Please or to access all these features

Paid childcare

Discuss everything related to paid childcare here, including childminders, nannies, nurseries and au pairs.

Help me decide what sort of childcare to go for in September .... longish post

86 replies

VirginBoffinMum · 13/12/2008 10:42

I'm having dc4 in April, and by then my other kids will be dd 21 (i.e. not needing childcare any more and away at uni), ds 11 and ds 8. I work full time about 1 hour 20 minutes away from where I live. I try to work from home every Friday, so I am out the house from 8-6.30 or so from Monday to Thursday. I've also got a minor disability that affects my mobility at the moment so I get quite tired, plus obviously I'll have a five month old probably waking me up in the night as well. DH works even longer hours than me, and part-time working won't be an option for either of us for a while.

Currently I have an au pair to do the school run and various bits and pieces to help me. However I am trying to decide what to do about childcare come September when I go back to work after maternity leave, and if anyone has advice or help I would be very interested to hear it.

There is a really good nursery at work but it costs £180 a week (probably less a bit more because you can do salary sacrifice), plus I wonder if the drive would be too much for the baby. It would be nice to have the baby near me though. I would probably still need an au pair on top of this for the older boys (£80 a week plus board and associated au pair management hassle).

Another option would be a nanny for all three, but I reckon this would probably cost me about £350 a week gross. Realistically this is a little bit beyond our means, but may keep me more sane. However I am a bit worried because I have heard a nanny wouldn't give domestic help and we would need someone to be doing washing and ironing and a few errands as well (I have a cleaner once a week for the main cleaning jobs). I am also a bit worried about whether a nanny would be hard to manage and fussy. I have been wondering about trying to get a Norland trainee to avoid this, but I am not sure if this means they will be any better. That would be £158 gross a week plus an one-off agency fee of £2000.

We don't have any childminders in our area and the local after school club closes at 6 and isn't brilliant, plus they usually ration it so you only end up with 2 or 3 days a week, but only find out which days at the last minute, i.e. days before term starts, which is why we stopped trying to use it.

As I say, any thoughts or advice on all this would be very helpful indeed.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
VirginBoffinMum · 16/12/2008 20:03

True indeed tankie but by the time she has realised I am letting her slope off at 10am every Friday instead of 12, and bunging her extra leave days here and there out of the blue, I think she will feel it's not too bad a deal.

OP posts:
tankie · 16/12/2008 19:31

Babysitting is normal for live in, but I think you should recognise that it is work time for the nanny, she may not have wanted to stay in especially as she could go away for the weekend otherwise - and you just can't relax on babysitting nights the same way you would if truly off (no big glasses of wine for one thing!)

Blondeshavemorefun · 16/12/2008 17:44

live in nanny gen do bs 1/2 nights as part of their weekly salary - quite normal

VirginBoffinMum · 16/12/2008 17:42

£20,627 Starting salary for a qualified teacher
£24,908 National average wage

OP posts:
mummydoc · 16/12/2008 17:41

sorry didn't realise it was a live in position, hadn't read whole thread , oops, but still disagree about babysitting it is part of a working week because she may have chosen to go out that night , i don't think you can say it is ok as she would bein the house anyway - she might not iyswim

VirginBoffinMum · 16/12/2008 17:37

Um, beg to differ there, it's live in and has six weeks' leave instead of 4.8 weeks, so it's well above the minimum wage. She'd be in the house anyway during the babysitting, as she would live here with us, and the kids would be asleep, so it's not the most challenging task in the world.

As a guideline, rent in our area for a shared house would be £400-£600 a month (probably with a smaller room in a less nice house for that actually - that's what my daughter was spending for a crappy student house last year around here), and food is probably £25 week minimum, so if you do the arithmetic properly, she would be on the equivalent of about £23,000-£25,000 gross before tax, which is more than a teacher with a degree and PGCE would start on, for very similar hours of 'directed time' as they call it.

Per hour it works out at the equivalent of £10.41. Bear in mind there is no commuting time or related costs here as well.

I'm not saying you are being thick, but I think you're confusing gross and net income and also the real life benefit in kind of board and keep and so on. It's actually one reason why I think nannies should start being encouraged to negotiate gross salaries rather than net ones as if it was the 1920s, because I think they look at other people's salaries and think they're very hard done by, whereas it's actually not badly paid when you add it all up.

OP posts:
Blondeshavemorefun · 16/12/2008 17:31

unfort live in's dont include min wage, as guess the perks of not paying rent/food outweight the salary iykwim

mummydoc · 16/12/2008 16:51

err am i being really thick here but you are asking a nanny to work 4 12 hr days plus babysitting and paying less than th eminimum wage - i am sure you are alovely boss but that doesn't seem right to me, 12 hr days would be bloody hard work plus the babysitting ... i htink you need ot offer more money

Anna8888 · 16/12/2008 16:04

I haven't read the thread, just the OP, but I would say that if you can afford it, get a nanny - it will be so much nicer for your little baby to be safely at home with a nanny with his/her brothers coming and going from school.

Can you be very upfront when recruiting your nanny about exactly what household chores and errands you will be expecting? Can you redefine your cleaner's job spec such that the nanny does everything child-related (ie all the children's laundry, ironing, bedroom and bathroom cleaning, meal prepping etc) and the cleaner does adult related laundry and general cleaning)?

VirginBoffinMum · 16/12/2008 15:59

The other thing about the nursery, actually, is that even though it was a good one, and I am still in touch with some of the staff and we text each other in a friendly way, I hated the bit at the end of the day at pickup time when they said "Can we have a little word?" and went on to tell me all about ds2's infractions of nursery protocol, little fights, or whatever. Also being told off for bringing the wrong number of spare pants and so on.

I used to feel I was being told off personally and on edge the whole time as to what would have gone wrong during the day.

I had forgotten that. It's probably a by product of institutionalising the children. Ds2 actually tried to escape once, and I wonder if he felt like I did actually. I put it down to him being 2 and a bit naughty, but maybe there was more to it ...

OP posts:
VirginBoffinMum · 16/12/2008 15:51

The nursery we used when ds 2 was little is lovely, but it is three miles in the opposite direction to work through urban traffic, and opens at 8.30, whereas I have already left for work at 7.45. I come back between 6.30 and 7 and the nursery closes at 5.30. Anyway even if it was open that long, I think it would be a bit soviet putting poor ds3 in there for that long each day.

I worked very locally until recently but was made redundant 2 years ago, hence the long commute now, which I bitterly resent. It feels very unfair.

OP posts:
Blondeshavemorefun · 16/12/2008 14:40

drinking on duty

is there a nursery near to your house or are you def thinking the nanny route - which i do think is easier when you have 2+ children

VirginBoffinMum · 16/12/2008 13:30

Yeah, in France they would probably give me the Legion d'Honneur for this many kids and this much hassle. In the UK there is always an air of perpetual surprise that children exist at all.

OP posts:
blueshoes · 16/12/2008 13:10

boffinmum, I only talk tough. 20 years of childcare grief?

VirginBoffinMum · 16/12/2008 13:04

blueshoes, I wish I was at tough as you. I am clearly a big softie and it has done me no favours.

OP posts:
blueshoes · 16/12/2008 12:34

boffinmum, I don't have actual experience of a poor aupair - I have been very lucky, save for my first one who never turned up! But reading horror stories on here, I have come to the conclusion that a lot of it is luck and I should be able to tell within 2 weeks whether it was going to work (and I don't mean just limp along) or not. If I was unlucky, my strategy would be to get rid of very quickly.

In fact, I was close to calling time on the current one who despite being absolutely lovely in a fit of homesickness wanted to cut short her stay in a way which was very inconvenient for me. So I think I do have the balls to do it if I had to. It would be expensive - involving a certain amount of pay off - but I will do it rather than bear another moment with someone I was not entirely happy with under my roof. I mean happy with childcare-wise. Housework is not so important.

I have hired at short notice before (no-show) and if I was still within the Sept/Oct months, I think I would have a good second bite at the cherry.

Well, that is the theory anyway.

VirginBoffinMum · 16/12/2008 12:25

I used to live in London in a very desirable area - however I have always found it awkward and disruptive getting rid of indifferent au pairs. They seem to be quite random and it's hard to tell who would be good. I am exhausted after 20 years of this childcare grief, hence trying to find a nanny now!!

OP posts:
blueshoes · 16/12/2008 12:23

Boffinmum, that makes sense.

Harriet, what is your track record like with hiring aupairs? I can afford to be fussy because being in London I can pick and choose aupairs. So if one is not up to scratch, (I tell myself that) I will get rid of her sharpish and try my luck with another, and another, and another. But if your location/family is not attractive to aupairs, then a nanny might be a safer bet.

HarrietTheSpy · 16/12/2008 12:18

Blueshoes
You've got me in a tizz again. I'm now wondering what to recruit for...an au pair or a live-in nanny, dumping the nursery????

VirginBoffinMum · 16/12/2008 12:09

Blondes, I am going to have to open another bottle because it appears Tankie and I drank all the virtual wine.

OP posts:
VirginBoffinMum · 16/12/2008 12:08

blueshoes, I think the main factor here is that I work 60 miles away from my home, and would be using a workplace nursery, so that makes the whole thing a problem, if for example the baby needs collecting during the day from nursery because of illness. If we were all just a few miles from each other it might be different.

OP posts:
blueshoes · 16/12/2008 11:19

Just wanted to say that Quattro's ft nursery/school-aupair combo works very well for me. I almost never have to take emergency childcare days anymore (even 10 whole working days' worth of recent chicken pox) as my aupair covers it for my dd 5 and ds 2. My aupair is also covering my dd's summer hols and all half terms.

For emergencies, it would naturally depend on aupair's availability. My German aupair attended English classes 3 mornings a week but voluntarily cancelled to cover dc sickness. She got paid extra of course. If she could not cover, either dh or I would step in.

I would not trust an aupair with sole charge of a young child initially. But from observation, it is possible to gauge whether the aupair has got commonsense and is a reliable sort. Both my aupairs, 19 and 20 respectively, did in fact pass the test, had good English and established good rapport with my dcs.

If I could not trust my aupair with solecharge of a young child, it would not matter whether that solecharge was 2 hours or 10 hours. She can either be trusted or not. And if she could not, she would be of limited use to me (I have been spoilt) and probably someone I would want to usher on.

Boffinmum, I appreciate nursery/aupair is not practical or appealing to you. Just wanted to give my experience of this.

Blondeshavemorefun · 16/12/2008 10:19

and yes most nannies i know LOVE the social aspect of being a nanny as well as the structured stuff

lets face it, most mums go out and meet friends/play dates ets

virgin - sure your nanny will enjoy working for you

VirginBoffinMum · 15/12/2008 21:16

Tankie, you sound brill too.

OP posts:
VirginBoffinMum · 15/12/2008 21:11

That was my thinking - it's too far for the baby in the car twice a day.

I had one AP once who was great with babies but she was 24 and very experienced, and there was more often than not one of us around the house during the day at that time.

I wouldn't normally leave a baby or toddler with an au pair for longer than a hairdressing appointment, because there's just too much going on, and they haven't developed a maternal instinct yet, which nannies often have.

I think the point about nanny networks is a very good one - they are more established than APs, who are very transient. I really like the idea of my nanny (ooh, I am getting a thrill just saying that! I am going to be a proper grown up nanny employer with proper childcare that doesn't go wrong all the time!) hosting/attending coffee mornings and so on, so there's a bit of friendship and continuity in the daytime for both nanny and baby, plus backup of course, just like us mums do it.

OP posts: