Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

Anyone seen the video where the police officer says a swastika is not anti-Semitic at a pro Palestine March?

469 replies

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 31/03/2024 15:29

I know there are lots of pro-Palestine supporters in this area of the board. If not anti-Semitic then what else is it standing for in this context? Apparently it was drawn on some protestors banners.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Laikalaika · 31/03/2024 20:03

titbumwillypoo · 31/03/2024 20:00

I've not seen any pictures on the news of the offending item so for all we know it was a Buddhist manji. If it had "death to all Jews" written across it then the person should have been arrested and rightly so, but if it was a manji the officer was right about context. It's a dangerous path to try and police symbols when for example such things as The Saint George's have both negative and positive associations.

Come on. You really think it's even remotely likely that a Swastika at an Anti-Israel march was a Buddhist Manji?

This is so ludicrous it's almost funny.

The anti-Semitism on this board could not be more thinly veiled. Make a bit more of an effort, please.

Laikalaika · 31/03/2024 20:01

TextureSeeker · 31/03/2024 19:47

You don't think that that is what the police are for? I honestly can't believe that you would think people shouldn't be able to protest about their government aiding and abetting war crimes, that people should put up and shut up about their government helping to kill people against international law rather than expecting the police to do their jobs. This is what I mean about the UK and what they 'condemn' being so confusing. War crimes = fine, protesting = not fine, expecting the police to do their jobs = not fine.

Firstly, the police are clearly not doing their jobs.

Secondly, the protest organisers should also have a responsibility to make it clear what isn't and isn't acceptable at their marches, as they have done very well at the Marches against Anti-Semitism. If this has become impossible to manage because the march has become uncontrollably overrun with anti-Semites, they should have the decency to cancel the marches.

titbumwillypoo · 31/03/2024 20:00

I've not seen any pictures on the news of the offending item so for all we know it was a Buddhist manji. If it had "death to all Jews" written across it then the person should have been arrested and rightly so, but if it was a manji the officer was right about context. It's a dangerous path to try and police symbols when for example such things as The Saint George's have both negative and positive associations.

TextureSeeker · 31/03/2024 19:47

Laikalaika · 31/03/2024 19:39

It ends where British Jews are being terrorised and abused.

You don't think that that is what the police are for? I honestly can't believe that you would think people shouldn't be able to protest about their government aiding and abetting war crimes, that people should put up and shut up about their government helping to kill people against international law rather than expecting the police to do their jobs. This is what I mean about the UK and what they 'condemn' being so confusing. War crimes = fine, protesting = not fine, expecting the police to do their jobs = not fine.

Laikalaika · 31/03/2024 19:39

TextureSeeker · 31/03/2024 19:37

I think if your government is aiding and abetting war crimes as today's reports would suggest people absolutely should be out on the streets. Imagine a world where your government is in breach of International Law as it is looks like the UK government is and nobody could protest about it? Where does that end? People should have a right to hold their government accountable, especially on something as serious as this.

It ends where British Jews are being terrorised and abused.

Laikalaika · 31/03/2024 19:38

I went to a Solidarity with Jews march the other day. There was one known Islamophobic personality there and the event organisers immediately made him leave and would not allow him to march with them.

Are the peaceful Pro-Palestine marchers doing the same? Are they calling the police on protesters marching alongside them displaying anti-semitic tropes? Are they making it clear what type of slogans and symbols will not be tolerated at their marches?

TextureSeeker · 31/03/2024 19:37

Laikalaika · 31/03/2024 19:31

I just can't believe these protests are still being allowed. Jewish people are afraid to be in Central London right now. People are parading anti semitic symbols through the streets of our cities day after day, and wilfully obtuse police officers are wittering away about "context".

I think if your government is aiding and abetting war crimes as today's reports would suggest people absolutely should be out on the streets. Imagine a world where your government is in breach of International Law as it is looks like the UK government is and nobody could protest about it? Where does that end? People should have a right to hold their government accountable, especially on something as serious as this.

Laikalaika · 31/03/2024 19:34

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Except the fact that many of these "compassionate" pro-Palestine supporters are knowingly and continuously marching alongside blatant anti-Semites...

Laikalaika · 31/03/2024 19:31

I just can't believe these protests are still being allowed. Jewish people are afraid to be in Central London right now. People are parading anti semitic symbols through the streets of our cities day after day, and wilfully obtuse police officers are wittering away about "context".

Laikalaika · 31/03/2024 19:28

hattie43 · 31/03/2024 16:18

If that was part of a far right demo imagine how quickly it'd be removed yet for a Palestinian demo it's ok . Totally wrong .

This

IsoldeWagner · 31/03/2024 19:17

Kendodd · 31/03/2024 19:14

Just to be clear, the people holding swastika signs weren't describing themselves as Nazis, they were calling others that. They had signs like EU = swastika or I saw some of an EU flag with a swastika overlayed. Some looked just home made cardboard, others looked professionally made.

I know. I understood. Just like these marches.
It doesn't make it acceptable.
They just sound very ignorant and bigoted.

Kendodd · 31/03/2024 19:14

IsoldeWagner · 31/03/2024 18:47

Dreadful. They should have been arrested.

Just to be clear, the people holding swastika signs weren't describing themselves as Nazis, they were calling others that. They had signs like EU = swastika or I saw some of an EU flag with a swastika overlayed. Some looked just home made cardboard, others looked professionally made.

stomachamelon · 31/03/2024 18:52

Am pleased they at least seem to be arresting the most extreme.
Sadly it's what happens next that's the issue....

IsoldeWagner · 31/03/2024 18:47

Kendodd · 31/03/2024 18:25

I saw a few people with swastika banners on a demonstration in about 2019. It was at an anti brexit march and the swastikas were held by people in a small pro brexit counter demonstration. They were claiming the EU were Nazis and so the anti brexit marchers were Nazi supporters.

Dreadful. They should have been arrested.

Scirocco · 31/03/2024 18:46

@Anywherebuthere and to help with wiping out Palestinians, the UK continues to provide arms despite apparent legal advice that this conflict is in breach of international law, and the US has just approved billions of dollars worth of arms.

Anywherebuthere · 31/03/2024 18:36

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Kendodd · 31/03/2024 18:25

IsoldeWagner · 31/03/2024 15:32

Shocking.
I never thought I'd see the swastika paraded through the streets of London with impunity. I genuinely don't understand why that's allowed.

I saw a few people with swastika banners on a demonstration in about 2019. It was at an anti brexit march and the swastikas were held by people in a small pro brexit counter demonstration. They were claiming the EU were Nazis and so the anti brexit marchers were Nazi supporters.

pickledandpuzzled · 31/03/2024 18:11

I think OP’s post reads as a rhetorical question- ‘is there ever a context where that symbol could be ok on a Palestinian march, can pro Palestinians on MN think of a context?’
If even pro Palestinians can’t think it acceptable, then why couldn’t the Met do so?

I don’t think she was accusing pro Palestinians on here of being Nazi sympathisers.

MrsFinkelstein · 31/03/2024 18:05

@Auvergne63
Yes. I am. Its abhorrent.

kasstherito · 31/03/2024 18:00

MissyB1 · 31/03/2024 17:56

Aaah… after reading the mets reply it’s quite clear that woman was just a goady troublemaker herself. There was probably never a swastika.

If there was no swastika then why was she arrested?

MissyB1 · 31/03/2024 17:56

TextureSeeker · 31/03/2024 15:42

The mets reply is here, it was right under the tweet you linked to. I think that probably answers your questions more than random people on the Internet who happen to disagree with occupation and war crimes can.

Edited

Aaah… after reading the mets reply it’s quite clear that woman was just a goady troublemaker herself. There was probably never a swastika.

TextureSeeker · 31/03/2024 17:40

BethDawn · 31/03/2024 16:31

This is disingenuous. That question was tagged onto another quote from a PP who said that they didn't know the context it was used in and the police would have to asked why they did not consider it anti-Semitic, rather than pro-Palestinians. That failure, right there, to condemn the swatiska by that poster tells you everything you need to know about the casual acceptance of anti-Semitism by too many on the pro-Palestinian side.

So the context was still very much within this March, and the poster claiming they didn't have the 'context' to comment on whether this swastika was anti-Semitic was a revolting apologist for blatant and outright anti-Semitism of the worst kind.

So, yeah, it a bit disingenuous to then pop up with 'helpful' replies about Buddhism and Hinduism when you know quite well what the context was that question was framed within.

Was this directed at me because I was the one who said the police would have to be asked? I genuinely didn't know I was supposed to 'condemn' it. I'm not British, I don't live in the UK and I find your culture of 'condemning' really confusing. I don't know when 'condemning' is needed and when it isn't.

For instance I posted on a thread that said that a source in the Tory party has said that government lawyers have said that Israel are breaking international laws and that the UK is aiding and abetting war crimes. Hardly anyone commented on that news, there is no 'condemning' there so obviously that doesn't fall under the banner of things that need to be 'condemned'. In my country that would be huge news, massive and everyone would be condemning but not in the UK and that's fair enough, you do you. But unless the poster specifies that they expect their posts to be 'condenmed' I'm lost. I have no idea what's condemn worthy and what isn't. There are so many things i think are condemn worthy and nobody says anything, so generally I just take what the OP says and answer it. The OP herself didn't 'condemn' it.

Now that I know that this is something mumsnet has decided everyone should 'condemn' rather than just answer the OP, I will say I condemn the use of a swastika on a banner at any protest. It shouldn't happen anywhere.

Auvergne63 · 31/03/2024 17:08

MrsFinkelstein · 31/03/2024 16:57

If you were parading with a swastika during a protest then the comment applies to you.
If you weren't - then it doesn't.
It's a pretty easy distinction to make.

Edit to add: if you're at a protest and parading alongside someone with a swastika, then the comment also applies to you.

Swastikas are never acceptable, in any protest.

Edited

Did I say that it was acceptable? Did I say I was parading with one. Never, ever assume anything because 99% of the time you will be wrong.
Are you as vociferous about the legality of selling Nazi artifacts in the UK? I find this odious and an insult to the millions of people who suffered, my family included, under the Nazi regime?

Comedycook · 31/03/2024 17:02

MrsFinkelstein · 31/03/2024 17:01

Which is appalling frankly.

Understandable, but appalling. Especially when I clearly recall the Met response to the Sarah Everard memorial.

It's almost as if they prefer to go for the low hanging fruit..

MrsFinkelstein · 31/03/2024 17:01

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 31/03/2024 16:49

I’m glad they arrested the protestor.

My thoughts were that I believe the police are being instructed to not incite the crowd because they don’t have the resources to handle any wide spread disruption. So swastikas can fly under the radar because of the bigger picture.

Which is appalling frankly.

Understandable, but appalling. Especially when I clearly recall the Met response to the Sarah Everard memorial.