Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

Israel/Hamas War - Ceasefire

920 replies

Toggenburgsaregreat · 15/01/2024 10:01

Each Saturday we are seeing demonstrations in London where people are marching with placards and calling for a ceasefire in the Hamas/Israel war.

However, it is difficult to know how the supporters of Palestine think this can be achieved? (Interestingly, no calls for Hamas to cease hostilities and return the hostages were heard - so is this really a call for unilateral disarmament?)

And who should Israel negotiate a ceasefire with? Hamas, ISIS, ISSP, The Muslim Brotherhood - all of these groups/any of these groups?

What is it the supporters of Palestine actually want?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
82
Auvergne63 · 24/01/2024 16:22

AdamRyan · 24/01/2024 13:04

Almost 20 years ago. At what point do we stop holding the decisions of the past against people today?

If you are Palestinian, never. If you are pro Israeli government, there is no past before 07/10.

anotherlevel · 24/01/2024 16:19

I've just seen on Al Jazeera that a group of Israeli protestors have intentionally blocked humanitarian aid from entering Gaza at the Karam Abu Salem border.

Parkingt111 · 24/01/2024 15:29

But yes it's a disgrace that Gaza is being bombed into oblivion

Parkingt111 · 24/01/2024 15:29

@Toggenburgsaregreat the bombing is not continuing because of the lack of agreement on a two state solution though
We are currently not anywhere near that

Toggenburgsaregreat · 24/01/2024 15:26

@Parkingt111 "But why would the Palestinians accept a solution or be expected to accept one which doesn't include Al Aqsa? They will never accept that either so what happens then?"

Then we have a stalemate.

Neither side can reconcile themselves to each others fundamental requirements.

In the meantime Gaza gets bombed into oblivion.

OP posts:
Parkingt111 · 24/01/2024 15:18

Toggenburgsaregreat · 24/01/2024 15:11

Israel would never accept such a solution with Jerusalem as the capital of Palestine as Temple Mount is Holy to Jews.
To the Jews it is Zion, the City of David and Solomon’s temple, and the heartland of the Israelite nation. The Jews call this sacred site in Jerusalem’s Old City Temple Mount after the temple built by Solomon in the 5th century BC.

But why would the Palestinians accept a solution or be expected to accept one which doesn't include Al Aqsa? They will never accept that either so what happens then?
I'm not aiming the question at you btw, just generally that this is something that it's unlikely for either side to agree on.

Toggenburgsaregreat · 24/01/2024 15:14

Apparently Hamas had rejected plans for a ceasefire in Dec 2023

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/hamas-islamic-jihad-reject-giving-up-power-return-permanent-ceasefire-egyptian-2023-12-25/

OP posts:
Toggenburgsaregreat · 24/01/2024 15:11

SummerFeverVenice · 24/01/2024 13:27

They did, in 2017. You are quoting from the 1988 one.
The 2017 one under the heading "The position toward Occupation and Political Solutions" (paragraphs 18 to 23), accepts and describes the two-state solution, i.e. the creation of an independent Palestinian state according to the 1967 borders with Jerusalem as its capital.

Israel would never accept such a solution with Jerusalem as the capital of Palestine as Temple Mount is Holy to Jews.
To the Jews it is Zion, the City of David and Solomon’s temple, and the heartland of the Israelite nation. The Jews call this sacred site in Jerusalem’s Old City Temple Mount after the temple built by Solomon in the 5th century BC.

OP posts:
EasterIssland · 24/01/2024 14:35

SummerFeverVenice · 24/01/2024 13:53

This is an issue because war polarises enemies and pushes them further apart. Every bit of death and suffering pushes them that bit farther away from their original more conciliatory view and off whatever common ground they would have if war were not generating emotions of revenge, distrust, and hatred for each other.

Netanyahu and Hamas have rejected the two state solution multiple times. It’s not because of the war. This has happened in the past as well

PeasfullPerson · 24/01/2024 14:29

When you say Hamas who exactly do you mean??

Why is it only necessary to change the leadership of Israel, but insist that the people of Gaza and their land is decimated!

Two state solution is the only viable way forward, they should all get over themselves, and get on with it!

SummerFeverVenice · 24/01/2024 14:07

SomeCatFromJapan · 24/01/2024 13:56

The issue is that you have Hamas leaders and Netanyahu saying now, in January 2024, that they reject a two state solution.

Netenyahu can at least be removed through an election (and that can't come soon enough imo, and he's teetering).
Hamas can only be removed militarily if they don't agree of their own accord, which doesn't seem likely.

You linked to Meshaal’s view and he isn’t the leader of Hamas, so we can’t even really say that his view is what Sinwar would agree with. He is more extreme than Sinwar.

Nethanyu is Israel’s PM, similarly he has political leaders under him that are more extreme than him, like Itam Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich who not only reject the two state solution but have also been advocating war crimes.

SomeCatFromJapan · 24/01/2024 13:56

The issue is that you have Hamas leaders and Netanyahu saying now, in January 2024, that they reject a two state solution.

Netenyahu can at least be removed through an election (and that can't come soon enough imo, and he's teetering).
Hamas can only be removed militarily if they don't agree of their own accord, which doesn't seem likely.

SummerFeverVenice · 24/01/2024 13:53

EasterIssland · 24/01/2024 13:29

The issue is that you have Hamas leaders and Netanyahu saying now, in January 2024, that they reject a two state solution.

you forgot about something in your sentence but I’ve corrected it for you

This is an issue because war polarises enemies and pushes them further apart. Every bit of death and suffering pushes them that bit farther away from their original more conciliatory view and off whatever common ground they would have if war were not generating emotions of revenge, distrust, and hatred for each other.

SummerFeverVenice · 24/01/2024 13:50

Humdingerydoo · 24/01/2024 12:29

What did the charter say when Hamas were democratically elected? The charter that people in Gaza, and many in the West Bank, voted for.

Let's not pretend Palestinians didn't knowingly vote in a genocidal terrorists group.

The people voted based on Hamas official political truce offers to Israel, which had been consistently reflective of the two state solution along 1967 borders since 1988.

A timeline of Hamas truce proposals:

1988: Just one year after the group was founded, Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Zahar met the late top Israeli officials Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres, and proposed that Israel withdraw from the 1967-occupied territories in exchange for a truce. This was before Hamas had built its armed wing, the Qassam Brigades. Also, in 1988, Hamas founder Sheikh Ahmad Yasin himself indicated a willingness to negotiate with Israel under the condition that it “first acknowledge the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination and right of return to their land”.

1994: Hamas offered a truce to Israel after the abduction and killing of Israeli soldier Nachshon Wachsman. A year earlier, the Palestinian Authority (PA) had accepted the proposal of a Palestinian state comprised of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem. Hamas agreed to that proposal.

1995: Hamas again proposed a 10-year truce based on the same condition of Israeli withdrawal from occupied territories.

1996: In March, after Israel assassinated Hamas military leader Yahya Ayyash in January, the movement offered a ceasefire.

1997: September: Days before Israel attempted to assassinate Hamas political leader Khaled Meshaal in the Jordanian capital, Amman, the movement offered Israel a 10-year truce. October:After his release from Israeli prison, Hamas founder Yasin renewed the call for a ceasefire. November: Hamas again proposed a truce. The Qassam Brigades said attacks against Israeli civilians would stop if Israel stopped targeting Palestinian civilians.

1999: Yasin made another ceasefire offer provided Israel withdrew from the 1967 territories. In a letter to European diplomats, Hamas offered to cease all hostilities in exchange for Israeli withdrawal, evacuation of settlements, and release of Palestinian prisoners.

2003: In December, Yasin offered a ceasefire on the condition that Israel withdraw from the Palestinian territories. He was killed four months later in an Israeli attack.

2004: Yasin’s successor and Hamas co-founder Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi again proposed a 10-year truce. Israel killed him one month after Yasin.

2006: Hamas again offered a 10-year truce that would be “automatically renewed if [Israel] commits to restoring the full and legitimate rights of the Palestinian people to them within a final solution that matches what is accepted by the PLO”. (The PLO had accepted the Oslo Accord of the two state solution, an accord broken by Israel after a far right Israeli assassinated Israeli PM Rabin because the far right didn’t agree with the Oslo peace process)

2007: Senior Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh repeated the group’s call for a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders.

2008: Hamas leader Meshaal again offered a 10-year truce, which he repeated a year later.

2014: Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad offered a 10-year truce in exchange for the lifting of the Israeli blockade and release of Palestinian prisoners.

2015: Hamas proposed a long-term ceasefire in exchange for the lifting of the blockade.

2017: Hamas presented its revised charter announcing that it accepted a Palestinian state in the 1967 borders.

Link to timeline source:https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2024/1/22/how-israel-has-repeatedly-rejected-hamas-truce-offers

EasterIssland · 24/01/2024 13:29

SomeCatFromJapan · 24/01/2024 13:16

The issue is that you have Hamas leaders saying now, in January 2024, that they reject a two state solution. Getting caught up in charter details or who voted when is a distraction.

The issue is that you have Hamas leaders and Netanyahu saying now, in January 2024, that they reject a two state solution.

you forgot about something in your sentence but I’ve corrected it for you

Babyboomtastic · 24/01/2024 13:28

Toggenburgsaregreat · 24/01/2024 13:03

OK,
So if I have got it wrong please link me to the correct one.

Here's a link

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/hamas-2017-document-full.

I'm not a fan of the group
I consider them to be terrorists, and the atrocity they committed in October is wholly inexcusable and disgusting.

But I have a real bugbear for inaccuracy 😂

SummerFeverVenice · 24/01/2024 13:27

Toggenburgsaregreat · 24/01/2024 08:47

I'm not too sure who the 'we' is?

If Hamas says they want a ceasefire, are they going to re-write their 'mission statement' that says they want to State of Israel removed from the map?

In Hamas's Charter it says -

"On the Destruction of Israel:

---------

'Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will

obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it.' (Preamble)"

"Peace initiatives, and so-called peaceful solutions and

international conferences are in contradiction to the principles of

the Islamic Resistance Movement... Those conferences are no more than

a means to appoint the infidels as arbitrators in the lands of

Islam... There is no solution for the Palestinian problem except by

Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are but a

waste of time, an exercise in futility.' (Article 13)"

They did, in 2017. You are quoting from the 1988 one.
The 2017 one under the heading "The position toward Occupation and Political Solutions" (paragraphs 18 to 23), accepts and describes the two-state solution, i.e. the creation of an independent Palestinian state according to the 1967 borders with Jerusalem as its capital.

Toggenburgsaregreat · 24/01/2024 13:19

SomeCatFromJapan · 24/01/2024 13:16

The issue is that you have Hamas leaders saying now, in January 2024, that they reject a two state solution. Getting caught up in charter details or who voted when is a distraction.

Not at all, it shows motivation and mindset.

OP posts:
Toggenburgsaregreat · 24/01/2024 13:17

AdamRyan · 24/01/2024 13:04

Almost 20 years ago. At what point do we stop holding the decisions of the past against people today?

That's interesting, when when GB is regularly having brickbats thrown at it over our 'Colonial Past' and being assailed by people/groups/organisations wanting reparation

OP posts:
SomeCatFromJapan · 24/01/2024 13:16

The issue is that you have Hamas leaders saying now, in January 2024, that they reject a two state solution. Getting caught up in charter details or who voted when is a distraction.

EasterIssland · 24/01/2024 13:15

Babyboomtastic · 24/01/2024 13:10

Most Gazans weren't even alive when Hamas was voted in. Only those over the age of 35 (23%) of the population we're of voting she in the last election. 75% of which voted.

So 17% of the current population voted in the last election, not all of which would have viewed for Hamas.

I'm not sure that justifies the collective punishment of 2m people, 40% of which are children.

Exactly. This is like saying Israelis deserve what they’re going through as they voted for a far right government who didn’t take the security seriously and there were some security gaps during 7-10. Citizens aren’t responsible of what their governments do, specially when most of the citizens haven’t elected them

AdamRyan · 24/01/2024 13:13

Here's the guardian report from the time:

https://www.theguardian.com/guardianweekly/story/0,,1699719,00.html

Hamas has killed more than 400 Israelis in about 60 suicide bombings aside from attacks on the army and Jewish settlers. But Palestinian voters did not elect Hamas to go on attacking Israelis. Just a year ago, Mahmoud Abbas won the presidential election on a platform of peace with Israel and an end to bloodshed.

But Palestinian voters' disenchantment was compounded by their government's inability to counter Israel's unwillingness to negotiate a peace settlement while it unilaterally marked out its final borders inside the West Bank. Among other things, Palestinians are now looking to Hamas to get them a state.

Really interesting to look at this analysis in todays context.

Hamas election victory sets new Middle East challenge | Guardian Weekly | guardian.co.uk

https://www.theguardian.com/guardianweekly/story/0,,1699719,00.html

Toggenburgsaregreat · 24/01/2024 13:13

SomeCatFromJapan · 24/01/2024 12:19

Um, whatever your are quoting from, it's not hamas current charter.

How about this then? It's from only a few days ago.
"We Reject the Two-State Solution; October 7 Has Shown that Liberating Palestine from the River to the Sea Is Realistic and Has Already Begun"

https://twitter.com/MEMRIReports/status/1749049490009440569

And this shows Hamas's position -
Ismail Haniyeh speech on Oct. 7, 2023 after Hamas attack on Israel
“Today, the enemy has had a political, military, intelligence, security and moral defeat inflicted upon it, and we shall crown it, with the grace of God, with a crushing defeat that will expel it from our lands, our holy city of Al-Quds, our Al-Aqsa mosque, and the release of our prisoners from the jails of the Zionist occupation. Operation Al-Aqsa Flood was launched from Gaza, but it will extend to the West Bank, to Al-Quds and to our people within the territories occupied in 1948, as well as to the Resistance and the Palestinian people abroad.

“Our objective is clear: we want to liberate our land, our holy sites, our Al-Aqsa mosque, our prisoners. We have no hesitation about this. This is the goal that is worthy of this battle, worthy of this heroism, worthy of this courage. Al-Qassam Brigades made the enemy lose its balance in just a few minutes, with this grand and blessed incursion; with this epic presence of men who write history with their blood and their guns; with their footsteps that crush the occupying invaders. And we say to all countries, including our beloved Arab countries: you must know that this entity which is incapable of protecting itself from our fighters is incapable of providing you with security or protection. All the normalization and recognition processes, all the agreements that have been signed [with Israel] can never put an end to this battle.”

OP posts:
Babyboomtastic · 24/01/2024 13:10

Humdingerydoo · 24/01/2024 12:29

What did the charter say when Hamas were democratically elected? The charter that people in Gaza, and many in the West Bank, voted for.

Let's not pretend Palestinians didn't knowingly vote in a genocidal terrorists group.

Most Gazans weren't even alive when Hamas was voted in. Only those over the age of 35 (23%) of the population we're of voting she in the last election. 75% of which voted.

So 17% of the current population voted in the last election, not all of which would have viewed for Hamas.

I'm not sure that justifies the collective punishment of 2m people, 40% of which are children.

Swipe left for the next trending thread