Aid workers accused of taking part on 7/10 attack on Israel - appalling !

12 actively participated, but a group of 3000 UNRWA teachers celebrated the attacks on October 7th their telegram group. I'm sure that not every single group member commented and joined in, but this is not 'just 12' hamas members who have infiltrated the group, this is a culture in a UN organisation that is so entrenched, that the actions of October 7th were openly celebrated and cheered on.

Trust in the UN in Israel, which was poor to start, has been badly shaken. Minimising the extent and scale of how compromised UNRWA is does nothing to repair the breach. If the UN are to play a role in bringing the two sides together, and rebuilding peace, showing strong action here is essential.

As I said before, it is imperative that the acute humanitarian needs of Palestinians are met; how would the UN address this in a situation where a UN organisation was not already in place? Would UNHCR step in? What are the protocols for aid in conflicts where the UN does not already have a presence? Given reports of aid being diverted, stolen, and sold, how the aid is handled once it is over the border clearly needs urgently addressing regardless.

https://unwatch.org/group-of-3000-unrwa-teachers-celebrates-hamas-massacre-and-rape/

You really need to put this into perspective. 12 out of 13,000 working in Gaza. 30,000 employees overall. Yes it is terrible they did infiltrate the organisation but there are very few organisations as large as this that have not had a scandal regarding conduct of a percentage of employees whether it's child abuse, rape, fraud and so on. It is more important to focus on how they deal with it and what they'll put in place to ensure it doesn't happen again

Here praying that withdrawal of aid to the UN in Gaza means that it will be directed via other organisations, like the Red Cross. Instead of meaning it will not be given.
Why should the civilians be punished, yet once more, for the actions of others?

I am really disappointed and angry at the UN failing to catch people infiltrating their organisation. They should have tougher rules and safety protocols to ensure this never happens again.

You are obviously a name changer so we can’t check your comments can we.
My comment was responding to the smearing of Owen Jones so stop with the pathetic derailing.

Well given some of the comments you've made in the past about Israeli rape victims I'm not surprised you think that.

So that's what you think, it isn't fact.

The ICJ may be called "one of the highest court in the world" but has no jurisdiction over non-UN members.

From their website;-

"The Court is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations.

The Court can only hear a dispute when requested to do so by one or more States. It cannot deal with a dispute on its own initiative. Neither is it permitted, under its Statute, to investigate and rule on acts of sovereign States as it chooses.

The States involved in the dispute must also have access to the Court and have accepted its jurisdiction, in other words they must consent to the Court's considering the dispute in question. This is a fundamental principle governing the settlement of international disputes, since States are sovereign and free to choose how to resolve their disputes."

This reality constitutes one of the inherent dilemmas of international tribunals that lack any enforcement capacity. (ICJ decisions are formally subject to enforcement by the Security Council, but each of the five permanent members can veto any effort at enforcement.)

You mean this paragraph?

"A decision can lead them to ask the question as to whether they are potentially in violation of their own legal obligations by continuing to support Israel with military assistance. "

What does that mean " their own legal obligations"? It's just a legal-speak to me.

I repeat, never said it was a solution.

I presumed you posted it alternative to UNWRA? Then you assumed wrongly.

Or was your post about the charity irrelevant to this thread? It isn't irrelevent to those it supports.

There are several charities working in Gaza,

The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) is working with Egyptian Red Crescent Society (ERCS) and PRCS for the transportation of aid into Gaza. Over 5,600 trucks of aid have been delivered and more than 3,800 of them are distributed.

Islamic Relief UK

https://www.charitynavigator.org/discover-charities/where-to-give/israel-hamas-conflict/

https://humanappeal.org.uk/appeals/gaza-emergency-appeal

This ! I watched his video as well and totally agree. You are smearing him to suit your agenda.

I can’t tell if this is meant to be sarcastic or not?

Is this your justification for the killing of 10,000 children?

UN - anti-Semitic

UNWRA - Hamas

WHO - in collusion with Hamas

Amnesty International - is among the most active NGOs that systematically promote demonization of Israel , BDS, and antisemitism – under the facade of universal human rights. In recent years, this bias and discrimination has been reflected in its “apartheid” campaign, extensive efforts to exclude antisemitism as a human rights concern, and undermining the implementation of the International Holocaust Remembrance Association (IHRA) definition to combat hatred of Jews.

ICJ - Ben Gvir slams the International Court of Justice for issuing a series of provisional measures against Israel, calling the international body “antisemitic.”

Red Cross - Red Cross shows clear anti-Israel bias, Jerusalem Institute of Justice claims

What have I missed?

I saw him speak about the film shown to him. He stated that in the film shown to hjm and other journalists he did not see those things, which does not mean they didn't happen. He can't lie and say he was shown things he wasn't? Or are you quoting him from some other video?