Please or to access all these features

Paid childcare

Discuss everything related to paid childcare here, including childminders, nannies, nurseries and au pairs.

Nannyshare or nanny with own child?

38 replies

Maria2007loveshersleep · 20/11/2009 20:42

Hello again wise MNetters

As some of you may know (I've already posted about what's been happening here & here) our nanny left unexpectedly so we're now frantically looking for a new part-time nanny (3 days a week).

I've done my calculations & it seems either a nannyshare (hopefully with someone close by) or a nanny with her own child is the way to go. For the part-time position we've advertised we've received many responses for very experienced nannies with their own child (who they want to bring along to work). They've all said they're happy to work for 8£ net per hour, and we're talking about nannies with fantastic CVs.

I wanted your opinions about the pluses & minuses of nannyshare versus nanny with own child.

About nannyshare:
How important do you think is distance between where the 2 families live?

About nanny with her own child:

One question in particular that I have, which is VERY politically incorrect & which I wouldn't even think of asking a potential nanny, is- what if a nanny with her own child (the candidates who've applied mostly have babies) have another baby sometime soon? Would I then have to pay maternity leave? And how much would that be? And what would be the logistics of having a nanny (if she were to come back to work) with 2 young children, along with mine?

About both options:
Do you think these 2 options have the potential to be long-term solutions? Or are they doomed to be temporary arrangements?

Anything that comes to your minds, I'm all ears...

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Maria2007loveshersleep · 30/11/2009 15:20

OK I thought I'd update everyone about what's been happening in our search. It seems we have 2 good possibilities at the moment. Not sure if any of the 2 will work out but hopefully one of the 2 will! Let me know which one you feel sounds better (I'd love your thoughts).

  1. Nanny with her own child. The nanny is the loveliest ever, she has loads of experience (more than 12 years), lots of qualifications, and just the best temperament / character. She & I clicked from the beginning & I feel we're on the same wavelength. We've already met twice, once alone & once with my DS & hers. She has the same misgivings as I do. Her own DS is 6 months, mine is 16 months. She worries whether she's ready to go back to work, worries also about whether she'll end up being too focused on my DS & will overcompensate in an effort not to favour her DS. We agreed we'd do a trial period if we were to work together.

  2. Nannyshare. We found a family in our area, literally down the street from us. They have a 13 month DD (as I said, our son is 16 months). They possibly want a nannyshare for 3 full days a week. 2 of our days will overlap, and the other 2 days will be sole charge with each child. THe nannyshare will be based at my home. The family seems lovely on the phone, we're meeting this week to discuss the details. Only problem is, their first option is still a CM & they'll let us know beginning of january...

Anyway. Hope that soon I'll know what's happening, it seems the whole thing is dragging on a bit.

OP posts:
claire74 · 25/11/2009 14:28

Maria, I think I can help you , I have messaged you on the other thread that you have. Please contact me on [email protected] and we can have a chat.

Maria2007loveshersleep · 23/11/2009 20:29

Apart from the legal problems, I just think it's a mad idea. We're talking about 3 children under 18 months. I'm not even going to go there.

OP posts:
frakkinaround · 23/11/2009 19:45

You may run into problems with OFSTED with that arrangement, and also any insurers, because the nanny would technically be caring for children from 3 families, albeit one of her own, which OFSTED see as childminding even though it isn't in her home IYSWIM.

Maria2007loveshersleep · 23/11/2009 17:19

Lemitta, sorry to hear it didn't work for you. Its all giving me food for thought though. I think the illness issue seems to be the biggest challenge in the nanny-with-own-child arrangement. However, yesterday I met a really lovely nanny with her own child who was completely aware of this problem & committed to find ways around it. So I'm hoping that it might be something that doesn't work in some cases, but may work in others.

Having said that, I'm still torn between the possibility of nannyshare versus nanny with own child. At the moment there are 2 real possibilities of either one or the other, both look promising, so it'll come down to what works on most levels.

We've even had an offer to take on a nanny with her own child PLUS to do a nannyshare with another family who lives a minute's walk away, so the nanny would have 3 children under 2 (including her own) . I think this arrangement sounds a bit mad tbh on many levels but for some strange reason the other mum seemed to love the idea .

I'm trying to look at all this objectively & to think it through but it all seems so confusing!

OP posts:
Lemitta123 · 22/11/2009 19:02

Hi,

A few months ago we took on a nanny with her own baby and, unfortunately, it didn't work out. Although we employed her for a few months, eventually her child (who was 1 when she left) proved too much with my 2 (DS1 DD2.5). The main issues of contention were illness (if mine were ill, she didn't want to come in, and if her's was ill, she wouldn't leave him with anyone else). Also it proved very hard to look after my 2 as her little one was starting to walk and crawl which took up alot of her time and attention. Having said all that, the nanny was brilliant and we mutually agreed that the situation wasn't going to improve...

For the foreseeable future, I won't employ a nanny with her own child.

HTH and good luck!

Millarkie · 22/11/2009 18:00

Maria - I don't think the same problems would arise if nanny didn't have her own child as the mixture of the job with looking after her own child was the main thing which instigated the problems ie. she wouldn't have to drive home to pick up her own child or have any excuse for her boyfriend to come to our house if she hadn't had a child to begin with.
But she was a problematic nanny in many other ways as well.
I think that a very clear discussion of expectations before she started working for us would've helped but I had no idea that she would find it reasonable to behave the way that she did (she was qualified with 10 years childcare experience).

Maria2007loveshersleep · 22/11/2009 17:18

Millarkie- your experience doesn't sound great Having said that, those kinds of things could happen with nannies with or without their own child. It's never a given how things will turn out in an employer-nanny relationship.

Ebb- your experience sounds great! Especially the last bit, wanting to keep the friendship between the children going (which would be one of my main concerns).

OP posts:
Ebb · 22/11/2009 12:06

I take my Ds, 18mths, to work. Originally I did 4 short days but have now changed to 3 long days ( 8-6 ) as my boss wanted to spend more time at home with her Dc. I actually prefer the 3 long days as we can get more done instead of rushing back for 3pm for Mum boss to be home. My Ds fits in with whatever suits the family and he's pretty laid back with it. Occassionally my mum boss is late but she's a GP so emergancies come up. It doesn't worry me in the slightest as I find give and take is essential in any nanny job. She's always so desparately apologetic but it really doesn't bother me. If she's major late then I just bath my Ds with her Dc and he's all ready for bed when we go home. I have had employers who have gone to the Mall at 2pm and spent the afternoon shopping and rung up at 5 to 7 to say they are stuck in traffic. That used to irritate me especialy as they were sahm's and could have gone earlier!

I think it is important that you and any nanny have the same views on routine, discipline and feeding etc whether they have a child or not.

With regards to illness etc, I look after their Dc when they're ill and I bring my Ds to work if he's poorly as long as he's not contagious. I'm talking coughs and colds rather than D&V! I figure that if the children are in close contact that they will get things together anyway. If my Ds was ill, my DP would take time off as he can work from home.

It takes a couple of weeks to settle into a routine that works for both nanny and charges and nannies child. They all have to adapt but an experienced nanny would deal with it professionally. Most nannies I know tend to put their own childrens needs second. I did to start but my boss was very insistant that I treated them both equally. My Ds adores their Dc and her name is normally the first thing he says when I get him up in the mornings. The job is ending soon but they live close enough that we will meet up weekly to keep the childrens friendship going.

Good luck with your nanny search.

Blondeshavemorefun · 22/11/2009 11:50

hi maria

i think a nanny with own child is easier than a nannyshare but if you do go down this route then find a family thats near by and if that family did stop/not want the share anymore then you will have to find another family to help with costs

anyone (female-sorry nick) under 45/50 could have a baby that you employ - worry about it when it happens and yes if has a baby then hopefully the nanny wont think about no 2 for a few years, and if she did get pregant then you dont have to offer job back with nanny coming back with 2

Millarkie · 22/11/2009 10:28

Maria - I think it's likely that 4 short days would appeal as one of the issues with our ex-nanny with child was that she wanted to leave early constantly (ie. before the end of her contracted hours - I am not the type to ask for overtime).
Other issues were that she didn't like to wake baby in the morning to bring him to work so she would leave him at home with her partner, come to work, take ds to school then drive dd the 30 mins back to her house to pick up her baby then drive dd back to our house so our dd spent 1 hour in the car unecessarily. Also we had reports that her partner was coming into our house during her working hours (ds mentioned that he was coming in and sleeping on the sofa!) which was to do with picking up the baby to take him places - it turned out that her partner had a criminal record so was definitely not the kind of person I wanted hanging round my house or children!
Also nanny's idea of what she wanted to feed her ds didn't match our ideas of healthy eating so our children were exposed(well, fed) to foods which we didn't want available (e.g. daily sweets, sausage rolls, chicken satay - our children are Vegetarian!).
Nanny took 2 seperate days off 'sick' because she had been up in the night with the baby and so she was 'tired'.
Nanny's baby once he was a toddler broke quite a lot of our things which nanny gave him to play with e.g. cordless phones, remote controls) which we then had to replace (this is in a baby-proof house with a playroom full of toys for all ages, no need to give him the phone to play with!).
As the employment went on it became more and more that looking after our children was something she did around her child's 'needs' i.e. during school holidays she would take them off to her house and meet up with her friends who wanted to see her baby and my children were left watching cartoons in her mum's house.
To me, one of the benefits of having a nanny rather than any other form of childcare is that you get more input into what the children do (play in their own home/local area), eat (vegetarian food) and are exposed to...this was not the case with this particular nanny.

As for nanny-sharing - biggest issues we had were to do with booking holiday so that both families and nanny knew who was on holiday when! This gets more complicated if both families don't need nanny for 5 days i.e. if one uses Mon-Thur and the other Tue-Fri and nanny likes to take Fridays off then one family is bearing the brunt of nanny's holiday. Otherwise as long as issues like discipline, food, attitudes towards breakages in each others homes, and sick children are sorted out before-hand then it can work really well.

Maria2007loveshersleep · 22/11/2009 09:35

I'm thinking that another positive with a nanny who has her own child is that she might agree to be slightly more flexible about hours. We want more or less 27-28 hours per week, and this could either be over 3 days (long hours) or over 4 days (shorter hours). I prefer the second option as that could give me time in the afternoons with DS... but I've advertised for 3 full days just because I know most nannies prefer that. However, now that I think of it, perhaps a nanny with her own child may see it as an advantage if the hours are shorter, over 4 days: that way she can get home earlier with her baby...

Do you think I'm right in thinking this?

OP posts:
fridayschild · 22/11/2009 09:01

When I was last looking, I had DS1 5 and DS2 3. I was quite happy with a younger child. DS1 loves babies and I thought it would do DS2 good to learn that smaller people sometimes has to come first - he has a very happy spot as the baby of our household. And as others have said, if it's similar to the usual sibling gaps of 2 - 3 years there's no reason why it shouldn't work with the ups and downs and compromises of any sibling relationship.

nbee84 · 21/11/2009 12:26

But then some older children may enjoy having a baby around - and nanny gets one on one time with the baby while the children are at school. School holidays and activities become a little more difficult though.

nbee84 · 21/11/2009 12:24

I think same age or a gap of less than 3 years is very workable - a 5 year old and a small baby will tie down the older one.

As to how the nanny treats each child - when you have your own child at work with you, you are very careful not to favour one over the other. To some extent your own childs needs come 2nd as you are at work and being paid to look after the other child. If you get a nanny with experience she is more likely to know how to handle this well.

naughtymummy · 21/11/2009 11:44

I think the age gap you describe sounds very workable. The activities eg:playgroups etc are likely to be similar. The 7 month will soon be mobile. Both children will sleep in the day giving each child some one on one time. When I went back to work Ds was about 10 months, his CM had a baby of 14 months, it worked brilliantly. I think a big deciding factor was the element of DS having a little freind, as he had one on one with me on the other days. Good luck. I you like the candidate you can always have a trial period, if it do'esnt work I think that will become apparent quite quickly.

argento · 21/11/2009 11:22

In terms of treating their own child differently, that of course depends on the nanny. I know friends of mine who bring their own child to work have been so keen to absolutely not favour their own child that actually it tips the other way and their charge's needs are always put first!

As for age differences, I guess their are pros and cons for all kinds of combinations. I have one friend whose own child and charge were exactly the same age, which worked well as they were at the same stage with food, baby-proofing the house, doing the same activities - but they did need double the amount of equipment. Another friend had a baby a couple of years younger than her youngest charge, so it was more like just having a younger sibling who slotted into the older children's routines.

Maria2007loveshersleep · 21/11/2009 09:19

Fridayschild- thanks that's all very helpful.

About the babysitting, no, we wouldn't need it, we have a couple of local babysitters who are lovely, plus our previous nanny who's keen to do babysitting for us regularly in order to keep in touch with DS So it wouldn't be an issue for me.

For of an issue would be the possibility for some flexibility regarding hours / days & perhaps a few more hours if needed in the future. Hopefully though that can be negotiated with the nanny beforehand & put in the contract.

It does seem, from what everyone's saying, that a nanny with her own child may, paradoxically, create a bit more continuity just because she might be keen to have that continuity! So I'm more & more open to that possibility...

A couple more questions. For nannies with their own child. Do you think there might be an issue with the age difference of the children? Most of the nannies who've applied seem to have young babies (6 months or so). My own DS is 16 months, walking & running confidently. Do you think that's an acceptable age difference & the nanny will be ok to manage it? Also, do you feel there's an issue with the dynamics between the children? I.e. the nanny is one child's mum- would my DS potentially feel jealous? Would the nanny differentiate between the children? (I don't think so at all if it's the right person). I suppose again all this needs to be discussed beforehand (maybe at a ssecond interview).

OP posts:
fridayschild · 21/11/2009 07:42

I think nanny shares do tend to be limited in time - people have more children, or move (especially in London). But if you've never had a nanny before, and you're not used to being an employer, it's great to have someone to compare notes with and agonise over!

As others have said, children who share a nanny do form incredibly close bonds which last for years. There's a lot to be gained for the children. DS1 shared a nanny for a year when I first went back to work and 6 years later he and his little pal are still like best friends, even though they only see each other once or twice a year.

One of the reasons I have a nanny is to get babysitting when DH and I are both working late, which for us is about once a week. More organised couples get one night babysitting in their nanny contract so they can go out together (even if it's just once a month!) but we cannot get ourselves together for this . If that's important you would need to discuss it at interview with the nanny and see what her approach is. I have a colleague whose nanny brings her child who has no issue with babysitting; when I last looked for a nanny some candidates weren't happy with babysitting once a week. That was candidates with and without a child.

I've had 2 nannies go on maternity leave now and TBH I think it's a great way to part company with a nanny. You get plenty of notice, the DCs can get used to it and obviously it's a very happy time for her and (vicariously) for her employing family. You need to cover her antenatal appointments, and if nanny has a difficult pregnancy that is a real pest unless you have good support networks. If your nanny is PG, you need to keep some of your holiday in reserve. And in terms of coming back afterwards, I think all the economic power is with the employer. On nanny pay, you cannot afford childcare sufficient to allow you do to a nanny job, so if the employer is not prepared to allow nanny back with a child or another child, you can be pretty sure she will not come back. I didn't want one nanny back with her DC, for a range of reasons. I would have been delighted to have the other nanny back with her DC but she chose to move 250 miles back home to be near her family. In that case I would have offered a temp role to the maternity cover.

nbee84 · 20/11/2009 22:53

Also, if you have a nanny who then goes on to have her own child (rather than one who already has one) you have to deal with maternity leave - she could take up to a year off - and employing a temp to cover her whilst she is off.

nbee84 · 20/11/2009 22:49

I started my job with one dd already, so the job didn't really change like it would if you hired a nanny who subsequently had a child, I should imagine that although you may love and trust your nanny and want to have her back it would mean having to adjust to the changes of having an extra little one around. Working as a nanny with 2 children of your own would present more problems and I don't know any nannies that do/have done.

My boss took a career break after having her 2nd child and I became a childminder. I did this until my youngest was 14 and old enough to get himself home from school and not need me around for a couple of hours. I've been nannying again for a couple of years and just work a 3 day week. I love it

Maria2007loveshersleep · 20/11/2009 22:34

Nbee. Sorry if I wasn't clear

I meant- do you think it could have worked equally well if you had started your job with the family when you already had your baby? It seems (from other threads here on MN) that that's mentioned quite a lot as an issue. I.e. that yes, hiring a nanny with her own child can work out brilliantly, provided you know the nanny already & trust her.

I think the problem you mention about not being able to go swimming (for example) with 2 little ones is not really a problem because in a way it would be the same problem if I had a second child or if we had a nannyshare (all possible scenarios). I'm not particularly looking for a one-nanny / one-child scenario so I'm prepared to have restriction in activities for the benefit of the company! I think my DS having a playmate would be lovely.

OP posts:
nbee84 · 20/11/2009 22:25

Sorry Maria, don't quite understand your question???

Just to tell you my story;

A lot of employers on her don't like the concept of a nanny with their own child - and I do understand the potential complications it can bring. However, for me and my employer it worked really well. My dd was 2 and my employers dd was 7 months old at the start of the job. They got on really well and were like sisters - they are still in contact now and they are 19 and 21 years old! My daughter was very healthy and I never needed to take time off because she was ill (though hubby would sometimes have been able to have her so that I could have worked). I was happy to go to work if my charge was ill as I figured the girls had probably passed any germs between themselves already. I didn't need things like double buggies and extra high chairs as my dd was old enough not to need them. At 2 she rarely slept during the day, but if she did I was happy to pop her on the sofa - so no need for a travel cot. I cost my boss about 25% less than the going rate for nannies in the area. She had someone who was committed to their job as I wanted continuity for my own dd - like she did hers.

Possible difficulties were; not being able to go swimming with 2 small ones. Working late would have been difficult (though my bosses were in jobs where it was never needed) as it would have been past my dd's bedtime.

Happy to answer any question you have

Maria2007loveshersleep · 20/11/2009 22:23

Millarkie, can I ask, why was nanny with her own child more of a hassle day to day? What were the main issues (problems) do you think?

OP posts:
nannynick · 20/11/2009 22:20

Maria79 - start a new message thread (click here and then put in a descriptive message title) it is more likely to get responses. If you can include your location as wages do vary around the country... London (inside M25) for example is often a lot higher than outside of the M25. There has been chat on here in the past about nannies with their own child taking a pay cut of 20% maybe more... but also many comments from nannies in particular saying that they didn't take a pay cut to get work.

Swipe left for the next trending thread