Illegal settlements

No, the creation of Israel was the culmination of a number of things that denied the Palestinians their right to self determination.

Sykes-Picot, Balfour, UN resolution 181 were all external parties extrajudicially determining what should happen to the Palestinians.

The sin that this led to was the Nakba and the forceful removal of Palestinians from their land and homes with no compensation (and often by the barrel of a hun).

Plan Dalet shows that this was happening in 1947 prior to the creation of Israel.

Are you saying rhe 'original sin' is the creation of the state of Israel?

“to convey a clear message of strengthening and encouraging the settlements, which are at the forefront of the struggle against Palestinian terrorism and face growing security challenges.”

So the illegal settlements are part of israeli government policy and supported. I thought people didn't agree with them?

In my mind this is not going to end well. We(politicians)’ve not learnt anything and there won’t be peace in the area until settlements are dismantled , Israel abandons the occupied territories and Israel and Palestine change their governments. Whilst the same groups are in charge and settlements are allowed the same story will repeat time after time and there won’t be peace for Palestinians and Israelis.

The vengeance that some Israeli government officials display is fascinating.
It's like the mere thought of any Palestinian joy or happiness makes them angry.

Katz releases all settlers in administrative detention, ties it to Palestinians’ release
'It is better for the families of Jewish settlers to be happy than the families of freed terrorists,' defense minister says ahead of Gaza deal

he said, was meant “to convey a clear message of strengthening and encouraging the settlements, which are at the forefront of the struggle against Palestinian terrorism and face growing security challenges.”

https://www.timesofisrael.com/katz-says-settlers-in-administrative-detention-to-go-free-ties-it-to-palestinian-release/amp/

Accountability like "we're the most moral", "don't know what happened", "we're investigating", "oh no we didn't". Accountability like rewarding extremists with government positions, shutting down agencies raising concerns about sexual abuse of minors in detention settings, and covering up human rights abuses and high level fraud. Accountability like trying to control or shut down the press...

Yeah, lots of good quality accountability there.

It's for shithole countries, not countries like the US and their little pet. The crimes are irrelevant. They're only crimes when certain groups and states carry them out. The US and Israel can't commit crimes because they're special.

Amazing what they'll say out loud nowadays all the same.

He says it's intended to focus on countries that do not have their own robust accountability mechanisms, not for countries like Israel and the US that "solve their own problems".
Hmmm investigate themselves does he mean? And who decides which countries that do not have their own robust accountability mechanisms?

Bbc

Over in the Rubio hearing, the nominee for secretary of state is criticising the International Criminal Court (ICC) for issuing an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

• You can read about the charges here

If this is accurate it would be interesting to see how popular a war of attrition against the International Court of Justice in The Hague and against the arrest warrants issued against Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Galant would be with Americans.

Trump might be planning to remove the sanctions imposed by Biden to settlers

Translation
In Trump's "gift bag" you can also find the cancellation of the sanctions lists imposed by the Biden administration on settlers and elements in the extreme right, who suffered greatly from this move, after the outgoing president was convinced that Israel had no intention of enforcing the law on them. There are also indications that Trump intends to wage a war of attrition against the International Court of Justice in The Hague and against the arrest warrants issued against Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Galant, and against additional measures that may already be taken there against other senior Israeli officials.for

https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/bkj07tfwjl

This is a completely fascinating case study in how people read the media. The only way 'carte blanche' makes sense is if you ignore the bits that contradict it i.e - the bits that indicate that Trump's victory may not lead to carte blanche. Its weird because I would think you would find that interesting, but hey. Its been an education, so thanks for that, I suppose.

You’re pointing at one paragraph of the whole news. Im pointing at other paragraphs within the same link.

Nothing that the incoming administration is likely to want, is likely to be at all positive for Palestinians.

Im beginning to wonder if you and others have read it all. It clearly says Trump may not in fact be the enabler they hope/expect him to be because it might get in the way of the bigger deal that Trump probably wants to make.

I’ll not continue discussing with you about my comment because at the end the point of the link has been fully derailed. Palestinians will continue losing their land.

i guess you’re talking about me
the article clearly estates that the new appointed ambassador In USA as well as Israeli settlers see trumps victory will enable them continuing annexing to West Bank because this land belongs to them. So no, the link I’ve posted doesn’t clearly says something different to what I was posting.

Its confusing when someone posts an article sayimg something different to the point they apparently want to make.
Maybe for some it is

But the article was saying something diffetent.Its confusing when someone posts an article sayimg something different to the point they apparently want to make.

Yes very clear what you meant. They have complete freedom to act as they wish. The very definition of carte blanche

You're still missing the point but I can't explain it a third time.

That's depressing hopefully it won't get passed, it's just taking over the west bank through the back door, normalising the name slowly distancing any claim from Palestinians on the area. Very calculated