Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

Why wasn’t the Israel-Palestinian issue dealt with before?

54 replies

WinterWarmth · 08/11/2023 00:50

The conflict has been going on for 75 years. It has taken large scale atrocities on civilians with a level of barbarity rarely seen before for Israel to declare war on Gaza but there are reports going back years of Israel breaking the human rights laws of Palestinians, illegally occupying territory, killing and imprisoning civilians indiscriminately and preventing basic human needs like food and water getting to Gaza and the West Bank.

Billions of aid has been given to the Palestinians over decades, there is a heavy presence from the UN and global human rights agencies so these abuses have been well documented.

The horrific attack on Israel was apparently the Palestinians fighting for freedom after years of suppression and atrocities against them. A large proportion of the world seems to believe it was warranted but Israel declaring war in retaliation isn’t.

In which case. it begs the question why has Israel, a UN member, not been dealt with before these current events? Sanctions put in place, UN peacekeeping forces sent in, barred from the political world stage etc?

Surely it would have been more cost effective in terms of money AND lives if the world had intervened before current events?

OP posts:
Wonderously · 08/11/2023 01:10

if I had control I’d return to the original 1967 boarders.

asterel · 08/11/2023 01:02

a) there have been many, many tries to resolve the conflict - peace talks after peace talks. In most cases these have failed because Palestine refused to accept the terms of a two-state solution (see, for example, Arafat at Camp David).

b) the history of the situation is not quite as you describe above: your description is very biased, and to be honest, sounds very underinformed. Read some good histories of the region, and you will understand more. The League of Nations and the UN created Israel. It does not want to send in peacekeeping forces in these circumstances. There are both historical and security reasons for this. In particular, Arab states do not want UN forces in the region or their sphere of influence. They would not support a formal UN process as many don’t want a two-state solution either.

StBrides · 08/11/2023 01:01

For the same reason the UN isn't doing so now.

It isn't an easily solved issue. And was largely caused by the rest of the world (especially UK) sticking their oar in, in the first place.

SnackQueen · 08/11/2023 01:01

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.