Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

To think that water occupation is oppressive?

161 replies

Gardenowl · 19/10/2023 10:29

Till now I had read on most of the threads that Palestinians rely on water supply from Israel because they have not bothered to build their own water supply, desalination plants etc. But then one of the posters on another thread posted a link to an Amnesty article about water occupation and I was surprised reading it. Most of the article is about West Bank not Gaza.

Isn't this extremely oppressive? And to take water from your land to supply to the neighbouring country? They must feel so helpless.

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2017/11/the-occupation-of-water/

"In November 1967 the Israeli authorities issued Military Order 158, which stated that Palestinians could not construct any new water installation without first obtaining a permit from the Israeli army. Since then, the extraction of water from any new source or the development of any new water infrastructure would require permits from Israel, which are near impossible to obtain. Palestinians living under Israel’s military occupation continue to suffer the devastating consequences of this order until today. They are unable to drill new water wells, install pumps or deepen existing wells, in addition to being denied access to the Jordan River and fresh water springs. Israel even controls the collection of rain water throughout most of the West Bank, and rainwater harvesting cisterns owned by Palestinian communities are often destroyed by the Israeli army. As a result, some 180 Palestinian communities in rural areas in the occupied West Bank have no access to running water, according to OCHA."

"While restricting Palestinian access to water, Israel has effectively developed its own water infrastructure and water network in the West Bank for the use of its own citizens in Israel and in the settlements – that are illegal under international law. The Israeli state-owned water company Mekorot has systematically sunk wells and tapped springs in the occupied West Bank to supply its population, including those living in illegal settlements with water for domestic, agricultural and industrial purposes. While Mekorot sells some water to Palestinian water utilities, the amount is determined by the Israeli authorities. As a result of continuous restrictions, many Palestinian communities in the West Bank have no choice but to purchase water brought in by trucks at a much high prices ranging from 4 to 10 USD per cubic metre. In some of the poorest communities, water expenses can, at times, make up half of a family’s monthly income.
The Israeli authorities also restrict Palestinians’ access to water by denying or restricting their access to large parts of the West Bank. Many parts of the West Bank have been declared “closed military areas”, which Palestinians may not enter, because they are close to Israeli settlements, close to roads used by Israeli settlers, used for Israeli military training or protected nature reserves.
Israeli settlers living alongside Palestinians in the West Bank – in some cases just a few hundred meters away – face no such restrictions and water shortages, and can enjoy and capitalize on well-irrigated farmlands and swimming pools."

The Occupation of Water

The legacy of Israel’s 50-year occupation of the Palestinian territories has been systematic human rights violations on a mass scale. One of its consequences is the impact of Israel’s discriminatory policies on Palestinians’ access to clean and safe wa...

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2017/11/the-occupation-of-water

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Meshigenus · 21/10/2023 06:45

WhiteHorseSpirit · 20/10/2023 20:26

They can’t import anything. Everything flows through Israel. That is what a blockade is.

Interesting. So they managed to acquire all their weapons - the ak47s they used to massacre innocent civilians, the rpgs they used to blow up houses, the endless missiles they are firing at israel from thin air.
Ingenious.

Meshigenus · 21/10/2023 06:40

It has a border with Egypt. What's hard to understand about that? Why doesn't Egypt open the rafah crossing to whoever wants to leave?

I used to be against the blockade but can see now that it was needed. Imagine the weapons they would have if there wasn't one! They could have killed even more.
Actually prior to the massacre, because gaza had been quiet, Israel was increasing work permits, allowing exports through israeli ports. But the illusion that hamas has any desire to improve the wellbeing of gazans was well and truly burst 2 weeks ago

Parkingt111 · 21/10/2023 04:21

Meshigenus · 21/10/2023 02:41

But there is not one (non kidnapped) israeli in gaza. And gaza has a border with Egypt.
How, then, is it occupied?
Basically calling it occupied was to make sure israel kept supplying it with goods, water and electricity. Thats over. They'll need to look to Egypt.

It's occupied as Israel has placed a blockade by land air and sea
Surely you understand that?

Meshigenus · 21/10/2023 02:41

WhiteHorseSpirit · 20/10/2023 20:25

Makes complete sense. Iraq had a border with Iran, but the US occupied Iraq for years. Ukraine has a border with six countries other than Russia- but yes Russia is currently occupying great swathes of Ukraine.

Every occupied territory or country is going to have borders. You don’t have to be completely surrounded by the occupier to be occupied.

But there is not one (non kidnapped) israeli in gaza. And gaza has a border with Egypt.
How, then, is it occupied?
Basically calling it occupied was to make sure israel kept supplying it with goods, water and electricity. Thats over. They'll need to look to Egypt.

WhiteHorseSpirit · 20/10/2023 21:37

Parkingt111 · 20/10/2023 21:11

This post is eye opening, and extremely sad
Thank you for sharing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qibya_massacre
Ariel Sharon led the IDF troops that did this one in 1953.
69 villagers, two thirds women and children. In retaliation for the murder of a woman and child- unsolved but blamed on local Palestinians.
“Original documents of the time showed that Sharon personally ordered his troops to achieve "maximal killing and damage to property", and post-operational reports speak of breaking into houses and clearing them with grenades and shooting”

After the massacre was condemned, Sharon stated he “thought the houses were empty”

Ariel Sharon, Prime Minister of Israel from 2001-2006

Qibya massacre - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qibya_massacre

notsoready4school · 20/10/2023 21:17

I have read so many of these posts back and forths and it just feels like it is pointless debating with these types of posters. They are just bombarded by independent research and facts but the person just refuses to acknowledge it. You can’t convince them but I guess it helps the undecideds

Parkingt111 · 20/10/2023 21:11

WhiteHorseSpirit · 20/10/2023 20:00

Let’s not be shy about what you said
”What would you, as a human being being, parent, citizen etc have wanted if it was your neighbouring villages subjected to that attack? Like literally if the town down the road from you had had hundreds of people slaughtered in their beds and others kidnapped and raped and paraded naked through the streets,..”

Take your pick, there are 400 of them to start…have been many more since these first ones.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_towns_and_villages_depopulated_during_the_1947%E2%80%931949_Palestine_war

I’ve posted the start of a long table, note many of these villages were massacred.

This post is eye opening, and extremely sad
Thank you for sharing

WhiteHorseSpirit · 20/10/2023 20:26

Meshigenus · 20/10/2023 17:45

Interesting that they can import sophisticated weaponry but they can't import medicine.
I would suggest that Gazans question their government's priorities because it sure isn't their health and well being

They can’t import anything. Everything flows through Israel. That is what a blockade is.

WhiteHorseSpirit · 20/10/2023 20:25

Meshigenus · 20/10/2023 17:44

Gaza has a border with Egypt so how can it be occupied? Makes no sense.

Makes complete sense. Iraq had a border with Iran, but the US occupied Iraq for years. Ukraine has a border with six countries other than Russia- but yes Russia is currently occupying great swathes of Ukraine.

Every occupied territory or country is going to have borders. You don’t have to be completely surrounded by the occupier to be occupied.

WhiteHorseSpirit · 20/10/2023 20:18

nc14 · 20/10/2023 16:44

@swallowedAfly Hamas was elected the following year. Israel has already set its terms by then. Perhaps the disingenuous withdrawal is what made people vote for Hamas (I don’t know if that is the case but it would certainly make sense).

Exactly. Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, implementing a full blockade by land, air and sea. Controlling all movement of people, goods- including food, medical supplies, construction materials and fuel for all vehicles, the power plant, back up electric generators at hospitals and the desalination water plants and sewage system, also all agricultural supplies (seeds, fertiliser, tools), these were deliberately kept below subsistence levels so Gaza could never be self sufficient and Israel then controlled the top ups needed for life of water and electricity. Jobs were limited to a quota of 10,000 work permits for a population of over 2 million, leaving most of the population reliant on humanitarian aid to live- aid that had to go through Israel and the spending of which was supervised by Israel. Oh and they built a massive wall around the entire strip with a “buffer zone” that they can shoot to kill anyone who goes in it towards the wall.

Hamas came to power in 2007- two years later- and only in Gaza. They are not in the West Bank.

So the idea that Israel did all this because of Hamas is backwards. Israel created an oppressive “open air prison” which then caused some Palestinians trapped inside to be radicalised.

WhiteHorseSpirit · 20/10/2023 20:00

Meshigenus · 20/10/2023 16:37

In which Palestinian village have women been kidnapped, raped and paraded around the streets to be spat upon?
(Presumably you mean by Israelis, not the honour killing stuff)

Let’s not be shy about what you said
”What would you, as a human being being, parent, citizen etc have wanted if it was your neighbouring villages subjected to that attack? Like literally if the town down the road from you had had hundreds of people slaughtered in their beds and others kidnapped and raped and paraded naked through the streets,..”

Take your pick, there are 400 of them to start…have been many more since these first ones.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_towns_and_villages_depopulated_during_the_1947%E2%80%931949_Palestine_war

I’ve posted the start of a long table, note many of these villages were massacred.

To think that water occupation is oppressive?
To think that water occupation is oppressive?
WhiteHorseSpirit · 20/10/2023 19:54

Meshigenus · 20/10/2023 16:10

How do you recommend that is done exactly?

Repeal their Military Order from 1967 that gives them absolute control over all water in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

WhiteHorseSpirit · 20/10/2023 19:49

Meshigenus · 20/10/2023 17:45

Interesting that they can import sophisticated weaponry but they can't import medicine.
I would suggest that Gazans question their government's priorities because it sure isn't their health and well being

Hamas don’t have “sophisticated” weaponry!

“Homemade rockets. Modified AK-47s. Decades-old Soviet machine guns. Cheap, second-hand, and purloined weapons comprised Hamas’ deadly makeshift arsenal”
”CNN analyzed dozens of photos and videos of Hamas militants during the surprise assault to identify the weapons used to kill at least 1,200 people in Israel. Many of the weapons appeared to be altered Russian or Chinese firearms, presumedly left behind on the battlefield in decades past that eventually made their way into the hands of Hamas terrorists, experts say.”
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/10/13/middleeast/hamas-weapons-invs

nc14 · 20/10/2023 17:57

@Meshigenus You don’t understand how a country with a foreign border can be occupied?

In any event, the Egyptians have repeatedly said Israel is stopping humanitarian aid getting in through that border.

Meshigenus · 20/10/2023 17:45

WhiteHorseSpirit · 20/10/2023 17:34

All humanitarian aid and supplies of medicine go through Israel and if not approved by Israel do not reach the medical facilities in Gaza. Gazan doctors have long reported how they have to operate with reduced supplies and lower level of equipment than a usual hospital. In the West Bank, many women are denied access to hospital by being turned away at check points and ending up going into labour and losing infants by being forced to birth unassisted at home.

Interesting that they can import sophisticated weaponry but they can't import medicine.
I would suggest that Gazans question their government's priorities because it sure isn't their health and well being

Meshigenus · 20/10/2023 17:44

nc14 · 20/10/2023 16:40

@Meshigenus The UN and many NGOs still regard Gaza as occupied. Even though Israel renounced control in 2005, they have maintained control over its airspace, borders, electricity and water. Imagine if, say, France controlled all of the UK’s airspace, borders, electricity and water - is that freedom?

Gaza has a border with Egypt so how can it be occupied? Makes no sense.

WhiteHorseSpirit · 20/10/2023 17:34

Meshigenus · 20/10/2023 16:02

Gaza has its own ministry of health. Israel is not responsible for the infant mortality of gazan babies. They'll Gazan government have chosen to use aid money to plan and execute the most sophistication attack on Israel, knowing full well the retaliation that would follow. If gazans wish to be as rich and thriving as Israel and with similar infant mortality, then they need to stop trying to destroy Israel and focus on Building their.own society and (hopefully) state eventually.
Palestine is not rhe poorest country out there and no reason for any Palestinian child to suffer from malnutrition based on tbe resources available.

All humanitarian aid and supplies of medicine go through Israel and if not approved by Israel do not reach the medical facilities in Gaza. Gazan doctors have long reported how they have to operate with reduced supplies and lower level of equipment than a usual hospital. In the West Bank, many women are denied access to hospital by being turned away at check points and ending up going into labour and losing infants by being forced to birth unassisted at home.

WhiteHorseSpirit · 20/10/2023 17:30

Meshigenus · 20/10/2023 15:53

But it's exactly that. Gaza has had self rule for 17 years. Surely if you can build soohisticated tunnels, build missiles and get hold of advanced weaponry you would want to free yourself of reliance on your mortal sworn enemy.
There was zero reason gazans couldn't build desalination plants. They just preferred the cheap water from demon israel.

They did build desalination plants…then Israel limited and finally shut off their supply of fuel to run them. Israel also limited the number of plants they could build, the number of repairs they could do by controlling all building permits and construction supplies.

WhiteHorseSpirit · 20/10/2023 17:24

Meshigenus · 20/10/2023 16:32

@swallowedAfly
Exactly. They could have focused on building up Gaza after israel withdrew. Demonstrated what the future Palestinian state would look like. Well, they've demonstrated to Israelis what awaits them if they control the west bank too. Any dreams of a Palestinian state are even further away than they were before.

How? When Gaza was under a strict blockade by Israel the entire time? Israel did not withdraw so much as encircle Gaza with a land, sea and air blockade and then controlled and controls all water, electricity, food, goods, medicine, and the movement of people to/from Gaza.

FOJN · 20/10/2023 17:22

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2023 17:14

A very good point. But I guess what we're seeing on both sides of this is that 'out of your mind' state leads you to elect governments who don't have that kind of balanced big picture approach.

The difference here is that Israel is a democratically elected government, Hamas are terrorists. I expect better from a democratically elected government.

At the moment the Netanyahu administration is committing genocide and playing Russian roulette with Israeli safety. He is not fit to hold office.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2023 17:20

Israelis have been arrested for criticising their government too. As have Russians and however other many countries around the world.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2023 17:16

Gardenowl · 20/10/2023 17:09

No one on this post is excusing the hideousness of it.

Why we are confused is that all the people (including you) are now standing up and condemning these events and Hamas and rightly so but neither are you condemning Israel for what it did before nor what is it doing after. Casualties of Palestinian people are at least 20 times more than Israeli casualties in the last 15 years of this conflict.

We have to be very careful for saying that these atrocities by Hamas give justification to Israel for slaughtering people in Palestine. Because then by extension the atrocities and oppression done by Israel gives Hamas the justification for slaughtering people in Israel and neither is correct.

Casualties of Palestinian people are at least 20 times more than Israeli casualties in the last 15 years of this conflict. Does it justify Hamas killing Israeli civilians? No, it does not. In the same way Israel is not justified in bombing Palestianians.

But international community specially western nations never ever condemn Israel. That is inherently unfair and the reason that people are finally questioning the injustice.

Maybe you are just now 'finally' questioning this but it is nothing new for very many of us who have been campaigning about this for decades. Recent events though have forced me to afford a bit more complexity and nuance to the situation and to question what I would want were I on the Israeli side of the border.

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2023 17:14

FOJN · 20/10/2023 17:04

I'd be put of my mind with grief and baying for blood but I am not leading a government.

As an ordinary citizen I am not responsible for making decisions which may prevent or lead to a wider conflict which could kill many more citizens.

If I was leading a government I hope I would take advice from suitably qualified people so that I could avoid breaking multiple international laws, committing crimes against humanity and provoking my hostile neighbours.

A very good point. But I guess what we're seeing on both sides of this is that 'out of your mind' state leads you to elect governments who don't have that kind of balanced big picture approach.

Gardenowl · 20/10/2023 17:09

swallowedAfly · 20/10/2023 16:53

Why do you want to excuse the hideousness of what was done?

No one on this post is excusing the hideousness of it.

Why we are confused is that all the people (including you) are now standing up and condemning these events and Hamas and rightly so but neither are you condemning Israel for what it did before nor what is it doing after. Casualties of Palestinian people are at least 20 times more than Israeli casualties in the last 15 years of this conflict.

We have to be very careful for saying that these atrocities by Hamas give justification to Israel for slaughtering people in Palestine. Because then by extension the atrocities and oppression done by Israel gives Hamas the justification for slaughtering people in Israel and neither is correct.

Casualties of Palestinian people are at least 20 times more than Israeli casualties in the last 15 years of this conflict. Does it justify Hamas killing Israeli civilians? No, it does not. In the same way Israel is not justified in bombing Palestianians.

But international community specially western nations never ever condemn Israel. That is inherently unfair and the reason that people are finally questioning the injustice.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread