Please or to access all these features

Paid childcare

Discuss everything related to paid childcare here, including childminders, nannies, nurseries and au pairs.

Our nanny has suggested we only declare 50% of her hours for tax purposes WWYD?

57 replies

artichokes · 14/07/2009 09:38

Me again.

We have just chosen a new sole charge nanny for our daughters. This will be the first time we have been sole employers of a nanny (previously we have been teh second family in a share).

We have yet to agree a contract with the nanny who starts in a few weeks. She will be working a 41 hour week for a net payment of £10 an hour. She has suggested we might only declare 20 hours a week for tax and NI purposes. This would save us approx £70 a week. The reason she came-up with this idea is she wanted to take the girls to various local music and dance classes which are expensive. I said I was not sure we would be able to afford these classes and she suggested the tax solution. In her opinion it would not harm her as long as some tax is being paid in her name.

What do people think of this suggestion? Obivouly we are tempted as the girls would love to attend the classes.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Oligo · 15/07/2009 14:52

I've been in situations where i've found a really nice family but they just can't afford me or are surprised about expense of nannies etc. and i've wanted to offer them less cos didn't want them to resent having nanny cos of cost but not willing myself to take a cut in salary. Silly and wrong i know and in the past.

I've also had friend (really- not me!) who had to fill in tax declaration form form and IR got a HUGE amount back.

When you actually get that form specifically checking salary and sit down with it and have to fill in details and sign to say its accurate, not misleading, false etc. and hope your nanny lies the same and is comfortable enough to do so too at the time, you might wish you'd played by the rules.

depends where you are in london but 8net seems to be absolute minimum and 12 net is totally poss. ime.

Laquitar · 15/07/2009 14:07

It is usually employers who suggest this. It doesn't benefit the nanny so why should she? Hmm .

AtheneNoctua · 15/07/2009 14:05

Or, she wants to go to the music classes so she can have a break and have a place to meet up with people.

I guess the advantage for the nanny is that she does get to split the difference in the initial job offer. So, the employer says I have x to spend on you. I can give it to IR or I can give it to you. So if nanny signs up to tax evasion she gets a bit more money (but less proof of income). But, squiffy makes a good point. Why would the nanny suggest this after she has already negotiated her salary.

I would find a nanny to work for less than £10nett (and I'm sure I could) and then have a bit of money left over for dance. I can't see paying the nanny so much that my kids activities/education/development/social life suffers for it. Although we are rather committed to the whole dance thing in my house -- much to my DD's disgust.

limonchik · 15/07/2009 13:35

Or, she just wanted to help the OP out in saving some money?

OnceWasSquiffy · 15/07/2009 13:25

TBH if a new nanny suggested this to me I would be wondering if I had hired the right person.

I cannot think of any reason in it for her to suggest this, other than to ensure that - should your relationship turn sour - she has a potential hold over you. Either that, or in 6 months time she will turn round and demand you 'split the difference' of what you save.

I am sure plenty of people do it, but for the nanny herself to suggest it just smells V fishy to me. And if she is willing to be dishonest with the revenue, who else is she going to be dishonest with? You?

Cadelaide · 14/07/2009 23:16

I would never, ever evade tax.

It's just not worth it, you'd have to pay what you owe and then some, and I'd simply die of humiliation.

1dilemma · 14/07/2009 23:10

Agree wouldn't pay £10/hr net, have found agancies overinflate salaries and (funnily enough) don't use the differential I would for qualies/experience.

I also agree it would be a trust issue for me too, I 'need' to do everything above board (hence I have no nanny )

hf128219 · 14/07/2009 22:50

I think some of you would be very surprised what HMRC can find out through very simple checks.

Quattrocento · 14/07/2009 22:46

Sack the nanny

If she's dishonest, she's dishonest ...

BoffinMum · 14/07/2009 22:40

Not worth doing. There are two things you can never avoid: death and taxes.

Also in the modern workplace, there is a big difference between demanding a particular hourly rate for p/t or temp work, say £10 an hour, and the weekly rate for a permanent job, say £300 a week.

An example of this: if my current employer contracts me out to the private sector, they can currently get up to £1000 a day for my services. This does not mean I earn £365,000!!! (I wish!!!!!)

Feelingoptimistic · 14/07/2009 21:34

I am also in London and have a nanny and I have to say £10 per hour net is actually VERY high, particularly in the current economic climate. Figures quoted by nanny agencies are not at all an accurate reflection of the market.

frAKKINPannikin · 14/07/2009 20:37

It does harm your nanny because she misses out on NI contributions. Although that's more of an issue if she's on the cusp of employer paying NI/not paying NI....

atworknotworking · 14/07/2009 19:12

Wouldn't do it it's illegal also wouldn't employ someone who suggested it either, it would be a trust issue for me.

And as a CM EVERYTHING i earn is declared I don't take cash at all it goes into bank by STO, and have refused mindees when parents ask me to diddle figures.

Blondeshavemorefun · 14/07/2009 18:11

the way i see it is why should my salary not be paid in full

it is still my money and salary that i have earned - just that the family pay it on my behalf iyswim

artichokes · 14/07/2009 17:35

To be fair I have not considered any 18 year old nannies so I should not have said ALL local nannies ask for the same salary. However, I guarantee that in my area of London you cannot find a nanny of any age, with good references and previous experience, who will consider less than £10. They just won't.

Anyway, the fact is I have found a great nanny and had always assumed I would declare all her salary to HMRC.

I have found this thread fascinating. Clearly it is very common to under-declare but there are very legitimate objections to under-declaring not to mention risks associated with it. Much food for thought.

OP posts:
Blondeshavemorefun · 14/07/2009 17:21

Lowering the salary is not an option around here. All the nannies around here expect and require £10 net, all the agencies state £10 net is the norm (none of them seem to mention gross). We are lucky she is just asking for £10 net, several I interviewed expected that plus evening use of our car and gym membership!

I do find it odd that a nanny with one year's experience expects the same pay as someone with 20 year's experience.

OMG@above!!!

an 18yr may WANT?LIKE £10nett but surely no one would pay that would they - if they could get a nanny with 10yrs+ exp for that

£10nett is the higher end of the salary scale and if you cant afford it then tell agencys that your job offer is £8nett

so in answer to your Op - NO!!!! dont do it

hatwoman · 14/07/2009 17:07

athene - I completely misread your post . I thought you were making a completely different point to the entirely correct one you did make...I thought you were saying that it's the employer, not the nanny, who's doing the evading. sorry! just ignore me...

hatwoman · 14/07/2009 17:04

athene - you're right, in that it is the employer's responsibility to deduct tax from gross earnings and pay it straight to HMRC. but the tax in question is the nanny's income tax. so it's her that's not paying tax, iyswim (even if she hasn't committed an offence). just like the rest of us - our employer takes the tax off our wages - because they have to by law. but it's still our tax.

I know I said tax evasion, but I'm not sure in fact whether tax evasion, properly defined, comes into it. I wouldn;t be suprised if the offence in question - of not paying your employee's tax - has got another name.

FabBakerGirlIsBack · 14/07/2009 16:58

I also had that problem when I tried to get a mortgage as I was being paid some cash as the employers didn't want to pay tax on the same money twice. They came up trumps though and wrote a letter detailing my new responsibilities and therefore the increase in salary. Mortgage duly approved.

eeyore12 · 14/07/2009 15:18

I have a nanny friend who did this with her last job, one of the reasons she left was because she wanted to get a mortage and couldn't on what she had proof of earning, her boss used nannytax to pay her (wage slips etc) and as far as they knew and her contract stated she was on min wage, the difference in that and what she actually took home was paid cash in hand.

SillyMillysMummy · 14/07/2009 15:12

I must be missing a trick. I report everything

AtheneNoctua · 14/07/2009 14:48

Incidentally, I don't think nanny employers are the only one practicing tax evasion. These ways can be applied to lots of types of employment. For example, the gardener who comes and does the job for less if you pay him in cash, or high cash business like a restaurant or a car park who doesn't report quite all of the revenue. I'm sure it happens all the time. Oh, let's not forget childminders who don't really report everything they take in.

Of course this stuff happens all the time.

EldonAve · 14/07/2009 14:43

I think it's quite common practice in London

Just because all the nannies are looking for £10/net doesn't mean you have to pay it
Make sure your contract gives the gross salary though

Maria2007 · 14/07/2009 14:35

I'm sorry, that's ludicrous- the idea that you're withdrawing X amount every week & that can be proven to be going to your nanny- I too (like Chandellina & like everyone else) withdraw some money every week to spend on various things eg supermarket etc. Its never a standard amount. Even if it were to include cash to be given to a nanny etc, it might be part of a larger amount every week. I think that there is no way something can be traced back through that.

Personally I think all this is beside the point though. The way I think about it is- if someone wants to practice this kind of thing, they will without leaving any paper trail, its surely not that hard to do for relatively small amounts & many people do it & we all know that. I think the important thing is that it's unethical to engage in tax dodging and for me that's the most important reason to not do it (which is why I don't).

hatwoman · 14/07/2009 14:29

aside from whether or not you can get away with it/how likely it is you'll get caught, it's tax evasion and it's illegal. nanny has to pay her taxes just like the rest of us do.