Please or to access all these features

Paid childcare

Discuss everything related to paid childcare here, including childminders, nannies, nurseries and au pairs.

New budget - I'm excited!

110 replies

gemloving · 14/03/2023 18:41

I am so glad the topic of childcare is finally being discussed and it seems changed are being made.

I can't see us getting free hours for 1 year olds but 30h for 2 year olds would be fantastic and such a great move into the right direction.

I have a 4 year old and an almost 2 year old in the system!

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
FuchsAndMöhr · 14/03/2023 20:10

PrincessScarlett · 14/03/2023 19:45

There is also the worry that nurseries will employ the cheapest staff they can get away with who have no qualifications and slip through safeguarding checks and childminders will work unregistered so there will be no safeguarding checks. At the end of the day the children will be put at risk for cheap as chips childcare.

Unregistered childminders and nursery’s who don’t have the correct safeguarding procedures and qualified staff in place will not receive the funding! So no, that won’t be the case!

BitchBrigade · 14/03/2023 20:10

Violet1988 · 14/03/2023 20:07

Genuine question why do they want to destroy the childcare industry? What's the end goal there?

Probably for similar reasons to destroying all public services. Then again who knows why the Tories keep doing senseless shit that makes life unbearable and unaffordable to us pesants.

rattlinbog · 14/03/2023 20:10

"They also said that the DfE had been pushing for the hours to be funded “at cost” rather than the current low rate, which has led to childcare providers struggling and in many cases asking for top-up payments from parents."

From the Guardian

rattlinbog · 14/03/2023 20:09

My understanding is they will also increase the funding for the free hours to make it more sustainable

BitchBrigade · 14/03/2023 20:08

Just as a fun wee anecdote we have no choice but to send our DC to an expensive nursery because there are now ZERO childminders on our side of the city. The nearest one is 6 miles away into the countryside with zero public transport and even if we did drive she only covers the area closest to her.

There used to be four within walking distance and two cheaper day nurseries that the government destroyed financially while partying and having affairs etc etc.

FuchsAndMöhr · 14/03/2023 20:08

The only people who think this is a good idea is those who don’t understand the childcare sector.

If this goes ahead, especially if it’s administered in the same way the current 30 hours for 3 and 4 year olds, it will be the straw that breaks the back of childcare as we know it!

Violet1988 · 14/03/2023 20:07

BitchBrigade · 14/03/2023 20:03

I'd like a balance. I ultimately think for the idea to work you can't just throw money into the pockets of SAHM's.

The reason parents could stay at home when we were younger and our parents were younger was because you didn't need two wages and a Side Hussle each just to break even every month. So the change that would enable a parent to stat at home needs to come from raising wages and lowering ridiculous rent and energy prices. Ain't gonna happen.

As for free childcare this is going to absolutely cripple already fragile settings. The government fucked over childminders and nurseries by giving them scraps, if that, when the pandemic hit then did nothing to help them recover after. They clearly seem to want to destroy the childcare industry entirely and this will definitely do it.

Genuine question why do they want to destroy the childcare industry? What's the end goal there?

BitchBrigade · 14/03/2023 20:03

milliondollardress · 14/03/2023 19:46

I partly agree with you, in that I don’t think the right approach is encouraging all parents to work more and put their children in childcare.

Not sure encouraging one parent to stay at home is necessarily the right solution though (and inevitably it will be mothers, whilst men progress their careers and the workplace becomes more unequal than ever).

I’d rather see better part-time options for both parents (not just mums) made available and encouraged, as well as better paid parental leave for both parents.

I'd like a balance. I ultimately think for the idea to work you can't just throw money into the pockets of SAHM's.

The reason parents could stay at home when we were younger and our parents were younger was because you didn't need two wages and a Side Hussle each just to break even every month. So the change that would enable a parent to stat at home needs to come from raising wages and lowering ridiculous rent and energy prices. Ain't gonna happen.

As for free childcare this is going to absolutely cripple already fragile settings. The government fucked over childminders and nurseries by giving them scraps, if that, when the pandemic hit then did nothing to help them recover after. They clearly seem to want to destroy the childcare industry entirely and this will definitely do it.

gemloving · 14/03/2023 20:02

Both of mine go to a childminder (I chose not to send mine 4 year old to preschool as I preferred the home setting and he goes to two play groups on two days with them), so I supposed in a way, I'm not too aware personally of the actually nursery set up but it been very eye opening to read about this and I hope this is being considered.

My childminder does have a top up fee too and a food charge of £5 a day but the free hours have really made a difference especially now that both of mine go there 3 days a week.

OP posts:
Twinedpeaks · 14/03/2023 20:02

Livinginanotherworld · 14/03/2023 19:40

Ok, so I know this won’t be a popular opinion but wouldn’t it be refreshing for the government to actually encourage ( both financially and pension wise ) a parent to stay at home for the first 5 years. No ridiculous childcare costs, little ones have mummy ( or daddy) at home, so no dashing to childminder/nursery every morning, then working all day, then working all night at home catching up. Every mum of pre-schoolers working full time I know, is absolutely run ragged. No time to cook from scratch, no time to play, no time to relax. Make it financially viable to stay at home. Cover pension gaps, and pay a proper wage to do so. Happy parents, happy kids….what’s not to like ? Oh and before anyone says, kids need to be in nursery, yes they do to a point for socialising, learning to play with others. They can still go a couple of sessions a week plus toddler groups etc, but the difference is they don’t have to go purely for childcare. I’m now going to duck !

I don't agree for the reason highlighted in your post - women will bear the burden.

Plus why oh why is that something the state should fund? It would cost the state more than childcare hours do, and there would be no benefit to the economy (compared with a parent in work and nursery workers)

gemloving · 14/03/2023 19:58

@Livinginanotherworld I agree if this is what you want, however if you want a career as a women, that choice should be there without judgement. As much as it should be when you're a SAHM.

I work part time and enjoy the balance.

OP posts:
gemloving · 14/03/2023 19:56

@happyfishcoco I don't get 15h for my 2 year olds. At the moments, it's only vulnerable children who get this right?

OP posts:
Violet1988 · 14/03/2023 19:51

Livinginanotherworld · 14/03/2023 19:40

Ok, so I know this won’t be a popular opinion but wouldn’t it be refreshing for the government to actually encourage ( both financially and pension wise ) a parent to stay at home for the first 5 years. No ridiculous childcare costs, little ones have mummy ( or daddy) at home, so no dashing to childminder/nursery every morning, then working all day, then working all night at home catching up. Every mum of pre-schoolers working full time I know, is absolutely run ragged. No time to cook from scratch, no time to play, no time to relax. Make it financially viable to stay at home. Cover pension gaps, and pay a proper wage to do so. Happy parents, happy kids….what’s not to like ? Oh and before anyone says, kids need to be in nursery, yes they do to a point for socialising, learning to play with others. They can still go a couple of sessions a week plus toddler groups etc, but the difference is they don’t have to go purely for childcare. I’m now going to duck !

I'll go hide with you, I completely agree 😬

BernadetteIsMySister · 14/03/2023 19:51

Peekingovertheparapet · 14/03/2023 19:45

From what I understand (my kids have been out of nursery a little while now), the reason it sort of works with 30h for 3 year olds is because the ratios become easier to manage. Childcare for under 3s requires more staff. So in order to make it work, govt will have to fund care for two year olds at a higher rate and I can’t see that happening. Ultimately we will probably end up with worse childcare provision.

No they'll just increase ratios....

WeWereInParis · 14/03/2023 19:48

Peekingovertheparapet · 14/03/2023 19:45

From what I understand (my kids have been out of nursery a little while now), the reason it sort of works with 30h for 3 year olds is because the ratios become easier to manage. Childcare for under 3s requires more staff. So in order to make it work, govt will have to fund care for two year olds at a higher rate and I can’t see that happening. Ultimately we will probably end up with worse childcare provision.

Also at the moment the fees the nursery gets for their 1 & 2 year olds effectively subsidise the free hours for their 3 year olds. If all the children have free hours, that gets taken away.

YukoandHiro · 14/03/2023 19:48

I think 30h for 2yo will only be for those on UC

BuffaloCauliflower · 14/03/2023 19:47

As much as I’d love cheaper childcare, if they don’t increase the funding it’ll actually make things worse. Nursery’s only survive now because they can charge 1 and 2 year olds more to offset money lost on the funded - absolutely not free - hours. My childminder is £7 an hour, the funding she gets for funded hours is £4.87. Totally unsustainable. If parents can’t pay a voluntary top up she can’t take the child. The current funding is also term time only. Extended the provision exactly as it is now for 3-4yo’s would be a nightmare.

milliondollardress · 14/03/2023 19:46

Livinginanotherworld · 14/03/2023 19:40

Ok, so I know this won’t be a popular opinion but wouldn’t it be refreshing for the government to actually encourage ( both financially and pension wise ) a parent to stay at home for the first 5 years. No ridiculous childcare costs, little ones have mummy ( or daddy) at home, so no dashing to childminder/nursery every morning, then working all day, then working all night at home catching up. Every mum of pre-schoolers working full time I know, is absolutely run ragged. No time to cook from scratch, no time to play, no time to relax. Make it financially viable to stay at home. Cover pension gaps, and pay a proper wage to do so. Happy parents, happy kids….what’s not to like ? Oh and before anyone says, kids need to be in nursery, yes they do to a point for socialising, learning to play with others. They can still go a couple of sessions a week plus toddler groups etc, but the difference is they don’t have to go purely for childcare. I’m now going to duck !

I partly agree with you, in that I don’t think the right approach is encouraging all parents to work more and put their children in childcare.

Not sure encouraging one parent to stay at home is necessarily the right solution though (and inevitably it will be mothers, whilst men progress their careers and the workplace becomes more unequal than ever).

I’d rather see better part-time options for both parents (not just mums) made available and encouraged, as well as better paid parental leave for both parents.

Peekingovertheparapet · 14/03/2023 19:45

From what I understand (my kids have been out of nursery a little while now), the reason it sort of works with 30h for 3 year olds is because the ratios become easier to manage. Childcare for under 3s requires more staff. So in order to make it work, govt will have to fund care for two year olds at a higher rate and I can’t see that happening. Ultimately we will probably end up with worse childcare provision.

PrincessScarlett · 14/03/2023 19:45

There is also the worry that nurseries will employ the cheapest staff they can get away with who have no qualifications and slip through safeguarding checks and childminders will work unregistered so there will be no safeguarding checks. At the end of the day the children will be put at risk for cheap as chips childcare.

WeWereInParis · 14/03/2023 19:42

Miscellaneousme · 14/03/2023 19:38

This would make a big difference to me but I’m worried about how this funding will work for the nurseries that are already struggling, and quality of childcare.

Also there won’t be places available for all
the extra children etc.

I don’t think they will do it.

This is how I feel. Financially it would make a massive difference to us but it's no use if the wonderful nursery my DDs are at has to close because of it.

The guardian is reporting that the hourly rate nurseries get for the 30 free hours will go up. But I doubt it will go up enough.

Livinginanotherworld · 14/03/2023 19:40

Ok, so I know this won’t be a popular opinion but wouldn’t it be refreshing for the government to actually encourage ( both financially and pension wise ) a parent to stay at home for the first 5 years. No ridiculous childcare costs, little ones have mummy ( or daddy) at home, so no dashing to childminder/nursery every morning, then working all day, then working all night at home catching up. Every mum of pre-schoolers working full time I know, is absolutely run ragged. No time to cook from scratch, no time to play, no time to relax. Make it financially viable to stay at home. Cover pension gaps, and pay a proper wage to do so. Happy parents, happy kids….what’s not to like ? Oh and before anyone says, kids need to be in nursery, yes they do to a point for socialising, learning to play with others. They can still go a couple of sessions a week plus toddler groups etc, but the difference is they don’t have to go purely for childcare. I’m now going to duck !

Miscellaneousme · 14/03/2023 19:38

This would make a big difference to me but I’m worried about how this funding will work for the nurseries that are already struggling, and quality of childcare.

Also there won’t be places available for all
the extra children etc.

I don’t think they will do it.

happyfishcoco · 14/03/2023 19:38

30h for 2 year olds????
I don't even get 15h for 2-year-olds. not fair.
I have no hope for the new budget.

2anddone · 14/03/2023 19:38

This will be the final nail in the coffin for childcare providers. The government won't fund it properly and settings will close at a faster rate to they are now. Children will be in school settings from an even earlier age under the disguise of childcare....childminder here for the last 25 years depending on what's actually said tomorrow I might start job hunting