armed civilians were killed so it’s not an issue anyway.

it’s funny that we never heard any of this in the war the uk and us (together with others) fought against Isis? We killed far more civilians and used special forces.

Educate yourself and many many people couldn't make the march.
And I also think Israel are talking bollocks saying only Hamas and armed civilians were killed in the hostage rescue.
‘A beautiful outpouring of rage’: did Britain’s biggest ever protest change the world? | Politics past | The Guardian

‘A beautiful outpouring of rage’: did Britain’s biggest ever protest change the world?

In February 2003, 1.5 million people protested in London against the looming conflict. They didn’t stop the war… but their legacy still looms large

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/feb/11/slugs-iraq-war-london-protest-2003-legacy

User2460177 · 14/06/2024 23:10

Silence1 · 14/06/2024 22:59

@LastTrainEast Your post was deleted but I was going to reply saying people don't object to rescuing hostages. Instead they see shades of grey whereas it appears the supporters of the far right (including a convicted terrorist supporting one) Israeli ministers only see black and white.
Interestingly you mention Nazi supporters, I read in Haaretz that some Israeli's are celebrating the rise of the far right in Europe (irony just hit me through the heart)just as we see on here the ridiculing of "the left" and our "left media" who oppose Israeli Govt action in Gaza.
In the UK we see the far right like EDL supporting Israel too.
Repeat again - the irony.

Sadly there has always been antisemitism in both the left and right. It’s not particularly ironic. We have seen it from everyone from Eastern European and soviet communists to Jeremy corbyns Labour Party. Many of the current antisemitic attacks (maybe most) are coming from the left but equally there remain right wing antisemitism too.

sadly this sort of hate and conspiracy theories about Jews and Israel, not to mention double standards, just don’t seem to go away.

User2460177 · 14/06/2024 23:02

HelenHen · 13/06/2024 23:18

As former executive director of Human Rights Watch, I'd imagine he understands it pretty well.

If you read the full article that I linked to (not just the quotes i pasted), it is clear that the intent could NOT have been to avoid engaging in hostilities. He recognises that it is a grey area, which is why he is saying it should be investigated.

So no, it's not incorrect information.

It is incorrect information and human rights watch have well known anti Israel bias. Also israel are clear that only Hamas and armed civilians were killed so it’s not an issue anyway.

it’s funny that we never heard any of this in the war the uk and us (together with others) fought against Isis? We killed far more civilians and used special forces.

Silence1 · 14/06/2024 22:59

@LastTrainEast Your post was deleted but I was going to reply saying people don't object to rescuing hostages. Instead they see shades of grey whereas it appears the supporters of the far right (including a convicted terrorist supporting one) Israeli ministers only see black and white.
Interestingly you mention Nazi supporters, I read in Haaretz that some Israeli's are celebrating the rise of the far right in Europe (irony just hit me through the heart)just as we see on here the ridiculing of "the left" and our "left media" who oppose Israeli Govt action in Gaza.
In the UK we see the far right like EDL supporting Israel too.
Repeat again - the irony.

Dulra · 14/06/2024 22:50

@LastTrainEast Shoot back at who? The Nazis or innocent civilians?

No one opposes rescuing hostages. Many are concerned and upset with the amount of innocent civilians killed as a result of that rescue.
You are being pretty selective and inflammatory with what you are saying

LastTrainEast · 14/06/2024 22:29

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Circumferences · 14/06/2024 22:12

Israel have violated international law since year zero.

noblegiraffe · 14/06/2024 22:08

Because I was trying to answer every single little question that you keep throwing at me all in one go to try to get it over and done with. My answer answered your question and all the others. So if you intend to ask me, from now on, anything like 'do you support genocide' or 'do you think killing civilians is bad?' Or 'do you think independent journalists should be allowed to report on the war?', I'm not going to bother answering, not because I'm 'evading the question' but because I am totally and utterly fed up with the facile nature of these interactions.

HelenHen · 14/06/2024 21:59

noblegiraffe · 14/06/2024 21:20

You read but you do not understand.

Do I want independent journalists in there to referee the truth? I want everyone responsible for the whole sorry mess to be put onto a rocket and fired into the sun.

Put in independent observers, sure, I am not entirely sure why you think I should think otherwise, particularly given what I've written.

Just because I asked and you didn't answer. It seemed like you were evading and I wasn't sure why.

But thank you for clarifying and apologies for nagging.

OP posts:
PeasfullPerson · 14/06/2024 21:51

@noblegiraffe Perhaps it wasn’t your intention, but that you ignored the question, and a point that was repeatedly made about Israel allowing in independent journalists and observers, did come across as thought you didn’t want this issue to be discussed.

noblegiraffe · 14/06/2024 21:20

HelenHen · 14/06/2024 18:59

So is suggesting that international and independent journalists and observers be allowed to work safely spreading propaganda?

You still didn't answer my question.

You read but you do not understand.

Do I want independent journalists in there to referee the truth? I want everyone responsible for the whole sorry mess to be put onto a rocket and fired into the sun.

Put in independent observers, sure, I am not entirely sure why you think I should think otherwise, particularly given what I've written.

HelenHen · 14/06/2024 20:48

LordPercyPercy · 14/06/2024 20:45

Do you agree that international reporters and observers should be allowed to do their jobs safely, so that the figures cannot be disputed (among other things)?

Yes, although probably from a range of backgrounds to minimise bias accusations.

Thank you. Yes I would agree with that.

It would solve a lot of our debates if there were independent observers.

OP posts:
LordPercyPercy · 14/06/2024 20:45

Do you agree that international reporters and observers should be allowed to do their jobs safely, so that the figures cannot be disputed (among other things)?

Yes, although probably from a range of backgrounds to minimise bias accusations.

HelenHen · 14/06/2024 20:44

LordPercyPercy · 14/06/2024 20:32

I believe the numbers should not be disputed unless there is evidence to say they are incorrect.

I can't agree. There won't be any evidence either way at present, or for a long time. And I can't accept as fact, reports from a terrorist group with an agenda.

Ok if that's what you want to focus on.

Do you agree that international reporters and observers should be allowed to do their jobs safely, so that the figures cannot be disputed (among other things)?

OP posts:
LordPercyPercy · 14/06/2024 20:32

I believe the numbers should not be disputed unless there is evidence to say they are incorrect.

I can't agree. There won't be any evidence either way at present, or for a long time. And I can't accept as fact, reports from a terrorist group with an agenda.

HelenHen · 14/06/2024 19:37

Dulra · 14/06/2024 18:59

As welcome as it is that, in percentage terms, less children are being killed we all know they will be more negatively impacted by the lack of humanitarian aid, malnourishment, disease and also the negative impact trauma has on a child's development and the long-term impact of trauma.

I also suspect the Israeli state has had to rein things in a bit due to international pressure.

OP posts:
PeasfullPerson · 14/06/2024 19:15

The level of deaths caused due to inhumane conditions is also something that is more relevant to modern warfare and that makes counting deaths more difficult. According to the UN.

Really I’m more interested in discussing the human tragedy of war, my main concerns is the unnecessary suffering and deaths of people who just want to live a *normal life.

DownNative · 14/06/2024 18:59

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Reality is we generally get more authoritative, reliable figures after conflicts.

This particular war is very different to any in the 20th Century to now. This is the first major conflict involving such extensive use of underground tunnels which also breached the prohibition of placing military objects very close to or right in civilian areas, for example.

This kind of warfare, unfortunately, is here to stay. In time, everything relating to it will improve - IHL, tactics, strategies, numbers of dead & injured, etc.