Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East
Thread gallery
12
MercanDede · 30/01/2024 14:09

HeraSyndulla · 30/01/2024 14:04

Did Hamas follow the laws of international armed conflict ?.

They haven’t always.

But the law makes it clear that your enemy not following the law is no excuse to not follow the law yourself. It is not a mitigating factor. It is not a get out of jail free card that allows you to break the laws too.

This goes both ways.

Normally we would see a state conducting the war more lawfully than the non state terrorists. I can’t say I have seen that at all.

HeraSyndulla · 30/01/2024 14:08

Dulra · 30/01/2024 14:05

No that's why they are considered a terrorist organisation

And that is what they are being treated as.

DeeLusional · 30/01/2024 14:06

Aswad · 30/01/2024 12:53

Thank you OP
I was confused by the deletion but glad to see you’ve re posted.

What I don’t understand is this.
These assassins have the intel to know who these men are, where they were staying, and what look like. Could they not have used this same intel to avoid the senseless killing of thousands of civilians and the destruction of homes, schools and hospitals?

Bit difficult when said terrorists are hiding in homes schools and hospitals.

Desertrose2023 · 30/01/2024 14:06

AliceA2021 · 30/01/2024 14:00

Did you miss the 'will be found accountable' bit?

And in what parallel universe has the Israeli army been held to account for ANY of its war crimes?

OP posts:
Dulra · 30/01/2024 14:05

HeraSyndulla · 30/01/2024 14:04

Did Hamas follow the laws of international armed conflict ?.

No that's why they are considered a terrorist organisation

Dulra · 30/01/2024 14:04

@hogmanayhoolie you're completely missing the point. Not sure anyone here supports terrorists but we support a proper rule of law which is imperative to keep us all safe. If the lawmakers don't stick to the rules of law they are putting everyone at risk

HeraSyndulla · 30/01/2024 14:04

MercanDede · 30/01/2024 14:02

The suggestion to use precision and targeted hits has always been in the context of doing it while following the international laws of armed conflict. A precision or targeted hit is not automatically legal in all contexts.

What happened in the hospital was a war crime. It was not a legal targeted hit. It is as illegal as using phosphorus shells in an urban area.

There are not just illegal weapons, there are also illegal uses of legal weapons and tactics.

Edited

Did Hamas follow the laws of international armed conflict ?.

MercanDede · 30/01/2024 14:02

AliceA2021 · 30/01/2024 13:30

It is 'interesting ' that many denied what occurred on 7th Oct, minimised rapes, torture and brutal killings. Some deny parts of it.

Some believe anything that tic toc shows from Gaza, others demand evidence if something is claimed by 1 side, Israel. There are many, many wrongs.

It's awful the amount of innocent children that have died in bombing and it was suggested by some that targeted hits take place, to minimise this. It appears that a targeted hit took place with no other casualties and people not happy. There are rules of engagement and rules which armies must abide by (although terrorists don't of course). Different sides are held to different standards of course.

Still innocent children die and hostages are still held and no ceasefire. Overriding sadness and can see no way ahead since hames will not surrender.

So much polarisation. Very little negotiation.

The suggestion to use precision and targeted hits has always been in the context of doing it while following the international laws of armed conflict. A precision or targeted hit is not automatically legal in all contexts.

What happened in the hospital was a war crime. It was not a legal targeted hit. It is as illegal as using phosphorus shells in an urban area.

There are not just illegal weapons, there are also illegal uses of legal weapons and tactics.

HeraSyndulla · 30/01/2024 14:01

inkworks273 · 30/01/2024 13:07

No arrest and fair trial? Just murder them in cold blood while they are unarmed in a hospital room? That seems reasonable to you?

You need to read some of the witness statements and autopsy reports of the Hamas atrocities committed on innocent women and children including babies. That’s the reason for this. Mosad and the IDF will continue until they are satisfied the threat of further acts of brutality is secured. And what about all the hostages the Palestinian terrorists have abducted, including children.

Hamas are the Einsatzgruppen, and there is only one way to deal with them. History has taught the Jewish people that. This time they’re not going to fight back.

AliceA2021 · 30/01/2024 14:00

Desertrose2023 · 30/01/2024 13:44

As far as I can tell the Israeli army isn’t following any rules. This incident a classic example.

so by your logic the Israeli army is acting no better than terrorists.

Did you miss the 'will be found accountable' bit?

hogmanayhoolie · 30/01/2024 14:00

I wish I could be comfortable with supporting terrorists but I can't seem to do that

I don't see them as just bad people 🤷🏻‍♀️

Dulra · 30/01/2024 13:59

hogmanayhoolie · 30/01/2024 13:44

It's not that I don't care about law, it's just that I don't care about how and where terrorists are eliminated

I really can't find it in my heart of GAF

I would imagine had I lost family on 7th October, then I'd be celebrating too

There are plenty of murderers, rapists, child abusers that I would love to see disposed of in this way BUT we have laws to ensure it doesn't become a free for all and to ensure people's rights are protected which includes right to a fair trial. Dressing up and imitating medical staff to carry out an execution in a hospital ward is wrong on so many levels and has now set a very dangerous precedent. People complain that the terrorists don't follow any laws, no they don't that's why they are called terrorists! When a countries own defence force resort to terrorist tactics the lines are becoming dangerously blurred. Is it back to the wild west? An eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth? Netanyahu is continuing to put Israeli lives at risk with these kind of tactics.

stormy4319trevor · 30/01/2024 13:57

@Parkingt111 Yes, I saw he said they would control Gaza in the same way as the West Bank. He mentioned this hospital killing as an example of the military freedom of operation they could have in Gaza, (from Guardian.) I suppose this may be to reassure the public that nothing like Oct 7th would happen again. I remember the US was ruling out military occupation, so will be interesting to see what happens from their end.

Desertrose2023 · 30/01/2024 13:54

hogmanayhoolie · 30/01/2024 13:44

It's not that I don't care about law, it's just that I don't care about how and where terrorists are eliminated

I really can't find it in my heart of GAF

I would imagine had I lost family on 7th October, then I'd be celebrating too

What were these men’s crimes? What acts have they been accused of committing? None of that has been shared. No transparency or disclosure or accountability. I wish I could get so comfortable with the cold blooded assassination of people in their beds whilst in a hospital.

OP posts:
Parkingt111 · 30/01/2024 13:52

stormy4319trevor · 30/01/2024 13:46

@AliceA2021 Ironically, if Palestine was a recognised state with an army, they would have to abide by the rules too. But the West Bank is occupied, and occupiers have obligations. It's even more complicated that the occupation is internationally deemed illegal.

Gallant has just said today that the plan is for Israel to occupy Gaza militarily after the war, the same way as they do In the occupied territories.

stormy4319trevor · 30/01/2024 13:49

hogmanayhoolie · 30/01/2024 13:44

It's not that I don't care about law, it's just that I don't care about how and where terrorists are eliminated

I really can't find it in my heart of GAF

I would imagine had I lost family on 7th October, then I'd be celebrating too

I do understand your view. But I think it's dangerous to do away with the processes of law and justice. Maybe we will hear more about this story soon, and it will become clearer.

HeidiInTheBigCity · 30/01/2024 13:49

As a matter of fact, the rules of war do apply to non-state combattants. If they did not, you would not be able to, say, prosecute them in the ICC or similar.

stormy4319trevor · 30/01/2024 13:46

@AliceA2021 Ironically, if Palestine was a recognised state with an army, they would have to abide by the rules too. But the West Bank is occupied, and occupiers have obligations. It's even more complicated that the occupation is internationally deemed illegal.

hogmanayhoolie · 30/01/2024 13:44

EasterIssland · 30/01/2024 13:28

Thanks op. I put a similar link in another thread about this.

those supporting this I guess they don’t care about law. They just want people dies. My thing is that idf has done many mistakes so they might killed innocent lives and then apologies for their acts. We shouldn’t normalise the killing of anyone. Follow the lawful rules.

btw as we can see that whenever they want they can target kill, I hope the number of civilian deaths is reduced to 0

It's not that I don't care about law, it's just that I don't care about how and where terrorists are eliminated

I really can't find it in my heart of GAF

I would imagine had I lost family on 7th October, then I'd be celebrating too

Desertrose2023 · 30/01/2024 13:44

AliceA2021 · 30/01/2024 13:38

Yes armies are expected to follow rules.

Terrorists don't.

Wars have rules which armies have to abide by even when terrorists don't.

It makes fighting terrorist organisations who hide in civilian areas very difficult. Probably impossible.

One 'side' should and must follow rules, they will be found accountable. The other side won't and garners much sympathy.

How to end this war? Negotiations are ongoing. For the sake of all innocents they progress well.

As far as I can tell the Israeli army isn’t following any rules. This incident a classic example.

so by your logic the Israeli army is acting no better than terrorists.

OP posts:
AliceA2021 · 30/01/2024 13:39

An international peace keeping presence might help, but would it be possible

AliceA2021 · 30/01/2024 13:38

EasterIssland · 30/01/2024 13:28

Thanks op. I put a similar link in another thread about this.

those supporting this I guess they don’t care about law. They just want people dies. My thing is that idf has done many mistakes so they might killed innocent lives and then apologies for their acts. We shouldn’t normalise the killing of anyone. Follow the lawful rules.

btw as we can see that whenever they want they can target kill, I hope the number of civilian deaths is reduced to 0

Yes armies are expected to follow rules.

Terrorists don't.

Wars have rules which armies have to abide by even when terrorists don't.

It makes fighting terrorist organisations who hide in civilian areas very difficult. Probably impossible.

One 'side' should and must follow rules, they will be found accountable. The other side won't and garners much sympathy.

How to end this war? Negotiations are ongoing. For the sake of all innocents they progress well.

Desertrose2023 · 30/01/2024 13:36

the lengths and mental gymnastics that some posters go to in order to justify and excuse literal war crimes really beggars belief.

OP posts:
AliceA2021 · 30/01/2024 13:30

hogmanayhoolie · 30/01/2024 13:15

This place is crazy

Won't people think of the poor terrorists

Unbelievable. Disgusting

It is 'interesting ' that many denied what occurred on 7th Oct, minimised rapes, torture and brutal killings. Some deny parts of it.

Some believe anything that tic toc shows from Gaza, others demand evidence if something is claimed by 1 side, Israel. There are many, many wrongs.

It's awful the amount of innocent children that have died in bombing and it was suggested by some that targeted hits take place, to minimise this. It appears that a targeted hit took place with no other casualties and people not happy. There are rules of engagement and rules which armies must abide by (although terrorists don't of course). Different sides are held to different standards of course.

Still innocent children die and hostages are still held and no ceasefire. Overriding sadness and can see no way ahead since hames will not surrender.

So much polarisation. Very little negotiation.

EasterIssland · 30/01/2024 13:28

Thanks op. I put a similar link in another thread about this.

those supporting this I guess they don’t care about law. They just want people dies. My thing is that idf has done many mistakes so they might killed innocent lives and then apologies for their acts. We shouldn’t normalise the killing of anyone. Follow the lawful rules.

btw as we can see that whenever they want they can target kill, I hope the number of civilian deaths is reduced to 0

Swipe left for the next trending thread