Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

The people that don't call those that support Hamas

237 replies

Trulywonderful · 24/10/2023 16:32

Such a nice guy with a good morals obviously. What more do you want from a barrister or law firm that hasn't spoken out on this

(Sarcasm)

The people that don't call those that support Hamas
OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
EsmaCannonball · 24/10/2023 23:27

Maireas · 24/10/2023 20:40

I love the added pronouns, he/him, because Hamas are fully respectful of pronoun choices 🙄. I swear some people think they're some kind of left wing liberation group....

Yes, I'm thinking of the Harvard students who shit a brick when they realised their radical pro-jihadi stance might get them blacklisted from Wall Street and hedge funds and didn't even have the courage of their awful beliefs. Then there's the people on kibbutzes who've managed to find a way of living collectively and truly community-mindedly but who apparently deserved a horrible death.

EsmaCannonball · 24/10/2023 23:21

Ah yes, Garden Court. It's good to put a face and name to the people who think it's worse to misgender rapists than to behead people slowly with gardening implements. I hope from now on his nickname becomes He/Him/Hamas.

NoWordForFluffy · 24/10/2023 21:03

No, I'd say most Chambers remain very neutral at all times. Or the ones I instruct do.

MiniCooperLover · 24/10/2023 20:51

That will not go down well with a lot of the chambers. They don't usually go for being so bold and out there

RudsyFarmer · 24/10/2023 20:42

It’s been interesting to see so many doctors and lawyers coming out in support of rape and torture.

Maireas · 24/10/2023 20:40

I love the added pronouns, he/him, because Hamas are fully respectful of pronoun choices 🙄. I swear some people think they're some kind of left wing liberation group....

NoWordForFluffy · 24/10/2023 20:12

Alcemeg · 24/10/2023 20:10

Sadly, it's probably good for business. I never would have imagined that, but judging from some of the MN threads...

Bloody hell. Definitely a Chambers to avoid if that's what they're thinking. And inference will be made if they don't comment.

Alcemeg · 24/10/2023 20:10

NoWordForFluffy · 24/10/2023 20:07

Though I'm not saying the two incidences are of equal severity.

Clearly failing to acknowledge this incident is inflammatory at best. What on earth are they hoping to achieve by ignoring it?

Sadly, it's probably good for business. I never would have imagined that, but judging from some of the MN threads...

NoWordForFluffy · 24/10/2023 20:07

Though I'm not saying the two incidences are of equal severity.

Clearly failing to acknowledge this incident is inflammatory at best. What on earth are they hoping to achieve by ignoring it?

SeulementUneFois · 24/10/2023 20:07

Wow! Thanks OP .... Sickening bloke

Alcemeg · 24/10/2023 17:47

blimey 🤦🏻‍♀️ there are some dangerous nutters around!!